summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-17 12:20:39 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-17 12:20:39 +0000
commit1376c5a617be5c25655d0d7cb63e3beaa5a6e026 (patch)
tree3bb8d61aee02bc7a15eab3f36e3b921afc2075d0 /tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs
parentReleasing progress-linux version 1.69.0+dfsg1-1~progress7.99u1. (diff)
downloadrustc-1376c5a617be5c25655d0d7cb63e3beaa5a6e026.tar.xz
rustc-1376c5a617be5c25655d0d7cb63e3beaa5a6e026.zip
Merging upstream version 1.70.0+dfsg1.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs')
-rw-r--r--tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs39
1 files changed, 39 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs b/tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d1c6b1077
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// check-pass
+// compile-flags: -Ztrait-solver=next
+
+trait Mirror {
+ type Item;
+}
+
+struct Wrapper<T>(T);
+impl<T> Mirror for Wrapper<T> {
+ type Item = T;
+}
+
+fn mirror<T>()
+where
+ Wrapper<T>: Mirror<Item = i32>,
+{
+}
+
+fn main() {
+ mirror::<_ /* ?0 */>();
+
+ // Solving `<Wrapper<?0> as Mirror>::Item = i32`
+
+ // First, we replace the term with a fresh infer var:
+ // `<Wrapper<?0> as Mirror>::Item = ?1`
+
+ // We select the impl candidate on line #6, which leads us to learn that
+ // `?0 == ?1`.
+
+ // That should be reflected in our canonical response, which should have
+ // `^0 = ^0, ^1 = ^0`
+ // !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+ // !! We used to return a totally unconstrained response here :< !!
+ // !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
+
+ // Then, during the "equate term" part of the projection solving, we
+ // instantiate the response from the unconstrained projection predicate,
+ // and equate `?0 == i32`.
+}