summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/src/grep/gnulib-tests/test-regex.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/grep/gnulib-tests/test-regex.c')
-rw-r--r--src/grep/gnulib-tests/test-regex.c488
1 files changed, 488 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/grep/gnulib-tests/test-regex.c b/src/grep/gnulib-tests/test-regex.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ed4ca64
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/grep/gnulib-tests/test-regex.c
@@ -0,0 +1,488 @@
+/* Test regular expressions
+ Copyright 1996-2001, 2003-2021 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
+
+ This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
+ the Free Software Foundation; either version 3 of the License, or
+ (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>. */
+
+#include <config.h>
+
+#include "regex.h"
+
+#include <locale.h>
+#include <limits.h>
+#include <stdarg.h>
+#include <stdio.h>
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#include <string.h>
+#include <wctype.h>
+#if HAVE_DECL_ALARM
+# include <unistd.h>
+# include <signal.h>
+#endif
+
+#include "localcharset.h"
+
+static int exit_status;
+
+static void
+report_error (char const *format, ...)
+{
+ va_list args;
+ va_start (args, format);
+ fprintf (stderr, "test-regex: ");
+ vfprintf (stderr, format, args);
+ fprintf (stderr, "\n");
+ va_end (args);
+ exit_status = 1;
+}
+
+/* Check whether it's really a UTF-8 locale.
+ On mingw, setlocale (LC_ALL, "en_US.UTF-8") succeeds but returns
+ "English_United States.1252", with locale_charset () returning "CP1252". */
+static int
+really_utf8 (void)
+{
+ return strcmp (locale_charset (), "UTF-8") == 0;
+}
+
+/* Tests supposed to match; copied from glibc posix/bug-regex11.c. */
+static struct
+{
+ const char *pattern;
+ const char *string;
+ int flags, nmatch;
+ regmatch_t rm[5];
+} const tests[] = {
+ /* Test for newline handling in regex. */
+ { "[^~]*~", "\nx~y", 0, 2, { { 0, 3 }, { -1, -1 } } },
+ /* Other tests. */
+ { "a(.*)b", "a b", REG_EXTENDED, 2, { { 0, 3 }, { 1, 2 } } },
+ { ".*|\\([KIO]\\)\\([^|]*\\).*|?[KIO]", "10~.~|P|K0|I10|O16|?KSb", 0, 3,
+ { { 0, 21 }, { 15, 16 }, { 16, 18 } } },
+ { ".*|\\([KIO]\\)\\([^|]*\\).*|?\\1", "10~.~|P|K0|I10|O16|?KSb", 0, 3,
+ { { 0, 21 }, { 8, 9 }, { 9, 10 } } },
+ { "^\\(a*\\)\\1\\{9\\}\\(a\\{0,9\\}\\)\\([0-9]*;.*[^a]\\2\\([0-9]\\)\\)",
+ "a1;;0a1aa2aaa3aaaa4aaaaa5aaaaaa6aaaaaaa7aaaaaaaa8aaaaaaaaa9aa2aa1a0", 0,
+ 5, { { 0, 67 }, { 0, 0 }, { 0, 1 }, { 1, 67 }, { 66, 67 } } },
+ /* Test for BRE expression anchoring. POSIX says just that this may match;
+ in glibc regex it always matched, so avoid changing it. */
+ { "\\(^\\|foo\\)bar", "bar", 0, 2, { { 0, 3 }, { -1, -1 } } },
+ { "\\(foo\\|^\\)bar", "bar", 0, 2, { { 0, 3 }, { -1, -1 } } },
+ /* In ERE this must be treated as an anchor. */
+ { "(^|foo)bar", "bar", REG_EXTENDED, 2, { { 0, 3 }, { -1, -1 } } },
+ { "(foo|^)bar", "bar", REG_EXTENDED, 2, { { 0, 3 }, { -1, -1 } } },
+ /* Here ^ cannot be treated as an anchor according to POSIX. */
+ { "(^|foo)bar", "(^|foo)bar", 0, 2, { { 0, 10 }, { -1, -1 } } },
+ { "(foo|^)bar", "(foo|^)bar", 0, 2, { { 0, 10 }, { -1, -1 } } },
+ /* More tests on backreferences. */
+ { "()\\1", "x", REG_EXTENDED, 2, { { 0, 0 }, { 0, 0 } } },
+ { "()x\\1", "x", REG_EXTENDED, 2, { { 0, 1 }, { 0, 0 } } },
+ { "()\\1*\\1*", "", REG_EXTENDED, 2, { { 0, 0 }, { 0, 0 } } },
+ { "([0-9]).*\\1(a*)", "7;7a6", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 4 }, { 0, 1 }, { 3, 4 } } },
+ { "([0-9]).*\\1(a*)", "7;7a", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 4 }, { 0, 1 }, { 3, 4 } } },
