Adding upstream version 1:2.43.0.upstream/1%2.43.0

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 316 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt b/Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b50acac
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/git-merge-tree.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,316 @@
+git-merge-tree(1)
+=================
+
+NAME
+----
+git-merge-tree - Perform merge without touching index or working tree
+
+
+SYNOPSIS
+--------
+[verse]
+'git merge-tree' [--write-tree] [<options>] <branch1> <branch2>
+'git merge-tree' [--trivial-merge] <base-tree> <branch1> <branch2> (deprecated)
+
+[[NEWMERGE]]
+DESCRIPTION
+-----------
+
+This command has a modern `--write-tree` mode and a deprecated
+`--trivial-merge` mode.  With the exception of the
+<<DEPMERGE,DEPRECATED DESCRIPTION>> section at the end, the rest of
+this documentation describes the modern `--write-tree` mode.
+
+Performs a merge, but does not make any new commits and does not read
+from or write to either the working tree or index.
+
+The performed merge will use the same features as the "real"
+linkgit:git-merge[1], including:
+
+  * three way content merges of individual files
+  * rename detection
+  * proper directory/file conflict handling
+  * recursive ancestor consolidation (i.e. when there is more than one
+    merge base, creating a virtual merge base by merging the merge bases)
+  * etc.
+
+After the merge completes, a new toplevel tree object is created.  See
+`OUTPUT` below for details.
+
+OPTIONS
+-------
+
+-z::
+	Do not quote filenames in the <Conflicted file info> section,
+	and end each filename with a NUL character rather than
+	newline.  Also begin the messages section with a NUL character
+	instead of a newline.  See <<OUTPUT>> below for more information.
+
+--name-only::
+	In the Conflicted file info section, instead of writing a list
+	of (mode, oid, stage, path) tuples to output for conflicted
+	files, just provide a list of filenames with conflicts (and
+	do not list filenames multiple times if they have multiple
+	conflicting stages).
+
+--[no-]messages::
+	Write any informational messages such as "Auto-merging <path>"
+	or CONFLICT notices to the end of stdout.  If unspecified, the
+	default is to include these messages if there are merge
+	conflicts, and to omit them otherwise.
+
+--allow-unrelated-histories::
+	merge-tree will by default error out if the two branches specified
+	share no common history.  This flag can be given to override that
+	check and make the merge proceed anyway.
+
+--merge-base=<commit>::
+	Instead of finding the merge-bases for <branch1> and <branch2>,
+	specify a merge-base for the merge, and specifying multiple bases is
+	currently not supported. This option is incompatible with `--stdin`.
+
+[[OUTPUT]]
+OUTPUT
+------
+
+For a successful merge, the output from git-merge-tree is simply one
+line:
+
+	<OID of toplevel tree>
+
+Whereas for a conflicted merge, the output is by default of the form:
+
+	<OID of toplevel tree>
+	<Conflicted file info>
+	<Informational messages>
+
+These are discussed individually below.
+
+However, there is an exception.  If `--stdin` is passed, then there is
+an extra section at the beginning, a NUL character at the end, and then
+all the sections repeat for each line of input.  Thus, if the first merge
+is conflicted and the second is clean, the output would be of the form:
+
+	<Merge status>
+	<OID of toplevel tree>
+	<Conflicted file info>
+	<Informational messages>
+	NUL
+	<Merge status>
+	<OID of toplevel tree>
+	NUL
+
+[[MS]]
+Merge status
+~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+This is an integer status followed by a NUL character.  The integer status is:
+
+     0: merge had conflicts
+     1: merge was clean
+     <0: something prevented the merge from running (e.g. access to repository
+	 objects denied by filesystem)
+
+[[OIDTLT]]
+OID of toplevel tree
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+This is a tree object that represents what would be checked out in the
+working tree at the end of `git merge`.  If there were conflicts, then
+files within this tree may have embedded conflict markers.  This section
+is always followed by a newline (or NUL if `-z` is passed).
