summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c')
-rw-r--r--arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c760
1 files changed, 760 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..59882da3e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c
@@ -0,0 +1,760 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-later
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/ioport.h>
+#include <linux/bitmap.h>
+#include <linux/pci.h>
+
+#include <asm/opal.h>
+
+#include "pci.h"
+
+/*
+ * The majority of the complexity in supporting SR-IOV on PowerNV comes from
+ * the need to put the MMIO space for each VF into a separate PE. Internally
+ * the PHB maps MMIO addresses to a specific PE using the "Memory BAR Table".
+ * The MBT historically only applied to the 64bit MMIO window of the PHB
+ * so it's common to see it referred to as the "M64BT".
+ *
+ * An MBT entry stores the mapped range as an <base>,<mask> pair. This forces
+ * the address range that we want to map to be power-of-two sized and aligned.
+ * For conventional PCI devices this isn't really an issue since PCI device BARs
+ * have the same requirement.
+ *
+ * For a SR-IOV BAR things are a little more awkward since size and alignment
+ * are not coupled. The alignment is set based on the per-VF BAR size, but
+ * the total BAR area is: number-of-vfs * per-vf-size. The number of VFs
+ * isn't necessarily a power of two, so neither is the total size. To fix that
+ * we need to finesse (read: hack) the Linux BAR allocator so that it will
+ * allocate the SR-IOV BARs in a way that lets us map them using the MBT.
+ *
+ * The changes to size and alignment that we need to do depend on the "mode"
+ * of MBT entry that we use. We only support SR-IOV on PHB3 (IODA2) and above,
+ * so as a baseline we can assume that we have the following BAR modes
+ * available:
+ *
+ * NB: $PE_COUNT is the number of PEs that the PHB supports.
+ *
+ * a) A segmented BAR that splits the mapped range into $PE_COUNT equally sized
+ * segments. The n'th segment is mapped to the n'th PE.
+ * b) An un-segmented BAR that maps the whole address range to a specific PE.
+ *
+ *
+ * We prefer to use mode a) since it only requires one MBT entry per SR-IOV BAR
+ * For comparison b) requires one entry per-VF per-BAR, or:
+ * (num-vfs * num-sriov-bars) in total. To use a) we need the size of each segment
+ * to equal the size of the per-VF BAR area. So:
+ *
+ * new_size = per-vf-size * number-of-PEs
+ *
+ * The alignment for the SR-IOV BAR also needs to be changed from per-vf-size
+ * to "new_size", calculated above. Implementing this is a convoluted process
+ * which requires several hooks in the PCI core:
+ *
+ * 1. In pcibios_device_add() we call pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov().
+ *
+ * At this point the device has been probed and the device's BARs are sized,
+ * but no resource allocations have been done. The SR-IOV BARs are sized
+ * based on the maximum number of VFs supported by the device and we need
+ * to increase that to new_size.
+ *
+ * 2. Later, when Linux actually assigns resources it tries to make the resource
+ * allocations for each PCI bus as compact as possible. As a part of that it
+ * sorts the BARs on a bus by their required alignment, which is calculated
+ * using pci_resource_alignment().
+ *
+ * For IOV resources this goes:
+ * pci_resource_alignment()
+ * pci_sriov_resource_alignment()
+ * pcibios_sriov_resource_alignment()
+ * pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment()
+ *
+ * Our hook overrides the default alignment, equal to the per-vf-size, with
+ * new_size computed above.
+ *
+ * 3. When userspace enables VFs for a device:
+ *
+ * sriov_enable()
+ * pcibios_sriov_enable()
+ * pnv_pcibios_sriov_enable()
+ *
+ * This is where we actually allocate PE numbers for each VF and setup the
+ * MBT mapping for each SR-IOV BAR. In steps 1) and 2) we setup an "arena"
+ * where each MBT segment is equal in size to the VF BAR so we can shift
+ * around the actual SR-IOV BAR location within this arena. We need this
+ * ability because the PE space is shared by all devices on the same PHB.
+ * When using mode a) described above segment 0 in maps to PE#0 which might
+ * be already being used by another device on the PHB.
+ *
+ * As a result we need allocate a contigious range of PE numbers, then shift
+ * the address programmed into the SR-IOV BAR of the PF so that the address
+ * of VF0 matches up with the segment corresponding to the first allocated
+ * PE number. This is handled in pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift().