+ { "(b)()c\\1", "bcb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 3 }, { 0, 1 }, { 1, 1 } } },
+ { "()(b)c\\2", "bcb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 3 }, { 0, 0 }, { 0, 1 } } },
+ { "a(b)()c\\1", "abcb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 4 }, { 1, 2 }, { 2, 2 } } },
+ { "a()(b)c\\2", "abcb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 4 }, { 1, 1 }, { 1, 2 } } },
+ { "()(b)\\1c\\2", "bcb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 3 }, { 0, 0 }, { 0, 1 } } },
+ { "(b())\\2\\1", "bbbb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 2 }, { 0, 1 }, { 1, 1 } } },
+ { "a()(b)\\1c\\2", "abcb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 4 }, { 1, 1 }, { 1, 2 } } },
+ { "a()d(b)\\1c\\2", "adbcb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 5 }, { 1, 1 }, { 2, 3 } } },
+ { "a(b())\\2\\1", "abbbb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 3 }, { 1, 2 }, { 2, 2 } } },
+ { "(bb())\\2\\1", "bbbb", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 4 }, { 0, 2 }, { 2, 2 } } },
+ { "^([^,]*),\\1,\\1$", "a,a,a", REG_EXTENDED, 2, { { 0, 5 }, { 0, 1 } } },
+ { "^([^,]*),\\1,\\1$", "ab,ab,ab", REG_EXTENDED, 2, { { 0, 8 }, { 0, 2 } } },
+ { "^([^,]*),\\1,\\1,\\1$", "abc,abc,abc,abc", REG_EXTENDED, 2,
+ { { 0, 15 }, { 0, 3 } } },
+ { "^(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?).?\\5\\4\\3\\2\\1$",
+ "level", REG_NOSUB | REG_EXTENDED, 0, { { -1, -1 } } },
+ { "^(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.).?\\9\\8\\7\\6\\5\\4\\3\\2\\1$|^.?$",
+ "level", REG_NOSUB | REG_EXTENDED, 0, { { -1, -1 } } },
+ { "^(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.).?\\9\\8\\7\\6\\5\\4\\3\\2\\1$|^.?$",
+ "abcdedcba", REG_EXTENDED, 1, { { 0, 9 } } },
+ { "^(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.).?\\9\\8\\7\\6\\5\\4\\3\\2\\1$|^.?$",
+ "ababababa", REG_EXTENDED, 1, { { 0, 9 } } },
+ { "^(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?).?\\9\\8\\7\\6\\5\\4\\3\\2\\1$",
+ "level", REG_NOSUB | REG_EXTENDED, 0, { { -1, -1 } } },
+ { "^(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?)(.?).?\\9\\8\\7\\6\\5\\4\\3\\2\\1$",
+ "ababababa", REG_EXTENDED, 1, { { 0, 9 } } },
+ /* Test for *+ match. */
+ { "^a*+(.)", "ab", REG_EXTENDED, 2, { { 0, 2 }, { 1, 2 } } },
+ /* Test for ** match. */
+ { "^(a*)*(.)", "ab", REG_EXTENDED, 3, { { 0, 2 }, { 0, 1 }, { 1, 2 } } },
+};
+
+static void
+bug_regex11 (void)
+{
+ regex_t re;
+ regmatch_t rm[5];
+ size_t i;
+ int n;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < sizeof (tests) / sizeof (tests[0]); ++i)
+ {
+ n = regcomp (&re, tests[i].pattern, tests[i].flags);
+ if (n != 0)
+ {
+ char buf[500];
+ regerror (n, &re, buf, sizeof (buf));
+ report_error ("%s: regcomp %zd failed: %s", tests[i].pattern, i, buf);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (regexec (&re, tests[i].string, tests[i].nmatch, rm, 0))
+ {
+ report_error ("%s: regexec %zd failed", tests[i].pattern, i);
+ regfree (&re);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ for (n = 0; n < tests[i].nmatch; ++n)
+ if (rm[n].rm_so != tests[i].rm[n].rm_so
+ || rm[n].rm_eo != tests[i].rm[n].rm_eo)
+ {
+ if (tests[i].rm[n].rm_so == -1 && tests[i].rm[n].rm_eo == -1)
+ break;
+ report_error ("%s: regexec %zd match failure rm[%d] %d..%d",
+ tests[i].pattern, i, n,
+ (int) rm[n].rm_so, (int) rm[n].rm_eo);
+ break;
+ }
+
+ regfree (&re);
+ }
+}
+
+int
+main (void)
+{
+ static struct re_pattern_buffer regex;
+ unsigned char folded_chars[UCHAR_MAX + 1];
+ int i;
+ const char *s;
+ struct re_registers regs;
+
+#if HAVE_DECL_ALARM
+ /* In case a bug causes glibc to go into an infinite loop.
