1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
|
[base64](https://crates.io/crates/base64)
===
[![](https://img.shields.io/crates/v/base64.svg)](https://crates.io/crates/base64) [![Docs](https://docs.rs/base64/badge.svg)](https://docs.rs/base64) [![Build](https://travis-ci.org/marshallpierce/rust-base64.svg?branch=master)](https://travis-ci.org/marshallpierce/rust-base64) [![codecov](https://codecov.io/gh/marshallpierce/rust-base64/branch/master/graph/badge.svg)](https://codecov.io/gh/marshallpierce/rust-base64) [![unsafe forbidden](https://img.shields.io/badge/unsafe-forbidden-success.svg)](https://github.com/rust-secure-code/safety-dance/)
<a href="https://www.jetbrains.com/?from=rust-base64"><img src="/icon_CLion.svg" height="40px"/></a>
Made with CLion. Thanks to JetBrains for supporting open source!
It's base64. What more could anyone want?
This library's goals are to be *correct* and *fast*. It's thoroughly tested and widely used. It exposes functionality at multiple levels of abstraction so you can choose the level of convenience vs performance that you want, e.g. `decode_config_slice` decodes into an existing `&mut [u8]` and is pretty fast (2.6GiB/s for a 3 KiB input), whereas `decode_config` allocates a new `Vec<u8>` and returns it, which might be more convenient in some cases, but is slower (although still fast enough for almost any purpose) at 2.1 GiB/s.
Example
---
```rust
extern crate base64;
use base64::{encode, decode};
fn main() {
let a = b"hello world";
let b = "aGVsbG8gd29ybGQ=";
assert_eq!(encode(a), b);
assert_eq!(a, &decode(b).unwrap()[..]);
}
```
See the [docs](https://docs.rs/base64) for all the details.
Rust version compatibility
---
The minimum required Rust version is 1.34.0.
Developing
---
Benchmarks are in `benches/`. Running them requires nightly rust, but `rustup` makes it easy:
```bash
rustup run nightly cargo bench
```
Decoding is aided by some pre-calculated tables, which are generated by:
```bash
cargo run --example make_tables > src/tables.rs.tmp && mv src/tables.rs.tmp src/tables.rs
```
no_std
---
This crate supports no_std. By default the crate targets std via the `std` feature. You can deactivate the `default-features` to target core instead. In that case you lose out on all the functionality revolving around `std::io`, `std::error::Error` and heap allocations. There is an additional `alloc` feature that you can activate to bring back the support for heap allocations.
Profiling
---
On Linux, you can use [perf](https://perf.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page) for profiling. Then compile the benchmarks with `rustup nightly run cargo bench --no-run`.
Run the benchmark binary with `perf` (shown here filtering to one particular benchmark, which will make the results easier to read). `perf` is only available to the root user on most systems as it fiddles with event counters in your CPU, so use `sudo`. We need to run the actual benchmark binary, hence the path into `target`. You can see the actual full path with `rustup run nightly cargo bench -v`; it will print out the commands it runs. If you use the exact path that `bench` outputs, make sure you get the one that's for the benchmarks, not the tests. You may also want to `cargo clean` so you have only one `benchmarks-` binary (they tend to accumulate).
```bash
sudo perf record target/release/deps/benchmarks-* --bench decode_10mib_reuse
```
Then analyze the results, again with perf:
```bash
sudo perf annotate -l
```
You'll see a bunch of interleaved rust source and assembly like this. The section with `lib.rs:327` is telling us that 4.02% of samples saw the `movzbl` aka bit shift as the active instruction. However, this percentage is not as exact as it seems due to a phenomenon called *skid*. Basically, a consequence of how fancy modern CPUs are is that this sort of instruction profiling is inherently inaccurate, especially in branch-heavy code.
```text
lib.rs:322 0.70 : 10698: mov %rdi,%rax
2.82 : 1069b: shr $0x38,%rax
: if morsel == decode_tables::INVALID_VALUE {
: bad_byte_index = input_index;
: break;
: };
: accum = (morsel as u64) << 58;
lib.rs:327 4.02 : 1069f: movzbl (%r9,%rax,1),%r15d
: // fast loop of 8 bytes at a time
: while input_index < length_of_full_chunks {
: let mut accum: u64;
:
: let input_chunk = BigEndian::read_u64(&input_bytes[input_index..(input_index + 8)]);
: morsel = decode_table[(input_chunk >> 56) as usize];
lib.rs:322 3.68 : 106a4: cmp $0xff,%r15
: if morsel == decode_tables::INVALID_VALUE {
0.00 : 106ab: je 1090e <base64::decode_config_buf::hbf68a45fefa299c1+0x46e>
```
Fuzzing
---
This uses [cargo-fuzz](https://github.com/rust-fuzz/cargo-fuzz). See `fuzz/fuzzers` for the available fuzzing scripts. To run, use an invocation like these:
```bash
cargo +nightly fuzz run roundtrip
cargo +nightly fuzz run roundtrip_no_pad
cargo +nightly fuzz run roundtrip_random_config -- -max_len=10240
cargo +nightly fuzz run decode_random
```
License
---
This project is dual-licensed under MIT and Apache 2.0.
|