Adding upstream version 124.0.1.upstream/124.0.1

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 378 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/memory/replace/dmd/test/SmokeDMD.cpp b/memory/replace/dmd/test/SmokeDMD.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..c72e92a543
--- /dev/null
+++ b/memory/replace/dmd/test/SmokeDMD.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,378 @@
+/* -*- Mode: C++; tab-width: 8; indent-tabs-mode: nil; c-basic-offset: 2 -*- */
+/* vim: set ts=8 sts=2 et sw=2 tw=80: */
+/* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+ * License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this file,
+ * You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. */
+
+// This program is used by the DMD xpcshell test. It is run under DMD and
+// produces some output. The xpcshell test then post-processes and checks this
+// output.
+//
+// Note that this file does not have "Test" or "test" in its name, because that
+// will cause the build system to not record breakpad symbols for it, which
+// will stop the post-processing (which includes stack fixing) from working
+// correctly.
+
+// This is required on some systems such as Fedora to allow
+// building with -O0 together with --warnings-as-errors due to
+// a check in /usr/include/features.h
+#undef _FORTIFY_SOURCE
+
+#include <errno.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+
+#include "mozilla/Assertions.h"
+#include "mozilla/JSONWriter.h"
+#include "mozilla/Sprintf.h"
+#include "mozilla/UniquePtr.h"
+#include "DMD.h"
+
+using mozilla::MakeUnique;
+using namespace mozilla::dmd;
+
+DMDFuncs::Singleton DMDFuncs::sSingleton;
+
+class FpWriteFunc final : public mozilla::JSONWriteFunc {
+ public:
+  explicit FpWriteFunc(const char* aFilename) {
+    mFp = fopen(aFilename, "w");
+    if (!mFp) {
+      fprintf(stderr, "SmokeDMD: can't create %s file: %s\n", aFilename,
+              strerror(errno));
+      exit(1);
+    }
+  }
+
+  ~FpWriteFunc() { fclose(mFp); }
+
+  void Write(const mozilla::Span<const char>& aStr) final {
+    for (const char c : aStr) {
+      fputc(c, mFp);
+    }
+  }
+
+ private:
+  FILE* mFp;
+};
+
+// This stops otherwise-unused variables from being optimized away.
+static void UseItOrLoseIt(void* aPtr, int aSeven) {
+  char buf[64];
+  int n = SprintfLiteral(buf, "%p\n", aPtr);
+  if (n == 20 + aSeven) {
+    fprintf(stderr, "well, that is surprising");
+  }
+}
+
+// This function checks that heap blocks that have the same stack trace but
+// different (or no) reporters get aggregated separately.
+void Foo(int aSeven) {
+  char* a[6];
+  for (int i = 0; i < aSeven - 1; i++) {
+    a[i] = (char*)malloc(128 - 16 * i);
+    UseItOrLoseIt(a[i], aSeven);
+  }
+
+  // Oddly, some versions of clang will cause identical stack traces to be
+  // generated for adjacent calls to Report(), which breaks the test. Inserting
+  // the UseItOrLoseIt() calls in between is enough to prevent this.
+
+  Report(a[2]);  // reported
+
+  UseItOrLoseIt(a[2], aSeven);
+
+  for (int i = 0; i < aSeven - 5; i++) {
+    Report(a[i]);  // reported
+    UseItOrLoseIt(a[i], aSeven);
+  }
+
+  UseItOrLoseIt(a[2], aSeven);
+
+  Report(a[3]);  // reported
+
+  // a[4], a[5] unreported
+}
+
+void TestEmpty(const char* aTestName, const char* aMode) {
+  char filename[128];
+  SprintfLiteral(filename, "complete-%s-%s.json", aTestName, aMode);
+  auto f = MakeUnique<FpWriteFunc>(filename);
+
+  char options[128];
+  SprintfLiteral(options, "--mode=%s --stacks=full", aMode);
+  ResetEverything(options);
+
+  // Zero for everything.
+  Analyze(std::move(f));
+}
+
+void TestFull(const char* aTestName, int aNum, const char* aMode, int aSeven) {
+  char filename[128];
+  SprintfLiteral(filename, "complete-%s%d-%s.json", aTestName, aNum, aMode);
+  auto f = MakeUnique<FpWriteFunc>(filename);
+
+  // The --show-dump-stats=yes is there just to give that option some basic
+  // testing, e.g. ensure it doesn't crash. It's hard to test much beyond that.
+  char options[128];
+  SprintfLiteral(options, "--mode=%s --stacks=full --show-dump-stats=yes",
+                 aMode);
+  ResetEverything(options);
+
+  // Analyze 1: 1 freed, 9 out of 10 unreported.