+
+[[CFI]]
+Conflicted file info
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+This is a sequence of lines with the format
+
+	<mode> <object> <stage> <filename>
+
+The filename will be quoted as explained for the configuration
+variable `core.quotePath` (see linkgit:git-config[1]).  However, if
+the `--name-only` option is passed, the mode, object, and stage will
+be omitted.  If `-z` is passed, the "lines" are terminated by a NUL
+character instead of a newline character.
+
+[[IM]]
+Informational messages
+~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
+
+This section provides informational messages, typically about
+conflicts.  The format of the section varies significantly depending
+on whether `-z` is passed.
+
+If `-z` is passed:
+
+The output format is zero or more conflict informational records, each
+of the form:
+
+	<list-of-paths><conflict-type>NUL<conflict-message>NUL
+
+where <list-of-paths> is of the form
+
+	<number-of-paths>NUL<path1>NUL<path2>NUL...<pathN>NUL
+
+and includes paths (or branch names) affected by the conflict or
+informational message in <conflict-message>.  Also, <conflict-type> is a
+stable string explaining the type of conflict, such as
+
+  * "Auto-merging"
+  * "CONFLICT (rename/delete)"
+  * "CONFLICT (submodule lacks merge base)"
+  * "CONFLICT (binary)"
+
+and <conflict-message> is a more detailed message about the conflict which often
+(but not always) embeds the <stable-short-type-description> within it.  These
+strings may change in future Git versions.  Some examples:
+
+  * "Auto-merging <file>"
+  * "CONFLICT (rename/delete): <oldfile> renamed...but deleted in..."
+  * "Failed to merge submodule <submodule> (no merge base)"
+  * "Warning: cannot merge binary files: <filename>"
+
+If `-z` is NOT passed:
+
+This section starts with a blank line to separate it from the previous
+sections, and then only contains the <conflict-message> information
+from the previous section (separated by newlines).  These are
+non-stable strings that should not be parsed by scripts, and are just
+meant for human consumption.  Also, note that while <conflict-message>
+strings usually do not contain embedded newlines, they sometimes do.
+(However, the free-form messages will never have an embedded NUL
+character).  So, the entire block of information is meant for human
+readers as an agglomeration of all conflict messages.
+
+EXIT STATUS
+-----------
+
+For a successful, non-conflicted merge, the exit status is 0.  When the
+merge has conflicts, the exit status is 1.  If the merge is not able to
+complete (or start) due to some kind of error, the exit status is
+something other than 0 or 1 (and the output is unspecified).  When
+--stdin is passed, the return status is 0 for both successful and
+conflicted merges, and something other than 0 or 1 if it cannot complete
+all the requested merges.
+
+USAGE NOTES
+-----------
+
+This command is intended as low-level plumbing, similar to
+linkgit:git-hash-object[1], linkgit:git-mktree[1],
+linkgit:git-commit-tree[1], linkgit:git-write-tree[1],
+linkgit:git-update-ref[1], and linkgit:git-mktag[1].  Thus, it can be
+used as a part of a series of steps such as:
+
+       NEWTREE=$(git merge-tree --write-tree $BRANCH1 $BRANCH2)
+       test $? -eq 0 || die "There were conflicts..."
+       NEWCOMMIT=$(git commit-tree $NEWTREE -p $BRANCH1 -p $BRANCH2)
+       git update-ref $BRANCH1 $NEWCOMMIT
+
+Note that when the exit status is non-zero, `NEWTREE` in this sequence
+will contain a lot more output than just a tree.
+
+For conflicts, the output includes the same information that you'd get
+with linkgit:git-merge[1]:
+
+  * what would be written to the working tree (the
+    <<OIDTLT,OID of toplevel tree>>)
+  * the higher order stages that would be written to the index (the
+    <<CFI,Conflicted file info>>)
+  * any messages that would have been printed to stdout (the
+    <<IM,Informational messages>>)
+
+INPUT FORMAT
+------------
+'git merge-tree --stdin' input format is fully text based. Each line
+has this format:
+
+	[<base-commit> -- ]<branch1> <branch2>
+
+If one line is separated by `--`, the string before the separator is
+used for specifying a merge-base for the merge and the string after
+the separator describes the branches to be merged.
