Adding upstream version 124.0.1.upstream/124.0.1

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 350 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/third_party/libwebrtc/rtc_base/sigslot_unittest.cc b/third_party/libwebrtc/rtc_base/sigslot_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..e9fdba503c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/third_party/libwebrtc/rtc_base/sigslot_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,350 @@
+/*
+ *  Copyright 2012 The WebRTC Project Authors. All rights reserved.
+ *
+ *  Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license
+ *  that can be found in the LICENSE file in the root of the source
+ *  tree. An additional intellectual property rights grant can be found
+ *  in the file PATENTS.  All contributing project authors may
+ *  be found in the AUTHORS file in the root of the source tree.
+ */
+
+#include "rtc_base/third_party/sigslot/sigslot.h"
+
+#include "test/gtest.h"
+
+// This function, when passed a has_slots or signalx, will break the build if
+// its threading requirement is not single threaded
+static bool TemplateIsST(const sigslot::single_threaded* p) {
+  return true;
+}
+// This function, when passed a has_slots or signalx, will break the build if
+// its threading requirement is not multi threaded
+static bool TemplateIsMT(const sigslot::multi_threaded_local* p) {
+  return true;
+}
+
+class SigslotDefault : public ::testing::Test, public sigslot::has_slots<> {
+ protected:
+  sigslot::signal0<> signal_;
+};
+
+template <class slot_policy = sigslot::single_threaded,
+          class signal_policy = sigslot::single_threaded>
+class SigslotReceiver : public sigslot::has_slots<slot_policy> {
+ public:
+  SigslotReceiver() : signal_(nullptr), signal_count_(0) {}
+  ~SigslotReceiver() {}
+
+  // Provide copy constructor so that tests can exercise the has_slots copy
+  // constructor.
+  SigslotReceiver(const SigslotReceiver&) = default;
+
+  void Connect(sigslot::signal0<signal_policy>* signal) {
+    if (!signal)
+      return;
+    Disconnect();
+    signal_ = signal;
+    signal->connect(this,
+                    &SigslotReceiver<slot_policy, signal_policy>::OnSignal);
+  }
+  void Disconnect() {
+    if (!signal_)
+      return;
+    signal_->disconnect(this);
+    signal_ = nullptr;
+  }
+  void OnSignal() { ++signal_count_; }
+  int signal_count() { return signal_count_; }
+
+ private:
+  sigslot::signal0<signal_policy>* signal_;
+  int signal_count_;
+};
+
+template <class slot_policy = sigslot::single_threaded,
+          class mt_signal_policy = sigslot::multi_threaded_local>
+class SigslotSlotTest : public ::testing::Test {
+ protected:
+  SigslotSlotTest() {
+    mt_signal_policy mt_policy;
+    TemplateIsMT(&mt_policy);
+  }
+
+  virtual void SetUp() { Connect(); }
+  virtual void TearDown() { Disconnect(); }
+
+  void Disconnect() {
+    st_receiver_.Disconnect();
+    mt_receiver_.Disconnect();
+  }
+
+  void Connect() {
+    st_receiver_.Connect(&SignalSTLoopback);
+    mt_receiver_.Connect(&SignalMTLoopback);
+  }
+
+  int st_loop_back_count() { return st_receiver_.signal_count(); }
+  int mt_loop_back_count() { return mt_receiver_.signal_count(); }
+
+  sigslot::signal0<> SignalSTLoopback;
+  SigslotReceiver<slot_policy, sigslot::single_threaded> st_receiver_;
+  sigslot::signal0<mt_signal_policy> SignalMTLoopback;
+  SigslotReceiver<slot_policy, mt_signal_policy> mt_receiver_;
+};
+
+typedef SigslotSlotTest<> SigslotSTSlotTest;
+typedef SigslotSlotTest<sigslot::multi_threaded_local,
+                        sigslot::multi_threaded_local>
+    SigslotMTSlotTest;
+
+class multi_threaded_local_fake : public sigslot::multi_threaded_local {
+ public:
+  multi_threaded_local_fake() : lock_count_(0), unlock_count_(0) {}
+
+  void lock() { ++lock_count_; }
+  void unlock() { ++unlock_count_; }
+
+  int lock_count() { return lock_count_; }
+
+  bool InCriticalSection() { return lock_count_ != unlock_count_; }
+
+ protected:
+  int lock_count_;
+  int unlock_count_;
+};
+
+typedef SigslotSlotTest<multi_threaded_local_fake, multi_threaded_local_fake>
+    SigslotMTLockBase;
+
+class SigslotMTLockTest : public SigslotMTLockBase {
+ protected:
+  SigslotMTLockTest() {}
+
+  void SetUp() override {
+    EXPECT_EQ(0, SlotLockCount());
+    SigslotMTLockBase::SetUp();
+    // Connects to two signals (ST and MT). However,
+    // SlotLockCount() only gets the count for the
+    // MT signal (there are two separate SigslotReceiver which
+    // keep track of their own count).
