diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst')
| -rw-r--r-- | Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst | 194 |
1 files changed, 194 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..32b6ac4ca9 --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/xfs/xfs-maintainer-entry-profile.rst @@ -0,0 +1,194 @@ +XFS Maintainer Entry Profile +============================ + +Overview +-------- +XFS is a well known high-performance filesystem in the Linux kernel. +The aim of this project is to provide and maintain a robust and +performant filesystem. + +Patches are generally merged to the for-next branch of the appropriate +git repository. +After a testing period, the for-next branch is merged to the master +branch. + +Kernel code are merged to the xfs-linux tree[0]. +Userspace code are merged to the xfsprogs tree[1]. +Test cases are merged to the xfstests tree[2]. +Ondisk format documentation are merged to the xfs-documentation tree[3]. + +All patchsets involving XFS *must* be cc'd in their entirety to the mailing +list linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org. + +Roles +----- +There are eight key roles in the XFS project. +A person can take on multiple roles, and a role can be filled by +multiple people. +Anyone taking on a role is advised to check in with themselves and +others on a regular basis about burnout. + +- **Outside Contributor**: Anyone who sends a patch but is not involved + in the XFS project on a regular basis. + These folks are usually people who work on other filesystems or + elsewhere in the kernel community. + +- **Developer**: Someone who is familiar with the XFS codebase enough to + write new code, documentation, and tests. + + Developers can often be found in the IRC channel mentioned by the ``C:`` + entry in the kernel MAINTAINERS file. + +- **Senior Developer**: A developer who is very familiar with at least + some part of the XFS codebase and/or other subsystems in the kernel. + These people collectively decide the long term goals of the project + and nudge the community in that direction. + They should help prioritize development and review work for each release + cycle. + + Senior developers tend to be more active participants in the IRC channel. + +- **Reviewer**: Someone (most likely also a developer) who reads code + submissions to decide: + + 0. Is the idea behind the contribution sound? + 1. Does the idea fit the goals of the project? + 2. Is the contribution designed correctly? + 3. Is the contribution polished? + 4. Can the contribution be tested effectively? + + Reviewers should identify themselves with an ``R:`` entry in the kernel + and fstests MAINTAINERS files. + +- **Testing Lead**: This person is responsible for setting the test + coverage goals of the project, negotiating with developers to decide + on new tests for new features, and making sure that developers and + release managers execute on the testing. + + The testing lead should identify themselves with an ``M:`` entry in + the XFS section of the fstests MAINTAINERS file. + +- **Bug Triager**: Someone who examines incoming bug reports in just + enough detail to identify the person to whom the report should be + forwarded. + + The bug triagers should identify themselves with a ``B:`` entry in + the kernel MAINTAINERS file. + +- **Release Manager**: This person merges reviewed patchsets into an + integration branch, tests the result locally, pushes the branch to a + public git repository, and sends pull requests further upstream. + The release manager is not expected to work on new feature patchsets. + If a developer and a reviewer fail to reach a resolution on some point, + the release manager must have the ability to intervene to try to drive a + resolution. + + The release manager should identify themselves with an ``M:`` entry in + the kernel MAINTAINERS file. + +- **Community Manager**: This person calls and moderates meetings of as many + XFS participants as they can get when mailing list discussions prove + insufficient for collective decisionmaking. + They may also serve as liaison between managers of the organizations + sponsoring work on any part of XFS. + +- **LTS Maintainer**: Someone who backports and tests bug fixes from + uptream to the LTS kernels. + There tend to be six separate LTS trees at any given time. + + The maintainer for a given LTS release should identify themselves with an + ``M:`` entry in the MAINTAINERS file for that LTS tree. + Unmaintained LTS kernels should be marked with status ``S: Orphan`` in that + same file. + +Submission Checklist Addendum +----------------------------- +Please follow these additional rules when submitting to XFS: + +- Patches affecting only the filesystem itself should be based against + the latest -rc or the for-next branch. + These patches will be merged back to the for-next branch. + +- Authors of patches touching other subsystems need to coordinate with + the maintainers of XFS and the relevant subsystems to decide how to + proceed with a merge. + +- Any patchset changing XFS should be cc'd in its entirety to linux-xfs. + Do not send partial patchsets; that makes analysis of the broader + context of the changes unnecessarily difficult. + +- Anyone making kernel changes that have corresponding changes to the + userspace utilities should send the userspace changes as separate + patchsets immediately after the kernel patchsets. + +- Authors of bug fix patches are expected to use fstests[2] to perform + an A/B test of the patch to determine that there are no regressions. + When possible, a new regression test case should be written for + fstests. + +- Authors of new feature patchsets must ensure that fstests will have + appropriate functional and input corner-case test cases for the new + feature. + +- When implementing a new feature, it is strongly suggested that the + developers write a design document to answer the following questions: + + * **What** problem is this trying to solve? + + * **Who** will benefit from this solution, and **where** will they + access it? + + * **How** will this new feature work? This should touch on major data + structures and algorithms supporting the solution at a higher level + than code comments. + + * **What** userspace interfaces are necessary to build off of the new + features? + + * **How** will this work be tested to ensure that it solves the + problems laid out in the design document without causing new + problems? + + The design document should be committed in the kernel documentation + directory. + It may be omitted if the feature is already well known to the + community. + +- Patchsets for the new tests should be submitted as separate patchsets + immediately after the kernel and userspace code patchsets. + +- Changes to the on-disk format of XFS must be described in the ondisk + format document[3] and submitted as a patchset after the fstests + patchsets. + +- Patchsets implementing bug fixes and further code cleanups should put + the bug fixes at the beginning of the series to ease backporting. + +Key Release Cycle Dates +----------------------- +Bug fixes may be sent at any time, though the release manager may decide to +defer a patch when the next merge window is close. + +Code submissions targeting the next merge window should be sent between +-rc1 and -rc6. +This gives the community time to review the changes, to suggest other changes, +and for the author to retest those changes. + +Code submissions also requiring changes to fs/iomap and targeting the +next merge window should be sent between -rc1 and -rc4. +This allows the broader kernel community adequate time to test the +infrastructure changes. + +Review Cadence +-------------- +In general, please wait at least one week before pinging for feedback. +To find reviewers, either consult the MAINTAINERS file, or ask +developers that have Reviewed-by tags for XFS changes to take a look and +offer their opinion. + +References +---------- +| [0] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-linux.git/ +| [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfsprogs-dev.git/ +| [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfstests-dev.git/ +| [3] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/xfs/xfs-documentation.git/ |