diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-16 19:46:48 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-16 19:46:48 +0000 |
commit | 311bcfc6b3acdd6fd152798c7f287ddf74fa2a98 (patch) | |
tree | 0ec307299b1dada3701e42f4ca6eda57d708261e /src/test/modules/test_predtest/test_predtest.c | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | postgresql-15-311bcfc6b3acdd6fd152798c7f287ddf74fa2a98.tar.xz postgresql-15-311bcfc6b3acdd6fd152798c7f287ddf74fa2a98.zip |
Adding upstream version 15.4.upstream/15.4upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/modules/test_predtest/test_predtest.c')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/modules/test_predtest/test_predtest.c | 218 |
1 files changed, 218 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/modules/test_predtest/test_predtest.c b/src/test/modules/test_predtest/test_predtest.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3b19e0e --- /dev/null +++ b/src/test/modules/test_predtest/test_predtest.c @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------- + * + * test_predtest.c + * Test correctness of optimizer's predicate proof logic. + * + * Copyright (c) 2018-2022, PostgreSQL Global Development Group + * + * IDENTIFICATION + * src/test/modules/test_predtest/test_predtest.c + * + * ------------------------------------------------------------------------- + */ + +#include "postgres.h" + +#include "access/htup_details.h" +#include "catalog/pg_type.h" +#include "executor/spi.h" +#include "funcapi.h" +#include "nodes/makefuncs.h" +#include "optimizer/optimizer.h" +#include "utils/builtins.h" + +PG_MODULE_MAGIC; + +/* + * test_predtest(query text) returns record + */ +PG_FUNCTION_INFO_V1(test_predtest); + +Datum +test_predtest(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS) +{ + text *txt = PG_GETARG_TEXT_PP(0); + char *query_string = text_to_cstring(txt); + SPIPlanPtr spiplan; + int spirc; + TupleDesc tupdesc; + bool s_i_holds, + w_i_holds, + s_r_holds, + w_r_holds; + CachedPlan *cplan; + PlannedStmt *stmt; + Plan *plan; + Expr *clause1; + Expr *clause2; + bool strong_implied_by, + weak_implied_by, + strong_refuted_by, + weak_refuted_by; + Datum values[8]; + bool nulls[8]; + int i; + + /* We use SPI to parse, plan, and execute the test query */ + if (SPI_connect() != SPI_OK_CONNECT) + elog(ERROR, "SPI_connect failed"); + + /* + * First, plan and execute the query, and inspect the results. To the + * extent that the query fully exercises the two expressions, this + * provides an experimental indication of whether implication or + * refutation holds. + */ + spiplan = SPI_prepare(query_string, 0, NULL); + if (spiplan == NULL) + elog(ERROR, "SPI_prepare failed for \"%s\"", query_string); + + spirc = SPI_execute_plan(spiplan, NULL, NULL, true, 0); + if (spirc != SPI_OK_SELECT) + elog(ERROR, "failed to execute \"%s\"", query_string); + tupdesc = SPI_tuptable->tupdesc; + if (tupdesc->natts != 2 || + TupleDescAttr(tupdesc, 0)->atttypid != BOOLOID || + TupleDescAttr(tupdesc, 1)->atttypid != BOOLOID) + elog(ERROR, "query must yield two boolean columns"); + + s_i_holds = w_i_holds = s_r_holds = w_r_holds = true; + for (i = 0; i < SPI_processed; i++) + { + HeapTuple tup = SPI_tuptable->vals[i]; + Datum dat; + bool isnull; + char c1, + c2; + + /* Extract column values in a 3-way representation */ + dat = SPI_getbinval(tup, tupdesc, 1, &isnull); + if (isnull) + c1 = 'n'; + else if (DatumGetBool(dat)) + c1 = 't'; + else + c1 = 'f'; + + dat = SPI_getbinval(tup, tupdesc, 2, &isnull); + if (isnull) + c2 = 'n'; + else if (DatumGetBool(dat)) + c2 = 't'; + else + c2 = 'f'; + + /* Check for violations of various proof conditions */ + + /* strong implication: truth of c2 implies truth of c1 */ + if (c2 == 't' && c1 != 't') + s_i_holds = false; + /* weak implication: non-falsity of c2 implies non-falsity