diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-19 00:47:55 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-19 00:47:55 +0000 |
commit | 26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6 (patch) | |
tree | f435a8308119effd964b339f76abb83a57c29483 /dom/media/webrtc/transport/README | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | firefox-26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6.tar.xz firefox-26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6.zip |
Adding upstream version 124.0.1.upstream/124.0.1
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'dom/media/webrtc/transport/README')
-rw-r--r-- | dom/media/webrtc/transport/README | 45 |
1 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/dom/media/webrtc/transport/README b/dom/media/webrtc/transport/README new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..3630b2aa1f --- /dev/null +++ b/dom/media/webrtc/transport/README @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +This is a generic media transport system for WebRTC. + +The basic model is that you have a TransportFlow which contains a +series of TransportLayers, each of which gets an opportunity to +manipulate data up and down the stack (think SysV STREAMS or a +standard networking stack). You can also address individual +sublayers to manipulate them or to bypass reading and writing +at an upper layer; WebRTC uses this to implement DTLS-SRTP. + + +DATAFLOW MODEL +Unlike the existing nsSocket I/O system, this is a push rather +than a pull system. Clients of the interface do writes downward +with SendPacket() and receive notification of incoming packets +via callbacks registed via sigslot.h. It is the responsibility +of the bottom layer (or any other layer which needs to reference +external events) to arrange for that somehow; typically by +using nsITimer or the SocketTansportService. + +This sort of push model is a much better fit for the demands +of WebRTC, expecially because ICE contexts span multiple +network transports. + + +THREADING MODEL +There are no thread locks. It is the responsibility of the caller to +arrange that any given TransportLayer/TransportFlow is only +manipulated in one thread at once. One good way to do this is to run +everything on the STS thread. Many of the existing layer implementations +(TransportLayerIce, TransportLayerLoopback) already run on STS so in those +cases you must run on STS, though you can do setup on the main thread and +then activate them on the STS. + + +EXISTING TRANSPORT LAYERS +The following transport layers are currently implemented: + +* DTLS -- a wrapper around NSS's DTLS [RFC 6347] stack +* ICE -- a wrapper around the nICEr ICE [RFC 5245] stack. +* Loopback -- a loopback IO mechanism +* Logging -- a passthrough that just logs its data + +The last two are primarily for debugging. + + |