summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/lib/eval/tests
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/lib/eval/tests')
-rw-r--r--src/lib/eval/tests/Makefile.am46
-rw-r--r--src/lib/eval/tests/Makefile.in1098
-rw-r--r--src/lib/eval/tests/boolean_unittest.cc64
-rw-r--r--src/lib/eval/tests/context_unittest.cc2118
-rw-r--r--src/lib/eval/tests/dependency_unittest.cc103
-rw-r--r--src/lib/eval/tests/evaluate_unittest.cc515
-rw-r--r--src/lib/eval/tests/run_unittests.cc21
-rw-r--r--src/lib/eval/tests/token_unittest.cc3487
8 files changed, 7452 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/lib/eval/tests/Makefile.am b/src/lib/eval/tests/Makefile.am
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..13ba097
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/lib/eval/tests/Makefile.am
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+SUBDIRS = .
+
+AM_CPPFLAGS = -I$(top_builddir)/src/lib -I$(top_srcdir)/src/lib
+AM_CPPFLAGS += $(BOOST_INCLUDES)
+AM_CPPFLAGS += -DLOGGING_SPEC_FILE=\"$(abs_top_srcdir)/src/lib/dhcpsrv/logging.spec\"
+
+AM_CXXFLAGS = $(KEA_CXXFLAGS)
+
+if USE_STATIC_LINK
+AM_LDFLAGS = -static
+endif
+
+CLEANFILES = *.gcno *.gcda
+
+TESTS_ENVIRONMENT = $(LIBTOOL) --mode=execute $(VALGRIND_COMMAND)
+
+TESTS =
+if HAVE_GTEST
+
+TESTS += libeval_unittests
+
+libeval_unittests_SOURCES = boolean_unittest.cc
+libeval_unittests_SOURCES += context_unittest.cc
+libeval_unittests_SOURCES += dependency_unittest.cc
+libeval_unittests_SOURCES += evaluate_unittest.cc
+libeval_unittests_SOURCES += token_unittest.cc
+libeval_unittests_SOURCES += run_unittests.cc
+libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS = $(AM_CXXFLAGS)
+libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS = $(AM_CPPFLAGS) $(GTEST_INCLUDES)
+libeval_unittests_LDFLAGS = $(AM_LDFLAGS) $(CRYPTO_LDFLAGS) $(GTEST_LDFLAGS)
+libeval_unittests_LDADD = $(top_builddir)/src/lib/eval/libkea-eval.la
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(top_builddir)/src/lib/dhcp/libkea-dhcp++.la
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(top_builddir)/src/lib/hooks/libkea-hooks.la
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(top_builddir)/src/lib/testutils/libkea-testutils.la
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(top_builddir)/src/lib/cc/libkea-cc.la
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(top_builddir)/src/lib/asiolink/libkea-asiolink.la
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(top_builddir)/src/lib/dns/libkea-dns++.la
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(top_builddir)/src/lib/cryptolink/libkea-cryptolink.la
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(top_builddir)/src/lib/log/libkea-log.la
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(top_builddir)/src/lib/util/libkea-util.la
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(top_builddir)/src/lib/exceptions/libkea-exceptions.la
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(CRYPTO_LIBS) $(LOG4CPLUS_LIBS)
+libeval_unittests_LDADD += $(BOOST_LIBS) $(GTEST_LDADD)
+endif
+
+noinst_PROGRAMS = $(TESTS)
diff --git a/src/lib/eval/tests/Makefile.in b/src/lib/eval/tests/Makefile.in
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6aa01a2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/lib/eval/tests/Makefile.in
@@ -0,0 +1,1098 @@
+# Makefile.in generated by automake 1.16.1 from Makefile.am.
+# @configure_input@
+
+# Copyright (C) 1994-2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+# This Makefile.in is free software; the Free Software Foundation
+# gives unlimited permission to copy and/or distribute it,
+# with or without modifications, as long as this notice is preserved.
+
+# This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY, to the extent permitted by law; without
+# even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
+# PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
+
+@SET_MAKE@
+
+VPATH = @srcdir@
+am__is_gnu_make = { \
+ if test -z '$(MAKELEVEL)'; then \
+ false; \
+ elif test -n '$(MAKE_HOST)'; then \
+ true; \
+ elif test -n '$(MAKE_VERSION)' && test -n '$(CURDIR)'; then \
+ true; \
+ else \
+ false; \
+ fi; \
+}
+am__make_running_with_option = \
+ case $${target_option-} in \
+ ?) ;; \
+ *) echo "am__make_running_with_option: internal error: invalid" \
+ "target option '$${target_option-}' specified" >&2; \
+ exit 1;; \
+ esac; \
+ has_opt=no; \
+ sane_makeflags=$$MAKEFLAGS; \
+ if $(am__is_gnu_make); then \
+ sane_makeflags=$$MFLAGS; \
+ else \
+ case $$MAKEFLAGS in \
+ *\\[\ \ ]*) \
+ bs=\\; \
+ sane_makeflags=`printf '%s\n' "$$MAKEFLAGS" \
+ | sed "s/$$bs$$bs[$$bs $$bs ]*//g"`;; \
+ esac; \
+ fi; \
+ skip_next=no; \
+ strip_trailopt () \
+ { \
+ flg=`printf '%s\n' "$$flg" | sed "s/$$1.*$$//"`; \
+ }; \
+ for flg in $$sane_makeflags; do \
+ test $$skip_next = yes && { skip_next=no; continue; }; \
+ case $$flg in \
+ *=*|--*) continue;; \
+ -*I) strip_trailopt 'I'; skip_next=yes;; \
+ -*I?*) strip_trailopt 'I';; \
+ -*O) strip_trailopt 'O'; skip_next=yes;; \
+ -*O?*) strip_trailopt 'O';; \
+ -*l) strip_trailopt 'l'; skip_next=yes;; \
+ -*l?*) strip_trailopt 'l';; \
+ -[dEDm]) skip_next=yes;; \
+ -[JT]) skip_next=yes;; \
+ esac; \
+ case $$flg in \
+ *$$target_option*) has_opt=yes; break;; \
+ esac; \
+ done; \
+ test $$has_opt = yes
+am__make_dryrun = (target_option=n; $(am__make_running_with_option))
+am__make_keepgoing = (target_option=k; $(am__make_running_with_option))
+pkgdatadir = $(datadir)/@PACKAGE@
+pkgincludedir = $(includedir)/@PACKAGE@
+pkglibdir = $(libdir)/@PACKAGE@
+pkglibexecdir = $(libexecdir)/@PACKAGE@
+am__cd = CDPATH="$${ZSH_VERSION+.}$(PATH_SEPARATOR)" && cd
+install_sh_DATA = $(install_sh) -c -m 644
+install_sh_PROGRAM = $(install_sh) -c
+install_sh_SCRIPT = $(install_sh) -c
+INSTALL_HEADER = $(INSTALL_DATA)
+transform = $(program_transform_name)
+NORMAL_INSTALL = :
+PRE_INSTALL = :
+POST_INSTALL = :
+NORMAL_UNINSTALL = :
+PRE_UNINSTALL = :
+POST_UNINSTALL = :
+build_triplet = @build@
+host_triplet = @host@
+TESTS = $(am__EXEEXT_1)
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@am__append_1 = libeval_unittests
+noinst_PROGRAMS = $(am__EXEEXT_2)
+subdir = src/lib/eval/tests
+ACLOCAL_M4 = $(top_srcdir)/aclocal.m4
+am__aclocal_m4_deps = $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ax_boost_for_kea.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ax_cpp11.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ax_cpp20.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ax_crypto.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ax_find_library.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ax_gssapi.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ax_gtest.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ax_isc_rpath.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ax_netconf.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/libtool.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ltoptions.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ltsugar.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/ltversion.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/m4macros/lt~obsolete.m4 \
+ $(top_srcdir)/configure.ac
+am__configure_deps = $(am__aclocal_m4_deps) $(CONFIGURE_DEPENDENCIES) \
+ $(ACLOCAL_M4)
+DIST_COMMON = $(srcdir)/Makefile.am $(am__DIST_COMMON)
+mkinstalldirs = $(install_sh) -d
+CONFIG_HEADER = $(top_builddir)/config.h
+CONFIG_CLEAN_FILES =
+CONFIG_CLEAN_VPATH_FILES =
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@am__EXEEXT_1 = libeval_unittests$(EXEEXT)
+am__EXEEXT_2 = $(am__EXEEXT_1)
+PROGRAMS = $(noinst_PROGRAMS)
+am__libeval_unittests_SOURCES_DIST = boolean_unittest.cc \
+ context_unittest.cc dependency_unittest.cc \
+ evaluate_unittest.cc token_unittest.cc run_unittests.cc
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@am_libeval_unittests_OBJECTS = \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.$(OBJEXT) \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ libeval_unittests-context_unittest.$(OBJEXT) \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.$(OBJEXT) \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.$(OBJEXT) \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ libeval_unittests-token_unittest.$(OBJEXT) \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ libeval_unittests-run_unittests.$(OBJEXT)
+libeval_unittests_OBJECTS = $(am_libeval_unittests_OBJECTS)
+am__DEPENDENCIES_1 =
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@libeval_unittests_DEPENDENCIES = \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/eval/libkea-eval.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/dhcp/libkea-dhcp++.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/hooks/libkea-hooks.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/testutils/libkea-testutils.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/cc/libkea-cc.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/asiolink/libkea-asiolink.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/dns/libkea-dns++.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/cryptolink/libkea-cryptolink.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/log/libkea-log.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/util/libkea-util.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/exceptions/libkea-exceptions.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(am__DEPENDENCIES_1) $(am__DEPENDENCIES_1) \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(am__DEPENDENCIES_1) $(am__DEPENDENCIES_1)
+AM_V_lt = $(am__v_lt_@AM_V@)
+am__v_lt_ = $(am__v_lt_@AM_DEFAULT_V@)
+am__v_lt_0 = --silent
+am__v_lt_1 =
+libeval_unittests_LINK = $(LIBTOOL) $(AM_V_lt) --tag=CXX \
+ $(AM_LIBTOOLFLAGS) $(LIBTOOLFLAGS) --mode=link $(CXXLD) \
+ $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) \
+ $(libeval_unittests_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
+AM_V_P = $(am__v_P_@AM_V@)
+am__v_P_ = $(am__v_P_@AM_DEFAULT_V@)
+am__v_P_0 = false
+am__v_P_1 = :
+AM_V_GEN = $(am__v_GEN_@AM_V@)
+am__v_GEN_ = $(am__v_GEN_@AM_DEFAULT_V@)
+am__v_GEN_0 = @echo " GEN " $@;
+am__v_GEN_1 =
+AM_V_at = $(am__v_at_@AM_V@)
+am__v_at_ = $(am__v_at_@AM_DEFAULT_V@)
+am__v_at_0 = @
+am__v_at_1 =
+DEFAULT_INCLUDES = -I.@am__isrc@ -I$(top_builddir)
+depcomp = $(SHELL) $(top_srcdir)/depcomp
+am__maybe_remake_depfiles = depfiles
+am__depfiles_remade = \
+ ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.Po \
+ ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-context_unittest.Po \
+ ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.Po \
+ ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.Po \
+ ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-run_unittests.Po \
+ ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-token_unittest.Po
+am__mv = mv -f
+CXXCOMPILE = $(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) \
+ $(AM_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(AM_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS)
+LTCXXCOMPILE = $(LIBTOOL) $(AM_V_lt) --tag=CXX $(AM_LIBTOOLFLAGS) \
+ $(LIBTOOLFLAGS) --mode=compile $(CXX) $(DEFS) \
+ $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(AM_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) \
+ $(AM_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS)
+AM_V_CXX = $(am__v_CXX_@AM_V@)
+am__v_CXX_ = $(am__v_CXX_@AM_DEFAULT_V@)
+am__v_CXX_0 = @echo " CXX " $@;
+am__v_CXX_1 =
+CXXLD = $(CXX)
+CXXLINK = $(LIBTOOL) $(AM_V_lt) --tag=CXX $(AM_LIBTOOLFLAGS) \
+ $(LIBTOOLFLAGS) --mode=link $(CXXLD) $(AM_CXXFLAGS) \
+ $(CXXFLAGS) $(AM_LDFLAGS) $(LDFLAGS) -o $@
+AM_V_CXXLD = $(am__v_CXXLD_@AM_V@)
+am__v_CXXLD_ = $(am__v_CXXLD_@AM_DEFAULT_V@)
+am__v_CXXLD_0 = @echo " CXXLD " $@;
+am__v_CXXLD_1 =
+SOURCES = $(libeval_unittests_SOURCES)
+DIST_SOURCES = $(am__libeval_unittests_SOURCES_DIST)
+RECURSIVE_TARGETS = all-recursive check-recursive cscopelist-recursive \
+ ctags-recursive dvi-recursive html-recursive info-recursive \
+ install-data-recursive install-dvi-recursive \
+ install-exec-recursive install-html-recursive \
+ install-info-recursive install-pdf-recursive \
+ install-ps-recursive install-recursive installcheck-recursive \
+ installdirs-recursive pdf-recursive ps-recursive \
+ tags-recursive uninstall-recursive
+am__can_run_installinfo = \
+ case $$AM_UPDATE_INFO_DIR in \
+ n|no|NO) false;; \
+ *) (install-info --version) >/dev/null 2>&1;; \
+ esac
+RECURSIVE_CLEAN_TARGETS = mostlyclean-recursive clean-recursive \
+ distclean-recursive maintainer-clean-recursive
+am__recursive_targets = \
+ $(RECURSIVE_TARGETS) \
+ $(RECURSIVE_CLEAN_TARGETS) \
+ $(am__extra_recursive_targets)
+AM_RECURSIVE_TARGETS = $(am__recursive_targets:-recursive=) TAGS CTAGS \
+ distdir distdir-am
+am__tagged_files = $(HEADERS) $(SOURCES) $(TAGS_FILES) $(LISP)
+# Read a list of newline-separated strings from the standard input,
+# and print each of them once, without duplicates. Input order is
+# *not* preserved.
+am__uniquify_input = $(AWK) '\
+ BEGIN { nonempty = 0; } \
+ { items[$$0] = 1; nonempty = 1; } \
+ END { if (nonempty) { for (i in items) print i; }; } \
+'
+# Make sure the list of sources is unique. This is necessary because,
+# e.g., the same source file might be shared among _SOURCES variables
+# for different programs/libraries.
+am__define_uniq_tagged_files = \
+ list='$(am__tagged_files)'; \
+ unique=`for i in $$list; do \
+ if test -f "$$i"; then echo $$i; else echo $(srcdir)/$$i; fi; \
+ done | $(am__uniquify_input)`
+ETAGS = etags
+CTAGS = ctags
+am__tty_colors_dummy = \
+ mgn= red= grn= lgn= blu= brg= std=; \
+ am__color_tests=no
+am__tty_colors = { \
+ $(am__tty_colors_dummy); \
+ if test "X$(AM_COLOR_TESTS)" = Xno; then \
+ am__color_tests=no; \
+ elif test "X$(AM_COLOR_TESTS)" = Xalways; then \
+ am__color_tests=yes; \
+ elif test "X$$TERM" != Xdumb && { test -t 1; } 2>/dev/null; then \
+ am__color_tests=yes; \
+ fi; \
+ if test $$am__color_tests = yes; then \
+ red=''; \
+ grn=''; \
+ lgn=''; \
+ blu=''; \
+ mgn=''; \
+ brg=''; \
+ std=''; \
+ fi; \
+}
+DIST_SUBDIRS = $(SUBDIRS)
+am__DIST_COMMON = $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(top_srcdir)/depcomp
+DISTFILES = $(DIST_COMMON) $(DIST_SOURCES) $(TEXINFOS) $(EXTRA_DIST)
+am__relativize = \
+ dir0=`pwd`; \
+ sed_first='s,^\([^/]*\)/.*$$,\1,'; \
+ sed_rest='s,^[^/]*/*,,'; \
+ sed_last='s,^.*/\([^/]*\)$$,\1,'; \
+ sed_butlast='s,/*[^/]*$$,,'; \
+ while test -n "$$dir1"; do \
+ first=`echo "$$dir1" | sed -e "$$sed_first"`; \
+ if test "$$first" != "."; then \
+ if test "$$first" = ".."; then \
+ dir2=`echo "$$dir0" | sed -e "$$sed_last"`/"$$dir2"; \
+ dir0=`echo "$$dir0" | sed -e "$$sed_butlast"`; \
+ else \
+ first2=`echo "$$dir2" | sed -e "$$sed_first"`; \
+ if test "$$first2" = "$$first"; then \
+ dir2=`echo "$$dir2" | sed -e "$$sed_rest"`; \
+ else \
+ dir2="../$$dir2"; \
+ fi; \
+ dir0="$$dir0"/"$$first"; \
+ fi; \
+ fi; \
+ dir1=`echo "$$dir1" | sed -e "$$sed_rest"`; \
+ done; \
+ reldir="$$dir2"
+ACLOCAL = @ACLOCAL@
+AMTAR = @AMTAR@
+AM_DEFAULT_VERBOSITY = @AM_DEFAULT_VERBOSITY@
+AR = @AR@
+ASCIIDOC = @ASCIIDOC@
+AUTOCONF = @AUTOCONF@
+AUTOHEADER = @AUTOHEADER@
+AUTOMAKE = @AUTOMAKE@
+AWK = @AWK@
+BOOST_INCLUDES = @BOOST_INCLUDES@
+BOOST_LIBS = @BOOST_LIBS@
+BOTAN_TOOL = @BOTAN_TOOL@
+CC = @CC@
+CCDEPMODE = @CCDEPMODE@
+CFLAGS = @CFLAGS@
+CONTRIB_DIR = @CONTRIB_DIR@
+CPP = @CPP@
+CPPFLAGS = @CPPFLAGS@
+CRYPTO_CFLAGS = @CRYPTO_CFLAGS@
+CRYPTO_INCLUDES = @CRYPTO_INCLUDES@
+CRYPTO_LDFLAGS = @CRYPTO_LDFLAGS@
+CRYPTO_LIBS = @CRYPTO_LIBS@
+CRYPTO_PACKAGE = @CRYPTO_PACKAGE@
+CRYPTO_RPATH = @CRYPTO_RPATH@
+CXX = @CXX@
+CXXCPP = @CXXCPP@
+CXXDEPMODE = @CXXDEPMODE@
+CXXFLAGS = @CXXFLAGS@
+CYGPATH_W = @CYGPATH_W@
+DEFS = @DEFS@
+DEPDIR = @DEPDIR@
+DISTCHECK_BOOST_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_BOOST_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_CONTRIB_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_CONTRIB_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_CRYPTO_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_CRYPTO_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_GSSAPI_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_GSSAPI_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_GTEST_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_GTEST_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_KEA_SHELL_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_KEA_SHELL_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_LIBYANGCPP_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_LIBYANGCPP_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_LIBYANG_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_LIBYANG_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_LOG4CPLUS_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_LOG4CPLUS_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_MYSQL_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_MYSQL_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_PERFDHCP_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_PERFDHCP_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_PGSQL_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_PGSQL_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_PREMIUM_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_PREMIUM_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_SYSREPOCPP_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_SYSREPOCPP_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DISTCHECK_SYSREPO_CONFIGURE_FLAG = @DISTCHECK_SYSREPO_CONFIGURE_FLAG@
+DLLTOOL = @DLLTOOL@
+DSYMUTIL = @DSYMUTIL@
+DUMPBIN = @DUMPBIN@
+ECHO_C = @ECHO_C@
+ECHO_N = @ECHO_N@
+ECHO_T = @ECHO_T@
+EGREP = @EGREP@
+EXEEXT = @EXEEXT@
+FGREP = @FGREP@
+GENHTML = @GENHTML@
+GREP = @GREP@
+GSSAPI_CFLAGS = @GSSAPI_CFLAGS@
+GSSAPI_LIBS = @GSSAPI_LIBS@
+GTEST_CONFIG = @GTEST_CONFIG@
+GTEST_INCLUDES = @GTEST_INCLUDES@
+GTEST_LDADD = @GTEST_LDADD@
+GTEST_LDFLAGS = @GTEST_LDFLAGS@
+GTEST_SOURCE = @GTEST_SOURCE@
+HAVE_NETCONF = @HAVE_NETCONF@
+INSTALL = @INSTALL@
+INSTALL_DATA = @INSTALL_DATA@
+INSTALL_PROGRAM = @INSTALL_PROGRAM@
+INSTALL_SCRIPT = @INSTALL_SCRIPT@
+INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM = @INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM@
+KEA_CXXFLAGS = @KEA_CXXFLAGS@
+KEA_SRCID = @KEA_SRCID@
+KRB5_CONFIG = @KRB5_CONFIG@
+LCOV = @LCOV@
+LD = @LD@
+LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
+LEX = @LEX@
+LEXLIB = @LEXLIB@
+LEX_OUTPUT_ROOT = @LEX_OUTPUT_ROOT@
+LIBOBJS = @LIBOBJS@
+LIBS = @LIBS@
+LIBTOOL = @LIBTOOL@
+LIBYANGCPP_CPPFLAGS = @LIBYANGCPP_CPPFLAGS@
+LIBYANGCPP_INCLUDEDIR = @LIBYANGCPP_INCLUDEDIR@
+LIBYANGCPP_LIBS = @LIBYANGCPP_LIBS@
+LIBYANGCPP_PREFIX = @LIBYANGCPP_PREFIX@
+LIBYANGCPP_VERSION = @LIBYANGCPP_VERSION@
+LIBYANG_CPPFLAGS = @LIBYANG_CPPFLAGS@
+LIBYANG_INCLUDEDIR = @LIBYANG_INCLUDEDIR@
+LIBYANG_LIBS = @LIBYANG_LIBS@
+LIBYANG_PREFIX = @LIBYANG_PREFIX@
+LIBYANG_VERSION = @LIBYANG_VERSION@
+LIPO = @LIPO@
+LN_S = @LN_S@
+LOG4CPLUS_INCLUDES = @LOG4CPLUS_INCLUDES@
+LOG4CPLUS_LIBS = @LOG4CPLUS_LIBS@
+LTLIBOBJS = @LTLIBOBJS@
+LT_SYS_LIBRARY_PATH = @LT_SYS_LIBRARY_PATH@
+MAKEINFO = @MAKEINFO@
+MANIFEST_TOOL = @MANIFEST_TOOL@
+MKDIR_P = @MKDIR_P@
+MYSQL_CPPFLAGS = @MYSQL_CPPFLAGS@
+MYSQL_LIBS = @MYSQL_LIBS@
+NM = @NM@
+NMEDIT = @NMEDIT@
+OBJDUMP = @OBJDUMP@
+OBJEXT = @OBJEXT@
+OTOOL = @OTOOL@
+OTOOL64 = @OTOOL64@
+PACKAGE = @PACKAGE@
+PACKAGE_BUGREPORT = @PACKAGE_BUGREPORT@
+PACKAGE_NAME = @PACKAGE_NAME@
+PACKAGE_STRING = @PACKAGE_STRING@
+PACKAGE_TARNAME = @PACKAGE_TARNAME@
+PACKAGE_URL = @PACKAGE_URL@
+PACKAGE_VERSION = @PACKAGE_VERSION@
+PACKAGE_VERSION_TYPE = @PACKAGE_VERSION_TYPE@
+PATH_SEPARATOR = @PATH_SEPARATOR@
+PDFLATEX = @PDFLATEX@
+PERL = @PERL@
+PGSQL_CPPFLAGS = @PGSQL_CPPFLAGS@
+PGSQL_LIBS = @PGSQL_LIBS@
+PKGPYTHONDIR = @PKGPYTHONDIR@
+PKG_CONFIG = @PKG_CONFIG@
+PLANTUML = @PLANTUML@
+PREMIUM_DIR = @PREMIUM_DIR@
+PYTHON = @PYTHON@
+PYTHON_EXEC_PREFIX = @PYTHON_EXEC_PREFIX@
+PYTHON_PLATFORM = @PYTHON_PLATFORM@
+PYTHON_PREFIX = @PYTHON_PREFIX@
+PYTHON_VERSION = @PYTHON_VERSION@
+RANLIB = @RANLIB@
+SED = @SED@
+SEP = @SEP@
+SET_MAKE = @SET_MAKE@
+SHELL = @SHELL@
+SPHINXBUILD = @SPHINXBUILD@
+SRPD_PLUGINS_PATH = @SRPD_PLUGINS_PATH@
+SR_PLUGINS_PATH = @SR_PLUGINS_PATH@
+SR_REPO_PATH = @SR_REPO_PATH@
+STRIP = @STRIP@
+SYSREPOCPP_CPPFLAGS = @SYSREPOCPP_CPPFLAGS@
+SYSREPOCPP_INCLUDEDIR = @SYSREPOCPP_INCLUDEDIR@
+SYSREPOCPP_LIBS = @SYSREPOCPP_LIBS@
+SYSREPOCPP_PREFIX = @SYSREPOCPP_PREFIX@
+SYSREPOCPP_VERSION = @SYSREPOCPP_VERSION@
+SYSREPO_CPPFLAGS = @SYSREPO_CPPFLAGS@
+SYSREPO_INCLUDEDIR = @SYSREPO_INCLUDEDIR@
+SYSREPO_LIBS = @SYSREPO_LIBS@
+SYSREPO_PREFIX = @SYSREPO_PREFIX@
+SYSREPO_VERSION = @SYSREPO_VERSION@
+USE_LCOV = @USE_LCOV@
+VALGRIND = @VALGRIND@
+VERSION = @VERSION@
+WARNING_GCC_44_STRICT_ALIASING_CFLAG = @WARNING_GCC_44_STRICT_ALIASING_CFLAG@
+YACC = @YACC@
+abs_builddir = @abs_builddir@
+abs_srcdir = @abs_srcdir@
+abs_top_builddir = @abs_top_builddir@
+abs_top_srcdir = @abs_top_srcdir@
+ac_ct_AR = @ac_ct_AR@
+ac_ct_CC = @ac_ct_CC@
+ac_ct_CXX = @ac_ct_CXX@
+ac_ct_DUMPBIN = @ac_ct_DUMPBIN@
+am__include = @am__include@
+am__leading_dot = @am__leading_dot@
+am__quote = @am__quote@
+am__tar = @am__tar@
+am__untar = @am__untar@
+bindir = @bindir@
+build = @build@
+build_alias = @build_alias@
+build_cpu = @build_cpu@
+build_os = @build_os@
+build_vendor = @build_vendor@
+builddir = @builddir@
+datadir = @datadir@
+datarootdir = @datarootdir@
+docdir = @docdir@
+dvidir = @dvidir@
+exec_prefix = @exec_prefix@
+host = @host@
+host_alias = @host_alias@
+host_cpu = @host_cpu@
+host_os = @host_os@
+host_vendor = @host_vendor@
+htmldir = @htmldir@
+includedir = @includedir@
+infodir = @infodir@
+install_sh = @install_sh@
+libdir = @libdir@
+libexecdir = @libexecdir@
+localedir = @localedir@
+localstatedir = @localstatedir@
+mandir = @mandir@
+mkdir_p = @mkdir_p@
+oldincludedir = @oldincludedir@
+pdfdir = @pdfdir@
+pkgpyexecdir = @pkgpyexecdir@
+pkgpythondir = @pkgpythondir@
+prefix = @prefix@
+program_transform_name = @program_transform_name@
+psdir = @psdir@
+pyexecdir = @pyexecdir@
+pythondir = @pythondir@
+runstatedir = @runstatedir@
+sbindir = @sbindir@
+sharedstatedir = @sharedstatedir@
+srcdir = @srcdir@
+sysconfdir = @sysconfdir@
+target_alias = @target_alias@
+top_build_prefix = @top_build_prefix@
+top_builddir = @top_builddir@
+top_srcdir = @top_srcdir@
+SUBDIRS = .
