diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'src/bin/d2/tests/simple_remove_unittests.cc')
| -rw-r--r-- | src/bin/d2/tests/simple_remove_unittests.cc | 1238 |
1 files changed, 1238 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/bin/d2/tests/simple_remove_unittests.cc b/src/bin/d2/tests/simple_remove_unittests.cc new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1d53400 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/bin/d2/tests/simple_remove_unittests.cc @@ -0,0 +1,1238 @@ +// Copyright (C) 2020-2021 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC") +// +// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public +// License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this +// file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/. + +#include <config.h> + +#include <asiolink/io_service.h> +#include <d2/simple_remove.h> +#include <d2srv/d2_cfg_mgr.h> +#include <d2srv/testutils/nc_test_utils.h> +#include <dns/messagerenderer.h> + +#include <gtest/gtest.h> + +using namespace std; +using namespace isc; +using namespace isc::d2; +using namespace isc::util; + + +namespace { + +/// @brief Test class derived from SimpleRemoveTransaction to provide visibility +// to protected methods. +class SimpleRemoveStub : public SimpleRemoveTransaction { +public: + SimpleRemoveStub(asiolink::IOServicePtr& io_service, + dhcp_ddns::NameChangeRequestPtr& ncr, + DdnsDomainPtr& forward_domain, + DdnsDomainPtr& reverse_domain, + D2CfgMgrPtr& cfg_mgr) + : SimpleRemoveTransaction(io_service, ncr, forward_domain, + reverse_domain, cfg_mgr), + simulate_send_exception_(false), + simulate_build_request_exception_(false) { + } + + virtual ~SimpleRemoveStub() { + } + + /// @brief Simulates sending update requests to the DNS server + /// + /// This method simulates the initiation of an asynchronous send of + /// a DNS update request. It overrides the actual sendUpdate method in + /// the base class, thus avoiding an actual send, yet still increments + /// the update attempt count and posts a next event of NOP_EVT. + /// + /// It will also simulate an exception-based failure of sendUpdate, if + /// the simulate_send_exception_ flag is true. + /// + /// @param comment Parameter is unused, but present in base class method + /// + virtual void sendUpdate(const std::string& /* comment */) { + if (simulate_send_exception_) { + // Make the flag a one-shot by resetting it. + simulate_send_exception_ = false; + // Transition to failed. + transition(PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, UPDATE_FAILED_EVT); + return; + } + + // Update send attempt count and post a NOP_EVT. + setUpdateAttempts(getUpdateAttempts() + 1); + postNextEvent(StateModel::NOP_EVT); + } + + /// @brief Prepares the initial D2UpdateMessage + /// + /// This method overrides the NameChangeTransaction implementation to + /// provide the ability to simulate an exception throw in the build + /// request logic. + /// If the one-shot flag, simulate_build_request_exception_ is true, + /// this method will throw an exception, otherwise it will invoke the + /// base class method, providing normal functionality. + /// + /// For parameter description see the NameChangeTransaction implementation. + virtual D2UpdateMessagePtr prepNewRequest(DdnsDomainPtr domain) { + if (simulate_build_request_exception_) { + simulate_build_request_exception_ = false; + isc_throw (SimpleRemoveTransactionError, + "Simulated build requests exception"); + } + + return (NameChangeTransaction::prepNewRequest(domain)); + } + + /// @brief Simulates receiving a response + /// + /// This method simulates the completion of a DNSClient send. This allows + /// the state handler logic devoted to dealing with IO completion to be + /// fully exercised without requiring any actual IO. The two primary + /// pieces of information gleaned from IO completion are the DNSClient + /// status which indicates whether or not the IO exchange was successful + /// and the rcode, which indicates the server's reaction to the request. + /// + /// This method updates the transaction's DNS status value to that of the + /// given parameter, and then constructs and DNS update response message + /// with the given rcode value. To complete the simulation it then posts + /// a next event of IO_COMPLETED_EVT. + /// + /// @param status simulated DNSClient status + /// @param rcode simulated server response code + void fakeResponse(const DNSClient::Status& status, + const dns::Rcode& rcode) { + // Set the DNS update status. This is normally set in + // DNSClient IO completion handler. + setDnsUpdateStatus(status); + + // Construct an empty message with the given Rcode. + D2UpdateMessagePtr msg(new D2UpdateMessage(D2UpdateMessage::OUTBOUND)); + msg->setRcode(rcode); + + // Set the update response to the message. + setDnsUpdateResponse(msg); + + // Post the IO completion event. + postNextEvent(NameChangeTransaction::IO_COMPLETED_EVT); + } + + /// @brief Selects the first forward server. + /// Some state handlers require a server to have been selected. + /// This selects a server without going through the state + /// transition(s) to do so. + bool selectFwdServer() { + if (getForwardDomain()) { + initServerSelection(getForwardDomain()); + selectNextServer(); + return (getCurrentServer().get() != 0); + } + + return (false); + } + + /// @brief Selects the first reverse server. + /// Some state handlers require a server to have been selected. + /// This selects a server without going through the state + /// transition(s) to do so. + bool selectRevServer() { + if (getReverseDomain()) { + initServerSelection(getReverseDomain()); + selectNextServer(); + return (getCurrentServer().get() != 0); + } + + return (false); + } + + /// @brief One-shot flag which will