diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-10 21:30:40 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-10 21:30:40 +0000 |
commit | 133a45c109da5310add55824db21af5239951f93 (patch) | |
tree | ba6ac4c0a950a0dda56451944315d66409923918 /test/coverage.md | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | rspamd-upstream.tar.xz rspamd-upstream.zip |
Adding upstream version 3.8.1.upstream/3.8.1upstream
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'test/coverage.md')
-rw-r--r-- | test/coverage.md | 58 |
1 files changed, 58 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/coverage.md b/test/coverage.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8d177f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/coverage.md @@ -0,0 +1,58 @@ +Coverage collection explained +============================= + +Hi mate. In short, you don't wanna know this. Believe me, you don't. Please, close this file and forget about it. + +Surely? You still here? + +Please, stop it until it's too late. + +You were warned. + + +Preamble +-------- +RSPAMD is written mainly in two languages: C and Lua. Coverage for each of them is being collected using different +tools and approaches and is sent into [coveralls.io](https://coveralls.io). +Each approach is not quite compatible to other tools. This document describes how we crutch them to work together. + + +C coverage +---------- +In general, pretty boring. When you run `cmake` with "-DENABLE_COVERAGE=ON" flag, it adds "--coverage" flag to both +CFLAGS and LDFLAGS. So that each run of generated binary will create `*.gcda` file containing coverage data. + +However, there are some moment to highlight: + +- RSPAMD is run under "nobody" user. Hence, directories and files should be writable for this user. +- To make it possible, we explicitly run `umask 0000` in "build" and "functional" stages in .circleci/config.yml +- After run, we persist coverage data in "coverage.${CIRCLE\_JOB}.dump" during this build flow, see `capture_coverage_data`, + to use it on the final stage. +- we use `cpp-coveralls` because it is able to save data for coveralls without actually sending it. We send on our own + along with Lua-coverage. + +Lua coverage +------------ +Lua coverage is collected for unit-tests and functional test suite. +First part contains nothing interesting, just see `test/lua/tests.lua`. + +"Functional" part is completely unobvious. + +1. Coverage collecting is initiated and dumped in `test/functional/lua/test_coverage.lua` (there are a lot of comments inside). + This file should be included on the very early stage of test run. Usually it's included via config. +2. Coverage is dumped into ${TMPDIR}/%{worker_name}.luacov.stats.out +3. All worker coverage reports are merged into `lua_coverage_report.json` (see `collect_lua_coverage()`) +4. finally, `lua_coverage_report.json` is persisted in build flow (see `functional` stage) + +Altogether +---------- + +Finally, we get all the reports: + +- `coverage.functional.dump` +- `coverage.rspamd-test.dump` +- `lua_coverage_report.json` +- `unit_test_lua.json` + +and merge them and send the resulting report using `test/functional/util/merge_coveralls.py`. Also, this scripts maps installed +paths into corresponding repository paths and removes unneeded files (i.e. test sources). |