Adding upstream version 1.64.0+dfsg1.upstream/1.64.0+dfsg1

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 191 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ea8fec527
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/tools/clippy/tests/ui/get_unwrap.stderr
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:35:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&boxed_slice[1]`
+   |
+note: the lint level is defined here
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:5:9
+   |
+LL | #![deny(clippy::get_unwrap)]
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:35:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = note: `-D clippy::unwrap-used` implied by `-D warnings`
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:36:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_slice[0]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:36:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_slice.get(0).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vec[0]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:37:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_vec.get(0).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_vecdeque[0]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:38:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_vecdeque.get(0).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a HashMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_hashmap[&1]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:39:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_hashmap.get(&1).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a BTreeMap. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `&some_btreemap[&1]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:40:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_btreemap.get(&1).unwrap();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:44:21
+   |
+LL |         let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
+   |                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[1]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:44:22
+   |
+LL |         let _: u8 = *boxed_slice.get(1).unwrap();
+   |                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:49:9
+   |
+LL |         *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `boxed_slice[0]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:49:10
+   |
+LL |         *boxed_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a slice. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50:9
+   |
+LL |         *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_slice[0]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:50:10
+   |
+LL |         *some_slice.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:51:9
+   |
+LL |         *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:51:10
+   |
+LL |         *some_vec.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a VecDeque. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52:9
+   |
+LL |         *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vecdeque[0]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:52:10
+   |
+LL |         *some_vecdeque.get_mut(0).unwrap() = 1;
+   |          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:64:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:64:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_vec.get(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: called `.get_mut().unwrap()` on a Vec. Using `[]` is more clear and more concise
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:65:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: try this: `some_vec[0..1]`
+
+error: used `unwrap()` on `an Option` value
+  --> $DIR/get_unwrap.rs:65:17
+   |
+LL |         let _ = some_vec.get_mut(0..1).unwrap().to_vec();
+   |                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
+   |
+   = help: if you don't want to handle the `None` case gracefully, consider using `expect()` to provide a better panic message
+
+error: aborting due to 26 previous errors
+