diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions.c')
-rw-r--r-- | tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions.c | 368 |
1 files changed, 368 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..2811ee842b --- /dev/null +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/exceptions.c @@ -0,0 +1,368 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 +#include <vmlinux.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_tracing.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_helpers.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_core_read.h> +#include <bpf/bpf_endian.h> +#include "bpf_misc.h" +#include "bpf_experimental.h" + +#ifndef ETH_P_IP +#define ETH_P_IP 0x0800 +#endif + +struct { + __uint(type, BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY); + __uint(max_entries, 4); + __uint(key_size, sizeof(__u32)); + __uint(value_size, sizeof(__u32)); +} jmp_table SEC(".maps"); + +static __noinline int static_func(u64 i) +{ + bpf_throw(32); + return i; +} + +__noinline int global2static_simple(u64 i) +{ + static_func(i + 2); + return i - 1; +} + +__noinline int global2static(u64 i) +{ + if (i == ETH_P_IP) + bpf_throw(16); + return static_func(i); +} + +static __noinline int static2global(u64 i) +{ + return global2static(i) + i; +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_throw_always_1(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + bpf_throw(64); + return 0; +} + +/* In this case, the global func will never be seen executing after call to + * static subprog, hence verifier will DCE the remaining instructions. Ensure we + * are resilient to that. + */ +SEC("tc") +int exception_throw_always_2(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + return global2static_simple(ctx->protocol); +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_throw_unwind_1(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + return static2global(bpf_ntohs(ctx->protocol)); +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_throw_unwind_2(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + return static2global(bpf_ntohs(ctx->protocol) - 1); +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_throw_default(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + bpf_throw(0); + return 1; +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_throw_default_value(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + bpf_throw(5); + return 1; +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_tail_call_target(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + bpf_throw(16); + return 0; +} + +static __noinline +int exception_tail_call_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + volatile int ret = 10; + + bpf_tail_call_static(ctx, &jmp_table, 0); + return ret; +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_tail_call(struct __sk_buff *ctx) { + volatile int ret = 0; + + ret = exception_tail_call_subprog(ctx); + return ret + 8; +} + +__noinline int exception_ext_global(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + volatile int ret = 0; + + return ret; +} + +static __noinline int exception_ext_static(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + return exception_ext_global(ctx); +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_ext(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + return exception_ext_static(ctx); +} + +__noinline int exception_cb_mod_global(u64 cookie) +{ + volatile int ret = 0; + + return ret; +} + +/* Example of how the exception callback supplied during verification can still + * introduce extensions by calling to dummy global functions, and alter runtime + * behavior. + * + * Right now we don't allow freplace attachment to exception callback itself, + * but if the need arises this restriction is technically feasible to relax in + * the future. + */ +__noinline int exception_cb_mod(u64 cookie) +{ + return exception_cb_mod_global(cookie) + cookie + 10; +} + +SEC("tc") +__exception_cb(exception_cb_mod) +int exception_ext_mod_cb_runtime(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + bpf_throw(25); + return 0; +} + +__noinline static int subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + return bpf_ktime_get_ns(); +} + +__noinline static int throwing_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + if (ctx->tstamp) + bpf_throw(0); + return bpf_ktime_get_ns(); +} + +__noinline int global_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + return bpf_ktime_get_ns(); +} + +__noinline int throwing_global_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + if (ctx->tstamp) + bpf_throw(0); + return bpf_ktime_get_ns(); +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_throw_subprog(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + switch (ctx->protocol) { + case 1: + return subprog(ctx); + case 2: + return global_subprog(ctx); + case 3: + return throwing_subprog(ctx); + case 4: + return throwing_global_subprog(ctx); + default: + break; + } + bpf_throw(1); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_nz_gfunc(u64 c) +{ + volatile u64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert(cookie != 0); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_zero_gfunc(u64 c) +{ + volatile u64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert_eq(cookie, 0); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_neg_gfunc(s64 c) +{ + volatile s64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert_lt(cookie, 0); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_pos_gfunc(s64 c) +{ + volatile s64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert_gt(cookie, 0); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_negeq_gfunc(s64 c) +{ + volatile s64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert_le(cookie, -1); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_poseq_gfunc(s64 c) +{ + volatile s64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert_ge(cookie, 1); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_nz_gfunc_with(u64 c) +{ + volatile u64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert_with(cookie != 0, cookie + 100); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_zero_gfunc_with(u64 c) +{ + volatile u64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert_eq_with(cookie, 0, cookie + 100); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_neg_gfunc_with(s64 c) +{ + volatile s64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert_lt_with(cookie, 0, cookie + 100); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_pos_gfunc_with(s64 c) +{ + volatile s64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert_gt_with(cookie, 0, cookie + 100); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_negeq_gfunc_with(s64 c) +{ + volatile s64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert_le_with(cookie, -1, cookie + 100); + return 0; +} + +__noinline int assert_poseq_gfunc_with(s64 c) +{ + volatile s64 cookie = c; + + bpf_assert_ge_with(cookie, 1, cookie + 100); + return 0; +} + +#define check_assert(name, cookie, tag) \ +SEC("tc") \ +int exception##tag##name(struct __sk_buff *ctx) \ +{ \ + return name(cookie) + 1; \ +} + +check_assert(assert_nz_gfunc, 5, _); +check_assert(assert_zero_gfunc, 0, _); +check_assert(assert_neg_gfunc, -100, _); +check_assert(assert_pos_gfunc, 100, _); +check_assert(assert_negeq_gfunc, -1, _); +check_assert(assert_poseq_gfunc, 1, _); + +check_assert(assert_nz_gfunc_with, 5, _); +check_assert(assert_zero_gfunc_with, 0, _); +check_assert(assert_neg_gfunc_with, -100, _); +check_assert(assert_pos_gfunc_with, 100, _); +check_assert(assert_negeq_gfunc_with, -1, _); +check_assert(assert_poseq_gfunc_with, 1, _); + +check_assert(assert_nz_gfunc, 0, _bad_); +check_assert(assert_zero_gfunc, 5, _bad_); +check_assert(assert_neg_gfunc, 100, _bad_); +check_assert(assert_pos_gfunc, -100, _bad_); +check_assert(assert_negeq_gfunc, 1, _bad_); +check_assert(assert_poseq_gfunc, -1, _bad_); + +check_assert(assert_nz_gfunc_with, 0, _bad_); +check_assert(assert_zero_gfunc_with, 5, _bad_); +check_assert(assert_neg_gfunc_with, 100, _bad_); +check_assert(assert_pos_gfunc_with, -100, _bad_); +check_assert(assert_negeq_gfunc_with, 1, _bad_); +check_assert(assert_poseq_gfunc_with, -1, _bad_); + +SEC("tc") +int exception_assert_range(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + u64 time = bpf_ktime_get_ns(); + + bpf_assert_range(time, 0, ~0ULL); + return 1; +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_assert_range_with(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + u64 time = bpf_ktime_get_ns(); + + bpf_assert_range_with(time, 0, ~0ULL, 10); + return 1; +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_bad_assert_range(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + u64 time = bpf_ktime_get_ns(); + + bpf_assert_range(time, -100, 100); + return 1; +} + +SEC("tc") +int exception_bad_assert_range_with(struct __sk_buff *ctx) +{ + u64 time = bpf_ktime_get_ns(); + + bpf_assert_range_with(time, -1000, 1000, 10); + return 1; +} + +char _license[] SEC("license") = "GPL"; |