+ *
+ * Once all that is done we return to the PCI core which then enables VFs,
+ * scans them and creates pci_devs for each. The init process for a VF is
+ * largely the same as a normal device, but the VF is inserted into the IODA
+ * PE that we allocated for it rather than the PE associated with the bus.
+ *
+ * 4. When userspace disables VFs we unwind the above in
+ * pnv_pcibios_sriov_disable(). Fortunately this is relatively simple since
+ * we don't need to validate anything, just tear down the mappings and
+ * move SR-IOV resource back to its "proper" location.
+ *
+ * That's how mode a) works. In theory mode b) (single PE mapping) is less work
+ * since we can map each individual VF with a separate BAR. However, there's a
+ * few limitations:
+ *
+ * 1) For IODA2 mode b) has a minimum alignment requirement of 32MB. This makes
+ * it only usable for devices with very large per-VF BARs. Such devices are
+ * similar to Big Foot. They definitely exist, but I've never seen one.
+ *
+ * 2) The number of MBT entries that we have is limited. PHB3 and PHB4 only
+ * 16 total and some are needed for. Most SR-IOV capable network cards can support
+ * more than 16 VFs on each port.
+ *
+ * We use b) when using a) would use more than 1/4 of the entire 64 bit MMIO
+ * window of the PHB.
+ *
+ *
+ *
+ * PHB4 (IODA3) added a few new features that would be useful for SR-IOV. It
+ * allowed the MBT to map 32bit MMIO space in addition to 64bit which allows
+ * us to support SR-IOV BARs in the 32bit MMIO window. This is useful since
+ * the Linux BAR allocation will place any BAR marked as non-prefetchable into
+ * the non-prefetchable bridge window, which is 32bit only. It also added two
+ * new modes:
+ *
+ * c) A segmented BAR similar to a), but each segment can be individually
+ * mapped to any PE. This is matches how the 32bit MMIO window worked on
+ * IODA1&2.
+ *
+ * d) A segmented BAR with 8, 64, or 128 segments. This works similarly to a),
+ * but with fewer segments and configurable base PE.
+ *
+ * i.e. The n'th segment maps to the (n + base)'th PE.
+ *
+ * The base PE is also required to be a multiple of the window size.
+ *
+ * Unfortunately, the OPAL API doesn't currently (as of skiboot v6.6) allow us
+ * to exploit any of the IODA3 features.
+ */
+
+static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ struct pnv_phb *phb = pci_bus_to_pnvhb(pdev->bus);
+ struct resource *res;
+ int i;
+ resource_size_t vf_bar_sz;
+ struct pnv_iov_data *iov;
+ int mul;
+
+ iov = kzalloc(sizeof(*iov), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!iov)
+ goto disable_iov;
+ pdev->dev.archdata.iov_data = iov;
+ mul = phb->ioda.total_pe_num;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
+ res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
+ if (!res->flags || res->parent)
+ continue;
+ if (!pnv_pci_is_m64_flags(res->flags)) {
+ dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Don't support SR-IOV with non M64 VF BAR%d: %pR. \n",
+ i, res);
+ goto disable_iov;
+ }
+
+ vf_bar_sz = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
+
+ /*
+ * Generally, one segmented M64 BAR maps one IOV BAR. However,
+ * if a VF BAR is too large we end up wasting a lot of space.
+ * If each VF needs more than 1/4 of the default m64 segment
+ * then each VF BAR should be mapped in single-PE mode to reduce
+ * the amount of space required. This does however limit the
+ * number of VFs we can support.
+ *
+ * The 1/4 limit is arbitrary and can be tweaked.
+ */
+ if (vf_bar_sz > (phb->ioda.m64_segsize >> 2)) {
+ /*
+ * On PHB3, the minimum size alignment of M64 BAR in
+ * single mode is 32MB. If this VF BAR is smaller than
+ * 32MB, but still too large for a segmented window
+ * then we can't map it and need to disable SR-IOV for
+ * this device.
+ */
+ if (vf_bar_sz < SZ_32M) {
+ pci_err(pdev, "VF BAR%d: %pR can't be mapped in single PE mode\n",
+ i, res);
+ goto disable_iov;
+ }
+
+ iov->m64_single_mode[i] = true;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This BAR can be mapped with one segmented window, so adjust
+ * te resource size to accommodate.
