summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/debian/patches-rt/0174-locking-rtmutex-add-rwlock-implementation-based-on-r.patch
blob: 4816103641979b619f24ed0b9c763d78745d58ca (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
From 85ee193953134a79ee60def58e6d8c98b8cd8e55 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Oct 2017 17:18:06 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 174/323] locking/rtmutex: add rwlock implementation based on
 rtmutex
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz

The implementation is bias-based, similar to the rwsem implementation.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
 include/linux/rwlock_rt.h       | 109 +++++++++++
 include/linux/rwlock_types_rt.h |  56 ++++++
 kernel/Kconfig.locks            |   2 +-
 kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c      | 328 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 494 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 include/linux/rwlock_rt.h
 create mode 100644 include/linux/rwlock_types_rt.h
 create mode 100644 kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c

diff --git a/include/linux/rwlock_rt.h b/include/linux/rwlock_rt.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..aafdb0a685d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/rwlock_rt.h
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#ifndef __LINUX_RWLOCK_RT_H
+#define __LINUX_RWLOCK_RT_H
+
+#ifndef __LINUX_SPINLOCK_H
+#error Do not include directly. Use spinlock.h
+#endif
+
+extern void __lockfunc rt_write_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern void __lockfunc rt_read_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern int __lockfunc rt_write_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern int __lockfunc rt_read_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern void __lockfunc rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern void __lockfunc rt_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern int __lockfunc rt_read_can_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern int __lockfunc rt_write_can_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock);
+extern void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, char *name, struct lock_class_key *key);
+
+#define read_can_lock(rwlock)		rt_read_can_lock(rwlock)
+#define write_can_lock(rwlock)		rt_write_can_lock(rwlock)
+
+#define read_trylock(lock)	__cond_lock(lock, rt_read_trylock(lock))
+#define write_trylock(lock)	__cond_lock(lock, rt_write_trylock(lock))
+
+static inline int __write_trylock_rt_irqsave(rwlock_t *lock, unsigned long *flags)
+{
+	*flags = 0;
+	return rt_write_trylock(lock);
+}
+
+#define write_trylock_irqsave(lock, flags)		\
+	__cond_lock(lock, __write_trylock_rt_irqsave(lock, &(flags)))
+
+#define read_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)			\
+	do {						\
+		typecheck(unsigned long, flags);	\
+		rt_read_lock(lock);			\
+		flags = 0;				\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define write_lock_irqsave(lock, flags)			\
+	do {						\
+		typecheck(unsigned long, flags);	\
+		rt_write_lock(lock);			\
+		flags = 0;				\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define read_lock(lock)		rt_read_lock(lock)
+
+#define read_lock_bh(lock)				\
+	do {						\
+		local_bh_disable();			\
+		rt_read_lock(lock);			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define read_lock_irq(lock)	read_lock(lock)
+
+#define write_lock(lock)	rt_write_lock(lock)
+
+#define write_lock_bh(lock)				\
+	do {						\
+		local_bh_disable();			\
+		rt_write_lock(lock);			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define write_lock_irq(lock)	write_lock(lock)
+
+#define read_unlock(lock)	rt_read_unlock(lock)
+
+#define read_unlock_bh(lock)				\
+	do {						\
+		rt_read_unlock(lock);			\
+		local_bh_enable();			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define read_unlock_irq(lock)	read_unlock(lock)
+
+#define write_unlock(lock)	rt_write_unlock(lock)
+
+#define write_unlock_bh(lock)				\
+	do {						\
+		rt_write_unlock(lock);			\
+		local_bh_enable();			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define write_unlock_irq(lock)	write_unlock(lock)
+
+#define read_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags)		\
+	do {						\
+		typecheck(unsigned long, flags);	\
+		(void) flags;				\
+		rt_read_unlock(lock);			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define write_unlock_irqrestore(lock, flags) \
+	do {						\
+		typecheck(unsigned long, flags);	\
+		(void) flags;				\
+		rt_write_unlock(lock);			\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define rwlock_init(rwl)				\
+do {							\
+	static struct lock_class_key __key;		\
+							\
+	__rt_rwlock_init(rwl, #rwl, &__key);		\
+} while (0)
+
+#endif
diff --git a/include/linux/rwlock_types_rt.h b/include/linux/rwlock_types_rt.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..4762391d659b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/linux/rwlock_types_rt.h
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#ifndef __LINUX_RWLOCK_TYPES_RT_H
+#define __LINUX_RWLOCK_TYPES_RT_H
+
+#ifndef __LINUX_SPINLOCK_TYPES_H
+#error "Do not include directly. Include spinlock_types.h instead"
+#endif
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+# define RW_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)	.dep_map = { .name = #lockname }
+#else
+# define RW_DEP_MAP_INIT(lockname)
+#endif
+
+typedef struct rt_rw_lock rwlock_t;
+
+#define __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name) __RWLOCK_RT_INITIALIZER(name)
+
+#define DEFINE_RWLOCK(name) \
+	rwlock_t name = __RW_LOCK_UNLOCKED(name)
+
+/*
+ * A reader biased implementation primarily for CPU pinning.
