Adding upstream version 124.0.1.upstream/124.0.1

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 182 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/js/src/tests/non262/Array/regress-130451.js b/js/src/tests/non262/Array/regress-130451.js
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..3ccf3d9dff
--- /dev/null
+++ b/js/src/tests/non262/Array/regress-130451.js
@@ -0,0 +1,182 @@
+/* -*- indent-tabs-mode: nil; js-indent-level: 2 -*- */
+/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+ * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+ * file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */
+
+/*
+ *
+ * Date:    25 Mar 2002
+ * SUMMARY: Array.prototype.sort() should not (re-)define .length
+ * See http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130451
+ *
+ * From the ECMA-262 Edition 3 Final spec:
+ *
+ * NOTE: The sort function is intentionally generic; it does not require that
+ * its |this| value be an Array object. Therefore, it can be transferred to
+ * other kinds of objects for use as a method. Whether the sort function can
+ * be applied successfully to a host object is implementation-dependent.
+ *
+ * The interesting parts of this testcase are the contrasting expectations for
+ * Brendan's test below, when applied to Array objects vs. non-Array objects.
+ *
+ */
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+var UBound = 0;
+var BUGNUMBER = 130451;
+var summary = 'Array.prototype.sort() should not (re-)define .length';
+var status = '';
+var statusitems = [];
+var actual = '';
+var actualvalues = [];
+var expect= '';
+var expectedvalues = [];
+var arr = [];
+var cmp = new Function();
+
+
+/*
+ * First: test Array.prototype.sort() on Array objects
+ */
+status = inSection(1);
+arr = [0,1,2,3];
+cmp = function(x,y) {return x-y;};
+actual = arr.sort(cmp).length;
+expect = 4;
+addThis();
+
+status = inSection(2);
+arr = [0,1,2,3];
+cmp = function(x,y) {return y-x;};
+actual = arr.sort(cmp).length;
+expect = 4;
+addThis();
+
+status = inSection(3);
+arr = [0,1,2,3];
+cmp = function(x,y) {return x-y;};
+arr.length = 1;
+actual = arr.sort(cmp).length;
+expect = 1;
+addThis();
+
+/*
+ * This test is by Brendan. Setting arr.length to
+ * 2 and then 4 should cause elements to be deleted.
+ */
+arr = [0,1,2,3];
+cmp = function(x,y) {return x-y;};
+arr.sort(cmp);
+
+status = inSection(4);
+actual = arr.join();
+expect = '0,1,2,3';
+addThis();
+
+status = inSection(5);
+actual = arr.length;
+expect = 4;
+addThis();
+
+status = inSection(6);
+arr.length = 2;
+actual = arr.join();
+expect = '0,1';
+addThis();
+
+status = inSection(7);
+arr.length = 4;
+actual = arr.join();
+expect = '0,1,,';  //<---- see how 2,3 have been lost
+addThis();
+
+
+
+/*
+ * Now test Array.prototype.sort() on non-Array objects
+ */
+status = inSection(8);
+var obj = new Object();
+obj.sort = Array.prototype.sort;
+obj.length = 4;
+obj[0] = 0;
+obj[1] = 1;
+obj[2] = 2;
+obj[3] = 3;
+cmp = function(x,y) {return x-y;};
+actual = obj.sort(cmp).length;
+expect = 4;
+addThis();
+
+
+/*
+ * Here again is Brendan's test. Unlike the array case
+ * above, the setting of obj.length to 2 and then 4
+ * should NOT cause elements to be deleted
+ */
+obj = new Object();
+obj.sort = Array.prototype.sort;
+obj.length = 4;
+obj[0] = 3;
+obj[1] = 2;
+obj[2] = 1;
+obj[3] = 0;
+cmp = function(x,y) {return x-y;};
+obj.sort(cmp);  //<---- this is what triggered the buggy behavior below
+obj.join = Array.prototype.join;
+
+status = inSection(9);
+actual = obj.join();
+expect = '0,1,2,3';
+addThis();
+
+status = inSection(10);
+actual = obj.length;
+expect = 4;
+addThis();
+
+status = inSection(11);
+obj.length = 2;
+actual = obj.join();
+expect = '0,1';
+addThis();
+
+/*
+ * Before this bug was fixed, |actual| held the value '0,1,,'
+ * as in the Array-object case at top. This bug only occurred
+ * if Array.prototype.sort() had been applied to |obj|,
+ * as we have done higher up.
+ */
+status = inSection(12);
+obj.length = 4;
+actual = obj.join();
+expect = '0,1,2,3';
+addThis();
+
+
+
+
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+test();
+//-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+
+
+function addThis()
+{
+  statusitems[UBound] = status;
+  actualvalues[UBound] = actual;
+  expectedvalues[UBound] = expect;
+  UBound++;
+}
+
+
+function test()
+{
+  printBugNumber(BUGNUMBER);
+  printStatus(summary);
+
+  for (var i=0; i<UBound; i++)
+  {
+    reportCompare(expectedvalues[i], actualvalues[i], statusitems[i]);
+  }
+}