+ */
+ pci_dbg(pdev, " Fixing VF BAR%d: %pR to\n", i, res);
+ res->end = res->start + vf_bar_sz * mul - 1;
+ pci_dbg(pdev, " %pR\n", res);
+
+ pci_info(pdev, "VF BAR%d: %pR (expanded to %d VFs for PE alignment)",
+ i, res, mul);
+
+ iov->need_shift = true;
+ }
+
+ return;
+
+disable_iov:
+ /* Save ourselves some MMIO space by disabling the unusable BARs */
+ for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
+ res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
+ res->flags = 0;
+ res->end = res->start - 1;
+ }
+
+ pdev->dev.archdata.iov_data = NULL;
+ kfree(iov);
+}
+
+void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ if (pdev->is_virtfn) {
+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe = pnv_ioda_get_pe(pdev);
+
+ /*
+ * VF PEs are single-device PEs so their pdev pointer needs to
+ * be set. The pdev doesn't exist when the PE is allocated (in
+ * (pcibios_sriov_enable()) so we fix it up here.
+ */
+ pe->pdev = pdev;
+ WARN_ON(!(pe->flags & PNV_IODA_PE_VF));
+ } else if (pdev->is_physfn) {
+ /*
+ * For PFs adjust their allocated IOV resources to match what
+ * the PHB can support using it's M64 BAR table.
+ */
+ pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(pdev);
+ }
+}
+
+resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev,
+ int resno)
+{
+ resource_size_t align = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, resno);
+ struct pnv_phb *phb = pci_bus_to_pnvhb(pdev->bus);
+ struct pnv_iov_data *iov = pnv_iov_get(pdev);
+
+ /*
+ * iov can be null if we have an SR-IOV device with IOV BAR that can't
+ * be placed in the m64 space (i.e. The BAR is 32bit or non-prefetch).
+ * In that case we don't allow VFs to be enabled since one of their
+ * BARs would not be placed in the correct PE.
+ */
+ if (!iov)
+ return align;
+
+ /*
+ * If we're using single mode then we can just use the native VF BAR
+ * alignment. We validated that it's possible to use a single PE
+ * window above when we did the fixup.
+ */
+ if (iov->m64_single_mode[resno - PCI_IOV_RESOURCES])
+ return align;
+
+ /*
+ * On PowerNV platform, IOV BAR is mapped by M64 BAR to enable the
+ * SR-IOV. While from hardware perspective, the range mapped by M64
+ * BAR should be size aligned.
+ *
+ * This function returns the total IOV BAR size if M64 BAR is in
+ * Shared PE mode or just VF BAR size if not.
+ * If the M64 BAR is in Single PE mode, return the VF BAR size or
+ * M64 segment size if IOV BAR size is less.
+ */
+ return phb->ioda.total_pe_num * align;
+}
+
+static int pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
+{
+ struct pnv_iov_data *iov;
+ struct pnv_phb *phb;
+ int window_id;
+
+ phb = pci_bus_to_pnvhb(pdev->bus);
+ iov = pnv_iov_get(pdev);
+
+ for_each_set_bit(window_id, iov->used_m64_bar_mask, MAX_M64_BARS) {
+ opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
+ window_id,
+ 0);
+
+ clear_bit(window_id, &phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc);
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+
+/*
+ * PHB3 and beyond support segmented windows. The window's address range
+ * is subdivided into phb->ioda.total_pe_num segments and there's a 1-1
+ * mapping between PEs and segments.
+ */
+static int64_t pnv_ioda_map_m64_segmented(struct pnv_phb *phb,
+ int window_id,
+ resource_size_t start,
+ resource_size_t size)
+{
+ int64_t rc;
+
+ rc = opal_pci_set_phb_mem_window(phb->opal_id,
+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
+ window_id,
+ start,
+ 0, /* unused */
+ size);
+ if (rc)
+ goto out;
+
+ rc = opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
+ window_id,
+ OPAL_ENABLE_M64_SPLIT);
+out:
+ if (rc)
+ pr_err("Failed to map M64 window #%d: %lld\n", window_id, rc);
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static int64_t pnv_ioda_map_m64_single(struct pnv_phb *phb,
+ int pe_num,
+ int window_id,
+ resource_size_t start,
+ resource_size_t size)
+{
+ int64_t rc;
+
+ /*
+ * The API for setting up m64 mmio windows seems to have been designed
+ * with P7-IOC in mind. For that chip each M64 BAR (window) had a fixed
+ * split of 8 equally sized segments each of which could individually
+ * assigned to a PE.
