summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-06-19 09:26:03 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-06-19 09:26:03 +0000
commit9918693037dce8aa4bb6f08741b6812923486c18 (patch)
tree21d2b40bec7e6a7ea664acee056eb3d08e15a1cf /tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs
parentReleasing progress-linux version 1.75.0+dfsg1-5~progress7.99u1. (diff)
downloadrustc-9918693037dce8aa4bb6f08741b6812923486c18.tar.xz
rustc-9918693037dce8aa4bb6f08741b6812923486c18.zip
Merging upstream version 1.76.0+dfsg1.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs')
-rw-r--r--tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs39
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs b/tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs
deleted file mode 100644
index d1c6b1077..000000000
--- a/tests/ui/traits/new-solver/canonical-ty-var-eq-in-response.rs
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
-// check-pass
-// compile-flags: -Ztrait-solver=next
-
-trait Mirror {
- type Item;
-}
-
-struct Wrapper<T>(T);
-impl<T> Mirror for Wrapper<T> {
- type Item = T;
-}
-
-fn mirror<T>()
-where
- Wrapper<T>: Mirror<Item = i32>,
-{
-}
-
-fn main() {
- mirror::<_ /* ?0 */>();
-
- // Solving `<Wrapper<?0> as Mirror>::Item = i32`
-
- // First, we replace the term with a fresh infer var:
- // `<Wrapper<?0> as Mirror>::Item = ?1`
-
- // We select the impl candidate on line #6, which leads us to learn that
- // `?0 == ?1`.
-
- // That should be reflected in our canonical response, which should have
- // `^0 = ^0, ^1 = ^0`
- // !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
- // !! We used to return a totally unconstrained response here :< !!
- // !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
- // Then, during the "equate term" part of the projection solving, we
- // instantiate the response from the unconstrained projection predicate,
- // and equate `?0 == i32`.
-}