+ The tests should take less than 10 s on a reasonably modern CPU. */
+ int alarm_value = 1000;
+ signal (SIGALRM, SIG_DFL);
+ alarm (alarm_value);
+#endif
+
+ bug_regex11 ();
+
+ if (setlocale (LC_ALL, "en_US.UTF-8"))
+ {
+ {
+ /* https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-hacker/2006-09/msg00008.html
+ This test needs valgrind to catch the bug on Debian
+ GNU/Linux 3.1 x86, but it might catch the bug better
+ on other platforms and it shouldn't hurt to try the
+ test here. */
+ static char const pat[] = "insert into";
+ static char const data[] =
+ "\xFF\0\x12\xA2\xAA\xC4\xB1,K\x12\xC4\xB1*\xACK";
+ re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_GREP | RE_HAT_LISTS_NOT_NEWLINE
+ | RE_ICASE);
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat, sizeof pat - 1, &regex);
+ if (s)
+ report_error ("%s: %s", pat, s);
+ else
+ {
+ memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+ i = re_search (&regex, data, sizeof data - 1,
+ 0, sizeof data - 1, &regs);
+ if (i != -1)
+ report_error ("re_search '%s' on '%s' returned %d",
+ pat, data, i);
+ regfree (&regex);
+ free (regs.start);
+ free (regs.end);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (really_utf8 ())
+ {
+ /* This test is from glibc bug 15078.
+ The test case is from Andreas Schwab in
+ <https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2013-01/msg00967.html>.
+ */
+ static char const pat[] = "[^x]x";
+ static char const data[] =
+ /* <U1000><U103B><U103D><U1014><U103A><U102F><U1015><U103A> */
+ "\xe1\x80\x80"
+ "\xe1\x80\xbb"
+ "\xe1\x80\xbd"
+ "\xe1\x80\x94"
+ "\xe1\x80\xba"
+ "\xe1\x80\xaf"
+ "\xe1\x80\x95"
+ "\xe1\x80\xba"
+ "x";
+ re_set_syntax (0);
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat, sizeof pat - 1, &regex);
+ if (s)
+ report_error ("%s: %s", pat, s);
+ else
+ {
+ memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+ i = re_search (&regex, data, sizeof data - 1,
+ 0, sizeof data - 1, 0);
+ if (i != 0 && i != 21)
+ report_error ("re_search '%s' on '%s' returned %d",
+ pat, data, i);
+ regfree (&regex);
+ free (regs.start);
+ free (regs.end);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (! setlocale (LC_ALL, "C"))
+ {
+ report_error ("setlocale \"C\" failed");
+ return exit_status;
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (setlocale (LC_ALL, "tr_TR.UTF-8"))
+ {
+ if (really_utf8 () && towupper (L'i') == 0x0130 /* U+0130; see below. */)
+ {
+ re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_GREP | RE_ICASE);
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ static char const pat[] = "i";
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat, sizeof pat - 1, &regex);
+ if (s)
+ report_error ("%s: %s", pat, s);
+ else
+ {
+ /* UTF-8 encoding of U+0130 LATIN CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DOT ABOVE.
