1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
|
From 915ee75a3da5732cf20be8f92b31d3ce33042c5b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@windriver.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 11:48:33 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 208/323] mm/memcontrol: Don't call schedule_work_on in
preemption disabled context
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz
The following trace is triggered when running ltp oom test cases:
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/rtmutex.c:659
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 17188, name: oom03
Preemption disabled at:[<ffffffff8112ba70>] mem_cgroup_reclaim+0x90/0xe0
CPU: 2 PID: 17188 Comm: oom03 Not tainted 3.10.10-rt3 #2
Hardware name: Intel Corporation Calpella platform/MATXM-CORE-411-B, BIOS 4.6.3 08/18/2010
ffff88007684d730 ffff880070df9b58 ffffffff8169918d ffff880070df9b70
ffffffff8106db31 ffff88007688b4a0 ffff880070df9b88 ffffffff8169d9c0
ffff88007688b4a0 ffff880070df9bc8 ffffffff81059da1 0000000170df9bb0
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8169918d>] dump_stack+0x19/0x1b
[<ffffffff8106db31>] __might_sleep+0xf1/0x170
[<ffffffff8169d9c0>] rt_spin_lock+0x20/0x50
[<ffffffff81059da1>] queue_work_on+0x61/0x100
[<ffffffff8112b361>] drain_all_stock+0xe1/0x1c0
[<ffffffff8112ba70>] mem_cgroup_reclaim+0x90/0xe0
[<ffffffff8112beda>] __mem_cgroup_try_charge+0x41a/0xc40
[<ffffffff810f1c91>] ? release_pages+0x1b1/0x1f0
[<ffffffff8106f200>] ? sched_exec+0x40/0xb0
[<ffffffff8112cc87>] mem_cgroup_charge_common+0x37/0x70
[<ffffffff8112e2c6>] mem_cgroup_newpage_charge+0x26/0x30
[<ffffffff8110af68>] handle_pte_fault+0x618/0x840
[<ffffffff8103ecf6>] ? unpin_current_cpu+0x16/0x70
[<ffffffff81070f94>] ? migrate_enable+0xd4/0x200
[<ffffffff8110cde5>] handle_mm_fault+0x145/0x1e0
[<ffffffff810301e1>] __do_page_fault+0x1a1/0x4c0
[<ffffffff8169c9eb>] ? preempt_schedule_irq+0x4b/0x70
[<ffffffff8169e3b7>] ? retint_kernel+0x37/0x40
[<ffffffff8103053e>] do_page_fault+0xe/0x10
[<ffffffff8169e4c2>] page_fault+0x22/0x30
So, to prevent schedule_work_on from being called in preempt disabled context,
replace the pair of get/put_cpu() to get/put_cpu_light().
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index d2a47428831b..53522a52ff15 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -2349,7 +2349,7 @@ static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
* as well as workers from this path always operate on the local
* per-cpu data. CPU up doesn't touch memcg_stock at all.
*/
- curcpu = get_cpu();
+ curcpu = get_cpu_light();
for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
struct memcg_stock_pcp *stock = &per_cpu(memcg_stock, cpu);
struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
@@ -2372,7 +2372,7 @@ static void drain_all_stock(struct mem_cgroup *root_memcg)
schedule_work_on(cpu, &stock->work);
}
}
- put_cpu();
+ put_cpu_light();
mutex_unlock(&percpu_charge_mutex);
}
--
2.43.0
|
