blob: 7f6f9294fa0587811c162d9fb542bf86fe9f5095 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<title>child-src-blocked</title>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Security-Policy" content="frame-src 'none'; child-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; connect-src 'self';">
<script src="/resources/testharness.js"></script>
<script src="/resources/testharnessreport.js"></script>
<script src='../support/logTest.sub.js?logs=["PASS IFrame %231 generated a load event.", "violated-directive=frame-src"]'></script>
<script>
window.addEventListener("message", function(event) {
alert_assert(event.data);
}, false);
window.addEventListener("securitypolicyviolation", function(e) {
log("violated-directive=" + e.violatedDirective);
});
function alert_assert(msg) {
t_log.step(function() {
if (msg.match(/^FAIL/i)) {
assert_unreached(msg);
t_log.done();
}
for (var i = 0; i < expected_alerts.length; i++) {
if (expected_alerts[i] == msg) {
assert_equals(expected_alerts[i], msg);
expected_alerts.splice(i, 1);
if (expected_alerts.length == 0) {
t_log.done();
}
return;
}
}
assert_unreached('unexpected alert: ' + msg);
t_log.done();
});
}
</script>
<!-- enforcing policy:
frame-src 'none'; child-src 'self'; script-src 'self' 'unsafe-inline'; connect-src 'self';
-->
<p>
A more permissive child-src should not relax restrictions from a less-
permissive frame-src. Directives still combine for least privilege, even when
one obsoletes another.
</p>
<script>
window.wasPostTestScriptParsed = true;
var loads = 0;
function loadEvent() {
loads++;
log("PASS " + "IFrame #" + loads + " generated a load event.");
}
</script>
</head>
<body>
<iframe src="/content-security-policy/support/postmessage-fail.html" onload="loadEvent()" onerror="log('FAIL')"></iframe>
<div id="log"></div>
</body>
</html>
|
