summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-17 12:02:58 +0000
committerDaniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>2024-04-17 12:02:58 +0000
commit698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9 (patch)
tree173a775858bd501c378080a10dca74132f05bc50 /vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs
parentInitial commit. (diff)
downloadrustc-698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9.tar.xz
rustc-698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9.zip
Adding upstream version 1.64.0+dfsg1.upstream/1.64.0+dfsg1
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs')
-rw-r--r--vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs195
1 files changed, 195 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs b/vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9d5af3561
--- /dev/null
+++ b/vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,195 @@
+#![cfg(test)]
+
+use crate::Iteration;
+use crate::Relation;
+use crate::RelationLeaper;
+use proptest::prelude::*;
+use proptest::{proptest, proptest_helper};
+
+fn inputs() -> impl Strategy<Value = Vec<(u32, u32)>> {
+ prop::collection::vec((0_u32..100, 0_u32..100), 1..500)
+}
+
+/// The original way to use datafrog -- computes reachable nodes from a set of edges
+fn reachable_with_var_join(edges: &[(u32, u32)]) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> {
+ let edges: Relation<_> = edges.iter().collect();
+ let mut iteration = Iteration::new();
+
+ let edges_by_successor = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("edges_invert");
+ edges_by_successor.extend(edges.iter().map(|&(n1, n2)| (n2, n1)));
+
+ let reachable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("reachable");
+ reachable.insert(edges);
+
+ while iteration.changed() {
+ // reachable(N1, N3) :- edges(N1, N2), reachable(N2, N3).
+ reachable.from_join(&reachable, &edges_by_successor, |&_, &n3, &n1| (n1, n3));
+ }
+
+ reachable.complete()
+}
+
+/// Like `reachable`, but using a relation as an input to `from_join`
+fn reachable_with_relation_join(edges: &[(u32, u32)]) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> {
+ let edges: Relation<_> = edges.iter().collect();
+ let mut iteration = Iteration::new();
+
+ // NB. Changed from `reachable_with_var_join`:
+ let edges_by_successor: Relation<_> = edges.iter().map(|&(n1, n2)| (n2, n1)).collect();
+
+ let reachable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("reachable");
+ reachable.insert(edges);
+
+ while iteration.changed() {
+ // reachable(N1, N3) :- edges(N1, N2), reachable(N2, N3).
+ reachable.from_join(&reachable, &edges_by_successor, |&_, &n3, &n1| (n1, n3));
+ }
+
+ reachable.complete()
+}
+
+fn reachable_with_leapfrog(edges: &[(u32, u32)]) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> {
+ let edges: Relation<_> = edges.iter().collect();
+ let mut iteration = Iteration::new();
+
+ let edges_by_successor: Relation<_> = edges.iter().map(|&(n1, n2)| (n2, n1)).collect();
+
+ let reachable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("reachable");
+ reachable.insert(edges);
+
+ while iteration.changed() {
+ // reachable(N1, N3) :- edges(N1, N2), reachable(N2, N3).
+ reachable.from_leapjoin(
+ &reachable,
+ edges_by_successor.extend_with(|&(n2, _)| n2),
+ |&(_, n3), &n1| (n1, n3),
+ );
+ }
+
+ reachable.complete()
+}
+
+/// Computes a join where the values are summed -- uses iteration
+/// variables (the original datafrog technique).
+fn sum_join_via_var(
+ input1_slice: &[(u32, u32)],
+ input2_slice: &[(u32, u32)],
+) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> {
+ let mut iteration = Iteration::new();
+
+ let input1 = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("input1");
+ input1.extend(input1_slice);
+
+ let input2 = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("input1");
+ input2.extend(input2_slice);
+
+ let output = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("output");
+
+ while iteration.changed() {
+ // output(K1, V1 * 100 + V2) :- input1(K1, V1), input2(K1, V2).
+ output.from_join(&input1, &input2, |&k1, &v1, &v2| (k1, v1 * 100 + v2));
+ }
+
+ output.complete()
+}
+
+/// Computes a join where the values are summed -- uses iteration
+/// variables (the original datafrog technique).
+fn sum_join_via_relation(
+ input1_slice: &[(u32, u32)],
+ input2_slice: &[(u32, u32)],
+) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> {
+ let input1: Relation<_> = input1_slice.iter().collect();
+ let input2: Relation<_> = input2_slice.iter().collect();
+ Relation::from_join(&input1, &input2, |&k1, &v1, &v2| (k1, v1 * 100 + v2))
+}
+
+proptest! {
+ #[test]
+ fn reachable_leapfrog_vs_var_join(edges in inputs()) {
+ let reachable1 = reachable_with_var_join(&edges);
+ let reachable2 = reachable_with_leapfrog(&edges);
+ assert_eq!(reachable1.elements, reachable2.elements);
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn reachable_rel_join_vs_var_join(edges in inputs()) {
+ let reachable1 = reachable_with_var_join(&edges);
+ let reachable2 = reachable_with_relation_join(&edges);
+ assert_eq!(reachable1.elements, reachable2.elements);
+ }
+
+ #[test]
+ fn sum_join_from_var_vs_rel((set1, set2) in (inputs(), inputs())) {
+ let output1 = sum_join_via_var(&set1, &set2);
+ let output2 = sum_join_via_relation(&set1, &set2);
+ assert_eq!(output1.elements, output2.elements);
+ }
+
+ /// Test the behavior of `filter_anti` used on its own in a
+ /// leapjoin -- effectively it becomes an "intersection"
+ /// operation.
+ #[test]
+ fn filter_with_on_its_own((set1, set2) in (inputs(), inputs())) {
+ let input1: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set1.iter().collect();
+ let input2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set2.iter().collect();
+ let intersection1 = Relation::from_leapjoin(
+ &input1,
+ input2.filter_with(|&tuple| tuple),
+ |&tuple, &()| tuple,
+ );
+
+ let intersection2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = input1.elements.iter()
+ .filter(|t| input2.elements.binary_search(&t).is_ok())
+ .collect();
+
+ assert_eq!(intersection1.elements, intersection2.elements);
+ }
+
+ /// Test the behavior of `filter_anti` used on its own in a
+ /// leapjoin -- effectively it becomes a "set minus" operation.
+ #[test]
+ fn filter_anti_on_its_own((set1, set2) in (inputs(), inputs())) {
+ let input1: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set1.iter().collect();
+ let input2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set2.iter().collect();
+
+ let difference1 = Relation::from_leapjoin(
+ &input1,
+ input2.filter_anti(|&tuple| tuple),
+ |&tuple, &()| tuple,
+ );
+
+ let difference2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = input1.elements.iter()
+ .filter(|t| input2.elements.binary_search(&t).is_err())
+ .collect();
+
+ assert_eq!(difference1.elements, difference2.elements);
+ }
+}
+
+/// Test that `from_leapjoin` matches against the tuples from an
+/// `extend` that precedes first iteration.
+///
+/// This was always true, but wasn't immediately obvious to me until I
+/// re-read the code more carefully. -nikomatsakis
+#[test]
+fn leapjoin_from_extend() {
+ let doubles: Relation<(u32, u32)> = (0..10).map(|i| (i, i * 2)).collect();
+
+ let mut iteration = Iteration::new();
+
+ let variable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("variable");
+ variable.extend(Some((2, 2)));
+
+ while iteration.changed() {
+ variable.from_leapjoin(
+ &variable,
+ doubles.extend_with(|&(i, _)| i),
+ |&(i, _), &j| (i, j),
+ );
+ }
+
+ let variable = variable.complete();
+
+ assert_eq!(variable.elements, vec![(2, 2), (2, 4)]);
+}