+AM_CPPFLAGS = -I$(top_builddir)/src/lib -I$(top_srcdir)/src/lib \
+ $(BOOST_INCLUDES) \
+ -DLOGGING_SPEC_FILE=\"$(abs_top_srcdir)/src/lib/dhcpsrv/logging.spec\"
+AM_CXXFLAGS = $(KEA_CXXFLAGS)
+@USE_STATIC_LINK_TRUE@AM_LDFLAGS = -static
+CLEANFILES = *.gcno *.gcda
+TESTS_ENVIRONMENT = $(LIBTOOL) --mode=execute $(VALGRIND_COMMAND)
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@libeval_unittests_SOURCES = boolean_unittest.cc \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ context_unittest.cc dependency_unittest.cc \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ evaluate_unittest.cc token_unittest.cc \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ run_unittests.cc
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS = $(AM_CXXFLAGS)
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS = $(AM_CPPFLAGS) $(GTEST_INCLUDES)
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@libeval_unittests_LDFLAGS = $(AM_LDFLAGS) $(CRYPTO_LDFLAGS) $(GTEST_LDFLAGS)
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@libeval_unittests_LDADD = \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/eval/libkea-eval.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/dhcp/libkea-dhcp++.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/hooks/libkea-hooks.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/testutils/libkea-testutils.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/cc/libkea-cc.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/asiolink/libkea-asiolink.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/dns/libkea-dns++.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/cryptolink/libkea-cryptolink.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/log/libkea-log.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/util/libkea-util.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(top_builddir)/src/lib/exceptions/libkea-exceptions.la \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(CRYPTO_LIBS) $(LOG4CPLUS_LIBS) \
+@HAVE_GTEST_TRUE@ $(BOOST_LIBS) $(GTEST_LDADD)
+all: all-recursive
+
+.SUFFIXES:
+.SUFFIXES: .cc .lo .o .obj
+$(srcdir)/Makefile.in: $(srcdir)/Makefile.am $(am__configure_deps)
+ @for dep in $?; do \
+ case '$(am__configure_deps)' in \
+ *$$dep*) \
+ ( cd $(top_builddir) && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) am--refresh ) \
+ && { if test -f $@; then exit 0; else break; fi; }; \
+ exit 1;; \
+ esac; \
+ done; \
+ echo ' cd $(top_srcdir) && $(AUTOMAKE) --foreign src/lib/eval/tests/Makefile'; \
+ $(am__cd) $(top_srcdir) && \
+ $(AUTOMAKE) --foreign src/lib/eval/tests/Makefile
+Makefile: $(srcdir)/Makefile.in $(top_builddir)/config.status
+ @case '$?' in \
+ *config.status*) \
+ cd $(top_builddir) && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) am--refresh;; \
+ *) \
+ echo ' cd $(top_builddir) && $(SHELL) ./config.status $(subdir)/$@ $(am__maybe_remake_depfiles)'; \
+ cd $(top_builddir) && $(SHELL) ./config.status $(subdir)/$@ $(am__maybe_remake_depfiles);; \
+ esac;
+
+$(top_builddir)/config.status: $(top_srcdir)/configure $(CONFIG_STATUS_DEPENDENCIES)
+ cd $(top_builddir) && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) am--refresh
+
+$(top_srcdir)/configure: $(am__configure_deps)
+ cd $(top_builddir) && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) am--refresh
+$(ACLOCAL_M4): $(am__aclocal_m4_deps)
+ cd $(top_builddir) && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) am--refresh
+$(am__aclocal_m4_deps):
+
+clean-noinstPROGRAMS:
+ @list='$(noinst_PROGRAMS)'; test -n "$$list" || exit 0; \
+ echo " rm -f" $$list; \
+ rm -f $$list || exit $$?; \
+ test -n "$(EXEEXT)" || exit 0; \
+ list=`for p in $$list; do echo "$$p"; done | sed 's/$(EXEEXT)$$//'`; \
+ echo " rm -f" $$list; \
+ rm -f $$list
+
+libeval_unittests$(EXEEXT): $(libeval_unittests_OBJECTS) $(libeval_unittests_DEPENDENCIES) $(EXTRA_libeval_unittests_DEPENDENCIES)
+ @rm -f libeval_unittests$(EXEEXT)
+ $(AM_V_CXXLD)$(libeval_unittests_LINK) $(libeval_unittests_OBJECTS) $(libeval_unittests_LDADD) $(LIBS)
+
+mostlyclean-compile:
+ -rm -f *.$(OBJEXT)
+
+distclean-compile:
+ -rm -f *.tab.c
+
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.Po@am__quote@ # am--include-marker
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-context_unittest.Po@am__quote@ # am--include-marker
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.Po@am__quote@ # am--include-marker
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.Po@am__quote@ # am--include-marker
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-run_unittests.Po@am__quote@ # am--include-marker
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__include@ @am__quote@./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-token_unittest.Po@am__quote@ # am--include-marker
+
+$(am__depfiles_remade):
+ @$(MKDIR_P) $(@D)
+ @echo '# dummy' >$@-t && $(am__mv) $@-t $@
+
+am--depfiles: $(am__depfiles_remade)
+
+.cc.o:
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXXCOMPILE) -MT $@ -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/$*.Tpo -c -o $@ $<
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/$*.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/$*.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXXCOMPILE) -c -o $@ $<
+
+.cc.obj:
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXXCOMPILE) -MT $@ -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/$*.Tpo -c -o $@ `$(CYGPATH_W) '$<'`
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/$*.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/$*.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='$<' object='$@' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXXCOMPILE) -c -o $@ `$(CYGPATH_W) '$<'`
+
+.cc.lo:
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(LTCXXCOMPILE) -MT $@ -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/$*.Tpo -c -o $@ $<
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/$*.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/$*.Plo
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='$<' object='$@' libtool=yes @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(LTCXXCOMPILE) -c -o $@ $<
+
+libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.o: boolean_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.o -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.o `test -f 'boolean_unittest.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`boolean_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='boolean_unittest.cc' object='libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.o' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.o `test -f 'boolean_unittest.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`boolean_unittest.cc
+
+libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.obj: boolean_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.obj -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.obj `if test -f 'boolean_unittest.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'boolean_unittest.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/boolean_unittest.cc'; fi`
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='boolean_unittest.cc' object='libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.obj' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.obj `if test -f 'boolean_unittest.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'boolean_unittest.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/boolean_unittest.cc'; fi`
+
+libeval_unittests-context_unittest.o: context_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-context_unittest.o -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-context_unittest.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-context_unittest.o `test -f 'context_unittest.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`context_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-context_unittest.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-context_unittest.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='context_unittest.cc' object='libeval_unittests-context_unittest.o' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-context_unittest.o `test -f 'context_unittest.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`context_unittest.cc
+
+libeval_unittests-context_unittest.obj: context_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-context_unittest.obj -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-context_unittest.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-context_unittest.obj `if test -f 'context_unittest.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'context_unittest.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/context_unittest.cc'; fi`
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-context_unittest.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-context_unittest.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='context_unittest.cc' object='libeval_unittests-context_unittest.obj' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-context_unittest.obj `if test -f 'context_unittest.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'context_unittest.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/context_unittest.cc'; fi`
+
+libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.o: dependency_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.o -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.o `test -f 'dependency_unittest.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`dependency_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='dependency_unittest.cc' object='libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.o' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.o `test -f 'dependency_unittest.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`dependency_unittest.cc
+
+libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.obj: dependency_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.obj -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.obj `if test -f 'dependency_unittest.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'dependency_unittest.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/dependency_unittest.cc'; fi`
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='dependency_unittest.cc' object='libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.obj' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.obj `if test -f 'dependency_unittest.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'dependency_unittest.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/dependency_unittest.cc'; fi`
+
+libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.o: evaluate_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.o -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.o `test -f 'evaluate_unittest.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`evaluate_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='evaluate_unittest.cc' object='libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.o' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.o `test -f 'evaluate_unittest.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`evaluate_unittest.cc
+
+libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.obj: evaluate_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.obj -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.obj `if test -f 'evaluate_unittest.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'evaluate_unittest.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/evaluate_unittest.cc'; fi`
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='evaluate_unittest.cc' object='libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.obj' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.obj `if test -f 'evaluate_unittest.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'evaluate_unittest.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/evaluate_unittest.cc'; fi`
+
+libeval_unittests-token_unittest.o: token_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-token_unittest.o -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-token_unittest.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-token_unittest.o `test -f 'token_unittest.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`token_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-token_unittest.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-token_unittest.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='token_unittest.cc' object='libeval_unittests-token_unittest.o' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-token_unittest.o `test -f 'token_unittest.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`token_unittest.cc
+
+libeval_unittests-token_unittest.obj: token_unittest.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-token_unittest.obj -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-token_unittest.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-token_unittest.obj `if test -f 'token_unittest.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'token_unittest.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/token_unittest.cc'; fi`
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-token_unittest.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-token_unittest.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='token_unittest.cc' object='libeval_unittests-token_unittest.obj' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-token_unittest.obj `if test -f 'token_unittest.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'token_unittest.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/token_unittest.cc'; fi`
+
+libeval_unittests-run_unittests.o: run_unittests.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-run_unittests.o -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-run_unittests.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-run_unittests.o `test -f 'run_unittests.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`run_unittests.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-run_unittests.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-run_unittests.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='run_unittests.cc' object='libeval_unittests-run_unittests.o' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-run_unittests.o `test -f 'run_unittests.cc' || echo '$(srcdir)/'`run_unittests.cc
+
+libeval_unittests-run_unittests.obj: run_unittests.cc
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_CXX)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -MT libeval_unittests-run_unittests.obj -MD -MP -MF $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-run_unittests.Tpo -c -o libeval_unittests-run_unittests.obj `if test -f 'run_unittests.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'run_unittests.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/run_unittests.cc'; fi`
+@am__fastdepCXX_TRUE@ $(AM_V_at)$(am__mv) $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-run_unittests.Tpo $(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-run_unittests.Po
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX)source='run_unittests.cc' object='libeval_unittests-run_unittests.obj' libtool=no @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@AMDEP_TRUE@@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ DEPDIR=$(DEPDIR) $(CXXDEPMODE) $(depcomp) @AMDEPBACKSLASH@
+@am__fastdepCXX_FALSE@ $(AM_V_CXX@am__nodep@)$(CXX) $(DEFS) $(DEFAULT_INCLUDES) $(INCLUDES) $(libeval_unittests_CPPFLAGS) $(CPPFLAGS) $(libeval_unittests_CXXFLAGS) $(CXXFLAGS) -c -o libeval_unittests-run_unittests.obj `if test -f 'run_unittests.cc'; then $(CYGPATH_W) 'run_unittests.cc'; else $(CYGPATH_W) '$(srcdir)/run_unittests.cc'; fi`
+
+mostlyclean-libtool:
+ -rm -f *.lo
+
+clean-libtool:
+ -rm -rf .libs _libs
+
+# This directory's subdirectories are mostly independent; you can cd
+# into them and run 'make' without going through this Makefile.
+# To change the values of 'make' variables: instead of editing Makefiles,
+# (1) if the variable is set in 'config.status', edit 'config.status'
+# (which will cause the Makefiles to be regenerated when you run 'make');
+# (2) otherwise, pass the desired values on the 'make' command line.
+$(am__recursive_targets):
+ @fail=; \
+ if $(am__make_keepgoing); then \
+ failcom='fail=yes'; \
+ else \
+ failcom='exit 1'; \
+ fi; \
+ dot_seen=no; \
+ target=`echo $@ | sed s/-recursive//`; \
+ case "$@" in \
+ distclean-* | maintainer-clean-*) list='$(DIST_SUBDIRS)' ;; \
+ *) list='$(SUBDIRS)' ;; \
+ esac; \
+ for subdir in $$list; do \
+ echo "Making $$target in $$subdir"; \
+ if test "$$subdir" = "."; then \
+ dot_seen=yes; \
+ local_target="$$target-am"; \
+ else \
+ local_target="$$target"; \
+ fi; \
+ ($(am__cd) $$subdir && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) $$local_target) \
+ || eval $$failcom; \
+ done; \
+ if test "$$dot_seen" = "no"; then \
+ $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) "$$target-am" || exit 1; \
+ fi; test -z "$$fail"
+
+ID: $(am__tagged_files)
+ $(am__define_uniq_tagged_files); mkid -fID $$unique
+tags: tags-recursive
+TAGS: tags
+
+tags-am: $(TAGS_DEPENDENCIES) $(am__tagged_files)
+ set x; \
+ here=`pwd`; \
+ if ($(ETAGS) --etags-include --version) >/dev/null 2>&1; then \
+ include_option=--etags-include; \
+ empty_fix=.; \
+ else \
+ include_option=--include; \
+ empty_fix=; \
+ fi; \
+ list='$(SUBDIRS)'; for subdir in $$list; do \
+ if test "$$subdir" = .; then :; else \
+ test ! -f $$subdir/TAGS || \
+ set "$$@" "$$include_option=$$here/$$subdir/TAGS"; \
+ fi; \
+ done; \
+ $(am__define_uniq_tagged_files); \
+ shift; \
+ if test -z "$(ETAGS_ARGS)$$*$$unique"; then :; else \
+ test -n "$$unique" || unique=$$empty_fix; \
+ if test $$# -gt 0; then \
+ $(ETAGS) $(ETAGSFLAGS) $(AM_ETAGSFLAGS) $(ETAGS_ARGS) \
+ "$$@" $$unique; \
+ else \
+ $(ETAGS) $(ETAGSFLAGS) $(AM_ETAGSFLAGS) $(ETAGS_ARGS) \
+ $$unique; \
+ fi; \
+ fi
+ctags: ctags-recursive
+
+CTAGS: ctags
+ctags-am: $(TAGS_DEPENDENCIES) $(am__tagged_files)
+ $(am__define_uniq_tagged_files); \
+ test -z "$(CTAGS_ARGS)$$unique" \
+ || $(CTAGS) $(CTAGSFLAGS) $(AM_CTAGSFLAGS) $(CTAGS_ARGS) \
+ $$unique
+
+GTAGS:
+ here=`$(am__cd) $(top_builddir) && pwd` \
+ && $(am__cd) $(top_srcdir) \
+ && gtags -i $(GTAGS_ARGS) "$$here"
+cscopelist: cscopelist-recursive
+
+cscopelist-am: $(am__tagged_files)
+ list='$(am__tagged_files)'; \
+ case "$(srcdir)" in \
+ [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*) sdir="$(srcdir)" ;; \
+ *) sdir=$(subdir)/$(srcdir) ;; \
+ esac; \
+ for i in $$list; do \
+ if test -f "$$i"; then \
+ echo "$(subdir)/$$i"; \
+ else \
+ echo "$$sdir/$$i"; \
+ fi; \
+ done >> $(top_builddir)/cscope.files
+
+distclean-tags:
+ -rm -f TAGS ID GTAGS GRTAGS GSYMS GPATH tags
+
+check-TESTS: $(TESTS)
+ @failed=0; all=0; xfail=0; xpass=0; skip=0; \
+ srcdir=$(srcdir); export srcdir; \
+ list=' $(TESTS) '; \
+ $(am__tty_colors); \
+ if test -n "$$list"; then \
+ for tst in $$list; do \
+ if test -f ./$$tst; then dir=./; \
+ elif test -f $$tst; then dir=; \
+ else dir="$(srcdir)/"; fi; \
+ if $(TESTS_ENVIRONMENT) $${dir}$$tst $(AM_TESTS_FD_REDIRECT); then \
+ all=`expr $$all + 1`; \
+ case " $(XFAIL_TESTS) " in \
+ *[\ \ ]$$tst[\ \ ]*) \
+ xpass=`expr $$xpass + 1`; \
+ failed=`expr $$failed + 1`; \
+ col=$$red; res=XPASS; \
+ ;; \
+ *) \
+ col=$$grn; res=PASS; \
+ ;; \
+ esac; \
+ elif test $$? -ne 77; then \
+ all=`expr $$all + 1`; \
+ case " $(XFAIL_TESTS) " in \
+ *[\ \ ]$$tst[\ \ ]*) \
+ xfail=`expr $$xfail + 1`; \
+ col=$$lgn; res=XFAIL; \
+ ;; \
+ *) \
+ failed=`expr $$failed + 1`; \
+ col=$$red; res=FAIL; \
+ ;; \
+ esac; \
+ else \
+ skip=`expr $$skip + 1`; \
+ col=$$blu; res=SKIP; \
+ fi; \
+ echo "$${col}$$res$${std}: $$tst"; \
+ done; \
+ if test "$$all" -eq 1; then \
+ tests="test"; \
+ All=""; \
+ else \
+ tests="tests"; \
+ All="All "; \
+ fi; \
+ if test "$$failed" -eq 0; then \
+ if test "$$xfail" -eq 0; then \
+ banner="$$All$$all $$tests passed"; \
+ else \
+ if test "$$xfail" -eq 1; then failures=failure; else failures=failures; fi; \
+ banner="$$All$$all $$tests behaved as expected ($$xfail expected $$failures)"; \
+ fi; \
+ else \
+ if test "$$xpass" -eq 0; then \
+ banner="$$failed of $$all $$tests failed"; \
+ else \
+ if test "$$xpass" -eq 1; then passes=pass; else passes=passes; fi; \
+ banner="$$failed of $$all $$tests did not behave as expected ($$xpass unexpected $$passes)"; \
+ fi; \
+ fi; \
+ dashes="$$banner"; \
+ skipped=""; \
+ if test "$$skip" -ne 0; then \
+ if test "$$skip" -eq 1; then \
+ skipped="($$skip test was not run)"; \
+ else \
+ skipped="($$skip tests were not run)"; \
+ fi; \
+ test `echo "$$skipped" | wc -c` -le `echo "$$banner" | wc -c` || \
+ dashes="$$skipped"; \
+ fi; \
+ report=""; \
+ if test "$$failed" -ne 0 && test -n "$(PACKAGE_BUGREPORT)"; then \
+ report="Please report to $(PACKAGE_BUGREPORT)"; \
+ test `echo "$$report" | wc -c` -le `echo "$$banner" | wc -c` || \
+ dashes="$$report"; \
+ fi; \
+ dashes=`echo "$$dashes" | sed s/./=/g`; \
+ if test "$$failed" -eq 0; then \
+ col="$$grn"; \
+ else \
+ col="$$red"; \
+ fi; \
+ echo "$${col}$$dashes$${std}"; \
+ echo "$${col}$$banner$${std}"; \
+ test -z "$$skipped" || echo "$${col}$$skipped$${std}"; \
+ test -z "$$report" || echo "$${col}$$report$${std}"; \
+ echo "$${col}$$dashes$${std}"; \
+ test "$$failed" -eq 0; \
+ else :; fi
+
+distdir: $(BUILT_SOURCES)
+ $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) distdir-am
+
+distdir-am: $(DISTFILES)
+ @srcdirstrip=`echo "$(srcdir)" | sed 's/[].[^$$\\*]/\\\\&/g'`; \
+ topsrcdirstrip=`echo "$(top_srcdir)" | sed 's/[].[^$$\\*]/\\\\&/g'`; \
+ list='$(DISTFILES)'; \
+ dist_files=`for file in $$list; do echo $$file; done | \
+ sed -e "s|^$$srcdirstrip/||;t" \
+ -e "s|^$$topsrcdirstrip/|$(top_builddir)/|;t"`; \
+ case $$dist_files in \
+ */*) $(MKDIR_P) `echo "$$dist_files" | \
+ sed '/\//!d;s|^|$(distdir)/|;s,/[^/]*$$,,' | \
+ sort -u` ;; \
+ esac; \
+ for file in $$dist_files; do \
+ if test -f $$file || test -d $$file; then d=.; else d=$(srcdir); fi; \
+ if test -d $$d/$$file; then \
+ dir=`echo "/$$file" | sed -e 's,/[^/]*$$,,'`; \
+ if test -d "$(distdir)/$$file"; then \
+ find "$(distdir)/$$file" -type d ! -perm -700 -exec chmod u+rwx {} \;; \
+ fi; \
+ if test -d $(srcdir)/$$file && test $$d != $(srcdir); then \
+ cp -fpR $(srcdir)/$$file "$(distdir)$$dir" || exit 1; \
+ find "$(distdir)/$$file" -type d ! -perm -700 -exec chmod u+rwx {} \;; \
+ fi; \
+ cp -fpR $$d/$$file "$(distdir)$$dir" || exit 1; \
+ else \
+ test -f "$(distdir)/$$file" \
+ || cp -p $$d/$$file "$(distdir)/$$file" \
+ || exit 1; \
+ fi; \
+ done
+ @list='$(DIST_SUBDIRS)'; for subdir in $$list; do \
+ if test "$$subdir" = .; then :; else \
+ $(am__make_dryrun) \
+ || test -d "$(distdir)/$$subdir" \
+ || $(MKDIR_P) "$(distdir)/$$subdir" \
+ || exit 1; \
+ dir1=$$subdir; dir2="$(distdir)/$$subdir"; \
+ $(am__relativize); \
+ new_distdir=$$reldir; \
+ dir1=$$subdir; dir2="$(top_distdir)"; \
+ $(am__relativize); \
+ new_top_distdir=$$reldir; \
+ echo " (cd $$subdir && $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) top_distdir="$$new_top_distdir" distdir="$$new_distdir" \\"; \
+ echo " am__remove_distdir=: am__skip_length_check=: am__skip_mode_fix=: distdir)"; \
+ ($(am__cd) $$subdir && \
+ $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) \
+ top_distdir="$$new_top_distdir" \
+ distdir="$$new_distdir" \
+ am__remove_distdir=: \
+ am__skip_length_check=: \
+ am__skip_mode_fix=: \
+ distdir) \
+ || exit 1; \
+ fi; \
+ done
+check-am: all-am
+ $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) check-TESTS
+check: check-recursive
+all-am: Makefile $(PROGRAMS)
+installdirs: installdirs-recursive
+installdirs-am:
+install: install-recursive
+install-exec: install-exec-recursive
+install-data: install-data-recursive
+uninstall: uninstall-recursive
+
+install-am: all-am
+ @$(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) install-exec-am install-data-am
+
+installcheck: installcheck-recursive
+install-strip:
+ if test -z '$(STRIP)'; then \
+ $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) INSTALL_PROGRAM="$(INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM)" \
+ install_sh_PROGRAM="$(INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM)" INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG=-s \
+ install; \
+ else \
+ $(MAKE) $(AM_MAKEFLAGS) INSTALL_PROGRAM="$(INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM)" \
+ install_sh_PROGRAM="$(INSTALL_STRIP_PROGRAM)" INSTALL_STRIP_FLAG=-s \
+ "INSTALL_PROGRAM_ENV=STRIPPROG='$(STRIP)'" install; \
+ fi
+mostlyclean-generic:
+
+clean-generic:
+ -test -z "$(CLEANFILES)" || rm -f $(CLEANFILES)
+
+distclean-generic:
+ -test -z "$(CONFIG_CLEAN_FILES)" || rm -f $(CONFIG_CLEAN_FILES)
+ -test . = "$(srcdir)" || test -z "$(CONFIG_CLEAN_VPATH_FILES)" || rm -f $(CONFIG_CLEAN_VPATH_FILES)
+
+maintainer-clean-generic:
+ @echo "This command is intended for maintainers to use"
+ @echo "it deletes files that may require special tools to rebuild."
+clean: clean-recursive
+
+clean-am: clean-generic clean-libtool clean-noinstPROGRAMS \
+ mostlyclean-am
+
+distclean: distclean-recursive
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.Po
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-context_unittest.Po
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.Po
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.Po
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-run_unittests.Po
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-token_unittest.Po
+ -rm -f Makefile
+distclean-am: clean-am distclean-compile distclean-generic \
+ distclean-tags
+
+dvi: dvi-recursive
+
+dvi-am:
+
+html: html-recursive
+
+html-am:
+
+info: info-recursive
+
+info-am:
+
+install-data-am:
+
+install-dvi: install-dvi-recursive
+
+install-dvi-am:
+
+install-exec-am:
+
+install-html: install-html-recursive
+
+install-html-am:
+
+install-info: install-info-recursive
+
+install-info-am:
+
+install-man:
+
+install-pdf: install-pdf-recursive
+
+install-pdf-am:
+
+install-ps: install-ps-recursive
+
+install-ps-am:
+
+installcheck-am:
+
+maintainer-clean: maintainer-clean-recursive
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-boolean_unittest.Po
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-context_unittest.Po
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-dependency_unittest.Po
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-evaluate_unittest.Po
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-run_unittests.Po
+ -rm -f ./$(DEPDIR)/libeval_unittests-token_unittest.Po
+ -rm -f Makefile
+maintainer-clean-am: distclean-am maintainer-clean-generic
+
+mostlyclean: mostlyclean-recursive
+
+mostlyclean-am: mostlyclean-compile mostlyclean-generic \
+ mostlyclean-libtool
+
+pdf: pdf-recursive
+
+pdf-am:
+
+ps: ps-recursive
+
+ps-am:
+
+uninstall-am:
+
+.MAKE: $(am__recursive_targets) check-am install-am install-strip
+
+.PHONY: $(am__recursive_targets) CTAGS GTAGS TAGS all all-am \
+ am--depfiles check check-TESTS check-am clean clean-generic \
+ clean-libtool clean-noinstPROGRAMS cscopelist-am ctags \
+ ctags-am distclean distclean-compile distclean-generic \
+ distclean-libtool distclean-tags distdir dvi dvi-am html \
+ html-am info info-am install install-am install-data \
+ install-data-am install-dvi install-dvi-am install-exec \
+ install-exec-am install-html install-html-am install-info \
+ install-info-am install-man install-pdf install-pdf-am \
+ install-ps install-ps-am install-strip installcheck \
+ installcheck-am installdirs installdirs-am maintainer-clean \
+ maintainer-clean-generic mostlyclean mostlyclean-compile \
+ mostlyclean-generic mostlyclean-libtool pdf pdf-am ps ps-am \
+ tags tags-am uninstall uninstall-am
+
+.PRECIOUS: Makefile
+
+
+# Tell versions [3.59,3.63) of GNU make to not export all variables.
+# Otherwise a system limit (for SysV at least) may be exceeded.
+.NOEXPORT:
diff --git a/src/lib/eval/tests/boolean_unittest.cc b/src/lib/eval/tests/boolean_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..f620dae
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/lib/eval/tests/boolean_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+// Copyright (C) 2016-2017 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
+//
+// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+// License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+// file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
+
+#include <config.h>
+#include <eval/eval_context.h>
+#include <eval/evaluate.h>
+#include <eval/token.h>
+#include <dhcp/pkt4.h>
+
+#include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp>
+#include <boost/scoped_ptr.hpp>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+using namespace std;
+using namespace isc::dhcp;
+
+namespace {
+
+/// @brief Test fixture for testing booleans.
