1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
|
// If you're testing an API that constructs a PerformanceMark, add your test here.
// See the for loop below for details.
const markConstructionTests = [
{
testName: "Number should be rejected as the mark-options.",
testFunction: function(newMarkFunction) {
assert_throws_js(TypeError, function() { newMarkFunction("mark1", 123); }, "Number passed as a dict argument should cause type-error.");
},
},
{
testName: "NaN should be rejected as the mark-options.",
testFunction: function(newMarkFunction) {
assert_throws_js(TypeError, function() { newMarkFunction("mark1", NaN); }, "NaN passed as a dict argument should cause type-error.");
},
},
{
testName: "Infinity should be rejected as the mark-options.",
testFunction: function(newMarkFunction) {
assert_throws_js(TypeError, function() { newMarkFunction("mark1", Infinity); }, "Infinity passed as a dict argument should cause type-error.");
},
},
{
testName: "String should be rejected as the mark-options.",
testFunction: function(newMarkFunction) {
assert_throws_js(TypeError, function() { newMarkFunction("mark1", "string"); }, "String passed as a dict argument should cause type-error.")
},
},
{
testName: "Negative startTime in mark-options should be rejected",
testFunction: function(newMarkFunction) {
assert_throws_js(TypeError, function() { newMarkFunction("mark1", {startTime: -1}); }, "Negative startTime should cause type-error.")
},
},
];
// There are multiple function calls that can construct a mark using the same arguments so we run
// each test on each construction method here, avoiding duplication.
for (let testInfo of markConstructionTests) {
test(function() {
testInfo.testFunction(self.performance.mark);
}, `[performance.mark]: ${testInfo.testName}`);
test(function() {
testInfo.testFunction((markName, obj) => new PerformanceMark(markName, obj));
}, `[new PerformanceMark]: ${testInfo.testName}`);
}
|
