blob: ddf0ee544b7b560ffe91f676f4b3bc60ea380d8c (
plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
|
SET max_parallel_maintenance_workers TO 4;
SET min_parallel_index_scan_size TO '128kB';
-- Bug #17245: Make sure that we don't totally fail to VACUUM individual indexes that
-- happen to be below min_parallel_index_scan_size during parallel VACUUM:
CREATE TABLE parallel_vacuum_table (a int) WITH (autovacuum_enabled = off);
INSERT INTO parallel_vacuum_table SELECT i from generate_series(1, 10000) i;
-- Parallel VACUUM will never be used unless there are at least two indexes
-- that exceed min_parallel_index_scan_size. Create two such indexes, and
-- a third index that is smaller than min_parallel_index_scan_size.
CREATE INDEX regular_sized_index ON parallel_vacuum_table(a);
CREATE INDEX typically_sized_index ON parallel_vacuum_table(a);
-- Note: vacuum_in_leader_small_index can apply deduplication, making it ~3x
-- smaller than the other indexes
CREATE INDEX vacuum_in_leader_small_index ON parallel_vacuum_table((1));
-- Verify (as best we can) that the cost model for parallel VACUUM
-- will make our VACUUM run in parallel, while always leaving it up to the
-- parallel leader to handle the vacuum_in_leader_small_index index:
SELECT EXISTS (
SELECT 1
FROM pg_class
WHERE oid = 'vacuum_in_leader_small_index'::regclass AND
pg_relation_size(oid) <
pg_size_bytes(current_setting('min_parallel_index_scan_size'))
) as leader_will_handle_small_index;
leader_will_handle_small_index
--------------------------------
t
(1 row)
SELECT count(*) as trigger_parallel_vacuum_nindexes
FROM pg_class
WHERE oid in ('regular_sized_index'::regclass, 'typically_sized_index'::regclass) AND
pg_relation_size(oid) >=
pg_size_bytes(current_setting('min_parallel_index_scan_size'));
trigger_parallel_vacuum_nindexes
----------------------------------
2
(1 row)
-- Parallel VACUUM with B-Tree page deletions, ambulkdelete calls:
DELETE FROM parallel_vacuum_table;
VACUUM (PARALLEL 4, INDEX_CLEANUP ON) parallel_vacuum_table;
-- Since vacuum_in_leader_small_index uses deduplication, we expect an
-- assertion failure with bug #17245 (in the absence of bugfix):
INSERT INTO parallel_vacuum_table SELECT i FROM generate_series(1, 10000) i;
RESET max_parallel_maintenance_workers;
RESET min_parallel_index_scan_size;
-- Deliberately don't drop table, to get further coverage from tools like
-- pg_amcheck in some testing scenarios
|