+
+MISTAKES TO AVOID
+-----------------
+
+Do NOT look through the resulting toplevel tree to try to find which
+files conflict; parse the <<CFI,Conflicted file info>> section instead.
+Not only would parsing an entire tree be horrendously slow in large
+repositories, there are numerous types of conflicts not representable by
+conflict markers (modify/delete, mode conflict, binary file changed on
+both sides, file/directory conflicts, various rename conflict
+permutations, etc.)
+
+Do NOT interpret an empty <<CFI,Conflicted file info>> list as a clean
+merge; check the exit status.  A merge can have conflicts without having
+individual files conflict (there are a few types of directory rename
+conflicts that fall into this category, and others might also be added
+in the future).
+
+Do NOT attempt to guess or make the user guess the conflict types from
+the <<CFI,Conflicted file info>> list.  The information there is
+insufficient to do so.  For example: Rename/rename(1to2) conflicts (both
+sides renamed the same file differently) will result in three different
+files having higher order stages (but each only has one higher order
+stage), with no way (short of the <<IM,Informational messages>> section)
+to determine which three files are related.  File/directory conflicts
+also result in a file with exactly one higher order stage.
+Possibly-involved-in-directory-rename conflicts (when
+"merge.directoryRenames" is unset or set to "conflicts") also result in
+a file with exactly one higher order stage.  In all cases, the
+<<IM,Informational messages>> section has the necessary info, though it
+is not designed to be machine parseable.
+
+Do NOT assume that each path from <<CFI,Conflicted file info>>, and
+the logical conflicts in the <<IM,Informational messages>> have a
+one-to-one mapping, nor that there is a one-to-many mapping, nor a
+many-to-one mapping.  Many-to-many mappings exist, meaning that each
+path can have many logical conflict types in a single merge, and each
+logical conflict type can affect many paths.
+
+Do NOT assume all filenames listed in the <<IM,Informational messages>>
+section had conflicts.  Messages can be included for files that have no
+conflicts, such as "Auto-merging <file>".
+
+AVOID taking the OIDS from the <<CFI,Conflicted file info>> and
+re-merging them to present the conflicts to the user.  This will lose
+information.  Instead, look up the version of the file found within the
+<<OIDTLT,OID of toplevel tree>> and show that instead.  In particular,
+the latter will have conflict markers annotated with the original
+branch/commit being merged and, if renames were involved, the original
+filename.  While you could include the original branch/commit in the
+conflict marker annotations when re-merging, the original filename is
+not available from the <<CFI,Conflicted file info>> and thus you would
+be losing information that might help the user resolve the conflict.
+
+[[DEPMERGE]]
+DEPRECATED DESCRIPTION
+----------------------
+
+Per the <<NEWMERGE,DESCRIPTION>> and unlike the rest of this
+documentation, this section describes the deprecated `--trivial-merge`
+mode.
+
+Other than the optional `--trivial-merge`, this mode accepts no
+options.
+
+This mode reads three tree-ish, and outputs trivial merge results and
+conflicting stages to the standard output in a semi-diff format.
+Since this was designed for higher level scripts to consume and merge
+the results back into the index, it omits entries that match
+<branch1>.  The result of this second form is similar to what
+three-way 'git read-tree -m' does, but instead of storing the results
+in the index, the command outputs the entries to the standard output.
+
+This form not only has limited applicability (a trivial merge cannot
+handle content merges of individual files, rename detection, proper
+directory/file conflict handling, etc.), the output format is also
+difficult to work with, and it will generally be less performant than
+the first form even on successful merges (especially if working in
+large repositories).
+
+GIT
+---
+Part of the linkgit:git[1] suite