blob: 44c4cc8c2f95e4a7a55dbe1f465ab8d6a91d7a56 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
|
From 367fe43dc09205ecc5fcdca95276fc481e7ccd9f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2020 11:45:14 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 259/323] x86/entry: Use should_resched() in
idtentry_exit_cond_resched()
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz
The TIF_NEED_RESCHED bit is inlined on x86 into the preemption counter.
By using should_resched(0) instead of need_resched() the same check can
be performed which uses the same variable as 'preempt_count()` which was
issued before.
Use should_resched(0) instead need_resched().
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
kernel/entry/common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/entry/common.c b/kernel/entry/common.c
index e6da86039ccf..f32250adb681 100644
--- a/kernel/entry/common.c
+++ b/kernel/entry/common.c
@@ -371,7 +371,7 @@ void irqentry_exit_cond_resched(void)
rcu_irq_exit_check_preempt();
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY))
WARN_ON_ONCE(!on_thread_stack());
- if (need_resched())
+ if (should_resched(0))
preempt_schedule_irq();
}
}
--
2.43.0
|