+ *
+ * The problem with this is that the API doesn't have any way to
+ * communicate the number of segments we want on a BAR. This wasn't
+ * a problem for p7-ioc since you didn't have a choice, but the
+ * single PE windows added in PHB3 don't map cleanly to this API.
+ *
+ * As a result we've got this slightly awkward process where we
+ * call opal_pci_map_pe_mmio_window() to put the single in single
+ * PE mode, and set the PE for the window before setting the address
+ * bounds. We need to do it this way because the single PE windows
+ * for PHB3 have different alignment requirements on PHB3.
+ */
+ rc = opal_pci_map_pe_mmio_window(phb->opal_id,
+ pe_num,
+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
+ window_id,
+ 0);
+ if (rc)
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * NB: In single PE mode the window needs to be aligned to 32MB
+ */
+ rc = opal_pci_set_phb_mem_window(phb->opal_id,
+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
+ window_id,
+ start,
+ 0, /* ignored by FW, m64 is 1-1 */
+ size);
+ if (rc)
+ goto out;
+
+ /*
+ * Now actually enable it. We specified the BAR should be in "non-split"
+ * mode so FW will validate that the BAR is in single PE mode.
+ */
+ rc = opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id,
+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE,
+ window_id,
+ OPAL_ENABLE_M64_NON_SPLIT);
+out:
+ if (rc)
+ pr_err("Error mapping single PE BAR\n");
+
+ return rc;
+}
+
+static int pnv_pci_alloc_m64_bar(struct pnv_phb *phb, struct pnv_iov_data *iov)
+{
+ int win;
+
+ do {
+ win = find_next_zero_bit(&phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc,
+ phb->ioda.m64_bar_idx + 1, 0);
+
+ if (win >= phb->ioda.m64_bar_idx + 1)
+ return -1;
+ } while (test_and_set_bit(win, &phb->ioda.m64_bar_alloc));
+
+ set_bit(win, iov->used_m64_bar_mask);
+
+ return win;
+}
+
+static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
+{
+ struct pnv_iov_data *iov;
+ struct pnv_phb *phb;
+ int win;
+ struct resource *res;
+ int i, j;
+ int64_t rc;
+ resource_size_t size, start;
+ int base_pe_num;
+
+ phb = pci_bus_to_pnvhb(pdev->bus);
+ iov = pnv_iov_get(pdev);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
+ res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
+ if (!res->flags || !res->parent)
+ continue;
+
+ /* don't need single mode? map everything in one go! */
+ if (!iov->m64_single_mode[i]) {
+ win = pnv_pci_alloc_m64_bar(phb, iov);
+ if (win < 0)
+ goto m64_failed;
+
+ size = resource_size(res);
+ start = res->start;
+
+ rc = pnv_ioda_map_m64_segmented(phb, win, start, size);
+ if (rc)
+ goto m64_failed;
+
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* otherwise map each VF with single PE BARs */
+ size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, PCI_IOV_RESOURCES + i);
+ base_pe_num = iov->vf_pe_arr[0].pe_number;
+
+ for (j = 0; j < num_vfs; j++) {
+ win = pnv_pci_alloc_m64_bar(phb, iov);
+ if (win < 0)
+ goto m64_failed;
+
+ start = res->start + size * j;
+ rc = pnv_ioda_map_m64_single(phb, win,
+ base_pe_num + j,
+ start,
+ size);
+ if (rc)
+ goto m64_failed;
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
+
+m64_failed:
+ pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
+ return -EBUSY;
+}
+
+static void pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ struct pnv_phb *phb;
+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe, *pe_n;
+
+ phb = pci_bus_to_pnvhb(pdev->bus);
+
+ if (!pdev->is_physfn)
+ return;
+
+ /* FIXME: Use pnv_ioda_release_pe()? */
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(pe, pe_n, &phb->ioda.pe_list, list) {
+ if (pe->parent_dev != pdev)
+ continue;
+
+ pnv_pci_ioda2_release_pe_dma(pe);
+
+ /* Remove from list */
+ mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_list_mutex);
+ list_del(&pe->list);
+ mutex_unlock(&phb->ioda.pe_list_mutex);
+
+ pnv_ioda_deconfigure_pe(phb, pe);
+
+ pnv_ioda_free_pe(pe);
+ }
+}
+
+static int pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(struct pci_dev *dev, int offset)
+{
+ struct resource *res, res2;
+ struct pnv_iov_data *iov;
+ resource_size_t size;
+ u16 num_vfs;
+ int i;
+
+ if (!dev->is_physfn)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ iov = pnv_iov_get(dev);
+
+ /*
+ * "offset" is in VFs. The M64 windows are sized so that when they
+ * are segmented, each segment is the same size as the IOV BAR.
