summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_rule.sgml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'doc/src/sgml/ref/create_rule.sgml')
-rw-r--r--doc/src/sgml/ref/create_rule.sgml305
1 files changed, 305 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_rule.sgml b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_rule.sgml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..dbf4c93
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/src/sgml/ref/create_rule.sgml
@@ -0,0 +1,305 @@
+<!--
+doc/src/sgml/ref/create_rule.sgml
+PostgreSQL documentation
+-->
+
+<refentry id="sql-createrule">
+ <indexterm zone="sql-createrule">
+ <primary>CREATE RULE</primary>
+ </indexterm>
+
+ <refmeta>
+ <refentrytitle>CREATE RULE</refentrytitle>
+ <manvolnum>7</manvolnum>
+ <refmiscinfo>SQL - Language Statements</refmiscinfo>
+ </refmeta>
+
+ <refnamediv>
+ <refname>CREATE RULE</refname>
+ <refpurpose>define a new rewrite rule</refpurpose>
+ </refnamediv>
+
+ <refsynopsisdiv>
+<synopsis>
+CREATE [ OR REPLACE ] RULE <replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable> AS ON <replaceable class="parameter">event</replaceable>
+ TO <replaceable class="parameter">table_name</replaceable> [ WHERE <replaceable class="parameter">condition</replaceable> ]
+ DO [ ALSO | INSTEAD ] { NOTHING | <replaceable class="parameter">command</replaceable> | ( <replaceable class="parameter">command</replaceable> ; <replaceable class="parameter">command</replaceable> ... ) }
+
+<phrase>where <replaceable class="parameter">event</replaceable> can be one of:</phrase>
+
+ SELECT | INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE
+</synopsis>
+ </refsynopsisdiv>
+
+ <refsect1>
+ <title>Description</title>
+
+ <para>
+ <command>CREATE RULE</command> defines a new rule applying to a specified
+ table or view.
+ <command>CREATE OR REPLACE RULE</command> will either create a
+ new rule, or replace an existing rule of the same name for the same
+ table.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ The <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> rule system allows one to
+ define an alternative action to be performed on insertions, updates,
+ or deletions in database tables. Roughly speaking, a rule causes
+ additional commands to be executed when a given command on a given
+ table is executed. Alternatively, an <literal>INSTEAD</literal>
+ rule can replace a given command by another, or cause a command
+ not to be executed at all. Rules are used to implement SQL
+ views as well. It is important to realize that a rule is really
+ a command transformation mechanism, or command macro. The
+ transformation happens before the execution of the command starts.
+ If you actually want an operation that fires independently for each
+ physical row, you probably want to use a trigger, not a rule.
+ More information about the rules system is in <xref linkend="rules"/>.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Presently, <literal>ON SELECT</literal> rules must be unconditional
+ <literal>INSTEAD</literal> rules and must have actions that consist
+ of a single <command>SELECT</command> command. Thus, an
+ <literal>ON SELECT</literal> rule effectively turns the table into
+ a view, whose visible contents are the rows returned by the rule's
+ <command>SELECT</command> command rather than whatever had been
+ stored in the table (if anything). It is considered better style
+ to write a <command>CREATE VIEW</command> command than to create a
+ real table and define an <literal>ON SELECT</literal> rule for it.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ You can create the illusion of an updatable view by defining
+ <literal>ON INSERT</literal>, <literal>ON UPDATE</literal>, and
+ <literal>ON DELETE</literal> rules (or any subset of those that's
+ sufficient for your purposes) to replace update actions on the view
+ with appropriate updates on other tables. If you want to support
+ <command>INSERT RETURNING</command> and so on, then be sure to put a suitable
+ <literal>RETURNING</literal> clause into each of these rules.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ There is a catch if you try to use conditional rules for complex view
+ updates: there <emphasis>must</emphasis> be an unconditional
+ <literal>INSTEAD</literal> rule for each action you wish to allow
+ on the view. If the rule is conditional, or is not
+ <literal>INSTEAD</literal>, then the system will still reject
+ attempts to perform the update action, because it thinks it might
+ end up trying to perform the action on the dummy table of the view
+ in some cases. If you want to handle all the useful cases in
+ conditional rules, add an unconditional <literal>DO
+ INSTEAD NOTHING</literal> rule to ensure that the system
+ understands it will never be called on to update the dummy table.
+ Then make the conditional rules non-<literal>INSTEAD</literal>; in
+ the cases where they are applied, they add to the default
+ <literal>INSTEAD NOTHING</literal> action. (This method does not
+ currently work to support <literal>RETURNING</literal> queries, however.)
+ </para>
+
+ <note>
+ <para>
+ A view that is simple enough to be automatically updatable (see <xref
+ linkend="sql-createview"/>) does not require a user-created rule in
+ order to be updatable. While you can create an explicit rule anyway,
+ the automatic update transformation will generally outperform an
+ explicit rule.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Another alternative worth considering is to use <literal>INSTEAD OF</literal>
+ triggers (see <xref linkend="sql-createtrigger"/>) in place of rules.