+class BooleanTest : public ::testing::Test {
+public:
+ void check(const string& expr, bool expected) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(eval.parseString(expr));
+ Pkt4Ptr pkt4(new Pkt4(DHCPDISCOVER, 12345));
+ if (expected) {
+ EXPECT_TRUE(evaluateBool(eval.expression, *pkt4));
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_FALSE(evaluateBool(eval.expression, *pkt4));
+ }
+ }
+};
+
+// A group of tests
+TEST_F(BooleanTest, tests) {
+ // true and (false or false)
+ check("('a' == 'a') and (('a' == 'b') or ('b' == 'a'))", false);
+ // (true and false) or false
+ check("(('a' == 'a') and ('a' == 'b')) or ('b' == 'a')", false);
+ // not true
+ check("not ('a' == 'a')", false);
+ // not false
+ check("not ('a' == 'b')", true);
+ // true and true and true and false
+ check("('a' == 'a') and ('b' == 'b') and ('c' == 'c') and ('a' == 'c')",
+ false);
+ // false or false or false or true
+ check("('a' == 'b') or ('a' == 'c') or ('b' == 'c') or ('b' == 'b')",
+ true);
+ // true or false or false or false
+ check("('a' == 'a') or ('a' == 'b') or ('a' == 'c') or ('b' == 'c')",
+ true);
+ // not (true or false)
+ check("not (('a' == 'a') or ('a' == 'b'))", false);
+ // not (true and false)
+ check("not (('a' == 'a') and ('a' == 'b'))", true);
+ // (not true) and false
+ check("(not ('a' == 'a')) and ('a' == 'b')",false);
+}
+
+};
diff --git a/src/lib/eval/tests/context_unittest.cc b/src/lib/eval/tests/context_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..26ef533
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/lib/eval/tests/context_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,2118 @@
+// Copyright (C) 2015-2021 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
+//
+// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+// License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+// file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
+
+#include <config.h>
+
+#include <eval/eval_context.h>
+#include <eval/token.h>
+#include <dhcp/option.h>
+#include <dhcp/pkt4.h>
+#include <asiolink/io_address.h>
+
+#include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp>
+#include <boost/scoped_ptr.hpp>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+using namespace std;
+using namespace isc::asiolink;
+using namespace isc::dhcp;
+
+namespace {
+
+/// @brief Test class for testing EvalContext aka class test parsing
+class EvalContextTest : public ::testing::Test {
+public:
+ /// @brief constructor to initialize members
+ EvalContextTest() : ::testing::Test(),
+ universe_(Option::V4), parsed_(false)
+ { }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is a string with the expected value
+ void checkTokenString(const TokenPtr& token, const std::string& expected) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenString> str =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenString>(token);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(str);
+
+ Pkt4Ptr pkt4(new Pkt4(DHCPDISCOVER, 12345));
+ ValueStack values;
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(token->evaluate(*pkt4, values));
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values.size());
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected, values.top());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is a hex string with the expected value
+ void checkTokenHexString(const TokenPtr& token,
+ const std::string& expected) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenHexString> hex =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenHexString>(token);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(hex);
+
+ Pkt4Ptr pkt4(new Pkt4(DHCPDISCOVER, 12345));
+ ValueStack values;
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(token->evaluate(*pkt4, values));
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values.size());
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected, values.top());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is an IP address with the expected value
+ void checkTokenIpAddress(const TokenPtr& token,
+ const std::string& expected) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenIpAddress> ipaddr =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenIpAddress>(token);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(ipaddr);
+
+ Pkt4Ptr pkt4(new Pkt4(DHCPDISCOVER, 12345));
+ ValueStack values;
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(token->evaluate(*pkt4, values));
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values.size());
+ string value = values.top();
+
+ boost::scoped_ptr<IOAddress> exp_ip;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(exp_ip.reset(new IOAddress(expected)));
+ vector<uint8_t> exp_addr = exp_ip->toBytes();
+ ASSERT_EQ(exp_addr.size(), value.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&exp_addr[0], &value[0], value.size()));
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is an equal operator
+ void checkTokenEq(const TokenPtr& token) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenEqual> eq =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenEqual>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(eq);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Checks if the given token is integer with expected value
+ ///
+ /// @param token token to be inspected
+ /// @param exp_value expected integer value of the token
+ void checkTokenInteger(const TokenPtr& token, uint32_t exp_value) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenInteger> integer =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenInteger>(token);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(integer);
+ EXPECT_EQ(exp_value, integer->getInteger());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is an option with the expected code
+ /// and representation type
+ /// @param token token to be checked
+ /// @param expected_code expected option code
+ /// @param expected_repr expected representation (text, hex, exists)
+ void checkTokenOption(const TokenPtr& token,
+ uint16_t expected_code,
+ TokenOption::RepresentationType expected_repr) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenOption> opt =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenOption>(token);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(opt);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_code, opt->getCode());
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_repr, opt->getRepresentation());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief check if the given token is relay4 with the expected code
+ /// and representation type
+ /// @param token token to be checked
+ /// @param expected_code expected option code
+ /// @param expected_repr expected representation (text, hex, exists)
+ void checkTokenRelay4(const TokenPtr& token,
+ uint16_t expected_code,
+ TokenOption::RepresentationType expected_repr) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenRelay4Option> relay4 =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenRelay4Option>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(relay4);
+
+ if (relay4) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_code, relay4->getCode());
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_repr, relay4->getRepresentation());
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is a TokenRelay6Option with
+ /// the correct nesting level, option code and representation.
+ /// @param token token to be checked
+ /// @param expected_level expected nesting level
+ /// @param expected_code expected option code
+ /// @param expected_repr expected representation (text, hex, exists)
+ void checkTokenRelay6Option(const TokenPtr& token,
+ int8_t expected_level,
+ uint16_t expected_code,
+ TokenOption::RepresentationType expected_repr) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenRelay6Option> opt =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenRelay6Option>(token);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(opt);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_level, opt->getNest());
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_code, opt->getCode());
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_repr, opt->getRepresentation());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief This tests attempts to parse the expression then checks
+ /// if the number of tokens is correct and the TokenRelay6Option
+ /// is as expected.
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_level expected level to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_code expected option code to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_repr expected representation to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_tokens expected number of tokens
+ void testRelay6Option(const std::string& expr,
+ int8_t exp_level,
+ uint16_t exp_code,
+ TokenOption::RepresentationType exp_repr,
+ int exp_tokens) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ // parse the expression
+ try {
+ parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr);
+ }
+ catch (const EvalParseError& ex) {
+ FAIL() <<"Exception thrown: " << ex.what();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Parsing should succeed and return a token.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ // There should be the expected number of tokens.
+ ASSERT_EQ(exp_tokens, eval.expression.size());
+
+ // checked that the first token is TokenRelay6Option and that
+ // is has the correct attributes
+ checkTokenRelay6Option(eval.expression.at(0), exp_level, exp_code, exp_repr);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief check if the given token is a Pkt of specified type
+ /// @param token token to be checked
+ /// @param type expected type of the Pkt metadata
+ void checkTokenPkt(const TokenPtr& token, TokenPkt::MetadataType type) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenPkt> pkt =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenPkt>(token);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(pkt);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(type, pkt->getType());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Test that verifies access to the DHCP packet metadata.
+ ///
+ /// This test attempts to parse the expression, will check if the number
+ /// of tokens is exactly as expected and then will try to verify if the
+ /// first token represents the expected metadata in DHCP packet.
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_type expected metadata type to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_tokens expected number of tokens
+ void testPktMetadata(const std::string& expr,
+ TokenPkt::MetadataType exp_type,
+ int exp_tokens) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ // Parse the expression.
+ try {
+ parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr);
+ }
+ catch (const EvalParseError& ex) {
+ FAIL() << "Exception thrown: " << ex.what();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Parsing should succeed and return a token.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ // There should be exactly the expected number of tokens.
+ ASSERT_EQ(exp_tokens, eval.expression.size());
+
+ // Check that the first token is TokenPkt instance and has correct type.
+ checkTokenPkt(eval.expression.at(0), exp_type);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is Pkt4 of specified type
+ /// @param token token to be checked
+ /// @param type expected type of the Pkt4 field
+ void checkTokenPkt4(const TokenPtr& token, TokenPkt4::FieldType type) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenPkt4> pkt =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenPkt4>(token);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(pkt);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(type, pkt->getType());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Test that verifies access to the DHCPv4 packet fields.
+ ///
+ /// This test attempts to parse the expression, will check if the number
+ /// of tokens is exactly as expected and then will try to verify if the
+ /// first token represents the expected field in DHCPv4 packet.
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_type expected field type to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_tokens expected number of tokens
+ void testPkt4Field(const std::string& expr,
+ TokenPkt4::FieldType exp_type,
+ int exp_tokens) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ // Parse the expression.
+ try {
+ parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr);
+ }
+ catch (const EvalParseError& ex) {
+ FAIL() << "Exception thrown: " << ex.what();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Parsing should succeed and return a token.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ // There should be exactly the expected number of tokens.
+ ASSERT_EQ(exp_tokens, eval.expression.size());
+
+ // Check that the first token is TokenPkt4 instance and has correct type.
+ checkTokenPkt4(eval.expression.at(0), exp_type);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is Pkt6 of specified type
+ /// @param token token to be checked
+ /// @param exp_type expected type of the Pkt6 field
+ void checkTokenPkt6(const TokenPtr& token,
+ TokenPkt6::FieldType exp_type) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenPkt6> pkt =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenPkt6>(token);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(pkt);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(exp_type, pkt->getType());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Test that verifies access to the DHCPv6 packet fields.
+ ///
+ /// This test attempts to parse the expression, will check if the number
+ /// of tokens is exactly as planned and then will try to verify if the
+ /// first token represents expected the field in DHCPv6 packet.
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_type expected field type to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_tokens expected number of tokens
+ void testPkt6Field(const std::string& expr,
+ TokenPkt6::FieldType exp_type,
+ int exp_tokens) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ // Parse the expression.
+ try {
+ parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr);
+ }
+ catch (const EvalParseError& ex) {
+ FAIL() << "Exception thrown: " << ex.what();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Parsing should succeed and return a token.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ // There should be the requested number of tokens
+ ASSERT_EQ(exp_tokens, eval.expression.size());
+
+ // Check that the first token is TokenPkt6 instance and has correct type.
+ checkTokenPkt6(eval.expression.at(0), exp_type);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is a TokenRelay with the
+ /// correct nesting level and field type.
+ /// @param token token to be checked
+ /// @param expected_level expected nesting level
+ /// @param expected_code expected option code
+ /// @param expected_repr expected representation (text, hex, exists)
+ void checkTokenRelay6Field(const TokenPtr& token,
+ int8_t expected_level,
+ TokenRelay6Field::FieldType expected_type) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenRelay6Field> opt =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenRelay6Field>(token);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(opt);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_level, opt->getNest());
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_type, opt->getType());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief This tests attempts to parse the expression then checks
+ /// if the number of tokens is correct and the TokenRelay6Field is as
+ /// expected.
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_level expected level to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_type expected field type to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_tokens expected number of tokens
+ void testRelay6Field(const std::string& expr,
+ int8_t exp_level,
+ TokenRelay6Field::FieldType exp_type,
+ int exp_tokens) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ // parse the expression
+ try {
+ parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr);
+ }
+ catch (const EvalParseError& ex) {
+ FAIL() <<"Exception thrown: " << ex.what();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Parsing should succeed and return a token.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ // There should be the expected number of tokens.
+ ASSERT_EQ(exp_tokens, eval.expression.size());
+
+ // checked that the first token is TokenRelay6Field and that
+ // is has the correct attributes
+ checkTokenRelay6Field(eval.expression.at(0), exp_level, exp_type);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is a TokenMember with the
+ /// correct client class name.
+ /// @param token token to be checked
+ /// @param expected_client_class expected client class name
+ void checkTokenMember(const TokenPtr& token,
+ const std::string& expected_client_class) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenMember> member =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenMember>(token);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(member);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_client_class, member->getClientClass());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief This tests attempts to parse the expression then checks
+ /// if the number of tokens is correct and the TokenMember is as
+ /// expected.
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param check_defined closure checking if the client class is defined
+ /// @param exp_client_class expected client class name to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_tokens expected number of tokens
+ void testMember(const std::string& expr,
+ EvalContext::CheckDefined check_defined,
+ const std::string& exp_client_class,
+ int exp_tokens) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6, check_defined);
+
+ // parse the expression
+ try {
+ parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr);
+ }
+ catch (const EvalParseError& ex) {
+ FAIL() <<"Exception thrown: " << ex.what();
+ return;
+ }
+
+ // Parsing should succeed and return a token.
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ // There should be the expected number of tokens.
+ ASSERT_EQ(exp_tokens, eval.expression.size());
+
+ // checked that the first token is TokenRelay6Field and that
+ // is has the correct attributes
+ checkTokenMember(eval.expression.at(0), exp_client_class);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is a substring operator
+ void checkTokenSubstring(const TokenPtr& token) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenSubstring> sub =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenSubstring>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(sub);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is a concat operator
+ void checkTokenConcat(const TokenPtr& token) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenConcat> conc =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenConcat>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(conc);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is an ifelse operator
+ void checkTokenIfElse(const TokenPtr& token) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenIfElse> alt =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenIfElse>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(alt);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is a hexstring operator
+ void checkTokenToHexString(const TokenPtr& token) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenToHexString> tohex =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenToHexString>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tohex);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is an addrtotext operator
+ void checkTokenIpAddressToText(const TokenPtr& token,
+ const std::string& expected) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenIpAddressToText> addrtotext =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenIpAddressToText>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(addrtotext);
+
+ Pkt4Ptr pkt4(new Pkt4(DHCPDISCOVER, 12345));
+ ValueStack values;
+
+ std::vector<uint8_t> bytes = IOAddress(expected).toBytes();
+ values.push(std::string(bytes.begin(), bytes.end()));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(token->evaluate(*pkt4, values));
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values.size());
+ string value = values.top();
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(value, expected);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is a inttotext operator
+ template <typename IntegerType, typename TokenIntegerType>
+ void checkTokenIntToText(const TokenPtr& token,
+ const std::string& expected) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenIntegerType> inttotext =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenIntegerType>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(inttotext);
+
+ Pkt4Ptr pkt4(new Pkt4(DHCPDISCOVER, 12345));
+ ValueStack values;
+
+ IntegerType n;
+
+ try {
+ if (is_signed<IntegerType>()) {
+ n = static_cast<IntegerType>(boost::lexical_cast<int32_t>(expected));
+ } else {
+ n = static_cast<IntegerType>(boost::lexical_cast<uint32_t>(expected));
+ }
+ } catch (const boost::bad_lexical_cast& e) {
+ FAIL() << "invalid value " << expected << ", error: " << e.what();
+ }
+
+ values.push(std::string(const_cast<const char*>(reinterpret_cast<char*>(&n)), sizeof(IntegerType)));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(token->evaluate(*pkt4, values));
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values.size());
+ string value = values.top();
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(value, expected);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given expression raises the expected message
+ /// when it is parsed.
+ void checkError(const string& expr, const string& msg) {
+ EvalContext eval(universe_);
+ parsed_ = false;
+ try {
+ parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr);
+ FAIL() << "Expected EvalParseError but nothing was raised";
+ }
+ catch (const EvalParseError& ex) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(msg, ex.what());
+ EXPECT_FALSE(parsed_);
+ }
+ catch (...) {
+ FAIL() << "Expected EvalParseError but something else was raised";
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// @brief sets the universe
+ /// @note the default universe is DHCPv4
+ void setUniverse(const Option::Universe& universe) {
+ universe_ = universe;
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Checks if the given token is TokenVendor and has expected characteristics
+ /// @param token token to be checked
+ /// @param exp_vendor_id expected vendor-id (aka enterprise number)
+ /// @param exp_repr expected representation (either 'exists' or 'hex')
+ /// @param exp_option_code expected option code (ignored if 0)
+ void checkTokenVendor(const TokenPtr& token, uint32_t exp_vendor_id,
+ uint16_t exp_option_code,
+ TokenOption::RepresentationType exp_repr) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenVendor> vendor =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenVendor>(token);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(vendor);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(exp_vendor_id, vendor->getVendorId());
+ EXPECT_EQ(exp_repr, vendor->getRepresentation());
+ EXPECT_EQ(exp_option_code, vendor->getCode());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Tests if specified token vendor expression can be parsed
+ ///
+ /// This test assumes the first token will be token vendor. Any additional
+ /// tokens are ignored. Tests expressions:
+ /// vendor[1234].option[234].hex
+ /// vendor[1234].option[234].exists
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param vendor_id expected vendor-id (aka enterprise number)
+ /// @param option_code expected option code (ignored if 0)
+ /// @param expected_repr expected representation (either 'exists' or 'hex')
+ void testVendor(const std::string& expr, Option::Universe u,
+ uint32_t vendor_id, uint16_t option_code,
+ TokenOption::RepresentationType expected_repr) {
+ EvalContext eval(u);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ // We need at least one token, we will evaluate the first one.
+ ASSERT_FALSE(eval.expression.empty());
+
+ checkTokenVendor(eval.expression.at(0), vendor_id, option_code, expected_repr);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Checks if token is really a TokenVendor, that the vendor_id was
+ /// stored properly and that it has expected representation
+ ///
+ /// This test is able to handle expressions similar to:
+ /// vendor[4491].option[1].hex
+ /// vendor[4491].option[1].exists
+ /// vendor[4491].exists
+ /// vendor[*].exists
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param vendor_id expected vendor-id (aka enterprise number)
+ /// @param expected_repr expected representation (either 'exists' or 'hex')
+ void testVendor(const std::string& expr, Option::Universe u,
+ uint32_t vendor_id,
+ TokenOption::RepresentationType expected_repr) {
+ testVendor(expr, u, vendor_id, 0, expected_repr);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Tests if the expression parses into token vendor that returns enterprise-id
+ ///
+ /// This test is able to handle expressions similar to:
+ /// vendor.enterprise
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ void testVendorEnterprise(const std::string& expr,
+ Option::Universe u) {
+ EvalContext eval(u);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_FALSE(eval.expression.empty());
+
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenVendor> vendor =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenVendor>(eval.expression.at(0));
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(vendor);
+ EXPECT_EQ(TokenVendor::ENTERPRISE_ID, vendor->getField());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief This test checks if vendor-class token is correct
+ ///
+ /// This test checks if EXISTS representation is set correctly.
+ /// It covers cases like:
+ /// - vendor-class[4491].exists
+ /// - vendor-class[*].exists
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param vendor_id expected vendor-id (aka enterprise number)
+ void testVendorClass(const std::string& expr,
+ Option::Universe u, uint32_t vendor_id) {
+ EvalContext eval(u);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenVendorClass(eval.expression.at(0), vendor_id, 0, TokenOption::EXISTS,
+ TokenVendor::EXISTS);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Tests if specified token vendor class expression can be parsed
+ ///
+ /// This test assumes the first token will be token vendor-class.
+ /// Any additional tokens are ignored. Tests expressions:
+ /// - vendor-class[4491].exists
+ /// - vendor-class[*].exists
+ /// - vendor-class[4491].data
+ /// - vendor-class[4491].data[3]
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param vendor_id expected vendor-id (aka enterprise number)
+ /// @param index expected data index
+ void testVendorClass(const std::string& expr, Option::Universe u,
+ uint32_t vendor_id, uint16_t index) {
+ EvalContext eval(u);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ // Make sure there's at least one token
+ ASSERT_FALSE(eval.expression.empty());
+
+ // The first token should be TokenVendorClass, let's take a closer look.
+ checkTokenVendorClass(eval.expression.at(0), vendor_id, index,
+ TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, TokenVendor::DATA);
+
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Tests if the expression parses into vendor class token that
+ /// returns enterprise-id.
+ ///
+ /// This test is able to handle expressions similar to:
+ /// - vendor-class.enterprise
+ ///
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ void testVendorClassEnterprise(const std::string& expr,
+ Option::Universe u) {
+ EvalContext eval(u);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString(expr));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ // Make sure there's at least one token
+ ASSERT_FALSE(eval.expression.empty());
+
+ // The first token should be TokenVendorClass, let's take a closer look.
+ checkTokenVendorClass(eval.expression.at(0), 0, 0, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL,
+ TokenVendor::ENTERPRISE_ID);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Checks if the given token is TokenVendorClass and has expected characteristics
+ ///
+ /// @param token token to be checked
+ /// @param vendor_id expected vendor-id (aka enterprise number)
+ /// @param index expected index (used for data field only)
+ /// @param repr expected representation (either 'exists' or 'hex')
+ /// @param field expected field (none, enterprise or data)
+ void checkTokenVendorClass(const TokenPtr& token, uint32_t vendor_id,
+ uint16_t index, TokenOption::RepresentationType repr,
+ TokenVendor::FieldType field) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenVendorClass> vendor =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenVendorClass>(token);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(vendor);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(vendor_id, vendor->getVendorId());
+ EXPECT_EQ(index, vendor->getDataIndex());
+ EXPECT_EQ(repr, vendor->getRepresentation());
+ EXPECT_EQ(field, vendor->getField());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief checks if the given token is a sub-option with the expected
+ /// parent option and sub-option codes and representation type
+ /// @param token token to be checked
+ /// @param expected_code expected option code
+ /// @param expected_sub_code expected sub-option code
+ /// @param expected_repr expected representation (text, hex, exists)
+ void checkTokenSubOption(const TokenPtr& token,
+ uint16_t expected_code,
+ uint16_t expected_sub_code,
+ TokenOption::RepresentationType expected_repr) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenSubOption> sub =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenSubOption>(token);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(sub);
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_code, sub->getCode());
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_sub_code, sub->getSubCode());
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_repr, sub->getRepresentation());
+ }
+
+ Option::Universe universe_; ///< Universe (V4 or V6)
+ bool parsed_; ///< Parsing status
+
+};
+
+// Test the error method without location
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, error) {
+
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_THROW(eval.error("an error"), EvalParseError);
+}
+
+// Test the fatal method
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, fatal) {
+
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_THROW(eval.fatal("a fatal error"), isc::Unexpected);
+}
+
+// Test the convertOptionCode method with an illegal input
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, badOptionCode) {
+
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ // the option code must be a number
+ EXPECT_THROW(eval.convertOptionCode("bad", location(position())),
+ EvalParseError);
+}
+
+// Test the convertNestLevelNumber method with an illegal input
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, badNestLevelNumber) {
+
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ // the nest level number must be a number
+ EXPECT_THROW(eval.convertNestLevelNumber("bad", location(position())),
+ EvalParseError);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a basic expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, basic) {
+
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("option[123].text == 'MSFT'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a string terminal
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, string) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("'foo' == 'bar'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+
+ checkTokenString(tmp1, "foo");
+ checkTokenString(tmp2, "bar");
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a basic expression using integers
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, integer) {
+
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ eval.parseString("substring(option[123].text, 0, 2) == '42'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a hexstring terminal
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, hexstring) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("0x666f6f == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp = eval.expression.at(0);
+
+ checkTokenHexString(tmp, "foo");
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a hexstring terminal with an odd number of
+// hexadecimal digits
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, oddHexstring) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("0X7 == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp = eval.expression.at(0);
+
+ checkTokenHexString(tmp, "\a");
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of an IPv4 address
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, ipaddress4) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("10.0.0.1 == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp = eval.expression.at(0);
+
+ checkTokenIpAddress(tmp, "10.0.0.1");
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of an IPv6 address
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, ipaddress6) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("2001:db8::1 == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp = eval.expression.at(0);
+
+ checkTokenIpAddress(tmp, "2001:db8::1");
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of an IPv4 compatible IPv6 address
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, ipaddress46) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("::10.0.0.1 == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp = eval.expression.at(0);
+
+ checkTokenIpAddress(tmp, "::10.0.0.1");
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of the unspecified IPv6 address
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, ipaddress6unspec) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString(":: == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp = eval.expression.at(0);
+
+ checkTokenIpAddress(tmp, "::");
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of an IPv6 prefix
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, ipaddress6prefix) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("2001:db8:: == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp = eval.expression.at(0);
+
+ checkTokenIpAddress(tmp, "2001:db8::");
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of an equal expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, equal) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("'foo' == 'bar'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+
+ checkTokenString(tmp1, "foo");
+ checkTokenString(tmp2, "bar");
+ checkTokenEq(tmp3);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of an option terminal
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, option) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("option[123].text == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenOption(eval.expression.at(0), 123, TokenOption::TEXTUAL);
+}
+
+// Test parsing of an option identified by name.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, optionWithName) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ // Option 'host-name' is a standard DHCPv4 option defined in the libdhcp++.
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("option[host-name].text == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenOption(eval.expression.at(0), 12, TokenOption::TEXTUAL);
+}
+
+// Test parsing of an option existence
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, optionExists) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("option[100].exists"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenOption(eval.expression.at(0), 100, TokenOption::EXISTS);
+}
+
+// Test checking that whitespace can surround option name.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, optionWithNameAndWhitespace) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ // Option 'host-name' is a standard DHCPv4 option defined in the libdhcp++.
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("option[ host-name ].text == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenOption(eval.expression.at(0), 12, TokenOption::TEXTUAL);
+}
+
+// Test checking that newlines can surround option name.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, optionWithNameAndNewline) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ // Option 'host-name' is a standard DHCPv4 option defined in the libdhcp++.
