1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
|
From b625852d41e17fb13b4caf7192734866534d9799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 00:37:36 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 295/323] sched: Don't defer CPU pick to migration_cpu_stop()
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/5.10/older/patches-5.10.204-rt100.tar.xz
commit 475ea6c60279e9f2ddf7e4cf2648cd8ae0608361 upstream.
Will reported that the 'XXX __migrate_task() can fail' in migration_cpu_stop()
can happen, and it *is* sort of a big deal. Looking at it some more, one
will note there is a glaring hole in the deferred CPU selection:
(w/ CONFIG_CPUSET=n, so that the affinity mask passed via taskset doesn't
get AND'd with cpu_online_mask)
$ taskset -pc 0-2 $PID
# offline CPUs 3-4
$ taskset -pc 3-5 $PID
`\
$PID may stay on 0-2 due to the cpumask_any_distribute() picking an
offline CPU and __migrate_task() refusing to do anything due to
cpu_is_allowed().
set_cpus_allowed_ptr() goes to some length to pick a dest_cpu that matches
the right constraints vs affinity and the online/active state of the
CPUs. Reuse that instead of discarding it in the affine_move_task() case.
Fixes: 6d337eab041d ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs set_cpus_allowed_ptr()")
Reported-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210526205751.842360-2-valentin.schneider@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index d3b9d69171a2..81b342d6629b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -1958,7 +1958,6 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
struct migration_arg *arg = data;
struct set_affinity_pending *pending = arg->pending;
struct task_struct *p = arg->task;
- int dest_cpu = arg->dest_cpu;
struct rq *rq = this_rq();
bool complete = false;
struct rq_flags rf;
@@ -1991,19 +1990,15 @@ static int migration_cpu_stop(void *data)
if (p->migration_pending == pending)
p->migration_pending = NULL;
complete = true;
- }
- if (dest_cpu < 0) {
if (cpumask_test_cpu(task_cpu(p), &p->cpus_mask))
goto out;
-
- dest_cpu = cpumask_any_distribute(&p->cpus_mask);
}
if (task_on_rq_queued(p))
- rq = __migrate_task(rq, &rf, p, dest_cpu);
+ rq = __migrate_task(rq, &rf, p, arg->dest_cpu);
else
- p->wake_cpu = dest_cpu;
+ p->wake_cpu = arg->dest_cpu;
/*
* XXX __migrate_task() can fail, at which point we might end
@@ -2282,7 +2277,7 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag
init_completion(&my_pending.done);
my_pending.arg = (struct migration_arg) {
.task = p,
- .dest_cpu = -1, /* any */
+ .dest_cpu = dest_cpu,
.pending = &my_pending,
};
@@ -2290,6 +2285,15 @@ static int affine_move_task(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, struct rq_flag
} else {
pending = p->migration_pending;
refcount_inc(&pending->refs);
+ /*
+ * Affinity has changed, but we've already installed a
+ * pending. migration_cpu_stop() *must* see this, else
+ * we risk a completion of the pending despite having a
+ * task on a disallowed CPU.
+ *
+ * Serialized by p->pi_lock, so this is safe.
+ */
+ pending->arg.dest_cpu = dest_cpu;
}
}
pending = p->migration_pending;
--
2.43.0
|
