blob: 121088754936ebb875c1876c5891e35b52d1b851 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
|
// This file was procedurally generated from the following sources:
// - src/annex-b-fns/eval-global-no-skip-try.case
// - src/annex-b-fns/eval-global/direct-switch-case.template
/*---
description: Extension is observed when creation of variable binding would not produce an early error (try statement) (Function declaration in the `case` clause of a `switch` statement in eval code)
esid: sec-web-compat-evaldeclarationinstantiation
flags: [generated, noStrict]
info: |
B.3.3.3 Changes to EvalDeclarationInstantiation
[...]
ii. If replacing the FunctionDeclaration f with a VariableStatement that
has F as a BindingIdentifier would not produce any Early Errors for
body, then
[...]
B.3.5 VariableStatements in Catch Blocks
[...]
- It is a Syntax Error if any element of the BoundNames of CatchParameter
also occurs in the VarDeclaredNames of Block unless CatchParameter is
CatchParameter:BindingIdentifier and that element is only bound by a
VariableStatement, the VariableDeclarationList of a for statement, or the
ForBinding of a for-in statement.
---*/
eval(
'assert.sameValue(\
f, undefined, "Initialized binding created prior to evaluation"\
);\
\
try {\
throw null;\
} catch (f) {switch (1) {' +
' case 1:' +
' function f() { return 123; }' +
'}\
}\
\
assert.sameValue(\
typeof f,\
"function",\
"binding value is updated following evaluation"\
);\
assert.sameValue(f(), 123);'
);
reportCompare(0, 0);
|