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ eval.parseString("option[\n host-name \n ].text == \n'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenOption(eval.expression.at(0), 12, TokenOption::TEXTUAL);
+}
+
+// Test parsing of an option represented as hexadecimal string.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, optionHex) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("option[123].hex == 0x666F6F"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenOption(eval.expression.at(0), 123, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL);
+}
+
+// This test checks that the relay4[code].hex can be used in expressions.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay4Option) {
+
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ eval.parseString("relay4[13].hex == 'thirteen'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+
+ checkTokenRelay4(tmp1, 13, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL);
+ checkTokenString(tmp2, "thirteen");
+ checkTokenEq(tmp3);
+}
+
+// This test check the relay4[code].exists is supported.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay4Exists) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("relay4[13].exists"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenRelay4(eval.expression.at(0), 13, TokenOption::EXISTS);
+}
+
+// Verify that relay4[13] is not usable in v6
+// There will be a separate relay accessor for v6.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay4Error) {
+ universe_ = Option::V6;
+
+ checkError("relay4[13].hex == 'thirteen'",
+ "<string>:1.1-6: relay4 can only be used in DHCPv4.");
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a relay6 option
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay6Option) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ testRelay6Option("relay6[0].option[123].text == 'foo'",
+ 0, 123, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, 3);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of existence for a relay6 option
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay6OptionExists) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ testRelay6Option("relay6[1].option[75].exists",
+ 1, 75, TokenOption::EXISTS, 1);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of hex for a relay6 option
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay6OptionHex) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ testRelay6Option("relay6[2].option[85].hex == 'foo'",
+ 2, 85, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, 3);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a relay6 option in reverse order
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay6OptionReverse) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ testRelay6Option("relay6[-1].option[123].text == 'foo'",
+ -1, 123, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, 3);
+}
+
+// Test the nest level of a relay6 option should be in [-32..32[
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay6OptionLimits) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ // max nest level is hop count limit minus one so 31
+ testRelay6Option("relay6[31].option[123].text == 'foo'",
+ 31, 123, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, 3);
+
+ universe_ = Option::V6;
+
+ checkError("relay6[32].option[123].text == 'foo'",
+ "<string>:1.8-9: Nest level has invalid value in 32. "
+ "Allowed range: -32..31");
+
+ // min nest level is minus hop count limit
+ testRelay6Option("relay6[-32].option[123].text == 'foo'",
+ -32, 123, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, 3);
+
+ checkError("relay6[-33].option[123].text == 'foo'",
+ "<string>:1.8-10: Nest level has invalid value in -33. Allowed range: -32..31");
+}
+
+// Verify that relay6[13].option is not usable in v4
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay6OptionError) {
+ universe_ = Option::V4;
+
+ // nest_level is reduced first so raises the error
+ // (if we'd like to get a relay6 error we have to insert an
+ // intermediate action to check the universe)
+ checkError("relay6[0].option[123].text == 'foo'",
+ "<string>:1.8: Nest level invalid for DHCPv4 packets");
+}
+
+// Tests whether iface metadata in DHCP can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pktMetadataIface) {
+ testPktMetadata("pkt.iface == 'eth0'", TokenPkt::IFACE, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether src metadata in DHCP can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pktMetadataSrc) {
+ testPktMetadata("pkt.src == fe80::1", TokenPkt::SRC, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether dst metadata in DHCP can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pktMetadataDst) {
+ testPktMetadata("pkt.dst == fe80::2", TokenPkt::DST, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether len metadata in DHCP can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pktMetadataLen) {
+ testPktMetadata("pkt.len == 0x00000100", TokenPkt::LEN, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether chaddr field in DHCPv4 can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pkt4FieldChaddr) {
+ testPkt4Field("pkt4.mac == 0x000102030405", TokenPkt4::CHADDR, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether chaddr field in DHCPv4 can be accessed and converted.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pkt4FieldChaddrHexa) {
+ testPkt4Field("hexstring(pkt4.mac, ':') == '00:01:02:03:04:05'",
+ TokenPkt4::CHADDR, 5);
+}
+
+// Tests whether hlen field in DHCPv4 can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pkt4FieldHlen) {
+ testPkt4Field("pkt4.hlen == 0x6", TokenPkt4::HLEN, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether htype field in DHCPv4 can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pkt4FieldHtype) {
+ testPkt4Field("pkt4.htype == 0x1", TokenPkt4::HTYPE, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether ciaddr field in DHCPv4 can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pkt4FieldCiaddr) {
+ testPkt4Field("pkt4.ciaddr == 192.0.2.1", TokenPkt4::CIADDR, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether giaddr field in DHCPv4 can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pkt4FieldGiaddr) {
+ testPkt4Field("pkt4.giaddr == 192.0.2.1", TokenPkt4::GIADDR, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether yiaddr field in DHCPv4 can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pkt4FieldYiaddr) {
+ testPkt4Field("pkt4.yiaddr == 192.0.2.1", TokenPkt4::YIADDR, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether siaddr field in DHCPv4 can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pkt4FieldSiaddr) {
+ testPkt4Field("pkt4.siaddr == 192.0.2.1", TokenPkt4::SIADDR, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether message type field in DHCPv6 can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pkt6FieldMsgtype) {
+ testPkt6Field("pkt6.msgtype == 1", TokenPkt6::MSGTYPE, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests whether transaction id field in DHCPv6 can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, pkt6FieldTransid) {
+ testPkt6Field("pkt6.transid == 1", TokenPkt6::TRANSID, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests if the linkaddr field in a Relay6 encapsulation can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay6FieldLinkAddr) {
+ testRelay6Field("relay6[0].linkaddr == ::",
+ 0, TokenRelay6Field::LINKADDR, 3);
+}
+
+// Tests if the peeraddr field in a Relay6 encapsulation can be accessed.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay6FieldPeerAddr) {
+ testRelay6Field("relay6[1].peeraddr == ::",
+ 1, TokenRelay6Field::PEERADDR, 3);
+}
+
+// Verify that relay6[0].<field> is not usable in v4
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, relay6FieldError) {
+ universe_ = Option::V4;
+
+ // nest_level is reduced first so raises the error
+ // (if we'd like to get a relay6 error we have to insert an
+ // intermediate action to check the universe)
+ checkError("relay6[0].linkaddr == ::",
+ "<string>:1.8: Nest level invalid for DHCPv4 packets");
+}
+
+// Tests parsing of member with defined class
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, member) {
+ auto check_defined = [](const ClientClass& cc) { return (cc == "foo"); };
+ testMember("member('foo')", check_defined, "foo", 1);
+}
+
+// Test parsing of member with not defined class
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, memberError) {
+ auto check_defined = [](const ClientClass& cc) { return (cc == "foo"); };
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6, check_defined);
+ parsed_ = false;
+ try {
+ parsed_ = eval.parseString("member('bar')");
+ FAIL() << "Expected EvalParseError but nothing was raised";
+ }
+ catch (const EvalParseError& ex) {
+ EXPECT_EQ("<string>:1.8-12: Not defined client class 'bar'",
+ std::string(ex.what()));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(parsed_);
+ }
+ catch (...) {
+ FAIL() << "Expected EvalParseError but something else was raised";
+ }
+}
+
+// Test parsing of logical operators
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, logicalOps) {
+ // option.exists
+ EvalContext eval0(Option::V4);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval0.parseString("option[123].exists"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, eval0.expression.size());
+ TokenPtr token = eval0.expression.at(0);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenOption> opt =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenOption>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(opt);
+
+ // not
+ EvalContext evaln(Option::V4);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = evaln.parseString("not option[123].exists"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, evaln.expression.size());
+ token = evaln.expression.at(1);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenNot> tnot =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenNot>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tnot);
+
+ // and
+ EvalContext evala(Option::V4);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ evala.parseString("option[123].exists and option[123].exists"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, evala.expression.size());
+ token = evala.expression.at(2);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenAnd> tand =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenAnd>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tand);
+
+ // or
+ EvalContext evalo(Option::V4);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ evalo.parseString("option[123].exists or option[123].exists"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, evalo.expression.size());
+ token = evalo.expression.at(2);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenOr> tor =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenOr>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tor);
+}
+
+// Test parsing of logical operators with precedence
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, logicalPrecedence) {
+ // not precedence > and precedence
+ EvalContext evalna(Option::V4);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ evalna.parseString("not option[123].exists and option[123].exists"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, evalna.expression.size());
+ TokenPtr token = evalna.expression.at(3);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenAnd> tand =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenAnd>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tand);
+
+ // and precedence > or precedence
+ EvalContext evaloa(Option::V4);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ evaloa.parseString("option[123].exists or option[123].exists "
+ "and option[123].exists"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(5, evaloa.expression.size());
+ token = evaloa.expression.at(4);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenOr> tor =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenOr>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tor);
+}
+
+// Test parsing of logical operators with parentheses (same than
+// with precedence but using parentheses to overwrite precedence)
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, logicalParentheses) {
+ // not precedence > and precedence
+ EvalContext evalna(Option::V4);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ evalna.parseString("not (option[123].exists and option[123].exists)"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, evalna.expression.size());
+ TokenPtr token = evalna.expression.at(3);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenNot> tnot =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenNot>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tnot);
+
+ // and precedence > or precedence
+ EvalContext evaloa(Option::V4);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ evaloa.parseString("(option[123].exists or option[123].exists) "
+ "and option[123].exists"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(5, evaloa.expression.size());
+ token = evaloa.expression.at(4);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(token);
+ boost::shared_ptr<TokenAnd> tand =
+ boost::dynamic_pointer_cast<TokenAnd>(token);
+ EXPECT_TRUE(tand);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a substring expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, substring) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ eval.parseString("substring('foobar',2,all) == 'obar'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(6, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+
+ checkTokenString(tmp1, "foobar");
+ checkTokenString(tmp2, "2");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "all");
+ checkTokenSubstring(tmp4);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a concat expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, concat) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ eval.parseString("concat('foo','bar') == 'foobar'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(5, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+
+ checkTokenString(tmp1, "foo");
+ checkTokenString(tmp2, "bar");
+ checkTokenConcat(tmp3);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a plus expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, plus) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ eval.parseString("'foo' + 'bar' == 'foobar'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(5, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+
+ checkTokenString(tmp1, "foo");
+ checkTokenString(tmp2, "bar");
+ checkTokenConcat(tmp3);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of plus expressions
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, assocPlus) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ // Operator '+' is (left) associative
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ eval.parseString("'a' + 'b' + 'c' == 'abc'"));
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(7, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+ TokenPtr tmp5 = eval.expression.at(4);
+
+ checkTokenString(tmp1, "a");
+ checkTokenString(tmp2, "b");
+ checkTokenConcat(tmp3);
+ checkTokenString(tmp4, "c");
+ checkTokenConcat(tmp5);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of plus expressions with enforced associativity
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, assocRightPlus) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ eval.parseString("'a' + ('b' + 'c') == 'abc'"));
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(7, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+ TokenPtr tmp5 = eval.expression.at(4);
+
+ checkTokenString(tmp1, "a");
+ checkTokenString(tmp2, "b");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "c");
+ checkTokenConcat(tmp4);
+ checkTokenConcat(tmp5);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of an ifelse expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, ifElse) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ eval.parseString("ifelse('foo' == 'bar', 'us', 'them') == 'you'"));
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(8, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(3);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(4);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(5);
+
+ checkTokenEq(tmp1);
+ checkTokenString(tmp2, "us");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "them");
+ checkTokenIfElse(tmp4);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a plus operator and ifelse expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, plusIfElse) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ eval.parseString("'foo' + ifelse('a' == 'a', 'bar', '') == 'foobar'"));
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(10, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+ TokenPtr tmp5 = eval.expression.at(4);
+ TokenPtr tmp6 = eval.expression.at(5);
+ TokenPtr tmp7 = eval.expression.at(6);
+ TokenPtr tmp8 = eval.expression.at(7);
+
+ checkTokenString(tmp1, "foo");
+ checkTokenString(tmp2, "a");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "a");
+ checkTokenEq(tmp4);
+ checkTokenString(tmp5, "bar");
+ checkTokenString(tmp6, "");
+ checkTokenIfElse(tmp7);
+ checkTokenConcat(tmp8);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a hexstring expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, toHexString) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ =
+ eval.parseString("hexstring(0x666f,'-') == '66-6f'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(5, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+
+ checkTokenHexString(tmp1, "fo");
+ checkTokenString(tmp2, "-");
+ checkTokenToHexString(tmp3);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of an addrtotext expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, addressToText) {
+ {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("addrtotext(10.0.0.1) == '10.0.0.1'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+
+ checkTokenIpAddress(tmp1, "10.0.0.1");
+ checkTokenIpAddressToText(tmp2, "10.0.0.1");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "10.0.0.1");
+ checkTokenEq(tmp4);
+ }
+
+ {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("addrtotext(2001:db8::1) == '2001:db8::1'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+
+ checkTokenIpAddress(tmp1, "2001:db8::1");
+ checkTokenIpAddressToText(tmp2, "2001:db8::1");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "2001:db8::1");
+ checkTokenEq(tmp4);
+ }
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a int8_t expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, int8ToText) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("int8totext(255) == '-1'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+
+ checkTokenInteger(tmp1, 255);
+ checkTokenIntToText<int8_t, TokenInt8ToText>(tmp2, "-1");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "-1");
+ checkTokenEq(tmp4);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a int16_t expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, int16ToText) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("int16totext(65535) == '-1'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+
+ checkTokenInteger(tmp1, 65535);
+ checkTokenIntToText<int16_t, TokenInt16ToText>(tmp2, "-1");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "-1");
+ checkTokenEq(tmp4);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a int32_t expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, int32ToText) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("int32totext(4294967295) == '-1'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+
+ checkTokenInteger(tmp1, 4294967295);
+ checkTokenIntToText<int32_t, TokenInt32ToText>(tmp2, "-1");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "-1");
+ checkTokenEq(tmp4);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a uint8_t expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, uint8ToText) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("uint8totext(255) == '255'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+
+ checkTokenInteger(tmp1, 255);
+ checkTokenIntToText<uint8_t, TokenUInt8ToText>(tmp2, "255");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "255");
+ checkTokenEq(tmp4);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a uint16_t expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, uint16ToText) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("uint16totext(65535) == '65535'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+
+ checkTokenInteger(tmp1, 65535);
+ checkTokenIntToText<uint16_t, TokenUInt16ToText>(tmp2, "65535");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "65535");
+ checkTokenEq(tmp4);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a uint32_t expression
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, uint32ToText) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("uint32totext(4294967295) == '4294967295'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp1 = eval.expression.at(0);
+ TokenPtr tmp2 = eval.expression.at(1);
+ TokenPtr tmp3 = eval.expression.at(2);
+ TokenPtr tmp4 = eval.expression.at(3);
+
+ checkTokenInteger(tmp1, 4294967295);
+ checkTokenIntToText<uint32_t, TokenUInt32ToText>(tmp2, "4294967295");
+ checkTokenString(tmp3, "4294967295");
+ checkTokenEq(tmp4);
+}
+
+//
+// Test some scanner error cases
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, scanErrors) {
+ checkError("'", "<string>:1.1: Invalid character: '");
+ checkError("'\''", "<string>:1.3: Invalid character: '");
+ checkError("'\n'", "<string>:1.1: Invalid character: '");
+ checkError("0x123h", "<string>:1.6: Invalid character: h");
+ checkError(":1", "<string>:1.1: Invalid character: :");
+ checkError("=", "<string>:1.1: Invalid character: =");
+
+ // Typo should be handled as well.
+ checkError("subtring", "<string>:1.1: Invalid character: s");
+ checkError("foo", "<string>:1.1: Invalid character: f");
+ checkError(" bar", "<string>:1.2: Invalid character: b");
+ checkError("relay[12].hex == 'foo'", "<string>:1.1: Invalid character: r");
+ checkError("pkt4.ziaddr", "<string>:1.6: Invalid character: z");
+ checkError("members('foo'", "<string>:1.7: Invalid character: s");
+}
+
+// Tests some scanner/parser error cases
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, scanParseErrors) {
+ checkError("", "<string>:1.1: syntax error, unexpected end of file");
+ checkError(" ", "<string>:1.2: syntax error, unexpected end of file");
+ checkError("0x", "<string>:1.2: Invalid character: x");
+ checkError("0abc",
+ "<string>:1.2: Invalid character: a");
+
+ // This one is a little bid odd. This is a truncated address, so it's not
+ // recognized as an address. Instead, the first token (10) is recognized as
+ // an integer. The only thing we can do with integers right now is to
+ // apply equality or concat operators, so the only possible next token
+ // are == and +. There's a dot instead, so an error is reported.
+ checkError("10.0.1", "<string>:1.3: syntax error, unexpected ., "
+ "expecting == or +");
+
+ checkError("10.256.0.1",
+ "<string>:1.1-10: Failed to convert 10.256.0.1 to "
+ "an IP address.");
+ checkError(":::",
+ "<string>:1.1-3: Failed to convert ::: to an IP address.");
+ checkError("===", "<string>:1.1-2: syntax error, unexpected ==");
+ checkError("option[-1].text",
+ "<string>:1.8-9: Option code has invalid "
+ "value in -1. Allowed range: 0..255");
+ checkError("option[256].text",
+ "<string>:1.8-10: Option code has invalid "
+ "value in 256. Allowed range: 0..255");
+ setUniverse(Option::V6);
+ checkError("option[65536].text",
+ "<string>:1.8-12: Option code has invalid "
+ "value in 65536. Allowed range: 0..65535");
+ setUniverse(Option::V4);
+ checkError("option[12345678901234567890].text",
+ "<string>:1.8-27: Failed to convert 12345678901234567890 "
+ "to an integer.");
+ checkError("option[123]",
+ "<string>:1.12: syntax error, unexpected end of file,"
+ " expecting .");
+ checkError("option[123].text < 'foo'", "<string>:1.18: Invalid"
+ " character: <");
+ checkError("option[-ab].text", "<string>:1.8: Invalid character: -");
+ checkError("option[0ab].text",
+ "<string>:1.9-10: syntax error, unexpected option name, "
+ "expecting ]");
+ checkError("option[ab_].hex", "<string>:1.8: Invalid character: a");
+ checkError("option[\nhost-name\n].hex =\n= 'foo'",
+ "<string>:3.7: Invalid character: =");
+ checkError("substring('foo',12345678901234567890,1)",
+ "<string>:1.17-36: Failed to convert 12345678901234567890 "
+ "to an integer.");
+}
+
+// Tests some parser error cases
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, parseErrors) {
+ checkError("'foo''bar'",
+ "<string>:1.6-10: syntax error, unexpected constant string, "
+ "expecting == or +");
+ checkError("'foo' (",
+ "<string>:1.7: syntax error, unexpected (, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("== 'ab'", "<string>:1.1-2: syntax error, unexpected ==");
+ checkError("'foo' ==",
+ "<string>:1.9: syntax error, unexpected end of file");
+ checkError("('foo' == 'bar'",
+ "<string>:1.16: syntax error, unexpected end of file, "
+ "expecting ) or and or or");
+ checkError("('foo' == 'bar') ''",
+ "<string>:1.18-19: syntax error, unexpected constant string, "
+ "expecting end of file");
+ checkError("not",
+ "<string>:1.4: syntax error, unexpected end of file");
+ checkError("not 'foo'",
+ "<string>:1.10: syntax error, unexpected end of file, "
+ "expecting == or +");
+ checkError("not()",
+ "<string>:1.5: syntax error, unexpected )");
+ checkError("(not('foo' 'bar')",
+ "<string>:1.12-16: syntax error, unexpected constant string, "
+ "expecting ) or == or +");
+ checkError("and",
+ "<string>:1.1-3: syntax error, unexpected and");
+ checkError("'foo' and",
+ "<string>:1.7-9: syntax error, unexpected and, "
+ "expecting == or +");
+ checkError("'foo' == 'bar' and",
+ "<string>:1.19: syntax error, unexpected end of file");
+ checkError("'foo' == 'bar' and ''",
+ "<string>:1.22: syntax error, unexpected end of file, "
+ "expecting == or +");
+ checkError("or",
+ "<string>:1.1-2: syntax error, unexpected or");
+ checkError("'foo' or",
+ "<string>:1.7-8: syntax error, unexpected or, "
+ "expecting == or +");
+ checkError("'foo' == 'bar' or",
+ "<string>:1.18: syntax error, unexpected end of file");
+ checkError("'foo' == 'bar' or ''",
+ "<string>:1.21: syntax error, unexpected end of file, "
+ "expecting == or +");
+ checkError("option 'ab'",
+ "<string>:1.8-11: syntax error, unexpected "
+ "constant string, expecting [");
+ checkError("option(10) == 'ab'",
+ "<string>:1.7: syntax error, "
+ "unexpected (, expecting [");
+ checkError("option['ab'].text == 'foo'",
+ "<string>:1.8-11: syntax error, "
+ "unexpected constant string, "
+ "expecting integer or option name");
+ checkError("option[ab].text == 'foo'",
+ "<string>:1.8-9: option 'ab' is not defined");
+ checkError("option[0xa].text == 'ab'",
+ "<string>:1.8-10: syntax error, "
+ "unexpected constant hexstring, "
+ "expecting integer or option name");
+ checkError("option[10].bin", "<string>:1.12: Invalid character: b");
+ checkError("option[boot-size].bin", "<string>:1.19: Invalid character: b");
+ checkError("option[10].exists == 'foo'",
+ "<string>:1.19-20: syntax error, unexpected ==, "
+ "expecting end of file");
+ checkError("substring('foobar') == 'f'",
+ "<string>:1.19: syntax error, unexpected ), "
+ "expecting \",\" or +");
+ checkError("substring('foobar',3) == 'bar'",
+ "<string>:1.21: syntax error, unexpected ), expecting \",\"");
+ checkError("substring('foobar','3',3) == 'bar'",
+ "<string>:1.20-22: syntax error, unexpected constant string, "
+ "expecting integer");
+ checkError("substring('foobar',1,a) == 'foo'",
+ "<string>:1.22: Invalid character: a");
+ string long_text = "substring('foobar',1,65535) == ";
+ for (int i = 0; i < (1 << 16); ++i) {
+ long_text += "0";
+ }
+ long_text += "'";
+ checkError(long_text,
+ "<string>:1.65568: Invalid character: '");
+ checkError("concat('foobar') == 'f'",
+ "<string>:1.16: syntax error, unexpected ), "
+ "expecting \",\" or +");
+ checkError("concat('foo','bar','') == 'foobar'",
+ "<string>:1.19: syntax error, unexpected \",\", "
+ "expecting ) or +");
+ checkError("ifelse('foo'=='bar','foo')",
+ "<string>:1.26: syntax error, unexpected ), "
+ "expecting \",\" or +");
+ checkError("ifelse('foo'=='bar','foo','bar','')",
+ "<string>:1.32: syntax error, unexpected \",\", "
+ "expecting ) or +");
+ checkError("+ 'a' = 'a'", "<string>:1.1: syntax error, unexpected +");
+ checkError("'a' + == 'a'", "<string>:1.7-8: syntax error, unexpected ==");
+ checkError("'a' ++ 'b' == 'ab'",
+ "<string>:1.6: syntax error, unexpected +");
+ checkError("addrtotext(10.0.0.1, 10.0.0.2)",
+ "<string>:1.20: syntax error, unexpected \",\", expecting ) or +");
+ checkError("addrtotext('cafebabecafebabe')",
+ "<string>:1.31: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("addrtotext('')",
+ "<string>:1.15: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("int8totext('01', '01')",
+ "<string>:1.16: syntax error, unexpected \",\", expecting ) or +");
+ checkError("int8totext('0123')",
+ "<string>:1.19: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("int8totext('')",
+ "<string>:1.15: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("int16totext('0123', '0123')",
+ "<string>:1.19: syntax error, unexpected \",\", expecting ) or +");
+ checkError("int16totext('01')",
+ "<string>:1.18: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("int16totext('')",
+ "<string>:1.16: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("int32totext('01234567', '01234567')",
+ "<string>:1.23: syntax error, unexpected \",\", expecting ) or +");
+ checkError("int32totext('01')",
+ "<string>:1.18: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("int32totext('')",
+ "<string>:1.16: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("uint8totext('01', '01')",
+ "<string>:1.17: syntax error, unexpected \",\", expecting ) or +");
+ checkError("uint8totext('0123')",
+ "<string>:1.20: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("uint8totext('')",
+ "<string>:1.16: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("uint16totext('0123', '0123')",
+ "<string>:1.20: syntax error, unexpected \",\", expecting ) or +");
+ checkError("uint16totext('01')",
+ "<string>:1.19: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("uint16totext('')",
+ "<string>:1.17: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("uint32totext('01234567', '01234567')",
+ "<string>:1.24: syntax error, unexpected \",\", expecting ) or +");
+ checkError("uint32totext('01')",
+ "<string>:1.19: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+ checkError("uint32totext('')",
+ "<string>:1.17: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+}
+
+// Tests some type error cases
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, typeErrors) {
+ checkError("'foobar'",
+ "<string>:1.9: syntax error, unexpected end of file, "
+ "expecting == or +");
+ checkError("substring('foobar',all,1) == 'foo'",
+ "<string>:1.20-22: syntax error, unexpected all, "
+ "expecting integer");
+ checkError("substring('foobar',0x32,1) == 'foo'",
+ "<string>:1.20-23: syntax error, unexpected constant "
+ "hexstring, expecting integer");
+
+ // With the #4483 addition, all integers are treated as 4 byte strings,
+ // so those checks no longer makes sense. Commenting it out.
+ // checkError("concat('foo',3) == 'foo3'",
+ // "<string>:1.14: syntax error, unexpected integer");
+ // checkError("concat(3,'foo') == '3foo'",
+ // "<string>:1.8: syntax error, unexpected integer");
+ checkError("('foo' == 'bar') == 'false'",
+ "<string>:1.18-19: syntax error, unexpected ==, "
+ "expecting end of file");
+ checkError("not 'true'",
+ "<string>:1.11: syntax error, unexpected end of file, "
+ "expecting == or +");
+ checkError("'true' and 'false'",
+ "<string>:1.8-10: syntax error, unexpected and, "
+ "expecting == or +");
+ checkError("'true' or 'false'",
+ "<string>:1.8-9: syntax error, unexpected or, "
+ "expecting == or +");
+
+ // Ifelse requires a boolean condition and string branches.
+ checkError("ifelse('foobar','foo','bar')",
+ "<string>:1.16: syntax error, unexpected \",\", "
+ "expecting == or +");
+ checkError("ifelse('foo'=='bar','foo'=='foo','bar')",
+ "<string>:1.26-27: syntax error, unexpected ==, "
+ "expecting \",\" or +");
+ checkError("ifelse('foo'=='bar','foo','bar'=='bar')",
+ "<string>:1.32-33: syntax error, unexpected ==, "
+ "expecting ) or +");
+
+ // Member uses quotes around the client class name.
+ checkError("member(foo)", "<string>:1.8: Invalid character: f");
+
+ // sub-option by name is not supported.
+ checkError("option[123].option[host-name].exists",
+ "<string>:1.20-28: syntax error, unexpected option name, "
+ "expecting integer");
+
+ // Addrtotext requires string storing the binary representation of the address.
+ checkError("addrtotext('192.100.1.1')",
+ "<string>:1.26: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+
+ // Int8totext requires string storing the binary representation of the 8 bit integer.
+ checkError("int8totext('0123')",
+ "<string>:1.19: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+
+ // Int16totext requires string storing the binary representation of the 16 bit integer.
+ checkError("int16totext('01')",
+ "<string>:1.18: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+
+ // Int32totext requires string storing the binary representation of the 32 bit integer.
+ checkError("int32totext('01')",
+ "<string>:1.18: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+
+ // Uint8totext requires string storing the binary representation of the 8 bit unsigned integer.
+ checkError("uint8totext('0123')",
+ "<string>:1.20: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+
+ // Uint16totext requires string storing the binary representation of the 16 bit unsigned integer.
+ checkError("uint16totext('01')",
+ "<string>:1.19: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+
+ // Uint32totext requires string storing the binary representation of the 32 bit unsigned integer.