+ *
+ * Can be selected as general replacement for the single reader RT rwlock
+ * variant
+ */
+struct rt_rw_lock {
+	struct rt_mutex		rtmutex;
+	atomic_t		readers;
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+	struct lockdep_map	dep_map;
+#endif
+};
+
+#define READER_BIAS	(1U << 31)
+#define WRITER_BIAS	(1U << 30)
+
+#define __RWLOCK_RT_INITIALIZER(name)					\
+{									\
+	.readers = ATOMIC_INIT(READER_BIAS),				\
+	.rtmutex = __RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_SAVE_STATE(name.rtmutex),	\
+	RW_DEP_MAP_INIT(name)						\
+}
+
+void __rwlock_biased_rt_init(struct rt_rw_lock *lock, const char *name,
+			     struct lock_class_key *key);
+
+#define rwlock_biased_rt_init(rwlock)					\
+	do {								\
+		static struct lock_class_key __key;			\
+									\
+		__rwlock_biased_rt_init((rwlock), #rwlock, &__key);	\
+	} while (0)
+
+#endif
diff --git a/kernel/Kconfig.locks b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
index 3de8fd11873b..4198f0273ecd 100644
--- a/kernel/Kconfig.locks
+++ b/kernel/Kconfig.locks
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ config ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS
 
 config QUEUED_RWLOCKS
 	def_bool y if ARCH_USE_QUEUED_RWLOCKS
-	depends on SMP
+	depends on SMP && !PREEMPT_RT
 
 config ARCH_HAS_MMIOWB
 	bool
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..1ee16b8fedd7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwlock-rt.c
@@ -0,0 +1,328 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
+#include <linux/sched/debug.h>
+#include <linux/export.h>
+
+#include "rtmutex_common.h"
+#include <linux/rwlock_types_rt.h>
+
+/*
+ * RT-specific reader/writer locks
+ *
+ * write_lock()
+ *  1) Lock lock->rtmutex
+ *  2) Remove the reader BIAS to force readers into the slow path
+ *  3) Wait until all readers have left the critical region
+ *  4) Mark it write locked
+ *
+ * write_unlock()
+ *  1) Remove the write locked marker
+ *  2) Set the reader BIAS so readers can use the fast path again
+ *  3) Unlock lock->rtmutex to release blocked readers
+ *
+ * read_lock()
+ *  1) Try fast path acquisition (reader BIAS is set)
+ *  2) Take lock->rtmutex.wait_lock which protects the writelocked flag
+ *  3) If !writelocked, acquire it for read
+ *  4) If writelocked, block on lock->rtmutex
+ *  5) unlock lock->rtmutex, goto 1)
+ *
+ * read_unlock()
+ *  1) Try fast path release (reader count != 1)
+ *  2) Wake the writer waiting in write_lock()#3
+ *
+ * read_lock()#3 has the consequence, that rw locks on RT are not writer
+ * fair, but writers, which should be avoided in RT tasks (think tasklist
+ * lock), are subject to the rtmutex priority/DL inheritance mechanism.
