1 files changed, 0 insertions, 57 deletions
diff --git a/debian/patches-rt/0006-locking-rtmutex-Add-a-lockdep-assert-to-catch-potent.patch b/debian/patches-rt/0006-locking-rtmutex-Add-a-lockdep-assert-to-catch-potent.patch
deleted file mode 100644
index 7d94cdb9d..000000000
--- a/debian/patches-rt/0006-locking-rtmutex-Add-a-lockdep-assert-to-catch-potent.patch
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,57 +0,0 @@
-From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2023 18:22:53 +0200
-Subject: [PATCH 6/7] locking/rtmutex: Add a lockdep assert to catch potential
- nested blocking
-Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/6.6/older/patches-6.6.7-rt18.tar.xz
-
-There used to be a BUG_ON(current->pi_blocked_on) in the lock acquisition
-functions, but that vanished in one of the rtmutex overhauls.
-
-Bring it back in form of a lockdep assert to catch code paths which take
-rtmutex based locks with current::pi_blocked_on != NULL.
-
-Reported-by: Crystal Wood <swood@redhat.com>
-Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-Signed-off-by: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
-Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
-Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
-Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230908162254.999499-7-bigeasy@linutronix.de
----
- kernel/locking/rtmutex.c     |    2 ++
- kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c   |    2 ++
- kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c |    2 ++
- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
-
---- a/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
-+++ b/kernel/locking/rtmutex.c
-@@ -1784,6 +1784,8 @@ static int __sched rt_mutex_slowlock(str
- static __always_inline int __rt_mutex_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *lock,
- 					   unsigned int state)
- {
-+	lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on);
-+
- 	if (likely(rt_mutex_try_acquire(lock)))
- 		return 0;
- 
---- a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
-+++ b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
-@@ -133,6 +133,8 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(st
- static __always_inline int rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
- 					    unsigned int state)
- {
-+	lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on);
-+
- 	if (rwbase_read_trylock(rwb))
- 		return 0;
- 
---- a/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
-+++ b/kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c
-@@ -37,6 +37,8 @@
- 
- static __always_inline void rtlock_lock(struct rt_mutex_base *rtm)
- {
-+	lockdep_assert(!current->pi_blocked_on);
-+
- 	if (unlikely(!rt_mutex_cmpxchg_acquire(rtm, NULL, current)))
- 		rtlock_slowlock(rtm);
- }