diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-06-19 09:26:03 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-06-19 09:26:03 +0000 |
commit | 9918693037dce8aa4bb6f08741b6812923486c18 (patch) | |
tree | 21d2b40bec7e6a7ea664acee056eb3d08e15a1cf /compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs | |
parent | Releasing progress-linux version 1.75.0+dfsg1-5~progress7.99u1. (diff) | |
download | rustc-9918693037dce8aa4bb6f08741b6812923486c18.tar.xz rustc-9918693037dce8aa4bb6f08741b6812923486c18.zip |
Merging upstream version 1.76.0+dfsg1.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs')
-rw-r--r-- | compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs | 12 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs index 62ab1e104..aee513207 100644 --- a/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs +++ b/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/const_evaluatable.rs @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'tcx>( // FIXME(generic_const_exprs): we have a `ConstKind::Expr` which is fully concrete, but // currently it is not possible to evaluate `ConstKind::Expr` so we are unable to tell if it // is evaluatable or not. For now we just ICE until this is implemented. - Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(tcx.sess.delay_span_bug( + Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(tcx.sess.span_delayed_bug( span, "evaluating `ConstKind::Expr` is not currently supported", ))) @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'tcx>( let concrete = infcx.const_eval_resolve(param_env, uv, Some(span)); match concrete { Err(ErrorHandled::TooGeneric(_)) => { - Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(infcx.tcx.sess.delay_span_bug( + Err(NotConstEvaluatable::Error(infcx.tcx.sess.span_delayed_bug( span, "Missing value for constant, but no error reported?", ))) @@ -138,10 +138,10 @@ pub fn is_const_evaluatable<'tcx>( } else if uv.has_non_region_param() { NotConstEvaluatable::MentionsParam } else { - let guar = infcx - .tcx - .sess - .delay_span_bug(span, "Missing value for constant, but no error reported?"); + let guar = infcx.tcx.sess.span_delayed_bug( + span, + "Missing value for constant, but no error reported?", + ); NotConstEvaluatable::Error(guar) }; |