simulate sendUpdate failure if true. + bool simulate_send_exception_; + + /// @brief One-shot flag which will simulate an exception when sendUpdate + /// failure if true. + bool simulate_build_request_exception_; + + using StateModel::postNextEvent; + using StateModel::setState; + using StateModel::initDictionaries; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::defineEvents; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::verifyEvents; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::defineStates; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::verifyStates; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::readyHandler; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::selectingFwdServerHandler; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::getCurrentServer; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::setDnsUpdateStatus; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::removingFwdRRsHandler; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::selectingRevServerHandler; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::removingRevPtrsHandler; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::processRemoveOkHandler; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::processRemoveFailedHandler; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::buildRemoveFwdRRsRequest; + using SimpleRemoveTransaction::buildRemoveRevPtrsRequest; +}; + +typedef boost::shared_ptr<SimpleRemoveStub> SimpleRemoveStubPtr; + +/// @brief Test fixture for testing SimpleRemoveTransaction +/// +/// Note this class uses SimpleRemoveStub class to exercise non-public +/// aspects of SimpleRemoveTransaction. +class SimpleRemoveTransactionTest : public TransactionTest { +public: + SimpleRemoveTransactionTest() { + } + + virtual ~SimpleRemoveTransactionTest() { + } + + /// @brief Creates a transaction which requests an IPv4 DNS update. + /// + /// The transaction is constructed around a predefined (i.e. "canned") + /// IPv4 NameChangeRequest. The request has both forward and reverse DNS + /// changes requested. Based upon the change mask, the transaction + /// will have either the forward, reverse, or both domains populated. + /// + /// @param change_mask determines which change directions are requested + SimpleRemoveStubPtr makeTransaction4(int change_mask) { + // Creates IPv4 remove request, forward, and reverse domains. + setupForIPv4Transaction(dhcp_ddns::CHG_REMOVE, change_mask); + + // Now create the test transaction as would occur in update manager. + return (SimpleRemoveStubPtr(new SimpleRemoveStub(io_service_, ncr_, + forward_domain_, + reverse_domain_, + cfg_mgr_))); + } + + /// @brief Creates a transaction which requests an IPv6 DNS update. + /// + /// The transaction is constructed around a predefined (i.e. "canned") + /// IPv6 NameChangeRequest. The request has both forward and reverse DNS + /// changes requested. Based upon the change mask, the transaction + /// will have either the forward, reverse, or both domains populated. + /// + /// @param change_mask determines which change directions are requested + SimpleRemoveStubPtr makeTransaction6(int change_mask) { + // Creates IPv6 remove request, forward, and reverse domains. + setupForIPv6Transaction(dhcp_ddns::CHG_REMOVE, change_mask); + + // Now create the test transaction as would occur in update manager. + return (SimpleRemoveStubPtr(new SimpleRemoveStub(io_service_, ncr_, + forward_domain_, + reverse_domain_, + cfg_mgr_))); + } + + /// @brief Create a test transaction at a known point in the state model. + /// + /// Method prepares a new test transaction and sets its state and next + /// event values to those given. This makes the transaction appear to + /// be at that point in the state model without having to transition it + /// through prerequisite states. It also provides the ability to set + /// which change directions are requested: forward change only, reverse + /// change only, or both. + /// + /// @param state value to set as the current state + /// @param event value to post as the next event + /// @param change_mask determines which change directions are requested + /// @param family selects between an IPv4 (AF_INET) and IPv6 (AF_INET6) + /// transaction. + SimpleRemoveStubPtr prepHandlerTest(unsigned int state, unsigned int event, + unsigned int change_mask = FWD_AND_REV_CHG, + short family = AF_INET) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove = (family == AF_INET ? + makeTransaction4(change_mask) : + makeTransaction6(change_mask)); + name_remove->initDictionaries(); + name_remove->postNextEvent(event); + name_remove->setState(state); + return (name_remove); + } + +}; + +/// @brief Tests SimpleRemoveTransaction construction. +/// This test verifies that: +/// 1. Construction with invalid type of request +/// 2. Valid construction functions properly +TEST(SimpleRemoveTransaction, construction) { + asiolink::IOServicePtr io_service(new isc::asiolink::IOService()); + D2CfgMgrPtr cfg_mgr(new D2CfgMgr()); + + const char* msg_str = + "{" + " \"change-type\" : 0 , " + " \"forward-change\" : true , " + " \"reverse-change\" : true , " + " \"fqdn\" : \"example.com.