+ * Each segment is in a separate PE, and the high order bits of the
+ * address are the PE number. Therefore, each VF's BAR is in a
+ * separate PE, and changing the IOV BAR start address changes the
+ * range of PEs the VFs are in.
+ */
+ num_vfs = iov->num_vfs;
+ for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
+ res = &dev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
+ if (!res->flags || !res->parent)
+ continue;
+ if (iov->m64_single_mode[i])
+ continue;
+
+ /*
+ * The actual IOV BAR range is determined by the start address
+ * and the actual size for num_vfs VFs BAR. This check is to
+ * make sure that after shifting, the range will not overlap
+ * with another device.
+ */
+ size = pci_iov_resource_size(dev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
+ res2.flags = res->flags;
+ res2.start = res->start + (size * offset);
+ res2.end = res2.start + (size * num_vfs) - 1;
+
+ if (res2.end > res->end) {
+ dev_err(&dev->dev, "VF BAR%d: %pR would extend past %pR (trying to enable %d VFs shifted by %d)\n",
+ i, &res2, res, num_vfs, offset);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Since M64 BAR shares segments among all possible 256 PEs,
+ * we have to shift the beginning of PF IOV BAR to make it start from
+ * the segment which belongs to the PE number assigned to the first VF.
+ * This creates a "hole" in the /proc/iomem which could be used for
+ * allocating other resources so we reserve this area below and
+ * release when IOV is released.
+ */
+ for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) {
+ res = &dev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES];
+ if (!res->flags || !res->parent)
+ continue;
+ if (iov->m64_single_mode[i])
+ continue;
+
+ size = pci_iov_resource_size(dev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
+ res2 = *res;
+ res->start += size * offset;
+
+ dev_info(&dev->dev, "VF BAR%d: %pR shifted to %pR (%sabling %d VFs shifted by %d)\n",
+ i, &res2, res, (offset > 0) ? "En" : "Dis",
+ num_vfs, offset);
+
+ if (offset < 0) {
+ devm_release_resource(&dev->dev, &iov->holes[i]);
+ memset(&iov->holes[i], 0, sizeof(iov->holes[i]));
+ }
+
+ pci_update_resource(dev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES);
+
+ if (offset > 0) {
+ iov->holes[i].start = res2.start;
+ iov->holes[i].end = res2.start + size * offset - 1;
+ iov->holes[i].flags = IORESOURCE_BUS;
+ iov->holes[i].name = "pnv_iov_reserved";
+ devm_request_resource(&dev->dev, res->parent,
+ &iov->holes[i]);
+ }
+ }
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void pnv_pci_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ u16 num_vfs, base_pe;
+ struct pnv_iov_data *iov;
+
+ iov = pnv_iov_get(pdev);
+ if (WARN_ON(!iov))
+ return;
+
+ num_vfs = iov->num_vfs;
+ base_pe = iov->vf_pe_arr[0].pe_number;
+
+ /* Release VF PEs */
+ pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(pdev);
+
+ /* Un-shift the IOV BARs if we need to */
+ if (iov->need_shift)
+ pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, -base_pe);
+
+ /* Release M64 windows */
+ pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
+}
+
+static void pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
+{
+ struct pnv_phb *phb;
+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pe;
+ int pe_num;
+ u16 vf_index;
+ struct pnv_iov_data *iov;
+ struct pci_dn *pdn;
+
+ if (!pdev->is_physfn)
+ return;
+
+ phb = pci_bus_to_pnvhb(pdev->bus);
+ pdn = pci_get_pdn(pdev);
+ iov = pnv_iov_get(pdev);
+
