diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-17 12:06:37 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-17 12:06:37 +0000 |
commit | 246f239d9f40f633160f0c18f87a20922d4e77bb (patch) | |
tree | 5a88572663584b3d4d28e5a20e10abab1be40884 /src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/non-exhaustive-defined-here.stderr | |
parent | Releasing progress-linux version 1.64.0+dfsg1-1~progress7.99u1. (diff) | |
download | rustc-246f239d9f40f633160f0c18f87a20922d4e77bb.tar.xz rustc-246f239d9f40f633160f0c18f87a20922d4e77bb.zip |
Merging debian version 1.65.0+dfsg1-2.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/non-exhaustive-defined-here.stderr')
-rw-r--r-- | src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/non-exhaustive-defined-here.stderr | 42 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 21 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/non-exhaustive-defined-here.stderr b/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/non-exhaustive-defined-here.stderr index 0f06c31c4..678c9b2ab 100644 --- a/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/non-exhaustive-defined-here.stderr +++ b/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/non-exhaustive-defined-here.stderr @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `B` and `C` not covered +error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `E::B` and `E::C` not covered --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:38:11 | LL | match e1 { - | ^^ patterns `B` and `C` not covered + | ^^ patterns `E::B` and `E::C` not covered | note: `E` defined here --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:14:5 @@ -19,14 +19,14 @@ LL | C help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms | LL ~ E::A => {} -LL + B | C => todo!() +LL + E::B | E::C => todo!() | -error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `B` and `C` not covered +error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `E::B` and `E::C` not covered --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:44:9 | LL | let E::A = e; - | ^^^^ patterns `B` and `C` not covered + | ^^^^ patterns `E::B` and `E::C` not covered | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html @@ -47,11 +47,11 @@ help: you might want to use `if let` to ignore the variants that aren't matched LL | if let E::A = e { todo!() } | ++ ~~~~~~~~~~~ -error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&B` and `&C` not covered +error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:52:11 | LL | match e { - | ^ patterns `&B` and `&C` not covered + | ^ patterns `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered | note: `E` defined here --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:14:5 @@ -68,14 +68,14 @@ LL | C help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms | LL ~ E::A => {} -LL + &B | &C => todo!() +LL + &E::B | &E::C => todo!() | -error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&B` and `&C` not covered +error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:58:9 | LL | let E::A = e; - | ^^^^ patterns `&B` and `&C` not covered + | ^^^^ patterns `&E::B` and `&E::C` not covered | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html @@ -96,11 +96,11 @@ help: you might want to use `if let` to ignore the variants that aren't matched LL | if let E::A = e { todo!() } | ++ ~~~~~~~~~~~ -error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered +error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:66:11 | LL | match e { - | ^ patterns `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered + | ^ patterns `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered | note: `E` defined here --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:14:5 @@ -117,14 +117,14 @@ LL | C help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern, a match arm with multiple or-patterns as shown, or multiple match arms | LL ~ E::A => {} -LL + &&mut &B | &&mut &C => todo!() +LL + &&mut &E::B | &&mut &E::C => todo!() | -error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered +error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:72:9 | LL | let E::A = e; - | ^^^^ patterns `&&mut &B` and `&&mut &C` not covered + | ^^^^ patterns `&&mut &E::B` and `&&mut &E::C` not covered | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html @@ -145,11 +145,11 @@ help: you might want to use `if let` to ignore the variants that aren't matched LL | if let E::A = e { todo!() } | ++ ~~~~~~~~~~~ -error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `None` not covered +error[E0004]: non-exhaustive patterns: `Opt::None` not covered --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:92:11 | LL | match e { - | ^ pattern `None` not covered + | ^ pattern `Opt::None` not covered | note: `Opt` defined here --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:84:5 @@ -163,14 +163,14 @@ LL | None, help: ensure that all possible cases are being handled by adding a match arm with a wildcard pattern or an explicit pattern as shown | LL ~ Opt::Some(ref _x) => {} -LL + None => todo!() +LL + Opt::None => todo!() | -error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `None` not covered +error[E0005]: refutable pattern in local binding: `Opt::None` not covered --> $DIR/non-exhaustive-defined-here.rs:98:9 | LL | let Opt::Some(ref _x) = e; - | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `None` not covered + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pattern `Opt::None` not covered | = note: `let` bindings require an "irrefutable pattern", like a `struct` or an `enum` with only one variant = note: for more information, visit https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/ch18-02-refutability.html @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ help: you might want to use `if let` to ignore the variant that isn't matched | LL | let _x = if let Opt::Some(ref _x) = e { _x } else { todo!() }; | +++++++++++ +++++++++++++++++++++++ -help: alternatively, on nightly, you might want to use `#![feature(let_else)]` to handle the variant that isn't matched +help: alternatively, you might want to use let else to handle the variant that isn't matched | LL | let Opt::Some(ref _x) = e else { todo!() }; | ++++++++++++++++ |