+ *
+ * It's possible to make the rw locks writer fair by keeping a list of
+ * active readers. A blocked writer would force all newly incoming readers
+ * to block on the rtmutex, but the rtmutex would have to be proxy locked
+ * for one reader after the other. We can't use multi-reader inheritance
+ * because there is no way to support that with
+ * SCHED_DEADLINE. Implementing the one by one reader boosting/handover
+ * mechanism is a major surgery for a very dubious value.
+ *
+ * The risk of writer starvation is there, but the pathological use cases
+ * which trigger it are not necessarily the typical RT workloads.
+ */
+
+void __rwlock_biased_rt_init(struct rt_rw_lock *lock, const char *name,
+			     struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
+	/*
+	 * Make sure we are not reinitializing a held semaphore:
+	 */
+	debug_check_no_locks_freed((void *)lock, sizeof(*lock));
+	lockdep_init_map(&lock->dep_map, name, key, 0);
+#endif
+	atomic_set(&lock->readers, READER_BIAS);
+	rt_mutex_init(&lock->rtmutex);
+	lock->rtmutex.save_state = 1;
+}
+
+static int __read_rt_trylock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	int r, old;
+
+	/*
+	 * Increment reader count, if lock->readers < 0, i.e. READER_BIAS is
+	 * set.
+	 */
+	for (r = atomic_read(&lock->readers); r < 0;) {
+		old = atomic_cmpxchg(&lock->readers, r, r + 1);
+		if (likely(old == r))
+			return 1;
+		r = old;
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void __read_rt_lock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+	struct rt_mutex_waiter waiter;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (__read_rt_trylock(lock))
+		return;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+	/*
+	 * Allow readers as long as the writer has not completely
+	 * acquired the semaphore for write.
+	 */
+	if (atomic_read(&lock->readers) != WRITER_BIAS) {
+		atomic_inc(&lock->readers);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Call into the slow lock path with the rtmutex->wait_lock
+	 * held, so this can't result in the following race:
+	 *
+	 * Reader1		Reader2		Writer
+	 *			read_lock()
+	 *					write_lock()
+	 *					rtmutex_lock(m)
+	 *					swait()
+	 * read_lock()
+	 * unlock(m->wait_lock)
+	 *			read_unlock()
+	 *			swake()
+	 *					lock(m->wait_lock)
+	 *					lock->writelocked=true
+	 *					unlock(m->wait_lock)
+	 *
+	 *					write_unlock()
+	 *					lock->writelocked=false
+	 *					rtmutex_unlock(m)
+	 *			read_lock()
+	 *					write_lock()
+	 *					rtmutex_lock(m)
+	 *					swait()
+	 * rtmutex_lock(m)
+	 *
+	 * That would put Reader1 behind the writer waiting on
+	 * Reader2 to call read_unlock() which might be unbound.
+	 */
+	rt_mutex_init_waiter(&waiter, true);
+	rt_spin_lock_slowlock_locked(m, &waiter, flags);
+	/*
+	 * The slowlock() above is guaranteed to return with the rtmutex is
+	 * now held, so there can't be a writer active. Increment the reader
+	 * count and immediately drop the rtmutex again.
+	 */
+	atomic_inc(&lock->readers);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+	rt_spin_lock_slowunlock(m);
+
+	debug_rt_mutex_free_waiter(&waiter);
+}
+
+static void __read_rt_unlock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+	struct task_struct *tsk;
+
+	/*
+	 * sem->readers can only hit 0 when a writer is waiting for the
+	 * active readers to leave the critical region.
+	 */
+	if (!atomic_dec_and_test(&lock->readers))
+		return;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irq(&m->wait_lock);
+	/*
+	 * Wake the writer, i.e. the rtmutex owner. It might release the
+	 * rtmutex concurrently in the fast path, but to clean up the rw
+	 * lock it needs to acquire m->wait_lock. The worst case which can
+	 * happen is a spurious wakeup.
