diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'js/src/tests/test262/built-ins/Temporal/Calendar/prototype/fields/reverse.js')
-rw-r--r-- | js/src/tests/test262/built-ins/Temporal/Calendar/prototype/fields/reverse.js | 39 |
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/js/src/tests/test262/built-ins/Temporal/Calendar/prototype/fields/reverse.js b/js/src/tests/test262/built-ins/Temporal/Calendar/prototype/fields/reverse.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..88a1721cfd --- /dev/null +++ b/js/src/tests/test262/built-ins/Temporal/Calendar/prototype/fields/reverse.js @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +// |reftest| skip-if(!this.hasOwnProperty('Temporal')) -- Temporal is not enabled unconditionally +// Copyright (C) 2021 the V8 project authors. All rights reserved. +// This code is governed by the BSD license found in the LICENSE file. + +/*--- +esid: sec-temporal.calendar.prototype.fields +description: > + Temporal.Calendar.prototype.fields will return the iterable in array if all + input are valid regardless of it's order. +info: | + ## 12.4.21 Temporal.Calendar.prototype.fields ( fields ) + 1. Let calendar be the this value. + 2. Perform ? RequireInternalSlot(calendar, [[InitializedTemporalCalendar]]). + 4. Let iteratorRecord be ? Getiterator(fields, sync). + 5. Let fieldNames be a new empty List. + 6. Let next be true. + 7. Repeat, while next is not false, + a. Set next to ? IteratorStep(iteratorRecord). + b. If next is not false, then + i. Let nextValue be ? IteratorValue(next). + iv. If nextValue is not one of "year", "month", "monthCode", or "day", then + 1. Let completion be ThrowCompletion(a newly created RangeError object). + 2. Return ? IteratorClose(iteratorRecord, completion). +features: [Symbol, Symbol.iterator, Temporal, computed-property-names, generators] +includes: [compareArray.js] +---*/ +let cal = new Temporal.Calendar("iso8601") +const fields = { + *[Symbol.iterator]() { + yield "day"; + yield "monthCode"; + yield "month"; + yield "year"; + } +} +assert.compareArray(cal.fields(fields), Array.from(fields), + 'valid fields should be supported even if they are in reversed order of the spec'); + +reportCompare(0, 0); |