+ checkError("uint32totext('01')",
+ "<string>:1.19: syntax error, unexpected end of file, expecting == or +");
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendor4SpecificVendorExists) {
+ testVendor("vendor[4491].exists", Option::V4, 4491, TokenOption::EXISTS);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendor6SpecificVendorExists) {
+ testVendor("vendor[4491].exists", Option::V6, 4491, TokenOption::EXISTS);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendor4AnyVendorExists) {
+ testVendor("vendor[*].exists", Option::V4, 0, TokenOption::EXISTS);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendor6AnyVendorExists) {
+ testVendor("vendor[*].exists", Option::V6, 0, TokenOption::EXISTS);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendor4enterprise) {
+ testVendorEnterprise("vendor.enterprise == 0x1234", Option::V4);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendor6enterprise) {
+ testVendorEnterprise("vendor.enterprise == 0x1234", Option::V6);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendor4SuboptionExists) {
+ testVendor("vendor[4491].option[1].exists", Option::V4, 4491, 1, TokenOption::EXISTS);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendor6SuboptionExists) {
+ testVendor("vendor[4491].option[1].exists", Option::V6, 4491, 1, TokenOption::EXISTS);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendor4SuboptionHex) {
+ testVendor("vendor[4491].option[1].hex == 0x1234", Option::V4, 4491, 1,
+ TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendor6SuboptionHex) {
+ testVendor("vendor[4491].option[1].hex == 0x1234", Option::V6, 4491, 1,
+ TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass4SpecificVendorExists) {
+ testVendorClass("vendor-class[4491].exists", Option::V4, 4491);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass6SpecificVendorExists) {
+ testVendorClass("vendor-class[4491].exists", Option::V6, 4491);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass4AnyVendorExists) {
+ testVendorClass("vendor-class[*].exists", Option::V4, 0);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass6AnyVendorExists) {
+ testVendorClass("vendor-class[*].exists", Option::V6, 0);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass4enterprise) {
+ testVendorClassEnterprise("vendor-class.enterprise == 0x1234", Option::V4);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass6enterprise) {
+ testVendorClassEnterprise("vendor-class.enterprise == 0x1234", Option::V6);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass4SpecificVendorData) {
+ testVendorClass("vendor-class[4491].data == 0x1234", Option::V4, 4491, 0);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass6SpecificVendorData) {
+ testVendorClass("vendor-class[4491].data == 0x1234", Option::V6, 4491, 0);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass4AnyVendorData) {
+ testVendorClass("vendor-class[*].data == 0x1234", Option::V4, 0, 0);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass6AnyVendorData) {
+ testVendorClass("vendor-class[*].data == 0x1234", Option::V6, 0, 0);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass4DataIndex) {
+ testVendorClass("vendor-class[4491].data[3] == 0x1234", Option::V4, 4491, 3);
+}
+
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, vendorClass6DataIndex) {
+ testVendorClass("vendor-class[4491].data[3] == 0x1234", Option::V6, 4491, 3);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a sub-option with parent by code.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, subOptionWithCode) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("option[123].option[234].text == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenSubOption(eval.expression.at(0), 123, 234, TokenOption::TEXTUAL);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a sub-option with parent by name.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, subOptionWithName) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("option[host-name].option[123].text == 'foo'"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenSubOption(eval.expression.at(0), 12, 123, TokenOption::TEXTUAL);
+}
+
+// Test the parsing of a sub-option existence
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, subOptionExists) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("option[100].option[200].exists"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenSubOption(eval.expression.at(0), 100, 200, TokenOption::EXISTS);
+}
+
+// Test parsing of a sub-option represented as hexadecimal string.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, subOptionHex) {
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V4);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("option[123].option[234].hex == 0x666F6F"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+ checkTokenSubOption(eval.expression.at(0), 123, 234, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL);
+}
+
+// Checks if integer expressions can be parsed and checked for equality.
+TEST_F(EvalContextTest, integer1) {
+
+ EvalContext eval(Option::V6);
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed_ = eval.parseString("1 == 2"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed_);
+
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, eval.expression.size());
+
+ TokenPtr tmp = eval.expression.at(0);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(tmp);
+ checkTokenInteger(tmp, 1);
+ tmp = eval.expression.at(1);
+
+ ASSERT_TRUE(tmp);
+ checkTokenInteger(tmp, 2);
+}
+
+}
diff --git a/src/lib/eval/tests/dependency_unittest.cc b/src/lib/eval/tests/dependency_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..19f9121
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/lib/eval/tests/dependency_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
+// Copyright (C) 2018,2021 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
+//
+// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+// License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+// file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
+
+#include <config.h>
+#include <eval/dependency.h>
+#include <eval/eval_context.h>
+#include <eval/token.h>
+#include <dhcp/pkt4.h>
+#include <dhcp/pkt6.h>
+#include <dhcp/dhcp4.h>
+#include <dhcp/dhcp6.h>
+#include <dhcp/option_string.h>
+
+#include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp>
+#include <boost/scoped_ptr.hpp>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+using namespace std;
+using namespace isc::dhcp;
+
+namespace {
+
+/// @brief Test fixture for testing dependency.
+///
+/// This class provides several convenience objects to be used during testing
+/// of the dependency of classification expressions.
+class DependencyTest : public ::testing::Test {
+public:
+ /// @brief Constructor
+ DependencyTest() : result_(true) {
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Destructor
+ ///
+ /// Reset expression and result.
+ ~DependencyTest() {
+ e_.reset();
+ result_ = false;
+ }
+
+ ExpressionPtr e_; ///< An expression
+
+ bool result_; ///< A decision
+};
+
+// This checks the null expression: it should return false.
+TEST_F(DependencyTest, nullExpr) {
+ TokenPtr token;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = dependOnClass(token, "foobar"));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = dependOnClass(e_, "foobar"));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+}
+
+// This checks the empty expression: it should return false.
+TEST_F(DependencyTest, emptyExpr) {
+ e_.reset(new Expression());
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = dependOnClass(e_, "foobar"));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+}
+
+// This checks the { "true" } expression: it should return false.
+TEST_F(DependencyTest, trueExpr) {
+ TokenPtr ttrue;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(ttrue.reset(new TokenString("true")));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = dependOnClass(ttrue, "foobar"));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+ e_.reset(new Expression());
+ e_->push_back(ttrue);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = dependOnClass(e_, "foobar"));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+}
+
+// This checks the { member('not-matching') } expression:
+// it should return false.
+TEST_F(DependencyTest, notMatching) {
+ TokenPtr notmatching;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(notmatching.reset(new TokenMember("not-matching")));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = dependOnClass(notmatching, "foobar"));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+ e_.reset(new Expression());
+ e_->push_back(notmatching);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = dependOnClass(e_, "foobar"));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+}
+
+// This checks the { member('foobar') } expression: it should return true.
+TEST_F(DependencyTest, matching) {
+ TokenPtr matching;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(matching.reset(new TokenMember("foobar")));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = dependOnClass(matching, "foobar"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(result_);
+ e_.reset(new Expression());
+ e_->push_back(matching);
+ result_ = false;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = dependOnClass(e_, "foobar"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(result_);
+}
+
+};
diff --git a/src/lib/eval/tests/evaluate_unittest.cc b/src/lib/eval/tests/evaluate_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..37c4f83
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/lib/eval/tests/evaluate_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,515 @@
+// Copyright (C) 2015-2018,2021 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
+//
+// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+// License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+// file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
+
+#include <config.h>
+#include <eval/evaluate.h>
+#include <eval/eval_context.h>
+#include <eval/token.h>
+#include <dhcp/pkt4.h>
+#include <dhcp/pkt6.h>
+#include <dhcp/dhcp4.h>
+#include <dhcp/dhcp6.h>
+#include <dhcp/option_string.h>
+
+#include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp>
+#include <boost/scoped_ptr.hpp>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+using namespace std;
+using namespace isc::dhcp;
+
+namespace {
+
+/// @brief Test fixture for testing evaluation.
+///
+/// This class provides several convenience objects to be used during testing
+/// of the evaluation of classification expressions.
+class EvaluateTest : public ::testing::Test {
+public:
+
+ /// @brief Initializes Pkt4,Pkt6 and options that can be useful for
+ /// evaluation tests.
+ EvaluateTest() {
+ e_.clear();
+
+ result_ = false;
+
+ pkt4_.reset(new Pkt4(DHCPDISCOVER, 12345));
+ pkt6_.reset(new Pkt6(DHCPV6_SOLICIT, 12345));
+
+ // Add options with easily identifiable strings in them
+ option_str4_.reset(new OptionString(Option::V4, 100, "hundred4"));
+ option_str6_.reset(new OptionString(Option::V6, 100, "hundred6"));
+
+ pkt4_->addOption(option_str4_);
+ pkt6_->addOption(option_str6_);
+ }
+
+ Expression e_; ///< An expression
+
+ bool result_; ///< A decision
+
+ Pkt4Ptr pkt4_; ///< A stub DHCPv4 packet
+ Pkt6Ptr pkt6_; ///< A stub DHCPv6 packet
+
+ OptionPtr option_str4_; ///< A string option for DHCPv4
+ OptionPtr option_str6_; ///< A string option for DHCPv6
+
+ /// @todo: Add more option types here
+};
+
+// This checks the empty expression: it should raise EvalBadStack
+// when evaluated with a Pkt4. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, empty4) {
+ ASSERT_THROW(evaluateBool(e_, *pkt4_), EvalBadStack);
+}
+
+// This checks the empty expression: it should raise EvalBadStack
+// when evaluated with a Pkt6. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, empty6) {
+ ASSERT_THROW(evaluateBool(e_, *pkt6_), EvalBadStack);
+}
+
+// This checks the { "false" } expression: it should return false
+// when evaluated with a Pkt4. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, false4) {
+ TokenPtr tfalse;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tfalse.reset(new TokenString("false")));
+ e_.push_back(tfalse);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt4_));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+}
+
+// This checks the { "false" } expression: it should return false
+// when evaluated with a Pkt6. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, false6) {
+ TokenPtr tfalse;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tfalse.reset(new TokenString("false")));
+ e_.push_back(tfalse);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt6_));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+}
+
+// This checks the { "true" } expression: it should return true
+// when evaluated with a Pkt4. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, true4) {
+ TokenPtr ttrue;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(ttrue.reset(new TokenString("true")));
+ e_.push_back(ttrue);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt4_));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(result_);
+}
+
+// This checks the { "true" } expression: it should return true
+// when evaluated with a Pkt6. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, true6) {
+ TokenPtr ttrue;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(ttrue.reset(new TokenString("true")));
+ e_.push_back(ttrue);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt6_));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(result_);
+}
+
+// This checks the evaluation must lead to "false" or "true"
+// with a Pkt4. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, bad4) {
+ TokenPtr bad;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bad.reset(new TokenString("bad")));
+ e_.push_back(bad);
+ ASSERT_THROW(evaluateBool(e_, *pkt4_), EvalTypeError);
+}
+
+// This checks the evaluation must lead to "false" or "true"
+// with a Pkt6. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, bad6) {
+ TokenPtr bad;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bad.reset(new TokenString("bad")));
+ e_.push_back(bad);
+ ASSERT_THROW(evaluateBool(e_, *pkt6_), EvalTypeError);
+}
+
+// This checks the evaluation must leave only one value on the stack
+// with a Pkt4. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, two4) {
+ TokenPtr ttrue;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(ttrue.reset(new TokenString("true")));
+ e_.push_back(ttrue);
+ e_.push_back(ttrue);
+ ASSERT_THROW(evaluateBool(e_, *pkt4_), EvalBadStack);
+}
+
+// This checks the evaluation must leave only one value on the stack
+// with a Pkt6. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, two6) {
+ TokenPtr ttrue;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(ttrue.reset(new TokenString("true")));
+ e_.push_back(ttrue);
+ e_.push_back(ttrue);
+ ASSERT_THROW(evaluateBool(e_, *pkt6_), EvalBadStack);
+}
+
+// A more complex test evaluated with a Pkt4. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, compare4) {
+ TokenPtr tfoo;
+ TokenPtr tbar;
+ TokenPtr tequal;
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tfoo.reset(new TokenString("foo")));
+ e_.push_back(tfoo);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tbar.reset(new TokenString("bar")));
+ e_.push_back(tbar);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tequal.reset(new TokenEqual()));
+ e_.push_back(tequal);
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt4_));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+}
+
+// A more complex test evaluated with a Pkt6. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, compare6) {
+ TokenPtr tfoo;
+ TokenPtr tbar;
+ TokenPtr tequal;
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tfoo.reset(new TokenString("foo")));
+ e_.push_back(tfoo);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tbar.reset(new TokenString("bar")));
+ e_.push_back(tbar);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tequal.reset(new TokenEqual()));
+ e_.push_back(tequal);
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt6_));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+}
+
+// A test using option existence
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, exists) {
+ TokenPtr toption;
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(toption.reset(new TokenOption(100, TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+ e_.push_back(toption);
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt4_));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(result_);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt6_));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(result_);
+}
+
+// A test using option non-existence
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, dontExists) {
+ TokenPtr toption;
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(toption.reset(new TokenOption(101, TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+ e_.push_back(toption);
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt4_));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt6_));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+}
+
+// A test using packets.
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, packet) {
+ TokenPtr toption;
+ TokenPtr tstring;
+ TokenPtr tequal;
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(toption.reset(new TokenOption(100, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+ e_.push_back(toption);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tstring.reset(new TokenString("hundred4")));
+ e_.push_back(tstring);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tequal.reset(new TokenEqual()));
+ e_.push_back(tequal);
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt4_));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(result_);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt6_));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+}
+
+// A test which compares option value represented in hexadecimal format.
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, optionHex) {
+ TokenPtr toption;
+ TokenPtr tstring;
+ TokenPtr tequal;
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(toption.reset(new TokenOption(100, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL)));
+ e_.push_back(toption);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tstring.reset(new TokenString("hundred4")));
+ e_.push_back(tstring);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tequal.reset(new TokenEqual()));
+ e_.push_back(tequal);
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt4_));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(result_);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt6_));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(result_);
+}
+
+// A test using substring on an option.
+TEST_F(EvaluateTest, complex) {
+ TokenPtr toption;
+ TokenPtr tstart;
+ TokenPtr tlength;
+ TokenPtr tsubstring;
+ TokenPtr tstring;
+ TokenPtr tequal;
+
+ // Get the option, i.e., "hundred[46]"
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(toption.reset(new TokenOption(100, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+ e_.push_back(toption);
+
+ // Get substring("hundred[46]", 0, 7), i.e., "hundred"
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tstart.reset(new TokenString("0")));
+ e_.push_back(tstart);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tlength.reset(new TokenString("7")));
+ e_.push_back(tlength);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tsubstring.reset(new TokenSubstring()));
+ e_.push_back(tsubstring);
+
+ // Compare with "hundred"
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tstring.reset(new TokenString("hundred")));
+ e_.push_back(tstring);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tequal.reset(new TokenEqual()));
+ e_.push_back(tequal);
+
+ // Should return true for v4 and v6 packets
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt4_));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(result_);
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result_ = evaluateBool(e_, *pkt6_));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(result_);
+}
+
+/// @brief Generic class for parsing expressions and evaluating them.
+///
+/// The main purpose of this class is to provide a generic interface to the
+/// eval library, so everything (expression parsing and then evaluation for
+/// given packets) can be done in one simple call.
+///
+/// These tests may be somewhat redundant to other more specialized tests, but
+/// the idea here is to mass produce tests that are trivial to write.
+class ExpressionsTest : public EvaluateTest {
+public:
+
+ /// @brief Checks if expression can be parsed and evaluated to bool
+ ///
+ /// There are skeleton packets created in pkt4_ and pkt6_. Make sure you
+ /// tweak them as needed before calling this method.
+ ///
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_result expected result (true or false)
+ void testExpression(const Option::Universe& u, const std::string& expr,
+ const bool exp_result) {
+
+ EvalContext eval(u);
+ bool result = false;
+ bool parsed = false;
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed = eval.parseString(expr))
+ << " while parsing expression " << expr;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed) << " for expression " << expr;
+
+ switch (u) {
+ case Option::V4:
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result = evaluateBool(eval.expression, *pkt4_))
+ << " for expression " << expr;
+ break;
+ case Option::V6:
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result = evaluateBool(eval.expression, *pkt6_))
+ << " for expression " << expr;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(exp_result, result) << " for expression " << expr;
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Checks if expression can be parsed and evaluated to string
+ ///
+ /// There are skeleton packets created in pkt4_ and pkt6_. Make sure you
+ /// tweak them as needed before calling this method.
+ ///
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param expr expression to be parsed
+ /// @param exp_result expected result (string)
+ void testExpressionString(const Option::Universe& u, const std::string& expr,
+ const std::string& exp_result) {
+
+ EvalContext eval(u);
+ string result;
+ bool parsed = false;
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(parsed = eval.parseString(expr, EvalContext::PARSER_STRING))
+ << " while parsing expression " << expr;
+ EXPECT_TRUE(parsed) << " for expression " << expr;
+
+ switch (u) {
+ case Option::V4:
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result = evaluateString(eval.expression, *pkt4_))
+ << " for expression " << expr;
+ break;
+ case Option::V6:
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(result = evaluateString(eval.expression, *pkt6_))
+ << " for expression " << expr;
+ break;
+ }
+
+ EXPECT_EQ(exp_result, result) << " for expression " << expr;
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Checks that specified expression throws expected exception.
+ ///
+ /// @tparam ex exception type expected to be thrown
+ /// @param expr expression to be evaluated
+ template<typename ex>
+ void testExpressionNegative(const std::string& expr,
+ const Option::Universe& u = Option::V4,
+ EvalContext::ParserType type = EvalContext::PARSER_BOOL) {
+ EvalContext eval(u);
+
+ EXPECT_THROW(eval.parseString(expr, type), ex) << "while parsing expression "
+ << expr;
+ }
+};
+
+// This is a quick way to check if certain expressions are valid or not and
+// whether the whole expression makes sense. This particular test checks if
+// integers can be used properly in expressions. There are many places where
+// integers are used. This particular test checks if pkt6.msgtype returns
+// something that can be compared with integers.
+//
+// For basic things we can take advantage of the skeleton packets created in
+// EvaluateTest constructors: The packet type is DISCOVER in DHCPv4 and
+// SOLICIT in DHCPv6. There is one option added with code 100 and content
+// being either "hundred4" or "hundred6" depending on the universe.
+
+// Tests if pkt6.msgtype returns something that can be compared with integers.
+TEST_F(ExpressionsTest, expressionsInteger1) {
+ testExpression(Option::V6, "pkt6.msgtype == 1", true);
+ testExpression(Option::V6, "pkt6.msgtype == 2", false);
+
+ testExpression(Option::V6, "pkt6.msgtype == 0x00000001", true);
+ testExpression(Option::V6, "pkt6.msgtype == 0x00000002", false);
+}
+
+// Tests if pkt6.transid returns something that can be compared with integers.
+TEST_F(ExpressionsTest, expressionsInteger2) {
+ testExpression(Option::V6, "pkt6.transid == 0", false);
+ testExpression(Option::V6, "pkt6.transid == 12345", true);
+ testExpression(Option::V6, "pkt6.transid == 12346", false);
+}
+
+// Tests if pkt4.transid returns something that can be compared with integers.
+TEST_F(ExpressionsTest, expressionsInteger3) {
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.transid == 0", false);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.transid == 12345", true);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.transid == 12346", false);
+}
+
+// Tests if integers can be compared with integers.
+TEST_F(ExpressionsTest, expressionsInteger4) {
+ testExpression(Option::V6, "0 == 0", true);
+ testExpression(Option::V6, "2 == 3", false);
+}
+
+// Tests if pkt4.hlen and pkt4.htype return values that can be compared with integers.
+TEST_F(ExpressionsTest, expressionsPkt4Hlen) {
+
+ // By default there's no hardware set up. The default Pkt4 constructor
+ // creates HWAddr(), which has hlen=0 and htype set to HTYPE_ETHER.
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.hlen == 0", true);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.htype == 1", true);
+
+ // Ok, let's initialize the hardware address to something plausible.
+ const size_t hwaddr_len = 6;
+ const uint16_t expected_htype = 123;
+ std::vector<uint8_t> hw(hwaddr_len,0);
+ for (int i = 0; i < hwaddr_len; i++) {
+ hw[i] = i + 1;
+ }
+ pkt4_->setHWAddr(expected_htype, hwaddr_len, hw);
+
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.hlen == 0", false);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.hlen == 5", false);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.hlen == 6", true);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.hlen == 7", false);
+
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.htype == 0", false);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.htype == 122", false);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.htype == 123", true);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.htype == 124", false);
+
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.mac == 0x010203040506", true);
+}
+
+// Test if expressions message type can be detected in Pkt4.
+// It also doubles as a check for integer comparison here.
+TEST_F(ExpressionsTest, expressionsPkt4type) {
+
+ // We can inspect the option content directly, but
+ // it requires knowledge of the option type and its format.
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "option[53].hex == 0x0", false);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "option[53].hex == 0x1", true);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "option[53].hex == 0x2", false);
+
+ // It's easier to simply use the pkt4.msgtype
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.msgtype == 0", false);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.msgtype == 1", true);
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "pkt4.msgtype == 2", false);
+}
+
+// This tests if inappropriate values (negative, too large) are
+// rejected, but extreme values still allowed for uint32_t are ok.
+TEST_F(ExpressionsTest, invalidIntegers) {
+
+ // These are the extreme uint32_t values that still should be accepted.
+ testExpression(Option::V4, "4294967295 == 0", false);
+
+ // Negative integers should be rejected.
+ testExpressionNegative<EvalParseError>("4294967295 == -1");
+
+ // Oops, one too much.
+ testExpressionNegative<EvalParseError>("4294967296 == 0");
+}
+
+// Tests whether expressions can be evaluated to a string.
+TEST_F(ExpressionsTest, evaluateString) {
+
+ // Check that content of the options is returned properly.
+ testExpressionString(Option::V4, "option[100].hex", "hundred4");
+ testExpressionString(Option::V6, "option[100].hex", "hundred6");
+
+ // Check that content of non-existing option returns empty string.
+ testExpressionString(Option::V4, "option[200].hex", "");
+ testExpressionString(Option::V6, "option[200].hex", "");
+
+ testExpressionNegative<EvalParseError>("pkt4.msgtype == 1", Option::V4,
+ EvalContext::PARSER_STRING);
+ testExpressionNegative<EvalParseError>("pkt6.msgtype == 1", Option::V6,
+ EvalContext::PARSER_STRING);
+
+ // Check that ifelse works as expecting (it was added explicitly for
+ // the string evaluation).
+ testExpressionString(Option::V4,
+ "ifelse(option[100].exists,'foo','bar')", "foo");
+ testExpressionString(Option::V4,
+ "ifelse(option[200].exists,'foo','bar')", "bar");
+
+ // Check that ifelse can be chained.
+ testExpressionString(Option::V4,
+ "ifelse(option[200].exists,option[200].hex,"
+ "ifelse(option[100].exists,"
+ "option[100].hex,'none?'))",
+ "hundred4");
+
+ // Check that hexstring works as expecting.
+ testExpressionString(Option::V4, "hexstring(0x1234,':')", "12:34");
+ testExpressionString(Option::V4, "hexstring(0x56789a,'-')", "56-78-9a");
+ testExpressionString(Option::V4, "hexstring(0xbcde,'')", "bcde");
+ testExpressionString(Option::V4, "hexstring(0xf01234,'..')", "f0..12..34");
+}
+
+};
diff --git a/src/lib/eval/tests/run_unittests.cc b/src/lib/eval/tests/run_unittests.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..08f04d1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/lib/eval/tests/run_unittests.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+// Copyright (C) 2015 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
+//
+// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+// License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+// file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
+
+#include <config.h>
+
+#include <log/logger_support.h>
+
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+int
+main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
+ ::testing::InitGoogleTest(&argc, argv);
+ isc::log::initLogger();
+
+ int result = RUN_ALL_TESTS();
+
+ return (result);
+}
diff --git a/src/lib/eval/tests/token_unittest.cc b/src/lib/eval/tests/token_unittest.cc
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..bc70927
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/lib/eval/tests/token_unittest.cc
@@ -0,0 +1,3487 @@
+// Copyright (C) 2015-2023 Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. ("ISC")
+//
+// This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
+// License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
+// file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
+
+#include <config.h>
+#include <fstream>
+#include <eval/token.h>
+#include <eval/eval_context.h>
+#include <dhcp/pkt4.h>
+#include <dhcp/pkt6.h>
+#include <dhcp/dhcp4.h>
+#include <dhcp/dhcp6.h>
+#include <dhcp/option_string.h>
+#include <dhcp/option_vendor.h>
+#include <dhcp/option_vendor_class.h>
+#include <log/logger_manager.h>
+#include <log/logger_name.h>
+#include <log/logger_support.h>
+#include <testutils/log_utils.h>
+
+#include <boost/algorithm/string/classification.hpp>
+#include <boost/algorithm/string/constants.hpp>
+#include <boost/algorithm/string/split.hpp>
+#include <boost/shared_ptr.hpp>
+#include <boost/scoped_ptr.hpp>
+#include <gtest/gtest.h>
+
+#include <arpa/inet.h>
+
+using namespace std;
+using namespace isc::dhcp;
+using namespace isc::asiolink;
+using namespace isc::log;
+using namespace isc::dhcp::test;
+
+namespace {
+
+/// @brief Test fixture for testing Tokens.
+///
+/// This class provides several convenience objects to be used during testing
+/// of the Token family of classes.
+
+class TokenTest : public LogContentTest {
+public:
+
+ /// @brief Initializes Pkt4, Pkt6 and options that can be useful for
+ /// evaluation tests.
+ TokenTest() {
+ pkt4_.reset(new Pkt4(DHCPDISCOVER, 12345));
+ pkt6_.reset(new Pkt6(DHCPV6_SOLICIT, 12345));
+
+ // Add options with easily identifiable strings in them
+ option_str4_.reset(new OptionString(Option::V4, 100, "hundred4"));
+ option_str6_.reset(new OptionString(Option::V6, 100, "hundred6"));
+
+ pkt4_->addOption(option_str4_);
+ pkt6_->addOption(option_str6_);
+
+ // Change this to true if you need extra information about logging
+ // checks to be printed.
+ logCheckVerbose(false);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Inserts RAI option with several suboptions
+ ///
+ /// The structure inserted is:
+ /// - RAI (option 82)
+ /// - option 1 (containing string "one")
+ /// - option 13 (containing string "thirteen")
+ void insertRelay4Option() {
+
+ // RAI (Relay Agent Information) option
+ OptionPtr rai(new Option(Option::V4, DHO_DHCP_AGENT_OPTIONS));
+ OptionPtr sub1(new OptionString(Option::V4, 1, "one"));
+ OptionPtr sub13(new OptionString(Option::V4, 13, "thirteen"));
+
+ rai->addOption(sub1);
+ rai->addOption(sub13);
+ pkt4_->addOption(rai);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Adds relay encapsulations with some suboptions
+ ///
+ /// This will add 2 relay encapsulations all will have
+ /// msg_type of RELAY_FORW
+ /// Relay 0 (closest to server) will have
+ /// linkaddr = peeraddr = 0, hop-count = 1
+ /// option 100 "hundred.zero", option 101 "hundredone.zero"
+ /// Relay 1 (closest to client) will have
+ /// linkaddr 1::1= peeraddr = 1::2, hop-count = 0
+ /// option 100 "hundred.one", option 102 "hundredtwo.one"
+ void addRelay6Encapsulations() {
+ // First relay
+ Pkt6::RelayInfo relay0;
+ relay0.msg_type_ = DHCPV6_RELAY_FORW;
+ relay0.hop_count_ = 1;
+ relay0.linkaddr_ = isc::asiolink::IOAddress("::");
+ relay0.peeraddr_ = isc::asiolink::IOAddress("::");
+ OptionPtr optRelay01(new OptionString(Option::V6, 100,
+ "hundred.zero"));
+ OptionPtr optRelay02(new OptionString(Option::V6, 101,
+ "hundredone.zero"));
+
+ relay0.options_.insert(make_pair(optRelay01->getType(), optRelay01));
+ relay0.options_.insert(make_pair(optRelay02->getType(), optRelay02));
+
+ pkt6_->addRelayInfo(relay0);
+ // Second relay
+ Pkt6::RelayInfo relay1;
+ relay1.msg_type_ = DHCPV6_RELAY_FORW;
+ relay1.hop_count_ = 0;
+ relay1.linkaddr_ = isc::asiolink::IOAddress("1::1");
+ relay1.peeraddr_ = isc::asiolink::IOAddress("1::2");
+ OptionPtr optRelay11(new OptionString(Option::V6, 100,
+ "hundred.one"));
+ OptionPtr optRelay12(new OptionString(Option::V6, 102,
+ "hundredtwo.one"));
+
+ relay1.options_.insert(make_pair(optRelay11->getType(), optRelay11));
+ relay1.options_.insert(make_pair(optRelay12->getType(), optRelay12));
+ pkt6_->addRelayInfo(relay1);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Verify that the relay6 option evaluations work properly
+ ///
+ /// Given the nesting level and option code extract the option
+ /// and compare it to the expected string.
