Adding upstream version 2.4.1.upstream/2.4.1upstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/cppcheck-suppress.lst b/src/cppcheck-suppress.lst
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..9dc8d99
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/cppcheck-suppress.lst
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+// On some systems cppcheck produces false alarms about 'missing includes'.
+// the following two will suppress, depending on the cppcheck version
+debug
+missingInclude
+
+// Please don't add any suppressions here. We now use inline
+// suppressions (in the .cc files) so that we don't have to
+// maintain line numbers in this file.
+//
+// See the cppcheck manual for syntax. It is something like:
+//
+//    // cppcheck-suppress duplicateExpression
+//    EXPECT_FALSE(small_name < small_name);
+
+// With cppcheck 1.56, there are a number of false positives, which
+// All of these should be checked and hopefully removed after upgrading
+// cppcheck past 1.56
+
+// eraseDereference: This is a known false positive, which has been
+// fixed in the current development version of cppcheck
+eraseDereference
+
+// Unused functions: there suddenly are a lot of unused function errors
+// We could address those by adding for instance early declarations or
+// (unnecessary) header files, but they were all somewhat false positives
+// When we upgrade past 1.56, we should re-check this, and perhaps enable
+// unused-functions again.
+unusedFunction