+    EXPECT_EQ(1, SlotLockCount());
+  }
+  void TearDown() override {
+    const int previous_lock_count = SlotLockCount();
+    SigslotMTLockBase::TearDown();
+    // Disconnects from two signals. Note analogous to SetUp().
+    EXPECT_EQ(previous_lock_count + 1, SlotLockCount());
+  }
+
+  int SlotLockCount() { return mt_receiver_.lock_count(); }
+  void Signal() { SignalMTLoopback(); }
+  int SignalLockCount() { return SignalMTLoopback.lock_count(); }
+  int signal_count() { return mt_loop_back_count(); }
+  bool InCriticalSection() { return SignalMTLoopback.InCriticalSection(); }
+};
+
+// This test will always succeed. However, if the default template instantiation
+// changes from single threaded to multi threaded it will break the build here.
+TEST_F(SigslotDefault, DefaultIsST) {
+  EXPECT_TRUE(TemplateIsST(this));
+  EXPECT_TRUE(TemplateIsST(&signal_));
+}
+
+// ST slot, ST signal
+TEST_F(SigslotSTSlotTest, STLoopbackTest) {
+  SignalSTLoopback();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, st_loop_back_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, mt_loop_back_count());
+}
+
+// ST slot, MT signal
+TEST_F(SigslotSTSlotTest, MTLoopbackTest) {
+  SignalMTLoopback();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, mt_loop_back_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, st_loop_back_count());
+}
+
+// ST slot, both ST and MT (separate) signal
+TEST_F(SigslotSTSlotTest, AllLoopbackTest) {
+  SignalSTLoopback();
+  SignalMTLoopback();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, mt_loop_back_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, st_loop_back_count());
+}
+
+TEST_F(SigslotSTSlotTest, Reconnect) {
+  SignalSTLoopback();
+  SignalMTLoopback();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, mt_loop_back_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, st_loop_back_count());
+  Disconnect();
+  SignalSTLoopback();
+  SignalMTLoopback();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, mt_loop_back_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, st_loop_back_count());
+  Connect();
+  SignalSTLoopback();
+  SignalMTLoopback();
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, mt_loop_back_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(2, st_loop_back_count());
+}
+
+// MT slot, ST signal
+TEST_F(SigslotMTSlotTest, STLoopbackTest) {
+  SignalSTLoopback();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, st_loop_back_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, mt_loop_back_count());
+}
+
+// MT slot, MT signal
+TEST_F(SigslotMTSlotTest, MTLoopbackTest) {
+  SignalMTLoopback();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, mt_loop_back_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, st_loop_back_count());
+}
+
+// MT slot, both ST and MT (separate) signal
+TEST_F(SigslotMTSlotTest, AllLoopbackTest) {
+  SignalMTLoopback();
+  SignalSTLoopback();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, st_loop_back_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, mt_loop_back_count());
+}
+
+// Test that locks are acquired and released correctly.
+TEST_F(SigslotMTLockTest, LockSanity) {
+  const int lock_count = SignalLockCount();
+  Signal();
+  EXPECT_FALSE(InCriticalSection());
+  EXPECT_EQ(lock_count + 1, SignalLockCount());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, signal_count());
+}
+
+// Destroy signal and slot in different orders.