+ /* Reserve PE for each VF */
+ for (vf_index = 0; vf_index < num_vfs; vf_index++) {
+ int vf_devfn = pci_iov_virtfn_devfn(pdev, vf_index);
+ int vf_bus = pci_iov_virtfn_bus(pdev, vf_index);
+ struct pci_dn *vf_pdn;
+
+ pe = &iov->vf_pe_arr[vf_index];
+ pe->phb = phb;
+ pe->flags = PNV_IODA_PE_VF;
+ pe->pbus = NULL;
+ pe->parent_dev = pdev;
+ pe->mve_number = -1;
+ pe->rid = (vf_bus << 8) | vf_devfn;
+
+ pe_num = pe->pe_number;
+ pe_info(pe, "VF %04d:%02d:%02d.%d associated with PE#%x\n",
+ pci_domain_nr(pdev->bus), pdev->bus->number,
+ PCI_SLOT(vf_devfn), PCI_FUNC(vf_devfn), pe_num);
+
+ if (pnv_ioda_configure_pe(phb, pe)) {
+ /* XXX What do we do here ? */
+ pnv_ioda_free_pe(pe);
+ pe->pdev = NULL;
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ /* Put PE to the list */
+ mutex_lock(&phb->ioda.pe_list_mutex);
+ list_add_tail(&pe->list, &phb->ioda.pe_list);
+ mutex_unlock(&phb->ioda.pe_list_mutex);
+
+ /* associate this pe to it's pdn */
+ list_for_each_entry(vf_pdn, &pdn->parent->child_list, list) {
+ if (vf_pdn->busno == vf_bus &&
+ vf_pdn->devfn == vf_devfn) {
+ vf_pdn->pe_number = pe_num;
+ break;
+ }
+ }
+
+ pnv_pci_ioda2_setup_dma_pe(phb, pe);
+ }
+}
+
+static int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
+{
+ struct pnv_ioda_pe *base_pe;
+ struct pnv_iov_data *iov;
+ struct pnv_phb *phb;
+ int ret;
+ u16 i;
+
+ phb = pci_bus_to_pnvhb(pdev->bus);
+ iov = pnv_iov_get(pdev);
+
+ /*
+ * There's a calls to IODA2 PE setup code littered throughout. We could
+ * probably fix that, but we'd still have problems due to the
+ * restriction inherent on IODA1 PHBs.
+ *
+ * NB: We class IODA3 as IODA2 since they're very similar.
+ */
+ if (phb->type != PNV_PHB_IODA2) {
+ pci_err(pdev, "SR-IOV is not supported on this PHB\n");
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }
+
+ if (!iov) {
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "don't support this SRIOV device with non 64bit-prefetchable IOV BAR\n");
+ return -ENOSPC;
+ }
+
+ /* allocate a contiguous block of PEs for our VFs */
+ base_pe = pnv_ioda_alloc_pe(phb, num_vfs);
+ if (!base_pe) {
+ pci_err(pdev, "Unable to allocate PEs for %d VFs\n", num_vfs);
+ return -EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ iov->vf_pe_arr = base_pe;
+ iov->num_vfs = num_vfs;
+
+ /* Assign M64 window accordingly */
+ ret = pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Not enough M64 window resources\n");
+ goto m64_failed;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * When using one M64 BAR to map one IOV BAR, we need to shift
+ * the IOV BAR according to the PE# allocated to the VFs.
+ * Otherwise, the PE# for the VF will conflict with others.
+ */
+ if (iov->need_shift) {
+ ret = pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, base_pe->pe_number);
+ if (ret)
+ goto shift_failed;
+ }
+
+ /* Setup VF PEs */
+ pnv_ioda_setup_vf_PE(pdev, num_vfs);
+
+ return 0;
+
+shift_failed:
+ pnv_pci_vf_release_m64(pdev, num_vfs);
+
+m64_failed:
+ for (i = 0; i < num_vfs; i++)
+ pnv_ioda_free_pe(&iov->vf_pe_arr[i]);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+int pnv_pcibios_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ pnv_pci_sriov_disable(pdev);
+
+ /* Release PCI data */
+ remove_sriov_vf_pdns(pdev);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int pnv_pcibios_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 num_vfs)
+{
+ /* Allocate PCI data */
+ add_sriov_vf_pdns(pdev);
+
+ return pnv_pci_sriov_enable(pdev, num_vfs);
+}