blob: e2976aacd59d7e418f32667be3114f78af806449 (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
|
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 21:37:21 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 7/8] drm/i915/guc: Consider also RCU depth in busy loop.
Origin: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/projects/rt/6.10/older/patches-6.10.2-rt14.tar.xz
intel_guc_send_busy_loop() looks at in_atomic() and irqs_disabled() to
decide if it should busy-spin while waiting or if it may sleep.
Both checks will report false on PREEMPT_RT if sleeping spinlocks are
acquired leading to RCU splats while the function sleeps.
Check also if RCU has been disabled.
Reported-by: "John B. Wyatt IV" <jwyatt@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h
@@ -362,7 +362,7 @@ static inline int intel_guc_send_busy_lo
{
int err;
unsigned int sleep_period_ms = 1;
- bool not_atomic = !in_atomic() && !irqs_disabled();
+ bool not_atomic = !in_atomic() && !irqs_disabled() && !rcu_preempt_depth();
/*
* FIXME: Have caller pass in if we are in an atomic context to avoid
|