+  // Analyze 2: still present and unreported.
+  int i;
+  char* a = nullptr;
+  for (i = 0; i < aSeven + 3; i++) {
+    a = (char*)malloc(100);
+    UseItOrLoseIt(a, aSeven);
+  }
+  free(a);
+
+  // A no-op.
+  free(nullptr);
+
+  // Note: 16 bytes is the smallest requested size that gives consistent
+  // behaviour across all platforms with jemalloc.
+  // Analyze 1: reported.
+  // Analyze 2: thrice-reported.
+  char* a2 = (char*)malloc(16);
+  Report(a2);
+
+  // Analyze 1: reported.
+  // Analyze 2: reportedness carries over, due to ReportOnAlloc.
+  char* b = (char*)malloc(10);
+  ReportOnAlloc(b);
+
+  // ReportOnAlloc, then freed.
+  // Analyze 1: freed, irrelevant.
+  // Analyze 2: freed, irrelevant.
+  char* b2 = (char*)malloc(16);
+  ReportOnAlloc(b2);
+  free(b2);
+
+  // Analyze 1: reported 4 times.
+  // Analyze 2: freed, irrelevant.
+  char* c = (char*)calloc(10, 3);
+  Report(c);
+  for (int i = 0; i < aSeven - 4; i++) {
+    Report(c);
+  }
+
+  // Analyze 1: ignored.
+  // Analyze 2: irrelevant.
+  Report((void*)(intptr_t)i);
+
+  // jemalloc rounds this up to 8192.
+  // Analyze 1: reported.
+  // Analyze 2: freed.
+  char* e = (char*)malloc(4096);
+  e = (char*)realloc(e, 7169);
+  Report(e);
+
+  // First realloc is like malloc;  second realloc is shrinking.
+  // Analyze 1: reported.
+  // Analyze 2: re-reported.
+  char* e2 = (char*)realloc(nullptr, 1024);
+  e2 = (char*)realloc(e2, 512);
+  Report(e2);
+
+  // First realloc is like malloc;  second realloc creates a min-sized block.
+  // XXX: on Windows, second realloc frees the block.
+  // Analyze 1: reported.
+  // Analyze 2: freed, irrelevant.
+  char* e3 = (char*)realloc(nullptr, 1023);
+  // e3 = (char*) realloc(e3, 0);
+  MOZ_ASSERT(e3);
+  Report(e3);
+
+  // Analyze 1: freed, irrelevant.
+  // Analyze 2: freed, irrelevant.
+  char* f1 = (char*)malloc(64);
+  UseItOrLoseIt(f1, aSeven);
+  free(f1);
+
+  // Analyze 1: ignored.
+  // Analyze 2: irrelevant.
+  Report((void*)(intptr_t)0x0);
+
+  // Analyze 1: mixture of reported and unreported.
+  // Analyze 2: all unreported.
+  Foo(aSeven);
+
+  // Analyze 1: twice-reported.
+  // Analyze 2: twice-reported.
+  char* g1 = (char*)malloc(77);
+  ReportOnAlloc(g1);
+  ReportOnAlloc(g1);
+
+  // Analyze 1: mixture of reported and unreported.
+  // Analyze 2: all unreported.
+  // Nb: this Foo() call is deliberately not adjacent to the previous one. See
+  // the comment about adjacent calls in Foo() for more details.
+  Foo(aSeven);
+
+  // Analyze 1: twice-reported.
+  // Analyze 2: once-reported.
+  char* g2 = (char*)malloc(78);
+  Report(g2);
+  ReportOnAlloc(g2);
+
+  // Analyze 1: twice-reported.
+  // Analyze 2: once-reported.
+  char* g3 = (char*)malloc(79);
+  ReportOnAlloc(g3);
+  Report(g3);
+
+  // All the odd-ball ones.
+  // Analyze 1: all unreported.
+  // Analyze 2: all freed, irrelevant.
+  // XXX: no memalign on Mac
+  // void* w = memalign(64, 65);           // rounds up to 128
+  // UseItOrLoseIt(w, aSeven);
+
+  // XXX: posix_memalign doesn't work on B2G
+  // void* x;
+  // posix_memalign(&y, 128, 129);         // rounds up to 256
+  // UseItOrLoseIt(x, aSeven);
+
+  // XXX: valloc doesn't work on Windows.
+  // void* y = valloc(1);                  // rounds up to 4096
+  // UseItOrLoseIt(y, aSeven);
+
+  // XXX: C11 only
+  // void* z = aligned_alloc(64, 256);
+  // UseItOrLoseIt(z, aSeven);
+
+  if (aNum == 1) {
+    // Analyze 1.