+ ///
+ /// @param test_level The nesting level
+ /// @param test_code The code of the option to extract
+ /// @param result_addr The expected result of the address as a string
+ void verifyRelay6Option(const int8_t test_level,
+ const uint16_t test_code,
+ const TokenOption::RepresentationType& test_rep,
+ const std::string& result_string) {
+ // Create the token
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay6Option(test_level,
+ test_code,
+ test_rep)));
+
+ // We should be able to evaluate it
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+
+ // We should have one value on the stack
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+
+ // And it should match the expected result
+ // Invalid nesting levels result in a 0 length string
+ EXPECT_EQ(result_string, values_.top());
+
+ // Then we clear the stack
+ clearStack();
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Verify that the relay6 field evaluations work properly
+ ///
+ /// Given the nesting level, the field to extract and the expected
+ /// address create a token and evaluate it then compare the addresses
+ ///
+ /// @param test_level The nesting level
+ /// @param test_field The type of the field to extract
+ /// @param result_addr The expected result of the address as a string
+ void verifyRelay6Eval(const int8_t test_level,
+ const TokenRelay6Field::FieldType test_field,
+ const int result_len,
+ const uint8_t result_addr[]) {
+ // Create the token
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay6Field(test_level, test_field)));
+
+ // We should be able to evaluate it
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+
+ // We should have one value on the stack
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+
+ // And it should match the expected result
+ // Invalid nesting levels result in a 0 length string
+ EXPECT_EQ(result_len, values_.top().size());
+ if (result_len != 0) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(result_addr, &values_.top()[0], result_len));
+ }
+
+ // Then we clear the stack
+ clearStack();
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Convenience function. Removes token and values stacks.
+ /// @param token specifies if the convenience token should be removed or not
+ void clearStack(bool token = true) {
+ while (!values_.empty()) {
+ values_.pop();
+ }
+ if (token) {
+ t_.reset();
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Aux. function that stores integer values as 4 byte string.
+ ///
+ /// @param value integer value to be stored
+ /// @return 4 byte long string with encoded value.
+ string encode(uint32_t value) {
+ return EvalContext::fromUint32(value);
+ }
+
+ TokenPtr t_; ///< Just a convenience pointer
+
+ ValueStack values_; ///< evaluated values will be stored here
+
+ Pkt4Ptr pkt4_; ///< A stub DHCPv4 packet
+ Pkt6Ptr pkt6_; ///< A stub DHCPv6 packet
+
+ OptionPtr option_str4_; ///< A string option for DHCPv4
+ OptionPtr option_str6_; ///< A string option for DHCPv6
+
+ OptionVendorPtr vendor_; ///< Vendor option used during tests
+ OptionVendorClassPtr vendor_class_; ///< Vendor class option used during tests
+
+ /// @brief Verify that the substring eval works properly
+ ///
+ /// This function takes the parameters and sets up the value
+ /// stack then executes the eval and checks the results.
+ ///
+ /// @param test_string The string to operate on
+ /// @param test_start The position to start when getting a substring
+ /// @param test_length The length of the substring to get
+ /// @param result_string The expected result of the eval
+ /// @param should_throw The eval will throw
+ void verifySubstringEval(const std::string& test_string,
+ const std::string& test_start,
+ const std::string& test_length,
+ const std::string& result_string,
+ bool should_throw = false) {
+
+ // create the token
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSubstring()));
+
+ // push values on stack
+ values_.push(test_string);
+ values_.push(test_start);
+ values_.push(test_length);
+
+ // evaluate the token
+ if (should_throw) {
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, values_.size());
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // verify results
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(result_string, values_.top());
+
+ // remove result
+ values_.pop();
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Verify that the split eval works properly
+ ///
+ /// This function takes the parameters and sets up the value
+ /// stack then executes the eval and checks the results.
+ ///
+ /// @param test_string The string to operate on
+ /// @param test_delimiters The string of delimiter characters to split upon
+ /// @param test_field The field number of the desired field
+ /// @param result_string The expected result of the eval
+ /// @param should_throw The eval will throw
+ void verifySplitEval(const std::string& test_string,
+ const std::string& test_delimiters,
+ const std::string& test_field,
+ const std::string& result_string,
+ bool should_throw = false) {
+ // create the token
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSplit()));
+
+ // push values on stack
+ values_.push(test_string);
+ values_.push(test_delimiters);
+ values_.push(test_field);
+
+ // evaluate the token
+ if (should_throw) {
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+ ASSERT_EQ(0, values_.size());
+ } else {
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // verify results
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(result_string, values_.top());
+
+ // remove result
+ values_.pop();
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Creates vendor-option with specified value and adds it to packet
+ ///
+ /// This method creates specified vendor option, removes any existing
+ /// vendor options and adds the new one to v4 or v6 packet.
+ ///
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param vendor_id specifies enterprise-id value.
+ void setVendorOption(Option::Universe u, uint32_t vendor_id) {
+ vendor_.reset(new OptionVendor(u, vendor_id));
+ switch (u) {
+ case Option::V4:
+ pkt4_->delOption(DHO_VIVSO_SUBOPTIONS);
+ pkt4_->addOption(vendor_);
+ break;
+ case Option::V6:
+ pkt6_->delOption(D6O_VENDOR_OPTS);
+ pkt6_->addOption(vendor_);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Creates vendor-class option with specified values and adds it to packet
+ ///
+ /// This method creates specified vendor-class option, removes any existing
+ /// vendor class options and adds the new one to v4 or v6 packet.
+ /// It also creates data tuples with greek alphabet names.
+ ///
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param vendor_id specifies enterprise-id value.
+ /// @param tuples_size number of data tuples to create.
+ void setVendorClassOption(Option::Universe u, uint32_t vendor_id,
+ size_t tuples_size = 0) {
+ // Create the option first.
+ vendor_class_.reset(new OptionVendorClass(u, vendor_id));
+
+ // Now let's add specified number of data tuples
+ OpaqueDataTuple::LengthFieldType len = (u == Option::V4?OpaqueDataTuple::LENGTH_1_BYTE:
+ OpaqueDataTuple::LENGTH_2_BYTES);
+ const char* content[] = { "alpha", "beta", "delta", "gamma", "epsilon",
+ "zeta", "eta", "theta", "iota", "kappa" };
+ const size_t nb_content = sizeof(content) / sizeof(char*);
+ ASSERT_TRUE(tuples_size < nb_content);
+ for (size_t i = 0; i < tuples_size; ++i) {
+ OpaqueDataTuple tuple(len);
+ tuple.assign(string(content[i]));
+ if (u == Option::V4 && i == 0) {
+ // vendor-class for v4 has a peculiar quirk. The first tuple is being
+ // added, even if there's no data at all.
+ vendor_class_->setTuple(0, tuple);
+ } else {
+ vendor_class_->addTuple(tuple);
+ }
+ }
+
+ switch (u) {
+ case Option::V4:
+ pkt4_->delOption(DHO_VIVCO_SUBOPTIONS);
+ pkt4_->addOption(vendor_class_);
+ break;
+ case Option::V6:
+ pkt6_->delOption(D6O_VENDOR_CLASS);
+ pkt6_->addOption(vendor_class_);
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Auxiliary function that evaluates tokens and checks result
+ ///
+ /// Depending on the universe, either pkt4_ or pkt6_ are supposed to have
+ /// all the necessary values and options set. The result is checked
+ /// on the values_ stack.
+ ///
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param expected_result text representation of the expected outcome
+ void evaluate(Option::Universe u, std::string expected_result) {
+ switch (u) {
+ case Option::V4:
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ break;
+ case Option::V6:
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ break;
+ default:
+ ADD_FAILURE() << "Invalid universe specified.";
+ }
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(expected_result, values_.top());
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Tests if vendor token behaves properly.
+ ///
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param token_vendor_id enterprise-id used in the token
+ /// @param option_vendor_id enterprise-id used in option (0 means don't
+ /// create the option)
+ /// @param expected_result text representation of the expected outcome
+ void testVendorExists(Option::Universe u, uint32_t token_vendor_id,
+ uint32_t option_vendor_id,
+ const std::string& expected_result) {
+ // Let's clear any old values, so we can run multiple cases in each test
+ clearStack();
+
+ // Create the token
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenVendor(u, token_vendor_id,
+ TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+
+ // If specified option is non-zero, create it.
+ if (option_vendor_id) {
+ setVendorOption(u, option_vendor_id);
+ }
+
+ evaluate(u, expected_result);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Tests if vendor token properly returns enterprise-id.
+ ///
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param option_vendor_id enterprise-id used in option (0 means don't
+ /// create the option)
+ /// @param expected_result text representation of the expected outcome
+ void testVendorEnterprise(Option::Universe u, uint32_t option_vendor_id,
+ const std::string& expected_result) {
+ // Let's clear any old values, so we can run multiple cases in each test
+ clearStack();
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenVendor(u, 0, TokenVendor::ENTERPRISE_ID)));
+ if (option_vendor_id) {
+ setVendorOption(u, option_vendor_id);
+ }
+
+ evaluate(u, expected_result);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Tests if vendor class token properly returns enterprise-id.
+ ///
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param option_vendor_id enterprise-id used in option (0 means don't
+ /// create the option)
+ /// @param expected_result text representation of the expected outcome
+ void testVendorClassEnterprise(Option::Universe u, uint32_t option_vendor_id,
+ const std::string& expected_result) {
+ // Let's clear any old values, so we can run multiple cases in each test
+ clearStack();
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenVendorClass(u, 0, TokenVendor::ENTERPRISE_ID)));
+ if (option_vendor_id) {
+ setVendorClassOption(u, option_vendor_id);
+ }
+
+ evaluate(u, expected_result);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Tests if vendor class token can report existence properly.
+ ///
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param token_vendor_id enterprise-id used in the token
+ /// @param option_vendor_id enterprise-id used in option (0 means don't
+ /// create the option)
+ /// @param expected_result text representation of the expected outcome
+ void testVendorClassExists(Option::Universe u, uint32_t token_vendor_id,
+ uint32_t option_vendor_id,
+ const std::string& expected_result) {
+ // Let's clear any old values, so we can run multiple cases in each test
+ clearStack();
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenVendorClass(u, token_vendor_id,
+ TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+
+ if (option_vendor_id) {
+ setVendorClassOption(u, option_vendor_id);
+ }
+
+ evaluate(u, expected_result);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Tests if vendor token can handle sub-options properly.
+ ///
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param token_vendor_id enterprise-id used in the token
+ /// @param token_option_code option code in the token
+ /// @param option_vendor_id enterprise-id used in option (0 means don't
+ /// create the option)
+ /// @param option_code sub-option code (0 means don't create suboption)
+ /// @param repr representation (TokenOption::EXISTS or HEXADECIMAL)
+ /// @param expected_result text representation of the expected outcome
+ void testVendorSuboption(Option::Universe u,
+ uint32_t token_vendor_id, uint16_t token_option_code,
+ uint32_t option_vendor_id, uint16_t option_code,
+ TokenOption::RepresentationType repr,
+ const std::string& expected) {
+ // Let's clear any old values, so we can run multiple cases in each test
+ clearStack();
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenVendor(u, token_vendor_id, repr,
+ token_option_code)));
+ if (option_vendor_id) {
+ setVendorOption(u, option_vendor_id);
+ if (option_code) {
+ ASSERT_TRUE(vendor_);
+ OptionPtr subopt(new OptionString(u, option_code, "alpha"));
+ vendor_->addOption(subopt);
+ }
+ }
+
+ evaluate(u, expected);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Tests if vendor class token can handle data chunks properly.
+ ///
+ /// @param u universe (V4 or V6)
+ /// @param token_vendor_id enterprise-id used in the token
+ /// @param token_index data index used in the token
+ /// @param option_vendor_id enterprise-id used in option (0 means don't
+ /// create the option)
+ /// @param data_tuples number of data tuples in the option
+ /// @param expected_result text representation of the expected outcome
+ void testVendorClassData(Option::Universe u,
+ uint32_t token_vendor_id, uint16_t token_index,
+ uint32_t option_vendor_id, uint16_t data_tuples,
+ const std::string& expected) {
+ // Let's clear any old values, so we can run multiple cases in each test
+ clearStack();
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenVendorClass(u, token_vendor_id,
+ TokenVendor::DATA, token_index)));
+ if (option_vendor_id) {
+ setVendorClassOption(u, option_vendor_id, data_tuples);
+ }
+
+ evaluate(u, expected);
+ }
+
+ /// @brief Tests if TokenInteger evaluates to the proper value
+ ///
+ /// @param expected expected string representation on stack after evaluation
+ /// @param value integer value passed to constructor
+ void testInteger(const std::string& expected, uint32_t value) {
+
+ clearStack();
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenInteger(value)));
+
+ // The universe (v4 or v6) shouldn't have any impact on this,
+ // but let's check it anyway.
+ evaluate(Option::V4, expected);
+
+ clearStack(false);
+ evaluate(Option::V6, expected);
+
+ clearStack(true);
+ }
+};
+
+// This tests the toBool() conversions
+TEST_F(TokenTest, toBool) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(Token::toBool("true"));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(Token::toBool("true"));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(Token::toBool("false"));
+ EXPECT_FALSE(Token::toBool("false"));
+
+ // Token::toBool() is case-sensitive
+ EXPECT_THROW(Token::toBool("True"), EvalTypeError);
+ EXPECT_THROW(Token::toBool("TRUE"), EvalTypeError);
+
+ // Proposed aliases
+ EXPECT_THROW(Token::toBool("1"), EvalTypeError);
+ EXPECT_THROW(Token::toBool("0"), EvalTypeError);
+ EXPECT_THROW(Token::toBool(""), EvalTypeError);
+}
+
+// This simple test checks that a TokenString, representing a constant string,
+// can be used in Pkt4 evaluation. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(TokenTest, string4) {
+
+ // Store constant string "foo" in the TokenString object.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenString("foo")));
+
+ // Make sure that the token can be evaluated without exceptions.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("foo", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_STRING Pushing text string 'foo'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This simple test checks that a TokenString, representing a constant string,
+// can be used in Pkt6 evaluation. (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(TokenTest, string6) {
+
+ // Store constant string "foo" in the TokenString object.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenString("foo")));
+
+ // Make sure that the token can be evaluated without exceptions.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("foo", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_STRING Pushing text string 'foo'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This simple test checks that a TokenHexString, representing a constant
+// string coded in hexadecimal, can be used in Pkt4 evaluation.
+// (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(TokenTest, hexstring4) {
+ TokenPtr empty;
+ TokenPtr bad;
+ TokenPtr nodigit;
+ TokenPtr baddigit;
+ TokenPtr bell;
+ TokenPtr foo;
+ TokenPtr cookie;
+
+ // Store constant empty hexstring "" ("") in the TokenHexString object.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(empty.reset(new TokenHexString("")));
+ // Store bad encoded hexstring "0abc" ("").
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bad.reset(new TokenHexString("0abc")));
+ // Store hexstring with no digits "0x" ("").
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(nodigit.reset(new TokenHexString("0x")));
+ // Store hexstring with a bad hexdigit "0xxabc" ("").
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(baddigit.reset(new TokenHexString("0xxabc")));
+ // Store hexstring with an odd number of hexdigits "0x7" ("\a").
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bell.reset(new TokenHexString("0x7")));
+ // Store constant hexstring "0x666f6f" ("foo").
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(foo.reset(new TokenHexString("0x666f6f")));
+ // Store constant hexstring "0x63825363" (DHCP_OPTIONS_COOKIE).
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(cookie.reset(new TokenHexString("0x63825363")));
+
+ // Make sure that tokens can be evaluated without exceptions,
+ // and verify the debug output
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(empty->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bad->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(nodigit->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(baddigit->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bell->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(foo->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(cookie->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(7, values_.size());
+ uint32_t expected = htonl(DHCP_OPTIONS_COOKIE);
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&expected, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("foo", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("\a", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x07");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x666F6F");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x63825363");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This simple test checks that a TokenHexString, representing a constant
+// string coded in hexadecimal, can be used in Pkt6 evaluation.
+// (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(TokenTest, hexstring6) {
+ TokenPtr empty;
+ TokenPtr bad;
+ TokenPtr nodigit;
+ TokenPtr baddigit;
+ TokenPtr bell;
+ TokenPtr foo;
+ TokenPtr cookie;
+
+ // Store constant empty hexstring "" ("") in the TokenHexString object.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(empty.reset(new TokenHexString("")));
+ // Store bad encoded hexstring "0abc" ("").
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bad.reset(new TokenHexString("0abc")));
+ // Store hexstring with no digits "0x" ("").
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(nodigit.reset(new TokenHexString("0x")));
+ // Store hexstring with a bad hexdigit "0xxabc" ("").
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(baddigit.reset(new TokenHexString("0xxabc")));
+ // Store hexstring with an odd number of hexdigits "0x7" ("\a").
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bell.reset(new TokenHexString("0x7")));
+ // Store constant hexstring "0x666f6f" ("foo").
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(foo.reset(new TokenHexString("0x666f6f")));
+ // Store constant hexstring "0x63825363" (DHCP_OPTIONS_COOKIE).
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(cookie.reset(new TokenHexString("0x63825363")));
+
+ // Make sure that tokens can be evaluated without exceptions.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(empty->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bad->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(nodigit->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(baddigit->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bell->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(foo->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(cookie->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(7, values_.size());
+ uint32_t expected = htonl(DHCP_OPTIONS_COOKIE);
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&expected, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("foo", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("\a", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x07");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x666F6F");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_HEXSTRING Pushing hex string 0x63825363");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks that a TokenIpAddress, representing an IP address as
+// a constant string, can be used in Pkt4/Pkt6 evaluation.
+// (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(TokenTest, ipaddress) {
+ TokenPtr bad4;
+ TokenPtr bad6;
+ TokenPtr ip4;
+ TokenPtr ip6;
+
+ // Bad IP addresses
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bad4.reset(new TokenIpAddress("10.0.0.0.1")));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bad6.reset(new TokenIpAddress(":::")));
+
+ // IP addresses
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(ip4.reset(new TokenIpAddress("10.0.0.1")));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(ip6.reset(new TokenIpAddress("2001:db8::1")));
+
+ // Make sure that tokens can be evaluated without exceptions.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(ip4->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(ip6->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bad4->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(bad6->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.size());
+
+ // Check bad addresses (they pushed '' on the value stack)
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, values_.top().size());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, values_.top().size());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check IPv6 address
+ uint8_t expected6[] = { 0x20, 1, 0xd, 0xb8, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1 };
+ EXPECT_EQ(16, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(expected6, &values_.top()[0], 16));
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check IPv4 address
+ uint8_t expected4[] = { 10, 0, 0, 1 };
+ EXPECT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(expected4, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_IPADDRESS Pushing IPAddress 0x0A000001");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_IPADDRESS Pushing IPAddress "
+ "0x20010DB8000000000000000000000001");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_IPADDRESS Pushing IPAddress 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_IPADDRESS Pushing IPAddress 0x");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks that a TokenIpAddressToText, representing an IP address as
+// a string, can be used in Pkt4/Pkt6 evaluation.
+// (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(TokenTest, addressToText) {
+ TokenPtr address((new TokenIpAddressToText()));
+ std::vector<uint8_t> bytes;
+
+ std::string value = "10.0.0.1";
+ values_.push(value);
+
+ // Invalid data size fails.
+ EXPECT_THROW(address->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ bytes = IOAddress(value).toBytes();
+ values_.push(std::string(bytes.begin(), bytes.end()));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(address->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+
+ value = "2001:db8::1";
+ bytes = IOAddress(value).toBytes();
+ values_.push(std::string(bytes.begin(), bytes.end()));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(address->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, values_.size());
+
+ values_.push(std::string());
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(address->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, values_.size());
+
+ // Check empty data
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check IPv6 address
+ EXPECT_EQ(11, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("2001:db8::1", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check IPv4 address
+ EXPECT_EQ(8, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("10.0.0.1", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_IPADDRESSTOTEXT Pushing IPAddress 10.0.0.1");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_IPADDRESSTOTEXT Pushing IPAddress 2001:db8::1");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks that a TokenIntToText, representing an integer as a string,
+// can be used in Pkt4/Pkt6 evaluation.
+// (The actual packet is not used)
+TEST_F(TokenTest, integerToText) {
+ TokenPtr int8token((new TokenInt8ToText()));
+ TokenPtr int16token((new TokenInt16ToText()));
+ TokenPtr int32token((new TokenInt32ToText()));
+ TokenPtr uint8token((new TokenUInt8ToText()));
+ TokenPtr uint16token((new TokenUInt16ToText()));
+ TokenPtr uint32token((new TokenUInt32ToText()));
+
+ std::vector<uint8_t> bytes;
+ std::string value = "0123456789";
+
+ // Invalid data size fails.
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_THROW(int8token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_THROW(int16token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_THROW(int32token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_THROW(uint8token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_THROW(uint16token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_THROW(uint32token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ uint64_t data = -1;
+
+ values_.push(std::string(const_cast<const char *>(reinterpret_cast<char*>(&data)), sizeof(int8_t)));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(int8token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+
+ int16_t i16 = 0;
+ memcpy(&i16, &data, sizeof(int16_t));
+ values_.push(std::string(const_cast<const char *>(reinterpret_cast<char*>(&i16)), sizeof(int16_t)));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(int16token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, values_.size());
+
+ int32_t i32 = 0;
+ memcpy(&i32, &data, sizeof(int32_t));
+ values_.push(std::string(const_cast<const char *>(reinterpret_cast<char*>(&i32)), sizeof(int32_t)));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(int32token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(3, values_.size());
+
+ values_.push(std::string(const_cast<const char *>(reinterpret_cast<char*>(&data)), sizeof(uint8_t)));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(uint8token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.size());
+
+ uint16_t ui16 = 0;
+ memcpy(&ui16, &data, sizeof(uint16_t));
+ values_.push(std::string(const_cast<const char *>(reinterpret_cast<char*>(&ui16)), sizeof(uint16_t)));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(uint16token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(5, values_.size());
+
+ uint32_t ui32 = 0;
+ memcpy(&ui32, &data, sizeof(uint32_t));
+ values_.push(std::string(const_cast<const char *>(reinterpret_cast<char*>(&ui32)), sizeof(uint32_t)));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(uint32token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(6, values_.size());
+
+ value = "";
+
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(int8token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(7, values_.size());
+
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(int16token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(8, values_.size());
+
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(int32token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(9, values_.size());
+
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(uint8token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(10, values_.size());
+
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(uint16token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(11, values_.size());
+
+ values_.push(value);
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(uint32token->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check that the evaluation put its value on the values stack.
+ ASSERT_EQ(12, values_.size());
+
+ // Check empty data
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check empty data
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check empty data
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check empty data
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check empty data
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check empty data
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check uint32
+ EXPECT_EQ(10, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("4294967295", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check uint16
+ EXPECT_EQ(5, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("65535", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check uint8
+ EXPECT_EQ(3, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("255", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check int32
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("-1", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check int16
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("-1", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check int8
+ EXPECT_EQ(2, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("-1", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_INT8TOTEXT Pushing Int8 -1");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_INT16TOTEXT Pushing Int16 -1");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_INT32TOTEXT Pushing Int32 -1");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_UINT8TOTEXT Pushing UInt8 255");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_UINT16TOTEXT Pushing UInt16 65535");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_UINT32TOTEXT Pushing UInt32 4294967295");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an option value is able to extract
+// the option from an IPv4 packet and properly store the option's value.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, optionString4) {
+ TokenPtr found;
+ TokenPtr not_found;
+
+ // The packets we use have option 100 with a string in them.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found.reset(new TokenOption(100, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found.reset(new TokenOption(101, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+
+ // This should evaluate to the content of the option 100 (i.e. "hundred4")
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // This should evaluate to "" as there is no option 101.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // There should be 2 values evaluated.
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, values_.size());
+
+ // This is a stack, so the pop order is inversed. We should get the empty
+ // string first.
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Then the content of the option 100.
+ EXPECT_EQ("hundred4", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 'hundred4'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 101 with value ''");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing option value is able to extract
+// the option from an IPv4 packet and properly store its value in a
+// hexadecimal format.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, optionHexString4) {
+ TokenPtr found;
+ TokenPtr not_found;
+
+ // The packets we use have option 100 with a string in them.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found.reset(new TokenOption(100, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL)));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found.reset(new TokenOption(101, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL)));
+
+ // This should evaluate to the content of the option 100 (i.e. "hundred4")
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // This should evaluate to "" as there is no option 101.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // There should be 2 values evaluated.
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, values_.size());
+
+ // This is a stack, so the pop order is inversed. We should get the empty
+ // string first.
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Then the content of the option 100.
+ EXPECT_EQ("hundred4", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 0x68756E6472656434");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 101 with value 0x");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an option value is able to check
+// the existence of the option from an IPv4 packet.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, optionExistsString4) {
+ TokenPtr found;
+ TokenPtr not_found;
+
+ // The packets we use have option 100 with a string in them.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found.reset(new TokenOption(100, TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found.reset(new TokenOption(101, TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // There should be 2 values evaluated.
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, values_.size());
+
+ // This is a stack, so the pop order is inversed.
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 101 with value 'false'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an option value is able to extract
+// the option from an IPv6 packet and properly store the option's value.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, optionString6) {
+ TokenPtr found;
+ TokenPtr not_found;
+
+ // The packets we use have option 100 with a string in them.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found.reset(new TokenOption(100, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found.reset(new TokenOption(101, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+
+ // This should evaluate to the content of the option 100 (i.e. "hundred6")
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+
+ // This should evaluate to "" as there is no option 101.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+
+ // There should be 2 values evaluated.
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, values_.size());
+
+ // This is a stack, so the pop order is inversed. We should get the empty
+ // string first.
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Then the content of the option 100.
+ EXPECT_EQ("hundred6", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 'hundred6'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 101 with value ''");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an option value is able to extract
+// the option from an IPv6 packet and properly store its value in hexadecimal
+// format.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, optionHexString6) {
+ TokenPtr found;
+ TokenPtr not_found;
+
+ // The packets we use have option 100 with a string in them.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found.reset(new TokenOption(100, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL)));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found.reset(new TokenOption(101, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL)));
+
+ // This should evaluate to the content of the option 100 (i.e. "hundred6")
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+
+ // This should evaluate to "" as there is no option 101.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+
+ // There should be 2 values evaluated.
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, values_.size());
+
+ // This is a stack, so the pop order is inversed. We should get the empty
+ // string first.
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Then the content of the option 100.
+ EXPECT_EQ("hundred6", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 0x68756E6472656436");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 101 with value 0x");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an option value is able to check
+// the existence of the option from an IPv6 packet.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, optionExistsString6) {
+ TokenPtr found;
+ TokenPtr not_found;
+
+ // The packets we use have option 100 with a string in them.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found.reset(new TokenOption(100, TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found.reset(new TokenOption(101, TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(found->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(not_found->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+
+ // There should be 2 values evaluated.
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, values_.size());
+
+ // This is a stack, so the pop order is inversed.
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 101 with value 'false'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks that the existing relay4 option can be found.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, relay4Option) {
+
+ // Insert relay option with sub-options 1 and 13
+ insertRelay4Option();
+
+ // Creating the token should be safe.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay4Option(13, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+
+ // We should be able to evaluate it.
