diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-19 00:47:55 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-19 00:47:55 +0000 |
commit | 26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6 (patch) | |
tree | f435a8308119effd964b339f76abb83a57c29483 /nsprpub/pr/src/threads/combined/README | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | firefox-26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6.tar.xz firefox-26a029d407be480d791972afb5975cf62c9360a6.zip |
Adding upstream version 124.0.1.upstream/124.0.1
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'nsprpub/pr/src/threads/combined/README')
-rw-r--r-- | nsprpub/pr/src/threads/combined/README | 62 |
1 files changed, 62 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/nsprpub/pr/src/threads/combined/README b/nsprpub/pr/src/threads/combined/README new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..aa26665282 --- /dev/null +++ b/nsprpub/pr/src/threads/combined/README @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@ +NSPR 2.0 evolution +------------------ + + +Phase 1- today + +Currently (Oct 10, 1996) NSPR 2.0 has two modes. Either _PR_NTHREAD +is defined, in which case the PR_CreateThread() call always creates a +native kernel thread, or _PR_NTHREAD is not defined and PR_CreateThread() +always creates user level threads within the single, original process. This +source code is reflected in two directories, nspr20/pr/src/threads/native, and +nspr20/pr/src/threads/user. Although the PR_CreateThread() function has +a paramter to specify the "scope" of a thread, this parameter is not yet +used- except on solaris where it uses it to specify bound vs unbound threads. + +Phase 2 - next week + +The next step is to provide a combination of user and native threads. The +idea, of course, is to have some small number of native threads and each of +those threads be able to run user level threads. The number of native +threads created will most likely be proportional to the number of CPUs in +the system. For this reason, the specific set of native threads which are +used to run the user-level threads will be called "CPU" threads. + +The user level threads which will be run on the CPU threads are able to +run on any of the CPU threads available, and over the course of a user-level +thread's lifetime, it may drift from one CPU thread to another. All +user-level threads will compete for processing time via a single run queue. + +Creation of a CPU thread will be primarily controlled by NSPR itself or by +the user running a function PR_Concurrency(). The details of PR_Concurrency() +have not yet been worked out; but the idea is that the user can specify to +NSPR how many CPU threads are desired. + +In this system, user-level threads are created by using PR_CreateThread() and +specifying the PR_LOCAL_SCOPE option. LOCAL_SCOPE indicates that the thread +will be under the control of the "local" scheduler. Creating threads with +GLOBAL_SCOPE, on the other hand will create a thread which is under the +control of the system's scheduler. In otherwords, this creates a native thread +which is not a CPU thread; it runs a single thread task and never has more +than one task to run. LOCAL_SCOPE is much like creating a Solaris unbound +thread, while GLOBAL_SCOPE is similar to creating a Solaris bound thread. + +To implement this architecture, the source code will still maintain the "user" +and "native" directories which is has today. However a third directory +"combined" will also exist. To compile a version of NSPR which only creates +native threads, the user can define _PR_NTHREAD. For exclusive user-level +threads, do not define _PR_NTHREAD. To get the combined threads, define +_PR_NTHREAD and _PR_USE_CPUS. + + +Phase 3 - later than next week + +The goal is to eliminate the 3 directories. Once these three models are in +place, the remaining work will be to eliminate the native and user thread +directories for all platforms, so that the entire thread model is contained +within what is today called the "combined" model. This new and glorious +source code will attempt to make the "combined" model on any platforms which +provide the necessary underlying native threading, but will also be +capable of using exclusive user-level threads on systems which don't have +native threads. + |