diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-17 12:19:50 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-17 12:19:50 +0000 |
commit | 2e00214b3efbdfeefaa0fe9e8b8fd519de7adc35 (patch) | |
tree | d325add32978dbdc1db975a438b3a77d571b1ab8 /tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric | |
parent | Releasing progress-linux version 1.68.2+dfsg1-1~progress7.99u1. (diff) | |
download | rustc-2e00214b3efbdfeefaa0fe9e8b8fd519de7adc35.tar.xz rustc-2e00214b3efbdfeefaa0fe9e8b8fd519de7adc35.zip |
Merging upstream version 1.69.0+dfsg1.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric')
9 files changed, 204 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-fn-call.rs b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-fn-call.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c59596238 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-fn-call.rs @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +// check-fail +// compile-flags: -Z tiny-const-eval-limit + +const fn foo() {} + +const fn call_foo() -> u32 { + foo(); + foo(); + foo(); + foo(); + foo(); + + foo(); + foo(); + foo(); + foo(); + foo(); + + foo(); + foo(); + foo(); + foo(); + foo(); + + foo(); + foo(); + foo(); + foo(); //~ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed [E0080] + 0 +} + +const X: u32 = call_foo(); + +fn main() { + println!("{X}"); +} diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-fn-call.stderr b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-fn-call.stderr new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ed70975af --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-fn-call.stderr @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed + --> $DIR/ctfe-fn-call.rs:28:5 + | +LL | foo(); + | ^^^^^ exceeded interpreter step limit (see `#[const_eval_limit]`) + | +note: inside `call_foo` + --> $DIR/ctfe-fn-call.rs:28:5 + | +LL | foo(); + | ^^^^^ +note: inside `X` + --> $DIR/ctfe-fn-call.rs:32:16 + | +LL | const X: u32 = call_foo(); + | ^^^^^^^^^^ + +error: aborting due to previous error + +For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`. diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-labelled-loop.rs b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-labelled-loop.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c10b8d837 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-labelled-loop.rs @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +// check-fail +// compile-flags: -Z tiny-const-eval-limit + +const fn labelled_loop(n: u32) -> u32 { + let mut i = 0; + 'mylabel: loop { //~ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed [E0080] + if i > n { + break 'mylabel + } + i += 1; + } + 0 +} + +const X: u32 = labelled_loop(19); + +fn main() { + println!("{X}"); +} diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-labelled-loop.stderr b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-labelled-loop.stderr new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d9404edd5 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-labelled-loop.stderr @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed + --> $DIR/ctfe-labelled-loop.rs:6:5 + | +LL | / 'mylabel: loop { +LL | | if i > n { +LL | | break 'mylabel +LL | | } +LL | | i += 1; +LL | | } + | |_____^ exceeded interpreter step limit (see `#[const_eval_limit]`) + | +note: inside `labelled_loop` + --> $DIR/ctfe-labelled-loop.rs:6:5 + | +LL | / 'mylabel: loop { +LL | | if i > n { +LL | | break 'mylabel +LL | | } +LL | | i += 1; +LL | | } + | |_____^ +note: inside `X` + --> $DIR/ctfe-labelled-loop.rs:15:16 + | +LL | const X: u32 = labelled_loop(19); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +error: aborting due to previous error + +For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`. diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-recursion.rs b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-recursion.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..80ff835f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-recursion.rs @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +// check-fail +// compile-flags: -Z tiny-const-eval-limit + +const fn recurse(n: u32) -> u32 { + if n == 0 { + n + } else { + recurse(n - 1) //~ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed [E0080] + } +} + +const X: u32 = recurse(19); + +fn main() { + println!("{X}"); +} diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-recursion.stderr b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-recursion.stderr new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ed9a31119 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-recursion.stderr @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed + --> $DIR/ctfe-recursion.rs:8:9 + | +LL | recurse(n - 1) + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ exceeded interpreter step limit (see `#[const_eval_limit]`) + | +note: inside `recurse` + --> $DIR/ctfe-recursion.rs:8:9 + | +LL | recurse(n - 1) + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +note: [... 18 additional calls inside `recurse` ...] + --> $DIR/ctfe-recursion.rs:8:9 + | +LL | recurse(n - 1) + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +note: inside `X` + --> $DIR/ctfe-recursion.rs:12:16 + | +LL | const X: u32 = recurse(19); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^ + +error: aborting due to previous error + +For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`. diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-simple-loop.rs b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-simple-loop.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ca0eec93c --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-simple-loop.rs @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +// check-fail +// compile-flags: -Z tiny-const-eval-limit +const fn simple_loop(n: u32) -> u32 { + let mut index = 0; + while index < n { //~ ERROR evaluation of constant value failed [E0080] + index = index + 1; + } + 0 +} + +const X: u32 = simple_loop(19); + +fn main() { + println!("{X}"); +} diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-simple-loop.stderr b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-simple-loop.stderr new file mode 100644 index 000000000..83ff275de --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/ctfe-simple-loop.stderr @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +error[E0080]: evaluation of constant value failed + --> $DIR/ctfe-simple-loop.rs:5:5 + | +LL | / while index < n { +LL | | index = index + 1; +LL | | } + | |_____^ exceeded interpreter step limit (see `#[const_eval_limit]`) + | +note: inside `simple_loop` + --> $DIR/ctfe-simple-loop.rs:5:5 + | +LL | / while index < n { +LL | | index = index + 1; +LL | | } + | |_____^ +note: inside `X` + --> $DIR/ctfe-simple-loop.rs:11:16 + | +LL | const X: u32 = simple_loop(19); + | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ + +error: aborting due to previous error + +For more information about this error, try `rustc --explain E0080`. diff --git a/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/dominators-edge-case.rs b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/dominators-edge-case.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0b0f36180 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/ui/consts/const-eval/stable-metric/dominators-edge-case.rs @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +// check-pass +// +// Exercising an edge case which was found during Stage 2 compilation. +// Compilation would fail for this code when running the `CtfeLimit` +// MirPass (specifically when looking up the dominators). +#![crate_type="lib"] + +const DUMMY: Expr = Expr::Path(ExprPath { + attrs: Vec::new(), + path: Vec::new(), +}); + +pub enum Expr { + Path(ExprPath), +} +pub struct ExprPath { + pub attrs: Vec<()>, + pub path: Vec<()>, +} |