blob: d61e6d3cda92d46220c24ca7f51c49c8905a9351 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
|
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 15:05:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 05/10] drm/i915: Don't check for atomic context on PREEMPT_RT
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/6.8/older/patches-6.8.2-rt11.tar.xz
The !in_atomic() check in _wait_for_atomic() triggers on PREEMPT_RT
because the uncore::lock is a spinlock_t and does not disable
preemption or interrupts.
Changing the uncore:lock to a raw_spinlock_t doubles the worst case
latency on an otherwise idle testbox during testing. Therefore I'm
currently unsure about changing this.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211006164628.s2mtsdd2jdbfyf7g@linutronix.de/
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_utils.h
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ wait_remaining_ms_from_jiffies(unsigned
#define wait_for(COND, MS) _wait_for((COND), (MS) * 1000, 10, 1000)
/* If CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT is disabled, in_atomic() always reports false. */
-#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT)
+#if defined(CONFIG_DRM_I915_DEBUG) && defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_COUNT) && !defined(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT)
# define _WAIT_FOR_ATOMIC_CHECK(ATOMIC) WARN_ON_ONCE((ATOMIC) && !in_atomic())
#else
# define _WAIT_FOR_ATOMIC_CHECK(ATOMIC) do { } while (0)
|
