blob: beefd47a544d5c82b4b1d468ce99938e6d9924d9 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
|
<!DOCTYPE html>
<title>CSS Filters: feDiffuseLighting and feSpecularLighting error handling.</title>
<link rel="help" href="https://drafts.fxtf.org/filter-effects/#feDiffuseLightingElement">
<link rel="help" href="https://drafts.fxtf.org/filter-effects/#feSpecularLightingElement">
<link rel="match" href="reference/effect-reference-lighting-no-light.tentative-ref.html">
<meta name="assert" content="This test ensures that invalid parameters to both feDiffuseLighting and feSpecularLighting produce transparent black."/>
<style>
.target {
display: inline-block;
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background-color: red;
}
</style>
<div class="target" style="filter: url(#noLightDiffuse)"></div>
<div class="target" style="filter: url(#noLightSpecular)"></div>
<svg height="0" color-interpolation-filters="sRGB">
<filter id="noLightDiffuse" x="0" y="0" width="1" height="1">
<feDiffuseLighting lighting-color="blue"/>
<!-- Using 0.5 on the matrices below can cause in different engines
an off-by-one difference (127 vs. 128), when rounding 127.5 (255 * 0.5)
either up or downwards.
Hence, the test uses 0.502 (~128/255) to avoid this tie-break. -->
<feColorMatrix values="1 0 0 0 0,
0 1 0 0 0.502,
0 0 1 0 0,
0 0 0 1 1"/>
</filter>
<filter id="noLightSpecular" x="0" y="0" width="1" height="1">
<feSpecularLighting lighting-color="blue"/>
<feColorMatrix values="1 0 0 0 0,
0 1 0 0 0.502,
0 0 1 0 0,
0 0 0 1 1"/>
</filter>
</svg>
|