+ </para>
+ </note>
+ </refsect1>
+
+ <refsect1>
+ <title>Parameters</title>
+
+ <variablelist>
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><replaceable class="parameter">name</replaceable></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ The name of a rule to create. This must be distinct from the
+ name of any other rule for the same table. Multiple rules on
+ the same table and same event type are applied in alphabetical
+ name order.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><replaceable class="parameter">event</replaceable></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ The event is one of <literal>SELECT</literal>,
+ <literal>INSERT</literal>, <literal>UPDATE</literal>, or
+ <literal>DELETE</literal>. Note that an
+ <command>INSERT</command> containing an <literal>ON
+ CONFLICT</literal> clause cannot be used on tables that have
+ either <literal>INSERT</literal> or <literal>UPDATE</literal>
+ rules. Consider using an updatable view instead.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><replaceable class="parameter">table_name</replaceable></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ The name (optionally schema-qualified) of the table or view the
+ rule applies to.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><replaceable class="parameter">condition</replaceable></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ Any <acronym>SQL</acronym> conditional expression (returning
+ <type>boolean</type>). The condition expression cannot refer
+ to any tables except <literal>NEW</literal> and <literal>OLD</literal>, and
+ cannot contain aggregate functions.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><option>INSTEAD</option></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para><literal>INSTEAD</literal> indicates that the commands should be
+ executed <emphasis>instead of</emphasis> the original command.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><option>ALSO</option></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para><literal>ALSO</literal> indicates that the commands should be
+ executed <emphasis>in addition to</emphasis> the original
+ command.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ If neither <literal>ALSO</literal> nor
+ <literal>INSTEAD</literal> is specified, <literal>ALSO</literal>
+ is the default.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+
+ <varlistentry>
+ <term><replaceable class="parameter">command</replaceable></term>
+ <listitem>
+ <para>
+ The command or commands that make up the rule action. Valid
+ commands are <command>SELECT</command>,
+ <command>INSERT</command>, <command>UPDATE</command>,
+ <command>DELETE</command>, or <command>NOTIFY</command>.
+ </para>
+ </listitem>
+ </varlistentry>
+ </variablelist>
+
+ <para>
+ Within <replaceable class="parameter">condition</replaceable> and
+ <replaceable class="parameter">command</replaceable>, the special
+ table names <literal>NEW</literal> and <literal>OLD</literal> can
+ be used to refer to values in the referenced table.
+ <literal>NEW</literal> is valid in <literal>ON INSERT</literal> and
+ <literal>ON UPDATE</literal> rules to refer to the new row being
+ inserted or updated. <literal>OLD</literal> is valid in
+ <literal>ON UPDATE</literal> and <literal>ON DELETE</literal> rules
+ to refer to the existing row being updated or deleted.
+ </para>
+ </refsect1>
+
+ <refsect1>
+ <title>Notes</title>
+
+ <para>
+ You must be the owner of a table to create or change rules for it.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ In a rule for <literal>INSERT</literal>, <literal>UPDATE</literal>, or
+ <literal>DELETE</literal> on a view, you can add a <literal>RETURNING</literal>
+ clause that emits the view's columns. This clause will be used to compute
+ the outputs if the rule is triggered by an <command>INSERT RETURNING</command>,
+ <command>UPDATE RETURNING</command>, or <command>DELETE RETURNING</command> command
+ respectively. When the rule is triggered by a command without
+ <literal>RETURNING</literal>, the rule's <literal>RETURNING</literal> clause will be
+ ignored. The current implementation allows only unconditional
+ <literal>INSTEAD</literal> rules to contain <literal>RETURNING</literal>; furthermore
+ there can be at most one <literal>RETURNING</literal> clause among all the rules
+ for the same event. (This ensures that there is only one candidate
+ <literal>RETURNING</literal> clause to be used to compute the results.)
+ <literal>RETURNING</literal> queries on the view will be rejected if
+ there is no <literal>RETURNING</literal> clause in any available rule.
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ It is very important to take care to avoid circular rules. For
+ example, though each of the following two rule definitions are
+ accepted by <productname>PostgreSQL</productname>, the
+ <command>SELECT</command> command would cause
+ <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> to report an error because
+ of recursive expansion of a rule:
+
+<programlisting>
+CREATE RULE "_RETURN" AS
+ ON SELECT TO t1
+ DO INSTEAD
+ SELECT * FROM t2;
+
+CREATE RULE "_RETURN" AS
+ ON SELECT TO t2
+ DO INSTEAD
+ SELECT * FROM t1;
+
+SELECT * FROM t1;
+</programlisting>
+ </para>
+
+ <para>
+ Presently, if a rule action contains a <command>NOTIFY</command>
+ command, the <command>NOTIFY</command> command will be executed
+ unconditionally, that is, the <command>NOTIFY</command> will be
+ issued even if there are not any rows that the rule should apply
+ to. For example, in:
+<programlisting>
+CREATE RULE notify_me AS ON UPDATE TO mytable DO ALSO NOTIFY mytable;
+
+UPDATE mytable SET name = 'foo' WHERE id = 42;
+</programlisting>
+ one <command>NOTIFY</command> event will be sent during the
+ <command>UPDATE</command>, whether or not there are any rows that
+ match the condition <literal>id = 42</literal>. This is an
+ implementation restriction that might be fixed in future releases.
+ </para>
+ </refsect1>
+
+ <refsect1>
+ <title>Compatibility</title>
+
+ <para>
+ <command>CREATE RULE</command> is a
+ <productname>PostgreSQL</productname> language extension, as is the
+ entire query rewrite system.
+ </para>
+ </refsect1>
+
+ <refsect1>
+ <title>See Also</title>
+
+ <simplelist type="inline">
+ <member><xref linkend="sql-alterrule"/></member>
+ <member><xref linkend="sql-droprule"/></member>
+ </simplelist>
+ </refsect1>
+
+</refentry>