summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/coverage/closure_bug.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-06-07 05:48:48 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-06-07 05:48:48 +0000
commitef24de24a82fe681581cc130f342363c47c0969a (patch)
tree0d494f7e1a38b95c92426f58fe6eaa877303a86c /tests/coverage/closure_bug.rs
parentReleasing progress-linux version 1.74.1+dfsg1-1~progress7.99u1. (diff)
downloadrustc-ef24de24a82fe681581cc130f342363c47c0969a.tar.xz
rustc-ef24de24a82fe681581cc130f342363c47c0969a.zip
Merging upstream version 1.75.0+dfsg1.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/coverage/closure_bug.rs')
-rw-r--r--tests/coverage/closure_bug.rs44
1 files changed, 44 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/coverage/closure_bug.rs b/tests/coverage/closure_bug.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..739bc5f0b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/coverage/closure_bug.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+// Regression test for #115930.
+// All of these closures are identical, and should produce identical output in
+// the coverage report. However, an unstable sort was causing them to be treated
+// inconsistently when preparing coverage spans.
+
+fn main() {
+ let truthy = std::env::args().len() == 1;
+
+ let a
+ =
+ |
+ |
+ if truthy { true } else { false };
+
+ a();
+ if truthy { a(); }
+
+ let b
+ =
+ |
+ |
+ if truthy { true } else { false };
+
+ b();
+ if truthy { b(); }
+
+ let c
+ =
+ |
+ |
+ if truthy { true } else { false };
+
+ c();
+ if truthy { c(); }
+
+ let d
+ =
+ |
+ |
+ if truthy { true } else { false };
+
+ d();
+ if truthy { d(); }
+}