of c1 */ + if (c2 != 'f' && c1 == 'f') + w_i_holds = false; + /* strong refutation: truth of c2 implies falsity of c1 */ + if (c2 == 't' && c1 != 'f') + s_r_holds = false; + /* weak refutation: truth of c2 implies non-truth of c1 */ + if (c2 == 't' && c1 == 't') + w_r_holds = false; + } + + /* + * Now, dig the clause querytrees out of the plan, and see what predtest.c + * does with them. + */ + cplan = SPI_plan_get_cached_plan(spiplan); + + if (list_length(cplan->stmt_list) != 1) + elog(ERROR, "failed to decipher query plan"); + stmt = linitial_node(PlannedStmt, cplan->stmt_list); + if (stmt->commandType != CMD_SELECT) + elog(ERROR, "failed to decipher query plan"); + plan = stmt->planTree; + Assert(list_length(plan->targetlist) >= 2); + clause1 = linitial_node(TargetEntry, plan->targetlist)->expr; + clause2 = lsecond_node(TargetEntry, plan->targetlist)->expr; + + /* + * Because the clauses are in the SELECT list, preprocess_expression did + * not pass them through canonicalize_qual nor make_ands_implicit. + * + * We can't do canonicalize_qual here, since it's unclear whether the + * expressions ought to be treated as WHERE or CHECK clauses. Fortunately, + * useful test expressions wouldn't be affected by those transformations + * anyway. We should do make_ands_implicit, though. + * + * Another way in which this does not exactly duplicate the normal usage + * of the proof functions is that they are often given qual clauses + * containing RestrictInfo nodes. But since predtest.c just looks through + * those anyway, it seems OK to not worry about that point. + */ + clause1 = (Expr *) make_ands_implicit(clause1); + clause2 = (Expr *) make_ands_implicit(clause2); + + strong_implied_by = predicate_implied_by((List *) clause1, + (List *) clause2, + false); + + weak_implied_by = predicate_implied_by((List *) clause1, + (List *) clause2, + true); + + strong_refuted_by = predicate_refuted_by((List *) clause1, + (List *) clause2, + false); + + weak_refuted_by = predicate_refuted_by((List *) clause1, + (List *) clause2, + true); + + /* + * Issue warning if any proof is demonstrably incorrect. + */ + if (strong_implied_by && !s_i_holds) + elog(WARNING, "strong_implied_by result is incorrect"); + if (weak_implied_by && !w_i_holds) + elog(WARNING, "weak_implied_by result is incorrect"); + if (strong_refuted_by && !s_r_holds) + elog(WARNING, "strong_refuted_by result is incorrect"); + if (weak_refuted_by && !w_r_holds) + elog(WARNING, "weak_refuted_by result is incorrect"); + + /* + * Clean up and return a record of the results. + */ + if (SPI_finish() != SPI_OK_FINISH) + elog(ERROR, "SPI_finish failed"); + + tupdesc = CreateTemplateTupleDesc(8); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 1, + "strong_implied_by", BOOLOID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 2, + "weak_implied_by", BOOLOID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 3, + "strong_refuted_by", BOOLOID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 4, + "weak_refuted_by", BOOLOID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 5, + "s_i_holds", BOOLOID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 6, + "w_i_holds", BOOLOID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 7, + "s_r_holds", BOOLOID, -1, 0); + TupleDescInitEntry(tupdesc, (AttrNumber) 8, + "w_r_holds", BOOLOID, -1, 0); + tupdesc = BlessTupleDesc(tupdesc); + + MemSet(nulls, 0, sizeof(nulls)); + values[0] = BoolGetDatum(strong_implied_by); + values[1] = BoolGetDatum(weak_implied_by); + values[2] = BoolGetDatum(strong_refuted_by); + values[3] = BoolGetDatum(weak_refuted_by); + values[4] = BoolGetDatum(s_i_holds); + values[5] = BoolGetDatum(w_i_holds); + values[6] = BoolGetDatum(s_r_holds); + values[7] = BoolGetDatum(w_r_holds); + + PG_RETURN_DATUM(HeapTupleGetDatum(heap_form_tuple(tupdesc, values, nulls))); +} |