\" , " + " \"ip-address\" : \"192.168.2.1\" , " + " \"dhcid\" : \"0102030405060708\" , " + " \"lease-expires-on\" : \"20130121132405\" , " + " \"lease-length\" : 1300, " + " \"use-conflict-resolution\" : true " + "}"; + + dhcp_ddns::NameChangeRequestPtr ncr; + DnsServerInfoStoragePtr servers; + DdnsDomainPtr forward_domain; + DdnsDomainPtr reverse_domain; + DdnsDomainPtr empty_domain; + + ASSERT_NO_THROW(ncr = dhcp_ddns::NameChangeRequest::fromJSON(msg_str)); + ASSERT_NO_THROW(forward_domain.reset(new DdnsDomain("*", servers))); + ASSERT_NO_THROW(reverse_domain.reset(new DdnsDomain("*", servers))); + + // Verify that construction with wrong change type fails. + EXPECT_THROW(SimpleRemoveTransaction(io_service, ncr, + forward_domain, reverse_domain, cfg_mgr), + SimpleRemoveTransactionError); + + // Verify that a valid construction attempt works. + ncr->setChangeType(isc::dhcp_ddns::CHG_REMOVE); + EXPECT_NO_THROW(SimpleRemoveTransaction(io_service, ncr, + forward_domain, reverse_domain, + cfg_mgr)); +} + +/// @brief Tests event and state dictionary construction and verification. +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, dictionaryCheck) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove = makeTransaction4(FWD_AND_REV_CHG)); + // Verify that the event and state dictionary validation fails prior + // dictionary construction. + ASSERT_THROW(name_remove->verifyEvents(), StateModelError); + ASSERT_THROW(name_remove->verifyStates(), StateModelError); + + // Construct both dictionaries. + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->defineEvents()); + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->defineStates()); + + // Verify both event and state dictionaries now pass validation. + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->verifyEvents()); + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->verifyStates()); +} + +/// @brief Tests construction of a DNS update request for removing forward +/// dns RR entries. +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, buildRemoveFwdRRsRequest) { + // Create a IPv4 forward replace transaction. + // Verify the request builds without error. + // and then verify the request contents. + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove = makeTransaction4(FORWARD_CHG)); + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->buildRemoveFwdRRsRequest()); + checkSimpleRemoveFwdRRsRequest(*name_remove); + + // Create a IPv6 forward replace transaction. + // Verify the request builds without error. + // and then verify the request contents. + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove = makeTransaction6(FORWARD_CHG)); + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->buildRemoveFwdRRsRequest()); + checkSimpleRemoveFwdRRsRequest(*name_remove); +} + +/// @brief Tests the construction of a DNS update request for removing a +/// reverse dns entry. +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, buildRemoveRevPtrsRequest) { + // Create a IPv4 reverse replace transaction. + // Verify the request builds without error. + // and then verify the request contents. + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove = makeTransaction4(REVERSE_CHG)); + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->buildRemoveRevPtrsRequest()); + checkSimpleRemoveRevPtrsRequest(*name_remove); + + // Create a IPv6 reverse replace transaction. + // Verify the request builds without error. + // and then verify the request contents. + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove = makeTransaction6(REVERSE_CHG)); + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->buildRemoveRevPtrsRequest()); + checkSimpleRemoveRevPtrsRequest(*name_remove); +} + +// Tests the readyHandler functionality. +// It verifies behavior for the following scenarios: +// +// 1. Posted event is START_EVT and request includes only a forward change +// 2. Posted event is START_EVT and request includes both a forward and a +// reverse change +// 3. Posted event is START_EVT and request includes only a reverse change +// 4. Posted event is invalid +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, readyHandler) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + + // Create a transaction which includes only a forward change. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::READY_ST, + StateModel::START_EVT, FORWARD_CHG) + ); + + // Run readyHandler. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->readyHandler()); + + // Verify that a request requiring only a forward change, transitions to + // selecting a forward server. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::SELECTING_FWD_SERVER_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SELECT_SERVER_EVT); + + // Create a transaction which includes both a forward and a reverse change. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::READY_ST, + StateModel::START_EVT, FWD_AND_REV_CHG) + ); + + // Run readyHandler. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->readyHandler()); + + // Verify that a request requiring both forward and reverse, starts with + // the forward change by transitioning to selecting a forward server. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::SELECTING_FWD_SERVER_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SELECT_SERVER_EVT); + + // Create and prep a reverse only transaction. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::READY_ST, + StateModel::START_EVT, REVERSE_CHG) + ); + + // Run readyHandler. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->readyHandler()); + + // Verify that a request requiring only a reverse change, transitions to + // selecting a reverse server. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::SELECTING_REV_SERVER_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SELECT_SERVER_EVT); + + // Create and prep transaction, poised to run the handler but with an + // invalid event. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::READY_ST, + StateModel::NOP_EVT) + ); + + // Running the readyHandler should throw. + EXPECT_THROW(name_remove->readyHandler(), SimpleRemoveTransactionError); +} + + +// Tests the selectingFwdServerHandler functionality. +// It verifies behavior for the following scenarios: +// +// 1. Posted event is SELECT_SERVER_EVT +// 2. Posted event is SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT +// 3. Posted event is invalid +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, selectingFwdServerHandler) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::SELECTING_FWD_SERVER_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SELECT_SERVER_EVT) + ); + + // Call selectingFwdServerHandler enough times to select all of the + // servers in it's current domain. The first time, it will be with + // next event of SELECT_SERVER_EVT. Thereafter it will be with a next + // event of SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT. + int num_servers = name_remove->getForwardDomain()->getServers()->size(); + for (int i = 0; i < num_servers; ++i) { + SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << " num_servers: " << num_servers + << " selections:" << i); + // Run selectingFwdServerHandler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->selectingFwdServerHandler()); + + // Verify that a server was selected. + ASSERT_TRUE(name_remove->getCurrentServer()); + + // Verify that we transitioned correctly. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_FWD_RRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT); + + // Post a server IO error event. This simulates an IO error occurring + // and a need to select the new server. + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->postNextEvent(NameChangeTransaction:: + SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT)); + } + + // We should have exhausted the list of servers. Processing another + // SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT should transition us to failure. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->selectingFwdServerHandler()); + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::NO_MORE_SERVERS_EVT); + + // Create and prep transaction, poised to run the handler but with an + // invalid event. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::SELECTING_FWD_SERVER_ST, + StateModel::NOP_EVT) + ); + + // Running the handler should throw. + EXPECT_THROW(name_remove->selectingFwdServerHandler(), + SimpleRemoveTransactionError); +} + +// ************************ removingFwdRRsHandler Tests ***************** + +// Tests that removingFwdRRsHandler rejects invalid events. +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingFwdRRsHandler_InvalidEvent) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler but with + // an invalid event. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_FWD_RRS_ST, + StateModel::NOP_EVT) + ); + + // Running the handler should throw. + EXPECT_THROW(name_remove->removingFwdRRsHandler(), + SimpleRemoveTransactionError); +} + +// Tests removingFwdRRsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes only a forward change. +// Initial posted event is SERVER_SELECTED_EVT. +// The update request is sent without error. +// A server response is received which indicates successful update. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingFwdRRsHandler_FwdOnlyOK) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_FWD_RRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, FORWARD_CHG) + ); + + // Should not be an update message yet. + D2UpdateMessagePtr update_msg = name_remove->getDnsUpdateRequest(); + ASSERT_FALSE(update_msg); + + // At this point completion flags should be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // Run removingFwdRRsHandler to construct and send the request. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingFwdRRsHandler()); + + // Verify that an update message was constructed properly. + checkSimpleRemoveFwdRRsRequest(*name_remove); + + // Verify that we are still in this state and next event is NOP_EVT. + // This indicates we "sent" the message and are waiting for IO completion. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_FWD_RRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::NOP_EVT); + + // Simulate receiving a successful update response. + name_remove->fakeResponse(DNSClient::SUCCESS, dns::Rcode::NOERROR()); + + // Run removingFwdRRsHandler again to process the response. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingFwdRRsHandler()); + + // Forward completion should be true, reverse should be false. + EXPECT_TRUE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // Since it is a forward only change, we should be done. + // Verify that we transitioned correctly. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_OK_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_OK_EVT); +} + +// Tests removingFwdRRsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes a forward and reverse change. +// The update request is sent without error. +// A server response is received which indicates the update was rejected. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingFwdRRsHandler_OtherRcode) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create the transaction. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_FWD_RRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, + FWD_AND_REV_CHG) + ); + + // Select a server to satisfy log statements. + ASSERT_TRUE(name_remove->selectFwdServer()); + + // Run removingFwdRRsHandler to construct and send the request. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingFwdRRsHandler()); + + // Simulate receiving server rejection response. Per RFC, anything other + // than no error is failure (we are also treating FQDN not in use is + // success). Arbitrarily choosing refused. + name_remove->fakeResponse(DNSClient::SUCCESS, dns::Rcode::REFUSED()); + + // Run removingFwdRRsHandler again to process the response. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingFwdRRsHandler()); + + // Completion flags should still be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // We should have failed the transaction. Verify that we transitioned + // correctly. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_FAILED_EVT); +} + +// Tests removingFwdRRsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes a forward and reverse change. +// Initial posted event is SERVER_SELECTED_EVT. +// The update request send times out MAX_UPDATE_TRIES_PER_SERVER times. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingFwdRRsHandler_Timeout) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + + // Create the transaction. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_FWD_RRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, + FWD_AND_REV_CHG) + ); + + // Select a server to satisfy log statements. + ASSERT_TRUE(name_remove->selectFwdServer()); + + // Verify that we can make maximum number of update attempts permitted + // and then transition to selecting a new server. + int max_tries = NameChangeTransaction::MAX_UPDATE_TRIES_PER_SERVER; + for (int i = 1; i <= max_tries; ++i) { + // Run removingFwdRRsHandler to send the request. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingFwdRRsHandler()); + + // Simulate a server IO timeout. + name_remove->setDnsUpdateStatus(DNSClient::TIMEOUT); + name_remove->postNextEvent(NameChangeTransaction::IO_COMPLETED_EVT); + + // Run removingFwdRRsHandler again to process the response. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingFwdRRsHandler()); + + // Completion flags should be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + if (i < max_tries) { + // We should be ready to try again. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_FWD_RRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT); + } else { + // Server retries should be exhausted, time for a new server. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, SimpleRemoveTransaction::SELECTING_FWD_SERVER_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT); + } + } +} + +// Tests removingFwdRRsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes a forward and reverse change. +// Initial posted event is UPDATE_OK_EVT. +// The update request is sent but a corrupt response is received, this occurs +// MAX_UPDATE_TRIES_PER_SERVER times. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingFwdRRsHandler_InvalidResponse) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + + // Create the transaction. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_FWD_RRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_OK_EVT, FWD_AND_REV_CHG) + ); + + // Select a server to satisfy log statements. + ASSERT_TRUE(name_remove->selectFwdServer()); + + // Verify that we can make maximum number of update attempts permitted + // and then transition to selecting a new server. + int max_tries = NameChangeTransaction::MAX_UPDATE_TRIES_PER_SERVER; + for (int i = 1; i <= max_tries; ++i) { + // Run removingFwdRRsHandler to send the request. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingFwdRRsHandler()); + + // Simulate a corrupt server response. + name_remove->setDnsUpdateStatus(DNSClient::INVALID_RESPONSE); + name_remove->postNextEvent(NameChangeTransaction::IO_COMPLETED_EVT); + + // Run removingFwdRRsHandler again to process the response. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingFwdRRsHandler()); + + // Completion flags should be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + if (i < max_tries) { + // We should be ready to try again. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_FWD_RRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT); + } else { + // Server retries should be exhausted, time for a new server. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, SimpleRemoveTransaction::SELECTING_FWD_SERVER_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT); + } + } +} + + +// Tests the selectingRevServerHandler functionality. +// It verifies behavior for the following scenarios: +// +// 1. Posted event is SELECT_SERVER_EVT +// 2. Posted event is SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT +// 3. Posted event is invalid +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, selectingRevServerHandler) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::SELECTING_REV_SERVER_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SELECT_SERVER_EVT) + ); + + // Call selectingRevServerHandler enough times to select all of the + // servers in it's current domain. The first time, it will be with + // next event of SELECT_SERVER_EVT. Thereafter it will be with a next + // event of SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT. + int num_servers = name_remove->getReverseDomain()->getServers()->size(); + for (int i = 0; i < num_servers; ++i) { + SCOPED_TRACE(testing::Message() << " num_servers: " << num_servers + << " selections:" << i); + // Run selectingRevServerHandler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->selectingRevServerHandler()); + + // Verify that a server was selected. + ASSERT_TRUE(name_remove->getCurrentServer()); + + // Verify that we transitioned correctly. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT); + + // Post a server IO error event. This simulates an IO error occurring + // and a need to select the new server. + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->postNextEvent(NameChangeTransaction:: + SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT)); + } + + // We should have exhausted the list of servers. Processing another + // SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT should transition us to failure. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->selectingRevServerHandler()); + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::NO_MORE_SERVERS_EVT); + + // Create and prep transaction, poised to run the handler but with an + // invalid event. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::SELECTING_REV_SERVER_ST, + StateModel::NOP_EVT) + ); + + // Running the handler should throw. + EXPECT_THROW(name_remove->selectingRevServerHandler(), + SimpleRemoveTransactionError); +} + +//************************** removingRevPtrsHandler tests ***************** + +// Tests that removingRevPtrsHandler rejects invalid events. +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingRevPtrsHandler_InvalidEvent) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler but with + // an invalid event. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + StateModel::NOP_EVT) + ); + + // Running the handler should throw. + EXPECT_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler(), + SimpleRemoveTransactionError); +} + +// Tests removingRevPtrsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes only a reverse change. +// Initial posted event is SERVER_SELECTED_EVT. +// The update request is sent without error. +// A server response is received which indicates successful update. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingRevPtrsHandler_RevOnlyOK) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, REVERSE_CHG) + ); + + // Should not be an update message yet. + D2UpdateMessagePtr update_msg = name_remove->getDnsUpdateRequest(); + ASSERT_FALSE(update_msg); + + // At this point completion flags should be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler to construct and send the request. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Verify that an update message was constructed properly. + checkSimpleRemoveRevPtrsRequest(*name_remove); + + // Verify that we are still in this state and next event is NOP_EVT. + // This indicates we "sent" the message and are waiting for IO completion. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + StateModel::NOP_EVT); + + // Simulate receiving a successful update response. + name_remove->fakeResponse(DNSClient::SUCCESS, dns::Rcode::NOERROR()); + + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler again to process the response. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Forward completion should be false, reverse should be true. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_TRUE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // Since it is a reverse change, we should be done. + // Verify that we transitioned correctly. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_OK_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_OK_EVT); +} + +// Tests removingRevPtrsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes only a reverse change. +// Initial posted event is SERVER_SELECTED_EVT. +// The update request is sent without error. +// A server response is received which indicates FQDN is NOT in use. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingRevPtrsHandler_FqdnNotInUse) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, REVERSE_CHG) + ); + + // Should not be an update message yet. + D2UpdateMessagePtr update_msg = name_remove->getDnsUpdateRequest(); + ASSERT_FALSE(update_msg); + + // At this point completion flags should be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler to construct and send the request. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Verify that an update message was constructed properly. + checkSimpleRemoveRevPtrsRequest(*name_remove); + + // Verify that we are still in this state and next event is NOP_EVT. + // This indicates we "sent" the message and are waiting for IO completion. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + StateModel::NOP_EVT); + + // Simulate receiving a RRSET does not exist. + name_remove->fakeResponse(DNSClient::SUCCESS, dns::Rcode::NXRRSET()); + + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler again to process the response. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Forward completion should be false, reverse should be true. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_TRUE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // Since it is a reverse change, we should be done. + // Verify that we transitioned correctly. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_OK_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_OK_EVT); +} + +// Tests removingRevPtrsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes only a reverse change. +// Initial posted event is SERVER_SELECTED_EVT. +// The update request is sent without error. +// A server response is received which indicates the update was rejected. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingRevPtrsHandler_OtherRcode) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create the transaction. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, REVERSE_CHG) + ); + + // Select a server to satisfy log statements. + ASSERT_TRUE(name_remove->selectRevServer()); + + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler to construct and send the request. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Simulate receiving server rejection response. Per RFC, anything other + // than no error is failure. Arbitrarily choosing refused. + name_remove->fakeResponse(DNSClient::SUCCESS, dns::Rcode::REFUSED()); + + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler again to process the response. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Completion flags should still be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // We should have failed the transaction. Verify that we transitioned + // correctly. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_FAILED_EVT); +} + +// Tests removingRevPtrsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes only a reverse change. +// Initial posted event is SERVER_SELECTED_EVT. +// The update request send times out MAX_UPDATE_TRIES_PER_SERVER times. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingRevPtrsHandler_Timeout) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create the transaction. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, + REVERSE_CHG) + ); + + // Select a server to satisfy log statements. + ASSERT_TRUE(name_remove->selectRevServer()); + + // Verify that we can make maximum number of update attempts permitted + // and then transition to selecting a new server. + int max_tries = NameChangeTransaction::MAX_UPDATE_TRIES_PER_SERVER; + for (int i = 1; i <= max_tries; ++i) { + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler to send the request. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Simulate a server IO timeout. + name_remove->setDnsUpdateStatus(DNSClient::TIMEOUT); + name_remove->postNextEvent(NameChangeTransaction::IO_COMPLETED_EVT); + + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler again to process the response. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Completion flags should be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + if (i < max_tries) { + // We should be ready to try again. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT); + } else { + // Server retries should be exhausted, time for a new server. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::SELECTING_REV_SERVER_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT); + } + } +} + + +// Tests removingRevPtrsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes only a reverse change. +// Initial posted event is SERVER_SELECTED_EVT. +// The update request is sent but a corrupt response is received, this occurs +// MAX_UPDATE_TRIES_PER_SERVER times. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingRevPtrsHandler_CorruptResponse) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create the transaction. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, REVERSE_CHG) + ); + + // Select a server to satisfy log statements. + ASSERT_TRUE(name_remove->selectRevServer()); + + // Verify that we can make maximum number of update attempts permitted + // and then transition to selecting a new server. + int max_tries = NameChangeTransaction::MAX_UPDATE_TRIES_PER_SERVER; + for (int i = 1; i <= max_tries; ++i) { + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler to send the request. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Simulate a server corrupt response. + name_remove->setDnsUpdateStatus(DNSClient::INVALID_RESPONSE); + name_remove->postNextEvent(NameChangeTransaction::IO_COMPLETED_EVT); + + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler again to process the response. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Completion flags should be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + if (i < max_tries) { + // We should be ready to try again. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT); + } else { + // Server retries should be exhausted, time for a new server. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::SELECTING_REV_SERVER_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT); + } + } +} + +// Tests the processRemoveOkHandler functionality. +// It verifies behavior for the following scenarios: +// +// 1. Posted event is UPDATE_OK_EVT +// 2. Posted event is invalid +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, processRemoveOkHandler) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_OK_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_OK_EVT) + ); + + // Run processRemoveOkHandler. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->processRemoveOkHandler()); + + // Verify that a server was selected. + EXPECT_EQ(dhcp_ddns::ST_COMPLETED, name_remove->getNcrStatus()); + + // Verify that the model has ended. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, StateModel::END_ST, StateModel::END_EVT); + + // Create and prep transaction, poised to run the handler but with an + // invalid event. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_OK_ST, + StateModel::NOP_EVT) + ); + + // Running the handler should throw. + EXPECT_THROW(name_remove->processRemoveOkHandler(), + SimpleRemoveTransactionError); +} + +// Tests the processRemoveFailedHandler functionality. +// It verifies behavior for the following scenarios: +// +// 1. Posted event is UPDATE_FAILED_EVT +// 2. Posted event is invalid +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, processRemoveFailedHandler) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_FAILED_EVT) + ); + + // Run processRemoveFailedHandler. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->processRemoveFailedHandler()); + + // Verify that a server was selected. + EXPECT_EQ(dhcp_ddns::ST_FAILED, name_remove->getNcrStatus()); + + // Verify that the model has ended. (Remember, the transaction failed NOT + // the model. The model should have ended normally.) + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, StateModel::END_ST, StateModel::END_EVT); + + // Create and prep transaction, poised to run the handler but with an + // invalid event. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + StateModel::NOP_EVT) + ); + + // Running the handler should throw. + EXPECT_THROW(name_remove->processRemoveFailedHandler(), + SimpleRemoveTransactionError); +} + +// Tests the processRemoveFailedHandler functionality. +// It verifies behavior for posted event of NO_MORE_SERVERS_EVT. +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, processRemoveFailedHandler_NoMoreServers) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::NO_MORE_SERVERS_EVT) + ); + + // Run processRemoveFailedHandler. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->processRemoveFailedHandler()); + + // Verify that a server was selected. + EXPECT_EQ(dhcp_ddns::ST_FAILED, name_remove->getNcrStatus()); + + // Verify that the model has ended. (Remember, the transaction failed NOT + // the model. The model should have ended normally.) + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, StateModel::END_ST, StateModel::END_EVT); +} + +// Tests the processRemoveFailedHandler functionality. +// It verifies behavior for posted event of SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT. +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, processRemoveFailedHandler_ServerIOError) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_IO_ERROR_EVT) + ); + + // Run processRemoveFailedHandler. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->processRemoveFailedHandler()); + + // Verify that a server was selected. + EXPECT_EQ(dhcp_ddns::ST_FAILED, name_remove->getNcrStatus()); + + // Verify that the model has ended. (Remember, the transaction failed NOT + // the model. The model should have ended normally.) + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, StateModel::END_ST, StateModel::END_EVT); +} + +// Tests removingFwdRRsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes only a forward change. +// Initial posted event is SERVER_SELECTED_EVT. +// The send update request fails due to an unexpected exception. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingFwdRRsHandler_SendUpdateException) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_FWD_RRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, FORWARD_CHG) + ); + + name_remove->simulate_send_exception_ = true; + + // Run removingFwdRRsHandler to construct and send the request. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingFwdRRsHandler()); + + // Completion flags should be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // Since IO exceptions should be gracefully handled, any that occur + // are unanticipated, and deemed unrecoverable, so the transaction should + // be transitioned to failure. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_FAILED_EVT); +} + +// Tests removingRevPtrHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes only a reverse change. +// Initial posted event is SERVER_SELECTED_EVT. +// The send update request fails due to an unexpected exception. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingRevPtrsHandler_SendUpdateException) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, REVERSE_CHG) + ); + + name_remove->simulate_send_exception_ = true; + + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler to construct and send the request. + EXPECT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Completion flags should be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // Since IO exceptions should be gracefully handled, any that occur + // are unanticipated, and deemed unrecoverable, so the transaction should + // be transitioned to failure. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_FAILED_EVT); +} + +// Tests removingFwdRRsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes only a forward change. +// Initial posted event is SERVER_SELECTED_EVT. +// The request build fails due to an unexpected exception. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingFwdRRsHandler_BuildRequestException) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_FWD_RRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, FORWARD_CHG) + ); + + // Set the one-shot exception simulation flag. + name_remove->simulate_build_request_exception_ = true; + + // Run removingFwdRRsHandler to construct and send the request. + // This should fail with a build request throw which should be caught + // in the state handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingFwdRRsHandler()); + + // Verify we did not attempt to send anything. + EXPECT_EQ(0, name_remove->getUpdateAttempts()); + + // Completion flags should be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // Since IO exceptions should be gracefully handled, any that occur + // are unanticipated, and deemed unrecoverable, so the transaction should + // be transitioned to failure. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_FAILED_EVT); +} + +// Tests removingRevPTRsHandler with the following scenario: +// +// The request includes only a forward change. +// Initial posted event is SERVER_SELECTED_EVT. +// The request build fails due to an unexpected exception. +// +TEST_F(SimpleRemoveTransactionTest, removingRevPTRsHandler_BuildRequestException) { + SimpleRemoveStubPtr name_remove; + // Create and prep a transaction, poised to run the handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW( + name_remove = prepHandlerTest(SimpleRemoveTransaction::REMOVING_REV_PTRS_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::SERVER_SELECTED_EVT, FORWARD_CHG) + ); + + // Set the one-shot exception simulation flag. + name_remove->simulate_build_request_exception_ = true; + + // Run removingRevPtrsHandler to construct and send the request. + // This should fail with a build request throw which should be caught + // in the state handler. + ASSERT_NO_THROW(name_remove->removingRevPtrsHandler()); + + // Verify we did not attempt to send anything. + EXPECT_EQ(0, name_remove->getUpdateAttempts()); + + // Completion flags should be false. + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getForwardChangeCompleted()); + EXPECT_FALSE(name_remove->getReverseChangeCompleted()); + + // Since IO exceptions should be gracefully handled, any that occur + // are unanticipated, and deemed unrecoverable, so the transaction should + // be transitioned to failure. + CHECK_CONTEXT(name_remove, NameChangeTransaction::PROCESS_TRANS_FAILED_ST, + NameChangeTransaction::UPDATE_FAILED_EVT); +} + +} |