blob: d1f8234d53a722ffadd59a90acbbe17bc5571a69 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
|
From 0470292c7761cc1cd2847e60b43b202b1be7ee29 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:26:34 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 230/323] block/mq: do not invoke preempt_disable()
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz
preempt_disable() and get_cpu() don't play well together with the sleeping
locks it tries to allocate later.
It seems to be enough to replace it with get_cpu_light() and migrate_disable().
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
block/blk-mq.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
index a6618bf45992..37466b3a4ba5 100644
--- a/block/blk-mq.c
+++ b/block/blk-mq.c
@@ -1575,14 +1575,14 @@ static void __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx, bool async,
return;
if (!async && !(hctx->flags & BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING)) {
- int cpu = get_cpu();
+ int cpu = get_cpu_light();
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, hctx->cpumask)) {
__blk_mq_run_hw_queue(hctx);
- put_cpu();
+ put_cpu_light();
return;
}
- put_cpu();
+ put_cpu_light();
}
kblockd_mod_delayed_work_on(blk_mq_hctx_next_cpu(hctx), &hctx->run_work,
--
2.43.0
|