+    Analyze(std::move(f));
+  }
+
+  ClearReports();
+
+  //---------
+
+  Report(a2);
+  Report(a2);
+  free(c);
+  free(e);
+  Report(e2);
+  free(e3);
+  // free(w);
+  // free(x);
+  // free(y);
+  // free(z);
+
+  // Do some allocations that will only show up in cumulative mode.
+  for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
+    void* v = malloc(128);
+    UseItOrLoseIt(v, aSeven);
+    free(v);
+  }
+
+  if (aNum == 2) {
+    // Analyze 2.
+    Analyze(std::move(f));
+  }
+}
+
+void TestPartial(const char* aTestName, const char* aMode, int aSeven) {
+  char filename[128];
+  SprintfLiteral(filename, "complete-%s-%s.json", aTestName, aMode);
+  auto f = MakeUnique<FpWriteFunc>(filename);
+
+  char options[128];
+  SprintfLiteral(options, "--mode=%s", aMode);
+  ResetEverything(options);
+
+  int kTenThousand = aSeven + 9993;
+  char* s;
+
+  // The output of this function is deterministic but it relies on the
+  // probability and seeds given to the FastBernoulliTrial instance in
+  // ResetBernoulli(). If they change, the output will change too.
+
+  // Expected fraction with stacks: (1 - (1 - 0.003) ** 16) = 0.0469.
+  // So we expect about 0.0469 * 10000 == 469.
+  // We actually get 511.
+  for (int i = 0; i < kTenThousand; i++) {
+    s = (char*)malloc(16);
+    UseItOrLoseIt(s, aSeven);
+  }
+
+  // Expected fraction with stacks: (1 - (1 - 0.003) ** 128) = 0.3193.
+  // So we expect about 0.3193 * 10000 == 3193.
+  // We actually get 3136.
+  for (int i = 0; i < kTenThousand; i++) {
+    s = (char*)malloc(128);
+    UseItOrLoseIt(s, aSeven);
+  }
+
+  // Expected fraction with stacks: (1 - (1 - 0.003) ** 1024) = 0.9539.
+  // So we expect about 0.9539 * 10000 == 9539.
+  // We actually get 9531.
+  for (int i = 0; i < kTenThousand; i++) {
+    s = (char*)malloc(1024);
+    UseItOrLoseIt(s, aSeven);
+  }
+
+  Analyze(std::move(f));
+}
+
+void TestScan(int aSeven) {
+  auto f = MakeUnique<FpWriteFunc>("basic-scan.json");
+
+  ResetEverything("--mode=scan");
+
+  uintptr_t* p = (uintptr_t*)malloc(6 * sizeof(uintptr_t));
+  UseItOrLoseIt(p, aSeven);
+
+  // Hard-coded values checked by scan-test.py
+  p[0] = 0x123;                         // outside a block, small value
+  p[1] = 0x0;                           // null
+  p[2] = (uintptr_t)((uint8_t*)p - 1);  // pointer outside a block, but nearby
+  p[3] = (uintptr_t)p;                  // pointer to start of a block
+  p[4] = (uintptr_t)((uint8_t*)p + 1);  // pointer into a block
+  p[5] = 0x0;                           // trailing null
+
+  Analyze(std::move(f));
+}
+
+void RunTests() {
+  // This test relies on the compiler not doing various optimizations, such as
+  // eliding unused malloc() calls or unrolling loops with fixed iteration
+  // counts. So we compile it with -O0 (or equivalent), which probably prevents
+  // that. We also use the following variable for various loop iteration
+  // counts, just in case compilers might unroll very small loops even with
+  // -O0.
+  int seven = 7;
+
+  // Make sure that DMD is actually running; it is initialized on the first
+  // allocation.
+  int* x = (int*)malloc(100);
+  UseItOrLoseIt(x, seven);
+  MOZ_RELEASE_ASSERT(IsRunning());
+
+  // Please keep this in sync with run_test in test_dmd.js.
+
+  TestEmpty("empty", "live");
+  TestEmpty("empty", "dark-matter");
+  TestEmpty("empty", "cumulative");
+
+  TestFull("full", 1, "live", seven);
+  TestFull("full", 1, "dark-matter", seven);
+
+  TestFull("full", 2, "dark-matter", seven);
+  TestFull("full", 2, "cumulative", seven);
+
+  TestPartial("partial", "live", seven);
+
+  TestScan(seven);
+}
+
+int main() {
+  RunTests();
+
+  return 0;
+}