+TEST(SigslotDestructionOrder, SignalFirst) {
+  sigslot::signal0<>* signal = new sigslot::signal0<>;
+  SigslotReceiver<>* receiver = new SigslotReceiver<>();
+  receiver->Connect(signal);
+  (*signal)();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, receiver->signal_count());
+  delete signal;
+  delete receiver;
+}
+
+TEST(SigslotDestructionOrder, SlotFirst) {
+  sigslot::signal0<>* signal = new sigslot::signal0<>;
+  SigslotReceiver<>* receiver = new SigslotReceiver<>();
+  receiver->Connect(signal);
+  (*signal)();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, receiver->signal_count());
+
+  delete receiver;
+  (*signal)();
+  delete signal;
+}
+
+// Test that if a signal is copied, its slot connections are copied as well.
+TEST(SigslotTest, CopyConnectedSignal) {
+  sigslot::signal<> signal;
+  SigslotReceiver<> receiver;
+  receiver.Connect(&signal);
+
+  // Fire the copied signal, expecting the receiver to be notified.
+  sigslot::signal<> copied_signal(signal);
+  copied_signal();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, receiver.signal_count());
+}
+
+// Test that if a slot is copied, its signal connections are copied as well.
+TEST(SigslotTest, CopyConnectedSlot) {
+  sigslot::signal<> signal;
+  SigslotReceiver<> receiver;
+  receiver.Connect(&signal);
+
+  // Fire the signal after copying the receiver, expecting the copied receiver
+  // to be notified.
+  SigslotReceiver<> copied_receiver(receiver);
+  signal();
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, copied_receiver.signal_count());
+}
+
+// Just used for the test below.
+class Disconnector : public sigslot::has_slots<> {
+ public:
+  Disconnector(SigslotReceiver<>* receiver1, SigslotReceiver<>* receiver2)
+      : receiver1_(receiver1), receiver2_(receiver2) {}
+
+  void Connect(sigslot::signal<>* signal) {
+    signal_ = signal;
+    signal->connect(this, &Disconnector::Disconnect);
+  }
+
+ private:
+  void Disconnect() {
+    receiver1_->Disconnect();
+    receiver2_->Disconnect();
+    signal_->disconnect(this);
+  }
+
+  sigslot::signal<>* signal_;
+  SigslotReceiver<>* receiver1_;
+  SigslotReceiver<>* receiver2_;
+};
+
+// Test that things work as expected if a signal is disconnected from a slot
+// while it's firing.
+TEST(SigslotTest, DisconnectFromSignalWhileFiring) {
+  sigslot::signal<> signal;
+  SigslotReceiver<> receiver1;
+  SigslotReceiver<> receiver2;
+  SigslotReceiver<> receiver3;
+  Disconnector disconnector(&receiver1, &receiver2);
+
+  // From this ordering, receiver1 should receive the signal, then the
+  // disconnector will be invoked, causing receiver2 to be disconnected before
+  // it receives the signal. And receiver3 should also receive the signal,
+  // since it was never disconnected.
+  receiver1.Connect(&signal);
+  disconnector.Connect(&signal);
+  receiver2.Connect(&signal);
+  receiver3.Connect(&signal);
+  signal();
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, receiver1.signal_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, receiver2.signal_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, receiver3.signal_count());
+}
+
+// Uses disconnect_all instead of disconnect.
+class Disconnector2 : public sigslot::has_slots<> {
+ public:
+  void Connect(sigslot::signal<>* signal) {
+    signal_ = signal;
+    signal->connect(this, &Disconnector2::Disconnect);
+  }
+
+ private:
+  void Disconnect() { signal_->disconnect_all(); }
+
+  sigslot::signal<>* signal_;
+};
+
+// Test that things work as expected if a signal is disconnected from a slot
+// while it's firing using disconnect_all.
+TEST(SigslotTest, CallDisconnectAllWhileSignalFiring) {
+  sigslot::signal<> signal;
+  SigslotReceiver<> receiver1;
+  SigslotReceiver<> receiver2;
+  Disconnector2 disconnector;
+
+  // From this ordering, receiver1 should receive the signal, then the
+  // disconnector will be invoked, causing receiver2 to be disconnected before
+  // it receives the signal.
+  receiver1.Connect(&signal);
+  disconnector.Connect(&signal);
+  receiver2.Connect(&signal);
+  signal();
+
+  EXPECT_EQ(1, receiver1.signal_count());
+  EXPECT_EQ(0, receiver2.signal_count());
+}