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // we should have one value on the stack
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+
+ // The option should be found and relay4[13] should evaluate to the
+ // content of that sub-option, i.e. "thirteen"
+ EXPECT_EQ("thirteen", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 13 with value 'thirteen'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks that the code properly handles cases when
+// there is a RAI option, but there's no requested sub-option.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, relay4OptionNoSuboption) {
+
+ // Insert relay option with sub-options 1 and 13
+ insertRelay4Option();
+
+ // Creating the token should be safe.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay4Option(15, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+
+ // We should be able to evaluate it.
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // we should have one value on the stack
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+
+ // The option should NOT be found (there is no sub-option 15),
+ // so the expression should evaluate to ""
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 15 with value ''");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks that the code properly handles cases when
+// there's no RAI option at all.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, relay4OptionNoRai) {
+
+ // We didn't call insertRelay4Option(), so there's no RAI option.
+
+ // Creating the token should be safe.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay4Option(13, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+
+ // We should be able to evaluate it.
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // we should have one value on the stack
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+
+ // The option should NOT be found (there is no sub-option 13),
+ // so the expression should evaluate to ""
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 13 with value ''");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks that only the RAI is searched for the requested
+// sub-option.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, relay4RAIOnly) {
+
+ // Insert relay option with sub-options 1 and 13
+ insertRelay4Option();
+
+ // Add options 13 and 70 to the packet.
+ OptionPtr opt13(new OptionString(Option::V4, 13, "THIRTEEN"));
+ OptionPtr opt70(new OptionString(Option::V4, 70, "SEVENTY"));
+ pkt4_->addOption(opt13);
+ pkt4_->addOption(opt70);
+
+ // The situation is as follows:
+ // Packet:
+ // - option 13 (containing "THIRTEEN")
+ // - option 82 (rai)
+ // - option 1 (containing "one")
+ // - option 13 (containing "thirteen")
+
+ // Let's try to get option 13. It should get the one from RAI
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay4Option(13, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("thirteen", values_.top());
+
+ // Try to get option 1. It should get the one from RAI
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay4Option(1, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("one", values_.top());
+
+ // Try to get option 70. It should fail, as there's no such
+ // sub option in RAI.
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay4Option(70, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+
+ // Try to check option 1. It should return "true"
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay4Option(1, TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // Try to check option 70. It should return "false"
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay4Option(70, TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 13 with value 'thirteen'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 1 with value 'one'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 70 with value ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 1 with value 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 70 with value 'false'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if we can properly extract an option
+// from relay encapsulations. Our packet has two relay
+// encapsulations. Both include a common option with the
+// original message (option 100) and both include their
+// own option (101 and 102). We attempt to extract the
+// options and compare them to expected values. We also
+// try to extract an option from an encapsulation
+// that doesn't exist (level 2), this should result in an empty
+// string.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, relay6Option) {
+ // We start by adding a set of relay encapsulations to the
+ // basic v6 packet.
+ addRelay6Encapsulations();
+
+ // Then we work our way through the set of choices
+ // Level 0 both options it has and the check that
+ // the checking for an option it doesn't have results
+ // in an empty string.
+ verifyRelay6Option(0, 100, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "hundred.zero");
+ verifyRelay6Option(0, 100, TokenOption::EXISTS, "true");
+ verifyRelay6Option(0, 101, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "hundredone.zero");
+ verifyRelay6Option(0, 102, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "");
+ verifyRelay6Option(0, 102, TokenOption::EXISTS, "false");
+
+ // Level 1, again both options it has and the one for level 0
+ verifyRelay6Option(1, 100, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "hundred.one");
+ verifyRelay6Option(1, 101, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "");
+ verifyRelay6Option(1, 102, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "hundredtwo.one");
+
+ // Level 2, no encapsulation so no options
+ verifyRelay6Option(2, 100, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "");
+
+ // Level -1, the same as level 1
+ verifyRelay6Option(-1, 100, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "hundred.one");
+ verifyRelay6Option(-1, 101, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "");
+ verifyRelay6Option(-1, 102, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "hundredtwo.one");
+
+ // Level -2, the same as level 0
+ verifyRelay6Option(-2, 100, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "hundred.zero");
+ verifyRelay6Option(-2, 100, TokenOption::EXISTS, "true");
+ verifyRelay6Option(-2, 101, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "hundredone.zero");
+ verifyRelay6Option(-2, 102, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "");
+ verifyRelay6Option(-2, 102, TokenOption::EXISTS, "false");
+
+ // Level -3, no encapsulation so no options
+ verifyRelay6Option(-3, 100, TokenOption::TEXTUAL, "");
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 'hundred.zero'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 101 with value 'hundredone.zero'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 102 with value ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 102 with value 'false'");
+
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 'hundred.one'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 101 with value ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 102 with value 'hundredtwo.one'");
+
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value ''");
+
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 'hundred.one'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 101 with value ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 102 with value 'hundredtwo.one'");
+
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 'hundred.zero'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 101 with value 'hundredone.zero'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 102 with value ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 102 with value 'false'");
+
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 100 with value ''");
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Verifies that relay6 option requires DHCPv6
+TEST_F(TokenTest, relay6OptionError) {
+ // Create a relay6 option token
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay6Option(0, 13, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+
+ // A DHCPv6 packet is required
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+}
+
+// Verifies that DHCPv4 packet metadata can be extracted.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, pkt4MetaData) {
+ pkt4_->setIface("eth0");
+ pkt4_->setLocalAddr(IOAddress("10.0.0.1"));
+ pkt4_->setRemoteAddr(IOAddress("10.0.0.2"));
+
+ // Check interface (expect eth0)
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt(TokenPkt::IFACE)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ ASSERT_EQ("eth0", values_.top());
+
+ // Check source (expect 10.0.0.2)
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt(TokenPkt::SRC)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ vector<uint8_t> a2 = IOAddress("10.0.0.2").toBytes();
+ ASSERT_EQ(a2.size(), values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&a2[0], &values_.top()[0], a2.size()));
+
+ // Check destination (expect 10.0.0.1)
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt(TokenPkt::DST)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ vector<uint8_t> a1 = IOAddress("10.0.0.1").toBytes();
+ ASSERT_EQ(a1.size(), values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&a1[0], &values_.top()[0], a1.size()));
+
+ // Check length (expect 249)
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt(TokenPkt::LEN)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ uint32_t length = htonl(static_cast<uint32_t>(pkt4_->len()));
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&length, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Unknown metadata type fails
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt(TokenPkt::MetadataType(100))));
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT Pushing PKT meta data iface with value eth0");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT Pushing PKT meta data src with value 0x0A000002");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT Pushing PKT meta data dst with value 0x0A000001");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT Pushing PKT meta data len with value 0x000000F9");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Verifies that DHCPv6 packet metadata can be extracted.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, pkt6MetaData) {
+ pkt6_->setIface("eth0");
+ pkt6_->setLocalAddr(IOAddress("ff02::1:2"));
+ pkt6_->setRemoteAddr(IOAddress("fe80::1234"));
+
+ // Check interface (expect eth0)
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt(TokenPkt::IFACE)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ ASSERT_EQ("eth0", values_.top());
+
+ // Check source (expect fe80::1234)
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt(TokenPkt::SRC)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ ASSERT_EQ(16, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0xfe, static_cast<uint8_t>(values_.top()[0]));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0x80, static_cast<uint8_t>(values_.top()[1]));
+ for (unsigned i = 2; i < 14; ++i) {
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, values_.top()[i]);
+ }
+ EXPECT_EQ(0x12, values_.top()[14]);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0x34, values_.top()[15]);
+
+ // Check destination (expect ff02::1:2)
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt(TokenPkt::DST)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ vector<uint8_t> ma = IOAddress("ff02::1:2").toBytes();
+ ASSERT_EQ(ma.size(), values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&ma[0], &values_.top()[0], ma.size()));
+
+ // Check length (expect 16)
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt(TokenPkt::LEN)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ uint32_t length = htonl(static_cast<uint32_t>(pkt6_->len()));
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&length, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Unknown meta data type fails
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt(TokenPkt::MetadataType(100))));
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT Pushing PKT meta data iface with value eth0");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT Pushing PKT meta data src with value "
+ "0xFE800000000000000000000000001234");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT Pushing PKT meta data dst with value "
+ "0xFF020000000000000000000000010002");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT Pushing PKT meta data len with value 0x00000010");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Verifies if the DHCPv4 packet fields can be extracted.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, pkt4Fields) {
+ pkt4_->setGiaddr(IOAddress("192.0.2.1"));
+ pkt4_->setCiaddr(IOAddress("192.0.2.2"));
+ pkt4_->setYiaddr(IOAddress("192.0.2.3"));
+ pkt4_->setSiaddr(IOAddress("192.0.2.4"));
+
+ // We're setting hardware address to uncommon (7 bytes rather than 6 and
+ // hardware type 123) HW address. We'll use it in hlen and htype checks.
+ HWAddrPtr hw(new HWAddr(HWAddr::fromText("01:02:03:04:05:06:07", 123)));
+ pkt4_->setHWAddr(hw);
+
+ // Check hardware address field.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt4(TokenPkt4::CHADDR)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ uint8_t expected_hw[] = { 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 };
+ ASSERT_EQ(7, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(expected_hw, &values_.top()[0], 7));
+
+ // Check hlen value field.
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt4(TokenPkt4::HLEN)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ uint32_t expected_hlen = htonl(7);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&expected_hlen, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Check htype value.
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt4(TokenPkt4::HTYPE)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ uint32_t expected_htype = htonl(123);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&expected_htype, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Check giaddr value.
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt4(TokenPkt4::GIADDR)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ uint8_t expected_addr[] = { 192, 0, 2, 1 };
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(expected_addr, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Check ciaddr value.
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt4(TokenPkt4::CIADDR)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ expected_addr[3] = 2;
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(expected_addr, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Check yiaddr value.
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt4(TokenPkt4::YIADDR)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ expected_addr[3] = 3;
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(expected_addr, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Check siaddr value.
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt4(TokenPkt4::SIADDR)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ expected_addr[3] = 4;
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(expected_addr, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Check msgtype.
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt4(TokenPkt4::MSGTYPE)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ string exp_msgtype = encode(DHCPDISCOVER);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&exp_msgtype[0], &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Check transaction-id
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt4(TokenPkt4::TRANSID)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ ASSERT_EQ(4, values_.top().size());
+ string exp_transid = encode(12345);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&exp_transid[0], &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Check a DHCPv6 packet throws.
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt4(TokenPkt4::HLEN)));
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ // Unknown field fails
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt4(static_cast<TokenPkt4::FieldType>(100))));
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT4 Pushing PKT4 field mac with value 0x01020304050607");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT4 Pushing PKT4 field hlen with value 0x00000007");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT4 Pushing PKT4 field htype with value 0x0000007B");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT4 Pushing PKT4 field giaddr with value 0xC0000201");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT4 Pushing PKT4 field ciaddr with value 0xC0000202");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT4 Pushing PKT4 field yiaddr with value 0xC0000203");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT4 Pushing PKT4 field siaddr with value 0xC0000204");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT4 Pushing PKT4 field msgtype with value 0x00000001");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT4 Pushing PKT4 field transid with value 0x00003039");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Verifies if the DHCPv6 packet fields can be extracted.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, pkt6Fields) {
+ // The default test creates a v6 DHCPV6_SOLICIT packet with a
+ // transaction id of 12345.
+
+ // Check the message type
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt6(TokenPkt6::MSGTYPE)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ uint32_t expected = htonl(1);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&expected, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Check the transaction id field
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt6(TokenPkt6::TRANSID)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ expected = htonl(12345);
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, memcmp(&expected, &values_.top()[0], 4));
+
+ // Check that working with a v4 packet generates an error
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt6(TokenPkt6::TRANSID)));
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ // Unknown field fails
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenPkt6(static_cast<TokenPkt6::FieldType>(100))));
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT6 Pushing PKT6 field msgtype with value 0x00000001");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_PKT6 Pushing PKT6 field transid with value 0x00003039");
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if we can properly extract the link and peer
+// address fields from relay encapsulations. Our packet has
+// two relay encapsulations. We attempt to extract the two
+// fields from both of the encapsulations and compare them.
+// We also try to extract one of the fields from an encapsulation
+// that doesn't exist (level 2), this should result in an empty
+// string.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, relay6Field) {
+ // Values for the address results
+ uint8_t zeroaddr[] = { 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0 };
+ uint8_t linkaddr[] = { 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 1 };
+ uint8_t peeraddr[] = { 0, 1, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0,
+ 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 2 };
+
+ // We start by adding a set of relay encapsulations to the
+ // basic v6 packet.
+ addRelay6Encapsulations();
+
+ // Then we work our way through the set of choices
+ // Level 0 both link and peer address should be 0::0
+ verifyRelay6Eval(0, TokenRelay6Field::LINKADDR, 16, zeroaddr);
+ verifyRelay6Eval(0, TokenRelay6Field::PEERADDR, 16, zeroaddr);
+
+ // Level 1 link and peer should have different non-zero addresses
+ verifyRelay6Eval(1, TokenRelay6Field::LINKADDR, 16, linkaddr);
+ verifyRelay6Eval(1, TokenRelay6Field::PEERADDR, 16, peeraddr);
+
+ // Level 2 has no encapsulation so the address should be zero length
+ verifyRelay6Eval(2, TokenRelay6Field::LINKADDR, 0, zeroaddr);
+
+ // Level -1 is the same as level 1
+ verifyRelay6Eval(-1, TokenRelay6Field::LINKADDR, 16, linkaddr);
+ verifyRelay6Eval(-1, TokenRelay6Field::PEERADDR, 16, peeraddr);
+
+ // Level -2 is the same as level 0
+ verifyRelay6Eval(-2, TokenRelay6Field::LINKADDR, 16, zeroaddr);
+ verifyRelay6Eval(-2, TokenRelay6Field::PEERADDR, 16, zeroaddr);
+
+ // Level -3 has no encapsulation so the address should be zero length
+ verifyRelay6Eval(-3, TokenRelay6Field::LINKADDR, 0, zeroaddr);
+
+ // Lets check that the layout of the address returned by the
+ // token matches that of the TokenIpAddress
+ TokenPtr trelay;
+ TokenPtr taddr;
+ TokenPtr tequal;
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(trelay.reset(new TokenRelay6Field(1, TokenRelay6Field::LINKADDR)));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(taddr.reset(new TokenIpAddress("1::1")));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tequal.reset(new TokenEqual()));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(trelay->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(taddr->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(tequal->evaluate(*pkt6_, values_));
+
+ // We should have a single value on the stack and it should be "true"
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // be tidy
+ clearStack();
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_RELAY6 Pushing PKT6 relay field linkaddr nest 0 "
+ "with value 0x00000000000000000000000000000000");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_RELAY6 Pushing PKT6 relay field peeraddr nest 0 "
+ "with value 0x00000000000000000000000000000000");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_RELAY6 Pushing PKT6 relay field linkaddr nest 1 "
+ "with value 0x00010000000000000000000000000001");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_RELAY6 Pushing PKT6 relay field peeraddr nest 1 "
+ "with value 0x00010000000000000000000000000002");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_RELAY6_RANGE Pushing PKT6 relay field linkaddr "
+ "nest 2 with value 0x");
+
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_RELAY6 Pushing PKT6 relay field linkaddr nest -1 "
+ "with value 0x00010000000000000000000000000001");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_RELAY6 Pushing PKT6 relay field peeraddr nest -1 "
+ "with value 0x00010000000000000000000000000002");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_RELAY6 Pushing PKT6 relay field linkaddr nest -2 "
+ "with value 0x00000000000000000000000000000000");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_RELAY6 Pushing PKT6 relay field peeraddr nest -2 "
+ "with value 0x00000000000000000000000000000000");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_RELAY6_RANGE Pushing PKT6 relay field linkaddr "
+ "nest -3 with value 0x");
+
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_RELAY6 Pushing PKT6 relay field linkaddr nest 1 "
+ "with value 0x00010000000000000000000000000001");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_IPADDRESS Pushing IPAddress "
+ "0x00010000000000000000000000000001");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_EQUAL Popping 0x00010000000000000000000000000001 "
+ "and 0x00010000000000000000000000000001 pushing result 'true'");
+
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks some error cases for a relay6 field token
+TEST_F(TokenTest, relay6FieldError) {
+ // Create a valid relay6 field token
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenRelay6Field(0, TokenRelay6Field::LINKADDR)));
+
+ // a DHCPv6 packet is required
+ ASSERT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ // No test for unknown field as it is not (yet) checked?!
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an == operator is able to
+// compare two values (with incorrectly built stack).
+TEST_F(TokenTest, optionEqualInvalid) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenEqual()));
+
+ // CASE 1: There's not enough values on the stack. == is an operator that
+ // takes two parameters. There are 0 on the stack.
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ // CASE 2: One value is still not enough.
+ values_.push("foo");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an == operator is able to
+// compare two different values.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, optionEqualFalse) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenEqual()));
+
+ values_.push("foo");
+ values_.push("bar");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // After evaluation there should be a single value that represents
+ // result of "foo" == "bar" comparison.
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_EQUAL Popping 0x626172 and 0x666F6F "
+ "pushing result 'false'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an == operator is able to
+// compare two identical values.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, optionEqualTrue) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenEqual()));
+
+ values_.push("foo");
+ values_.push("foo");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // After evaluation there should be a single value that represents
+ // result of "foo" == "foo" comparison.
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_EQUAL Popping 0x666F6F and 0x666F6F "
+ "pushing result 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing a substring request
+// throws an exception if there aren't enough values on the stack.
+// The stack from the top is: length, start, string.
+// The actual packet is not used.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, substringNotEnoughValues) {
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSubstring()));
+
+ // Substring requires three values on the stack, try
+ // with 0, 1 and 2 all should throw an exception
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ values_.push("");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ values_.push("0");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ // Three should work
+ values_.push("0");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // As we had an empty string to start with we should have an empty
+ // one after the evaluate
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING_EMPTY Popping length 0, start 0, "
+ "string 0x pushing result 0x");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test getting the whole string in different ways
+TEST_F(TokenTest, substringWholeString) {
+ // Get the whole string
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "0", "6", "foobar");
+
+ // Get the whole string with "all"
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "0", "all", "foobar");
+
+ // Get the whole string with an extra long number
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "0", "123456", "foobar");
+
+ // Get the whole string counting from the back
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "-6", "all", "foobar");
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 6, start 0, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x666F6F626172");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length all, start 0, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x666F6F626172");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 123456, start 0, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x666F6F626172");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length all, start -6, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x666F6F626172");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test getting a suffix, in this case the last 3 characters
+TEST_F(TokenTest, substringTrailer) {
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "3", "3", "bar");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "3", "all", "bar");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "-3", "all", "bar");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "-3", "123", "bar");
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 3, start 3, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x626172");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length all, start 3, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x626172");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length all, start -3, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x626172");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 123, start -3, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x626172");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test getting the middle of the string in different ways
+TEST_F(TokenTest, substringMiddle) {
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "1", "4", "ooba");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "-5", "4", "ooba");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "-1", "-4", "ooba");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "5", "-4", "ooba");
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 4, start 1, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x6F6F6261");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 4, start -5, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x6F6F6261");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length -4, start -1, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x6F6F6261");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length -4, start 5, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x6F6F6261");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test getting the last letter in different ways
+TEST_F(TokenTest, substringLastLetter) {
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "5", "all", "r");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "5", "1", "r");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "5", "5", "r");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "-1", "all", "r");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "-1", "1", "r");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "-1", "5", "r");
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length all, start 5, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x72");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 1, start 5, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x72");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 5, start 5, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x72");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length all, start -1, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x72");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 1, start -1, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x72");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 5, start -1, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x72");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test we get only what is available if we ask for a longer string
+TEST_F(TokenTest, substringLength) {
+ // Test off the front
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "0", "-4", "");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "1", "-4", "f");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "2", "-4", "fo");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "3", "-4", "foo");
+
+ // and the back
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "3", "4", "bar");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "4", "4", "ar");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "5", "4", "r");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "6", "4", "");
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length -4, start 0, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length -4, start 1, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x66");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length -4, start 2, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x666F");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length -4, start 3, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x666F6F");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 4, start 3, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x626172");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 4, start 4, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x6172");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 4, start 5, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x72");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING_RANGE Popping length 4, start 6, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test that we get nothing if the starting position is out of the string
+TEST_F(TokenTest, substringStartingPosition) {
+ // Off the front
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "-7", "1", "");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "-7", "-11", "");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "-7", "all", "");
+
+ // and the back
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "6", "1", "");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "6", "-11", "");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "6", "all", "");
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING_RANGE Popping length 1, start -7, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING_RANGE Popping length -11, start -7, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING_RANGE Popping length all, start -7, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING_RANGE Popping length 1, start 6, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING_RANGE Popping length -11, start 6, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING_RANGE Popping length all, start 6, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Check what happens if we use strings that aren't numbers for start or length
+// We should return the empty string
+TEST_F(TokenTest, substringBadParams) {
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "0ick", "all", "", true);
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "ick0", "all", "", true);
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "ick", "all", "", true);
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "0", "ick", "", true);
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "0", "0ick", "", true);
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "0", "ick0", "", true);
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "0", "allaboard", "", true);
+
+ // These should result in a throw which should generate it's own
+ // log entry
+}
+
+// lastly check that we don't get anything if the string is empty or
+// we don't ask for any characters from it.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, substringReturnEmpty) {
+ verifySubstringEval("", "0", "all", "");
+ verifySubstringEval("foobar", "0", "0", "");
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING_EMPTY Popping length all, start 0, "
+ "string 0x pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 0, start 0, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Check if we can use the substring and equal tokens together
+// We put the result on the stack first then the substring values
+// then evaluate the substring which should leave the original
+// result on the bottom with the substring result on next.
+// Evaluating the equals should produce true for the first
+// and false for the second.
+// throws an exception if there aren't enough values on the stack.
+// The stack from the top is: length, start, string.
+// The actual packet is not used.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, substringEquals) {
+ TokenPtr tequal;
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSubstring()));
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(tequal.reset(new TokenEqual()));
+
+ // The final expected value
+ values_.push("ooba");
+
+ // The substring values
+ values_.push("foobar");
+ values_.push("1");
+ values_.push("4");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // we should have two values on the stack
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, values_.size());
+
+ // next the equals eval
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(tequal->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // get rid of the result
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // and try it again but with a bad final value
+ // The final expected value
+ values_.push("foob");
+
+ // The substring values
+ values_.push("foobar");
+ values_.push("1");
+ values_.push("4");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // we should have two values on the stack
+ ASSERT_EQ(2, values_.size());
+
+ // next the equals eval
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(tequal->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 4, start 1, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x6F6F6261");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_EQUAL Popping 0x6F6F6261 and 0x6F6F6261 "
+ "pushing result 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUBSTRING Popping length 4, start 1, "
+ "string 0x666F6F626172 pushing result 0x6F6F6261");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_EQUAL Popping 0x6F6F6261 and 0x666F6F62 "
+ "pushing result 'false'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing a concat request
+// throws an exception if there aren't enough values on the stack.
+// The actual packet is not used.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, concat) {
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenConcat()));
+
+ // Concat requires two values on the stack, try
+ // with 0 and 1 both should throw an exception
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ values_.push("foo");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ // Two should work
+ values_.push("bar");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check the result
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("foobar", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_CONCAT Popping 0x626172 and 0x666F6F "
+ "pushing 0x666F6F626172");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing a hexstring request
+// throws an exception if there aren't enough values on the stack.
+// The actual packet is not used.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, tohexstring) {
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenToHexString()));
+
+ // Hexstring requires two values on the stack, try
+ // with 0 and 1 both should throw an exception
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ values_.push("foo");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ // Two should work
+ values_.push("-");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Check the result
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("66-6f-6f", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_TOHEXSTRING Popping binary value 0x666F6F and "
+ "separator -, pushing result 66-6f-6f");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an ifelse is able
+// to select the branch following the condition.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, ifElse) {
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenIfElse()));
+
+ // Ifelse requires three values on the stack, try
+ // with 0, 1 and 2 all should throw an exception
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ values_.push("bar");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ values_.push("foo");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ // The condition must be a boolean
+ values_.push("bar");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ // Check if what it returns
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenIfElse()));
+ values_.push("true");
+ values_.push("foo");
+ values_.push("bar");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("foo", values_.top());
+
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenIfElse()));
+ values_.push("false");
+ values_.push("foo");
+ values_.push("bar");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("bar", values_.top());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing a not is able to
+// negate a boolean value (with incorrectly built stack).
+TEST_F(TokenTest, operatorNotInvalid) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenNot()));
+
+ // CASE 1: The stack is empty.
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ // CASE 2: The top value is not a boolean
+ values_.push("foo");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing a not operator is able to
+// negate a boolean value.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, operatorNot) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenNot()));
+
+ values_.push("true");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // After evaluation there should be the negation of the value.
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+
+ // Double negation is identity.
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_NOT Popping 'true' pushing 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_NOT Popping 'false' pushing 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an and is able to
+// conjugate two values (with incorrectly built stack).
+TEST_F(TokenTest, operatorAndInvalid) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenAnd()));
+
+ // CASE 1: There's not enough values on the stack. and is an operator that
+ // takes two parameters. There are 0 on the stack.
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ // CASE 2: One value is still not enough.
+ values_.push("foo");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ // CASE 3: The two values must be logical
+ values_.push("true");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ // Swap the 2 values
+ values_.push("true");
+ values_.push("foo");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an and operator is able to
+// conjugate false with another logical
+TEST_F(TokenTest, operatorAndFalse) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenAnd()));
+
+ values_.push("true");
+ values_.push("false");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // After evaluation there should be a single "false" value
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+
+ // After true and false, check false and true
+ values_.push("true");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+
+ // And false and false
+ values_.push("false");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_AND Popping 'false' and 'true' pushing 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_AND Popping 'true' and 'false' pushing 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_AND Popping 'false' and 'false' pushing 'false'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an and is able to
+// conjugate two true values.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, operatorAndTrue) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenAnd()));
+
+ values_.push("true");
+ values_.push("true");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // After evaluation there should be a single "true" value
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_AND Popping 'true' and 'true' pushing 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an or is able to
+// combine two values (with incorrectly built stack).
+TEST_F(TokenTest, operatorOrInvalid) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenOr()));
+
+ // CASE 1: There's not enough values on the stack. or is an operator that
+ // takes two parameters. There are 0 on the stack.
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ // CASE 2: One value is still not enough.