+	 */
+	tsk = rt_mutex_owner(m);
+	if (tsk)
+		wake_up_process(tsk);
+
+	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&m->wait_lock);
+}
+
+static void __write_unlock_common(struct rt_rw_lock *lock, int bias,
+				  unsigned long flags)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+
+	atomic_add(READER_BIAS - bias, &lock->readers);
+	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+	rt_spin_lock_slowunlock(m);
+}
+
+static void __write_rt_lock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+	struct task_struct *self = current;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	/* Take the rtmutex as a first step */
+	__rt_spin_lock(m);
+
+	/* Force readers into slow path */
+	atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &lock->readers);
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&self->pi_lock);
+	self->saved_state = self->state;
+	__set_current_state_no_track(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&self->pi_lock);
+
+	for (;;) {
+		/* Have all readers left the critical region? */
+		if (!atomic_read(&lock->readers)) {
+			atomic_set(&lock->readers, WRITER_BIAS);
+			raw_spin_lock(&self->pi_lock);
+			__set_current_state_no_track(self->saved_state);
+			self->saved_state = TASK_RUNNING;
+			raw_spin_unlock(&self->pi_lock);
+			raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+			return;
+		}
+
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+
+		if (atomic_read(&lock->readers) != 0)
+			schedule();
+
+		raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+
+		raw_spin_lock(&self->pi_lock);
+		__set_current_state_no_track(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&self->pi_lock);
+	}
+}
+
+static int __write_rt_trylock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	if (!__rt_mutex_trylock(m))
+		return 0;
+
+	atomic_sub(READER_BIAS, &lock->readers);
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+	if (!atomic_read(&lock->readers)) {
+		atomic_set(&lock->readers, WRITER_BIAS);
+		raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+		return 1;
+	}
+	__write_unlock_common(lock, 0, flags);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void __write_rt_unlock(struct rt_rw_lock *lock)
+{
+	struct rt_mutex *m = &lock->rtmutex;
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&m->wait_lock, flags);
+	__write_unlock_common(lock, WRITER_BIAS, flags);
+}
+
+int __lockfunc rt_read_can_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	return  atomic_read(&rwlock->readers) < 0;
+}
+
+int __lockfunc rt_write_can_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	return atomic_read(&rwlock->readers) == READER_BIAS;
+}
+
+/*
+ * The common functions which get wrapped into the rwlock API.
+ */
+int __lockfunc rt_read_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = __read_rt_trylock(rwlock);
+	if (ret) {
+		rwlock_acquire_read(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+		migrate_disable();
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_read_trylock);
+
+int __lockfunc rt_write_trylock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = __write_rt_trylock(rwlock);
+	if (ret) {
+		rwlock_acquire(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
+		migrate_disable();
+	}
+	return ret;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_trylock);
+
+void __lockfunc rt_read_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	rwlock_acquire_read(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+	__read_rt_lock(rwlock);
+	migrate_disable();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_read_lock);
+
+void __lockfunc rt_write_lock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	rwlock_acquire(&rwlock->dep_map, 0, 0, _RET_IP_);
+	__write_rt_lock(rwlock);
+	migrate_disable();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_lock);
+
+void __lockfunc rt_read_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	rwlock_release(&rwlock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+	migrate_enable();
+	__read_rt_unlock(rwlock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_read_unlock);
+
+void __lockfunc rt_write_unlock(rwlock_t *rwlock)
+{
+	rwlock_release(&rwlock->dep_map, _RET_IP_);
+	migrate_enable();
+	__write_rt_unlock(rwlock);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(rt_write_unlock);
+
+void __rt_rwlock_init(rwlock_t *rwlock, char *name, struct lock_class_key *key)
+{
+	__rwlock_biased_rt_init(rwlock, name, key);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(__rt_rwlock_init);
-- 
2.43.0