+ In Turkish, this is the upper-case equivalent of ASCII "i".
+ Older versions of Gnulib failed to match "i" to U+0130 when
+ ignoring case in Turkish <https://bugs.gnu.org/43577>. */
+ static char const data[] = "\xc4\xb0";
+
+ memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+ i = re_search (&regex, data, sizeof data - 1, 0, sizeof data - 1,
+ &regs);
+ if (i != 0)
+ report_error ("re_search '%s' on '%s' returned %d",
+ pat, data, i);
+ regfree (&regex);
+ free (regs.start);
+ free (regs.end);
+ }
+ }
+
+ if (! setlocale (LC_ALL, "C"))
+ {
+ report_error ("setlocale \"C\" failed");
+ return exit_status;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* This test is from glibc bug 3957, reported by Andrew Mackey. */
+ re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_EGREP | RE_HAT_LISTS_NOT_NEWLINE);
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ static char const pat_3957[] = "a[^x]b";
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat_3957, sizeof pat_3957 - 1, &regex);
+ if (s)
+ report_error ("%s: %s", pat_3957, s);
+ else
+ {
+ /* This should fail, but succeeds for glibc-2.5. */
+ memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+ static char const data[] = "a\nb";
+ i = re_search (&regex, data, sizeof data - 1, 0, sizeof data - 1, &regs);
+ if (i != -1)
+ report_error ("re_search '%s' on '%s' returned %d",
+ pat_3957, data, i);
+ regfree (&regex);
+ free (regs.start);
+ free (regs.end);
+ }
+
+ /* This regular expression is from Spencer ere test number 75
+ in grep-2.3. */
+ re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_EGREP);
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ for (i = 0; i <= UCHAR_MAX; i++)
+ folded_chars[i] = i;
+ regex.translate = folded_chars;
+ static char const pat75[] = "a[[:@:>@:]]b\n";
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat75, sizeof pat75 - 1, &regex);
+ /* This should fail with _Invalid character class name_ error. */
+ if (!s)
+ {
+ report_error ("re_compile_pattern: failed to reject '%s'", pat75);
+ regfree (&regex);
+ }
+
+ /* Ensure that [b-a] is diagnosed as invalid, when
+ using RE_NO_EMPTY_RANGES. */
+ re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_EGREP | RE_NO_EMPTY_RANGES);
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ static char const pat_b_a[] = "a[b-a]";
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat_b_a, sizeof pat_b_a - 1, &regex);
+ if (s == 0)
+ {
+ report_error ("re_compile_pattern: failed to reject '%s'", pat_b_a);
+ regfree (&regex);
+ }
+
+ /* This should succeed, but does not for glibc-2.1.3. */
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ static char const pat_213[] = "{1";
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat_213, sizeof pat_213 - 1, &regex);
+ if (s)
+ report_error ("%s: %s", pat_213, s);
+ else
+ regfree (&regex);
+
+ /* The following example is derived from a problem report
+ against gawk from Jorge Stolfi <stolfi@ic.unicamp.br>. */
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ static char const pat_stolfi[] = "[an\371]*n";
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat_stolfi, sizeof pat_stolfi - 1, &regex);
+ if (s)
+ report_error ("%s: %s", pat_stolfi, s);
+ /* This should match, but does not for glibc-2.2.1. */
+ else
+ {
+ memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+ static char const data[] = "an";
+ i = re_match (&regex, data, sizeof data - 1, 0, &regs);
+ if (i != 2)
+ report_error ("re_match '%s' on '%s' at 2 returned %d",
+ pat_stolfi, data, i);
+ regfree (&regex);
+ free (regs.start);
+ free (regs.end);
+ }
+
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ static char const pat_x[] = "x";
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat_x, sizeof pat_x - 1, &regex);
+ if (s)
+ report_error ("%s: %s", pat_x, s);
+ /* glibc-2.2.93 does not work with a negative RANGE argument. */
+ else
+ {
+ memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+ static char const data[] = "wxy";
+ i = re_search (&regex, data, sizeof data - 1, 2, -2, &regs);
+ if (i != 1)
+ report_error ("re_search '%s' on '%s' returned %d", pat_x, data, i);
+ regfree (&regex);
+ free (regs.start);
+ free (regs.end);
+ }
+
+ /* The version of regex.c in older versions of gnulib
+ ignored RE_ICASE. Detect that problem too. */
+ re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_EMACS | RE_ICASE);
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat_x, 1, &regex);
+ if (s)
+ report_error ("%s: %s", pat_x, s);
+ else
+ {
+ memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+ static char const data[] = "WXY";
+ i = re_search (&regex, data, sizeof data - 1, 0, 3, &regs);
+ if (i < 0)
+ report_error ("re_search '%s' on '%s' returned %d", pat_x, data, i);
+ regfree (&regex);
+ free (regs.start);
+ free (regs.end);
+ }
+
+ /* glibc bug 11053. */
+ re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_BASIC);
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ static char const pat_sub2[] = "\\(a*\\)*a*\\1";
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat_sub2, sizeof pat_sub2 - 1, &regex);
+ if (s)
+ report_error ("%s: %s", pat_sub2, s);
+ else
+ {
+ memset (&regs, 0, sizeof regs);
+ static char const data[] = "a";
+ int datalen = sizeof data - 1;
+ i = re_search (&regex, data, datalen, 0, datalen, &regs);
+ if (i != 0)
+ report_error ("re_search '%s' on '%s' returned %d", pat_sub2, data, i);
+ else if (regs.num_regs < 2)
+ report_error ("re_search '%s' on '%s' returned only %d registers",
+ pat_sub2, data, (int) regs.num_regs);
+ else if (! (regs.start[0] == 0 && regs.end[0] == 1))
+ report_error ("re_search '%s' on '%s' returned wrong match [%d,%d)",
+ pat_sub2, data, (int) regs.start[0], (int) regs.end[0]);
+ else if (! (regs.start[1] == 0 && regs.end[1] == 0))
+ report_error ("re_search '%s' on '%s' returned wrong submatch [%d,%d)",
+ pat_sub2, data, (int) regs.start[1], (int) regs.end[1]);
+ regfree (&regex);
+ free (regs.start);
+ free (regs.end);
+ }
+
+ /* Catch a bug reported by Vin Shelton in
+ https://lists.gnu.org/r/bug-coreutils/2007-06/msg00089.html
+ */
+ re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_BASIC
+ & ~RE_CONTEXT_INVALID_DUP
+ & ~RE_NO_EMPTY_RANGES);
+ static char const pat_shelton[] = "[[:alnum:]_-]\\\\+$";
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat_shelton, sizeof pat_shelton - 1, &regex);
+ if (s)
+ report_error ("%s: %s", pat_shelton, s);
+ else
+ regfree (&regex);
+
+ /* REG_STARTEND was added to glibc on 2004-01-15.
+ Reject older versions. */
+ if (REG_STARTEND == 0)
+ report_error ("REG_STARTEND is zero");
+
+ /* Matching with the compiled form of this regexp would provoke
+ an assertion failure prior to glibc-2.28:
+ regexec.c:1375: pop_fail_stack: Assertion 'num >= 0' failed
+ With glibc-2.28, compilation fails and reports the invalid
+ back reference. */
+ re_set_syntax (RE_SYNTAX_POSIX_EGREP);
+ memset (&regex, 0, sizeof regex);
+ static char const pat_badback[] = "0|()0|\\1|0";
+ s = re_compile_pattern (pat_badback, sizeof pat_badback, &regex);
+ if (!s && re_search (&regex, "x", 1, 0, 1, &regs) != -1)
+ s = "mishandled invalid back reference";
+ if (s && strcmp (s, "Invalid back reference") != 0)
+ report_error ("%s: %s", pat_badback, s);
+
+#if 0
+ /* It would be nice to reject hosts whose regoff_t values are too
+ narrow (including glibc on hosts with 64-bit ptrdiff_t and
+ 32-bit int), but we should wait until glibc implements this
+ feature. Otherwise, support for equivalence classes and
+ multibyte collation symbols would always be broken except
+ when compiling --without-included-regex. */
+ if (sizeof (regoff_t) < sizeof (ptrdiff_t)
+ || sizeof (regoff_t) < sizeof (ssize_t))
+ report_error ("regoff_t values are too narrow");
+#endif
+
+ return exit_status;
+}