+ values_.push("foo");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalBadStack);
+
+ // CASE 3: The two values must be logical
+ values_.push("true");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+
+ // Swap the 2 values
+ values_.push("true");
+ values_.push("foo");
+ EXPECT_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_), EvalTypeError);
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an or is able to
+// conjugate two false values.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, operatorOrFalse) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenOr()));
+
+ values_.push("false");
+ values_.push("false");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // After evaluation there should be a single "false" value
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OR Popping 'false' and 'false' pushing 'false'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks if a token representing an == operator is able to
+// conjugate true with another logical
+TEST_F(TokenTest, operatorOrTrue) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenOr()));
+
+ values_.push("false");
+ values_.push("true");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // After evaluation there should be a single "true" value
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // After false or true, checks true or false
+ values_.push("false");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // And true or true
+ values_.push("true");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OR Popping 'true' and 'false' pushing 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OR Popping 'false' and 'true' pushing 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OR Popping 'true' and 'true' pushing 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test verifies client class membership
+TEST_F(TokenTest, member) {
+
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenMember("foo")));
+
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // the packet has no classes so false was left on the stack
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Add bar and retry
+ pkt4_->addClass("bar");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // the packet has a class but it is not foo
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+ values_.pop();
+
+ // Add foo and retry
+ pkt4_->addClass("foo");
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // Now the packet is in the foo class
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+}
+
+// This test verifies if expression vendor[4491].exists works properly in DHCPv4.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendor4SpecificVendorExists) {
+ // Case 1: no option, should evaluate to false
+ testVendorExists(Option::V4, 4491, 0, "false");
+
+ // Case 2: option present, but uses different enterprise-id, should fail
+ testVendorExists(Option::V4, 4491, 1234, "false");
+
+ // Case 3: option present and has matching enterprise-id, should succeed
+ testVendorExists(Option::V4, 4491, 4491, "true");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_NO_OPTION Option with code 125 missing, "
+ "pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for 4491, "
+ "option had 1234, pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 4491 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test verifies if expression vendor[4491].exists works properly in DHCPv6.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendor6SpecificVendorExists) {
+ // Case 1: no option, should evaluate to false
+ testVendorExists(Option::V6, 4491, 0, "false");
+
+ // Case 2: option present, but uses different enterprise-id, should fail
+ testVendorExists(Option::V6, 4491, 1234, "false");
+
+ // Case 3: option present and has matching enterprise-id, should succeed
+ testVendorExists(Option::V6, 4491, 4491, "true");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_NO_OPTION Option with code 17 missing, "
+ "pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for 4491, "
+ "option had 1234, pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 4491 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+/// Test if expression vendor[*].exists works properly for DHCPv4.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendor4AnyVendorExists) {
+ // Case 1: no option, should evaluate to false
+ testVendorExists(Option::V4, 0, 0, "false");
+
+ // Case 2: option present with vendor-id 1234, should succeed
+ testVendorExists(Option::V4, 0, 1234, "true");
+
+ // Case 3: option present with vendor-id 4491, should succeed
+ testVendorExists(Option::V4, 0, 4491, "true");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_NO_OPTION Option with code 125 missing, "
+ "pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 1234 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 4491 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test if expression vendor[*].exists works properly for DHCPv6.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendor6AnyVendorExists) {
+ // Case 1: no option, should evaluate to false
+ testVendorExists(Option::V6, 0, 0, "false");
+
+ // Case 2: option present with vendor-id 1234, should succeed
+ testVendorExists(Option::V6, 0, 1234, "true");
+
+ // Case 3: option present with vendor-id 4491, should succeed
+ testVendorExists(Option::V6, 0, 4491, "true");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_NO_OPTION Option with code 17 missing, "
+ "pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 1234 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 4491 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test if expression vendor[*].enterprise works properly for DHCPv4.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendor4enterprise) {
+ // Case 1: No option present, should return empty string
+ testVendorEnterprise(Option::V4, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 2: Option with vendor-id 1234, should return "1234"
+ testVendorEnterprise(Option::V4, 1234, encode(1234));
+
+ // Case 3: Option with vendor-id set to maximum value, should still
+ // be able to handle it
+ testVendorEnterprise(Option::V4, 4294967295, encode(4294967295));
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_NO_OPTION Option with code 125 missing, pushing"
+ " result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID Pushing enterprise-id 1234 as "
+ "result 0x000004D2");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID Pushing enterprise-id 4294967295"
+ " as result 0xFFFFFFFF");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test if expression vendor[*].enterprise works properly for DHCPv6.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendor6enterprise) {
+ // Case 1: No option present, should return empty string
+ testVendorEnterprise(Option::V6, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 2: Option with vendor-id 1234, should return "1234"
+ testVendorEnterprise(Option::V6, 1234, encode(1234));
+
+ // Case 3: Option with vendor-id set to maximum value, should still
+ // be able to handle it
+ testVendorEnterprise(Option::V6, 4294967295, encode(4294967295));
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_NO_OPTION Option with code 17 missing, pushing"
+ " result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID Pushing enterprise-id 1234 as "
+ "result 0x000004D2");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID Pushing enterprise-id 4294967295 "
+ "as result 0xFFFFFFFF");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This one tests "vendor[4491].option[1].exists" expression. There are so many
+// wonderful ways in which this could fail: the option could not be there,
+// it could have different enterprise-id, may not have suboption 1. Or may
+// have the suboption with valid type, but enterprise may be different.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendor4SuboptionExists) {
+ // Case 1: expression vendor[4491].option[1].exists, no option present
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V4, 4491, 1, 0, 0, TokenOption::EXISTS, "false");
+
+ // Case 2: expression vendor[4491].option[1].exists, option with vendor-id = 1234,
+ // no suboptions, expected result "false"
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V4, 4491, 1, 1234, 0, TokenOption::EXISTS, "false");
+
+ // Case 3: expression vendor[4491].option[1].exists, option with vendor-id = 1234,
+ // suboption 1, expected result "false"
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V4, 4491, 1, 1234, 1, TokenOption::EXISTS, "false");
+
+ // Case 4: expression vendor[4491].option[1].exists, option with vendor-id = 4491,
+ // suboption 2, expected result "false"
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V4, 4491, 1, 4491, 2, TokenOption::EXISTS, "false");
+
+ // Case 5: expression vendor[4491].option[1].exists, option with vendor-id = 4491,
+ // suboption 1, expected result "true"
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V4, 4491, 1, 4491, 1, TokenOption::EXISTS, "true");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_NO_OPTION Option with code 125 missing, pushing "
+ "result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for 4491, "
+ "option had 1234, pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for 4491, "
+ "option had 1234, pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 1 with value 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 1 with value 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This is similar to the previous one, but tests vendor[4491].option[1].exists
+// for DHCPv6.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendor6SuboptionExists) {
+ // Case 1: expression vendor[4491].option[1].exists, no option present
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V6, 4491, 1, 0, 0, TokenOption::EXISTS, "false");
+
+ // Case 2: expression vendor[4491].option[1].exists, option with vendor-id = 1234,
+ // no suboptions, expected result "false"
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V6, 4491, 1, 1234, 0, TokenOption::EXISTS, "false");
+
+ // Case 3: expression vendor[4491].option[1].exists, option with vendor-id = 1234,
+ // suboption 1, expected result "false"
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V6, 4491, 1, 1234, 1, TokenOption::EXISTS, "false");
+
+ // Case 4: expression vendor[4491].option[1].exists, option with vendor-id = 4491,
+ // suboption 2, expected result "false"
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V6, 4491, 1, 4491, 2, TokenOption::EXISTS, "false");
+
+ // Case 5: expression vendor[4491].option[1].exists, option with vendor-id = 4491,
+ // suboption 1, expected result "true"
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V6, 4491, 1, 4491, 1, TokenOption::EXISTS, "true");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_NO_OPTION Option with code 17 missing, pushing "
+ "result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for 4491, "
+ "option had 1234, pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for 4491, "
+ "option had 1234, pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 1 with value 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 1 with value 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test verifies if vendor[4491].option[1].hex expression properly returns
+// value of said sub-option or empty string if desired option is not present.
+// This test is for DHCPv4.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendor4SuboptionHex) {
+ // Case 1: no option present, should return empty string
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V4, 4491, 1, 0, 0, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, "");
+
+ // Case 2: option with vendor-id = 1234, no suboptions, expected result ""
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V4, 4491, 1, 1234, 0, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, "");
+
+ // Case 3: option with vendor-id = 1234, suboption 1, expected result ""
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V4, 4491, 1, 1234, 1, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, "");
+
+ // Case 4: option with vendor-id = 4491, suboption 2, expected result ""
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V4, 4491, 1, 4491, 2, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, "");
+
+ // Case 5: option with vendor-id = 4491, suboption 1, expected result content
+ // of the option
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V4, 4491, 1, 4491, 1, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, "alpha");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_NO_OPTION Option with code 125 missing, pushing "
+ "result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for 4491, "
+ "option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for 4491, "
+ "option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 1 with value 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 1 with value 0x616C706861");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test verifies if vendor[4491].option[1].hex expression properly returns
+// value of said sub-option or empty string if desired option is not present.
+// This test is for DHCPv4.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendor6SuboptionHex) {
+ // Case 1: no option present, should return empty string
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V6, 4491, 1, 0, 0, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, "");
+
+ // Case 2: option with vendor-id = 1234, no suboptions, expected result ""
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V6, 4491, 1, 1234, 0, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, "");
+
+ // Case 3: option with vendor-id = 1234, suboption 1, expected result ""
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V6, 4491, 1, 1234, 1, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, "");
+
+ // Case 4: option with vendor-id = 4491, suboption 2, expected result ""
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V6, 4491, 1, 4491, 2, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, "");
+
+ // Case 5: option with vendor-id = 4491, suboption 1, expected result content
+ // of the option
+ testVendorSuboption(Option::V6, 4491, 1, 4491, 1, TokenOption::HEXADECIMAL, "alpha");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_NO_OPTION Option with code 17 missing, pushing "
+ "result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for 4491, "
+ "option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for 4491, "
+ "option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 1 with value 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_OPTION Pushing option 1 with value 0x616C706861");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test verifies that "vendor-class[4491].exists" expression can be used
+// in DHCPv4.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass4SpecificVendorExists) {
+ // Case 1: no option present, should fail
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V4, 4491, 0, "false");
+
+ // Case 2: option exists, but has different vendor-id (1234), should fail
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V4, 4491, 1234, "false");
+
+ // Case 3: option exists and has matching vendor-id, should succeed
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V4, 4491, 4491, "true");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 124 missing, "
+ "pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for "
+ "4491, option had 1234, pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 4491 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test verifies that "vendor-class[4491].exists" expression can be used
+// in DHCPv6.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass6SpecificVendorExists) {
+ // Case 1: no option present, should fail
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V6, 4491, 0, "false");
+
+ // Case 2: option exists, but has different vendor-id (1234), should fail
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V6, 4491, 1234, "false");
+
+ // Case 3: option exists and has matching vendor-id, should succeed
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V6, 4491, 4491, "true");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 16 missing, pushing "
+ "result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for "
+ "4491, option had 1234, pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 4491 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test verifies that "vendor-class[*].exists" can be used in DHCPv4
+// and it matches a vendor class option with any vendor-id.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass4AnyVendorExists) {
+ // Case 1: no option present, should fail
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V4, 0, 0, "false");
+
+ // Case 2: option exists, should succeed, regardless of the vendor-id
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V4, 0, 1234, "true");
+
+ // Case 3: option exists, should succeed, regardless of the vendor-id
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V4, 0, 4491, "true");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 124 missing, "
+ "pushing result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 1234 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 4491 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test verifies that "vendor-class[*].exists" can be used in DHCPv6
+// and it matches a vendor class option with any vendor-id.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass6AnyVendorExists) {
+ // Case 1: no option present, should fail
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V6, 0, 0, "false");
+
+ // Case 2: option exists, should succeed, regardless of the vendor-id
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V6, 0, 1234, "true");
+
+ // Case 3: option exists, should succeed, regardless of the vendor-id
+ testVendorClassExists(Option::V6, 0, 4491, "true");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 16 missing, pushing "
+ "result 'false'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 1234 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_EXISTS Option with enterprise-id 4491 "
+ "found, pushing result 'true'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test if expression "vendor-class.enterprise" works properly for DHCPv4.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass4enterprise) {
+ // Case 1: No option present, should return empty string
+ testVendorClassEnterprise(Option::V4, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 2: Option with vendor-id 1234, should return "1234"
+ testVendorClassEnterprise(Option::V4, 1234, encode(1234));
+
+ // Case 3: Option with vendor-id set to maximum value, should still
+ // be able to handle it
+ testVendorClassEnterprise(Option::V4, 4294967295, encode(4294967295));
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 124 missing, pushing "
+ "result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID Pushing enterprise-id "
+ "1234 as result 0x000004D2");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID Pushing enterprise-id "
+ "4294967295 as result 0xFFFFFFFF");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test if expression "vendor-class.enterprise" works properly for DHCPv6.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass6enterprise) {
+ // Case 1: No option present, should return empty string
+ testVendorClassEnterprise(Option::V6, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 2: Option with vendor-id 1234, should return "1234"
+ testVendorClassEnterprise(Option::V6, 1234, encode(1234));
+
+ // Case 3: Option with vendor-id set to maximum value, should still
+ // be able to handle it.
+ testVendorClassEnterprise(Option::V6, 4294967295, encode(4294967295));
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 16 missing, pushing "
+ "result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID Pushing enterprise-id "
+ "1234 as result 0x000004D2");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID Pushing enterprise-id "
+ "4294967295 as result 0xFFFFFFFF");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test that expression "vendor-class[4491].data" is able to retrieve content
+// of the first tuple of the vendor-class option in DHCPv4.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass4SpecificVendorData) {
+ // Case 1: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[0], there is no
+ // vendor-class option at all, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 0, 0, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 2: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and no data, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 0, 1234, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 3: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and no data, expected result is empty string.
+ // Note that vendor option in v4 always have at least one data chunk, even though
+ // it may be empty. The OptionVendor code was told to not create any special
+ // tuples, but it creates one empty on its own. So the code finds that one
+ // tuple and extracts its content (an empty string).
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 0, 4491, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 4: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and 1 data tuple, expected result is empty string
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 0, 1234, 1, "");
+
+ // Case 5: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and 1 data tuple, expected result is
+ // content of that data ("alpha")
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 0, 4491, 1, "alpha");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 124 missing, "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for "
+ "4491, option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA Data 0 (out of 1 received) in vendor "
+ "class found, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for "
+ "4491, option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA Data 0 (out of 1 received) in vendor "
+ "class found, pushing result 'alpha'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test that expression "vendor-class[4491].data" is able to retrieve content
+// of the first tuple of the vendor-class option in DHCPv6.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass6SpecificVendorData) {
+ // Case 1: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[0], there is no
+ // vendor-class option at all, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 4491, 0, 0, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 2: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and no data, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 4491, 0, 1234, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 3: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and no data, expected result is empty string
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 4491, 0, 4491, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 4: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and 1 data tuple, expected result is empty string
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 4491, 0, 1234, 1, "");
+
+ // Case 5: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and 1 data tuple, expected result is
+ // content of that data ("alpha")
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 4491, 0, 4491, 1, "alpha");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 16 missing, "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for "
+ "4491, option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA_NOT_FOUND Requested data index 0, "
+ "but option with enterprise-id 4491 has only 0 data tuple(s), "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for "
+ "4491, option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA Data 0 (out of 1 received) in vendor "
+ "class found, pushing result 'alpha'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test that expression "vendor-class[*].data" is able to retrieve content
+// of the first tuple of the vendor-class option in DHCPv4.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass4AnyVendorData) {
+ // Case 1: Expression looks for any vendor-id (0), data[0], there is no
+ // vendor-class option at all, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 0, 0, 0, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 2: Expression looks for any vendor-id (0), data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and no data (one empty tuple), expected
+ // result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 0, 0, 1234, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 3: Expression looks for any vendor-id (0), data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and no data (one empty tuple), expected
+ // result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 0, 0, 4491, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 4: Expression looks for any vendor-id (0), data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and 1 data tuple, expected result is
+ // content of that data ("alpha")
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 0, 0, 1234, 1, "alpha");
+
+ // Case 5: Expression looks for any vendor-id (0), data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and 1 data tuple, expected result is
+ // content of that data ("alpha")
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 0, 0, 4491, 1, "alpha");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 124 missing, "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA Data 0 (out of 1 received) in "
+ "vendor class found, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA Data 0 (out of 1 received) in "
+ "vendor class found, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA Data 0 (out of 1 received) in "
+ "vendor class found, pushing result 'alpha'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA Data 0 (out of 1 received) in "
+ "vendor class found, pushing result 'alpha'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Test that expression "vendor-class[*].data" is able to retrieve content
+// of the first tuple of the vendor-class option in DHCPv6.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass6AnyVendorData) {
+ // Case 1: Expression looks for any vendor-id (0), data[0], there is no
+ // vendor-class option at all, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 0, 0, 0, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 2: Expression looks for any vendor-id (0), data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and no data, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 0, 0, 1234, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 3: Expression looks for any vendor-id (0), data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and no data, expected result is empty string
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 0, 0, 4491, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 4: Expression looks for any vendor-id (0), data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and 1 data tuple, expected result is
+ // content of that data ("alpha")
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 0, 0, 1234, 1, "alpha");
+
+ // Case 5: Expression looks for any vendor-id (0), data[0], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and 1 data tuple, expected result is
+ // content of that data ("alpha")
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 0, 0, 4491, 1, "alpha");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 16 missing, "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA_NOT_FOUND Requested data index 0, "
+ "but option with enterprise-id 1234 has only 0 data tuple(s), "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA_NOT_FOUND Requested data index 0, "
+ "but option with enterprise-id 4491 has only 0 data tuple(s), "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA Data 0 (out of 1 received) in vendor "
+ "class found, pushing result 'alpha'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA Data 0 (out of 1 received) in vendor "
+ "class found, pushing result 'alpha'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test verifies if expression vendor-class[4491].data[3] is able to access
+// the tuple specified by index. This is a DHCPv4 test.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass4DataIndex) {
+ // Case 1: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is no
+ // vendor-class option at all, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 3, 0, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 2: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and no data, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 3, 1234, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 3: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and no data, expected result is empty string
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 3, 4491, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 4: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and 1 data tuple, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 3, 1234, 1, "");
+
+ // Case 5: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491, but has only 3 data tuples, expected
+ // result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 3, 4491, 3, "");
+
+ // Case 6: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and 5 data tuples, expected result is
+ // content of that tuple ("gamma")
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 3, 4491, 5, "gamma");
+
+ // Case 6: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and 5 data tuples, expected result is
+ // empty string, because vendor-id does not match.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V4, 4491, 3, 1234, 5, "");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 124 missing, "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for "
+ "4491, option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA_NOT_FOUND Requested data index 3, "
+ "but option with enterprise-id 4491 has only 1 data tuple(s), "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for "
+ "4491, option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA_NOT_FOUND Requested data index 3, "
+ "but option with enterprise-id 4491 has only 3 data tuple(s), "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA Data 3 (out of 5 received) in vendor "
+ "class found, pushing result 'gamma'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for "
+ "4491, option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test verifies if expression vendor-class[4491].data[3] is able to access
+// the tuple specified by index. This is a DHCPv6 test.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, vendorClass6DataIndex) {
+ // Case 1: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is no
+ // vendor-class option at all, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 4491, 3, 0, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 2: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and no data, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 4491, 3, 1234, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 3: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and no data, expected result is empty string
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 4491, 3, 4491, 0, "");
+
+ // Case 4: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 1234 and 5 data tuples, expected result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 4491, 3, 1234, 5, "");
+
+ // Case 5: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491, but has only 3 data tuples, expected
+ // result is empty string.
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 4491, 3, 4491, 3, "");
+
+ // Case 6: Expression looks for vendor-id 4491, data[3], there is
+ // vendor-class with vendor-id 4491 and 5 data tuples, expected result is
+ // content of that tuple ("gamma")
+ testVendorClassData(Option::V6, 4491, 3, 4491, 5, "gamma");
+
+ // Check if the logged messages are correct.
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_NO_OPTION Option with code 16 missing, "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for "
+ "4491, option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA_NOT_FOUND Requested data index 3, "
+ "but option with enterprise-id 4491 has only 0 data tuple(s), "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_ENTERPRISE_ID_MISMATCH Was looking for "
+ "4491, option had 1234, pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA_NOT_FOUND Requested data index 3, "
+ "but option with enterprise-id 4491 has only 3 data tuple(s), "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_VENDOR_CLASS_DATA Data 3 (out of 5 received) in vendor"
+ " class found, pushing result 'gamma'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks that the existing RAI -sunoption can be found.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, subOption) {
+
+ // Insert relay option with sub-options 1 and 13
+ insertRelay4Option();
+
+ // Creating the token should be safe.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSubOption(DHO_DHCP_AGENT_OPTIONS,
+ 13, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+
+ // We should be able to evaluate it.
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // we should have one value on the stack
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+
+ // The option should be found and option[82].option[13] should evaluate
+ // to thecontent of that sub-option, i.e. "thirteen"
+ EXPECT_EQ("thirteen", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUB_OPTION Pushing option 82 "
+ "sub-option 13 with value 'thirteen'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks that the code properly handles cases when
+// there is a RAI option, but there's no requested sub-option.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, subOptionNoSubOption) {
+
+ // Insert relay option with sub-options 1 and 13
+ insertRelay4Option();
+
+
+ // Creating the token should be safe.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSubOption(DHO_DHCP_AGENT_OPTIONS,
+ 15, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+
+ // We should be able to evaluate it.
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // we should have one value on the stack
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+
+ // The option should NOT be found (there is no sub-option 15),
+ // so the expression should evaluate to ""
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUB_OPTION Pushing option 82 "
+ "sub-option 15 with value ''");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks that the code properly handles cases when
+// there's no RAI option at all.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, subOptionNoOption) {
+
+ // We didn't call insertRelay4Option(), so there's no RAI option.
+
+ // Creating the token should be safe.
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSubOption(DHO_DHCP_AGENT_OPTIONS,
+ 13, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+
+ // We should be able to evaluate it.
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+
+ // we should have one value on the stack
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+
+ // The option should NOT be found (there is no option 82),
+ // so the expression should evaluate to ""
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUB_OPTION_NO_OPTION Requested option 82 "
+ "sub-option 13, but the parent option is not present, "
+ "pushing result ''");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// This test checks that only the requested parent is searched for
+// the requested sub-option.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, subOptionOptionOnly) {
+
+ // Insert relay option with sub-options 1 and 13
+ insertRelay4Option();
+
+ // Add options 13 and 70 to the packet.
+ OptionPtr opt13(new OptionString(Option::V4, 13, "THIRTEEN"));
+ OptionPtr opt70(new OptionString(Option::V4, 70, "SEVENTY"));
+ pkt4_->addOption(opt13);
+ pkt4_->addOption(opt70);
+
+ // The situation is as follows:
+ // Packet:
+ // - option 13 (containing "THIRTEEN")
+ // - option 82 (rai)
+ // - option 1 (containing "one")
+ // - option 13 (containing "thirteen")
+
+ // Let's try to get option 13. It should get the one from RAI
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSubOption(DHO_DHCP_AGENT_OPTIONS,
+ 13, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("thirteen", values_.top());
+
+ // Try to get option 1. It should get the one from RAI
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSubOption(DHO_DHCP_AGENT_OPTIONS,
+ 1, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("one", values_.top());
+
+ // Try to get option 70. It should fail, as there's no such
+ // sub option in RAI.
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSubOption(DHO_DHCP_AGENT_OPTIONS,
+ 70, TokenOption::TEXTUAL)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("", values_.top());
+
+ // Try to check option 1. It should return "true"
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSubOption(DHO_DHCP_AGENT_OPTIONS,
+ 1, TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("true", values_.top());
+
+ // Try to check option 70. It should return "false"
+ clearStack();
+ ASSERT_NO_THROW(t_.reset(new TokenSubOption(DHO_DHCP_AGENT_OPTIONS,
+ 70, TokenOption::EXISTS)));
+ EXPECT_NO_THROW(t_->evaluate(*pkt4_, values_));
+ ASSERT_EQ(1, values_.size());
+ EXPECT_EQ("false", values_.top());
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUB_OPTION Pushing option 82 "
+ "sub-option 13 with value 'thirteen'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUB_OPTION Pushing option 82 "
+ "sub-option 1 with value 'one'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUB_OPTION Pushing option 82 "
+ "sub-option 70 with value ''");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUB_OPTION Pushing option 82 "
+ "sub-option 1 with value 'true'");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SUB_OPTION Pushing option 82 "
+ "sub-option 70 with value 'false'");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Checks if various values can be represented as integer tokens
+TEST_F(TokenTest, integer) {
+ testInteger(encode(0), 0);
+ testInteger(encode(6), 6);
+ testInteger(encode(255), 255);
+ testInteger(encode(256), 256);
+ testInteger(encode(1410), 1410);
+ testInteger(encode(4294967295), 4294967295);
+}
+
+// Verify TokenSplit::eval, single delimiter.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, split) {
+ // Get the whole string
+ std::string input(".two.three..five.");
+ std::string delims(".");
+
+ // Empty input string should yield empty result.
+ verifySplitEval("", delims, "1", "");
+
+ // Empty delimiters string should yield original string result.
+ verifySplitEval(input, "", "1", input);
+
+ // Field number less than one should yield empty result.
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "0", "");
+
+ // Now get each field in succession.
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "1", "");
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "2", "two");
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "3", "three");
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "4", "");
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "5", "five");
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "6", "");
+
+ // Too large of a field should yield empty result.
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "7", "");
+
+ // A string without delimiters returns as field 1.
+ verifySplitEval("just_one", delims, "1", "just_one");
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT_EMPTY Popping field 1, delimiters .,"
+ " string , pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT_DELIM_EMPTY Popping field 1, delimiters ,"
+ " string .two.three..five., pushing result 0x2E74776F2E74687265652E2E666976652E");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT_FIELD_OUT_OF_RANGE Popping field 0, delimiters .,"
+ " string .two.three..five., pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 1, delimiters .,"
+ " string .two.three..five., pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 2, delimiters .,"
+ " string .two.three..five., pushing result 0x74776F");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 3, delimiters .,"
+ " string .two.three..five., pushing result 0x7468726565");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 4, delimiters .,"
+ " string .two.three..five., pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 5, delimiters .,"
+ " string .two.three..five., pushing result 0x66697665");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 6, delimiters .,"
+ " string .two.three..five., pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT_FIELD_OUT_OF_RANGE Popping field 7, delimiters .,"
+ " string .two.three..five., pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 1, delimiters .,"
+ " string just_one, pushing result 0x6A7573745F6F6E65");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+// Verify TokenSplit::eval with more than one delimiter.
+TEST_F(TokenTest, splitMultipleDelims) {
+ // Get the whole string
+ std::string input(".two:three.:five.");
+ std::string delims(".:");
+
+ // Empty input string should yield empty result.
+ verifySplitEval("", delims, "1", "");
+
+ // Too small of a field should yield empty result.
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "0", "");
+
+ // Now get each field in succession.
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "1", "");
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "2", "two");
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "3", "three");
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "4", "");
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "5", "five");
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "6", "");
+
+ // Too large of a field should yield empty result.
+ verifySplitEval(input, delims, "7", "");
+
+ // A string without delimiters returns as field 1.
+ verifySplitEval("just_one", delims, "1", "just_one");
+
+ // Check that the debug output was correct. Add the strings
+ // to the test vector in the class and then call checkFile
+ // for comparison
+
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT_EMPTY Popping field 1, delimiters .:,"
+ " string , pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT_FIELD_OUT_OF_RANGE Popping field 0, delimiters .:,"
+ " string .two:three.:five., pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 1, delimiters .:,"
+ " string .two:three.:five., pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 2, delimiters .:,"
+ " string .two:three.:five., pushing result 0x74776F");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 3, delimiters .:,"
+ " string .two:three.:five., pushing result 0x7468726565");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 4, delimiters .:,"
+ " string .two:three.:five., pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 5, delimiters .:,"
+ " string .two:three.:five., pushing result 0x66697665");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 6, delimiters .:,"
+ " string .two:three.:five., pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT_FIELD_OUT_OF_RANGE Popping field 7, delimiters .:,"
+ " string .two:three.:five., pushing result 0x");
+ addString("EVAL_DEBUG_SPLIT Popping field 1, delimiters .:,"
+ " string just_one, pushing result 0x6A7573745F6F6E65");
+ EXPECT_TRUE(checkFile());
+}
+
+};
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.39.1) at 2024-12-26 04:44:44 +0000