diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-17 12:02:58 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-17 12:02:58 +0000 |
commit | 698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9 (patch) | |
tree | 173a775858bd501c378080a10dca74132f05bc50 /vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | rustc-698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9.tar.xz rustc-698f8c2f01ea549d77d7dc3338a12e04c11057b9.zip |
Adding upstream version 1.64.0+dfsg1.upstream/1.64.0+dfsg1
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs')
-rw-r--r-- | vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs | 195 |
1 files changed, 195 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs b/vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9d5af3561 --- /dev/null +++ b/vendor/datafrog/src/test.rs @@ -0,0 +1,195 @@ +#![cfg(test)] + +use crate::Iteration; +use crate::Relation; +use crate::RelationLeaper; +use proptest::prelude::*; +use proptest::{proptest, proptest_helper}; + +fn inputs() -> impl Strategy<Value = Vec<(u32, u32)>> { + prop::collection::vec((0_u32..100, 0_u32..100), 1..500) +} + +/// The original way to use datafrog -- computes reachable nodes from a set of edges +fn reachable_with_var_join(edges: &[(u32, u32)]) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> { + let edges: Relation<_> = edges.iter().collect(); + let mut iteration = Iteration::new(); + + let edges_by_successor = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("edges_invert"); + edges_by_successor.extend(edges.iter().map(|&(n1, n2)| (n2, n1))); + + let reachable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("reachable"); + reachable.insert(edges); + + while iteration.changed() { + // reachable(N1, N3) :- edges(N1, N2), reachable(N2, N3). + reachable.from_join(&reachable, &edges_by_successor, |&_, &n3, &n1| (n1, n3)); + } + + reachable.complete() +} + +/// Like `reachable`, but using a relation as an input to `from_join` +fn reachable_with_relation_join(edges: &[(u32, u32)]) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> { + let edges: Relation<_> = edges.iter().collect(); + let mut iteration = Iteration::new(); + + // NB. Changed from `reachable_with_var_join`: + let edges_by_successor: Relation<_> = edges.iter().map(|&(n1, n2)| (n2, n1)).collect(); + + let reachable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("reachable"); + reachable.insert(edges); + + while iteration.changed() { + // reachable(N1, N3) :- edges(N1, N2), reachable(N2, N3). + reachable.from_join(&reachable, &edges_by_successor, |&_, &n3, &n1| (n1, n3)); + } + + reachable.complete() +} + +fn reachable_with_leapfrog(edges: &[(u32, u32)]) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> { + let edges: Relation<_> = edges.iter().collect(); + let mut iteration = Iteration::new(); + + let edges_by_successor: Relation<_> = edges.iter().map(|&(n1, n2)| (n2, n1)).collect(); + + let reachable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("reachable"); + reachable.insert(edges); + + while iteration.changed() { + // reachable(N1, N3) :- edges(N1, N2), reachable(N2, N3). + reachable.from_leapjoin( + &reachable, + edges_by_successor.extend_with(|&(n2, _)| n2), + |&(_, n3), &n1| (n1, n3), + ); + } + + reachable.complete() +} + +/// Computes a join where the values are summed -- uses iteration +/// variables (the original datafrog technique). +fn sum_join_via_var( + input1_slice: &[(u32, u32)], + input2_slice: &[(u32, u32)], +) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> { + let mut iteration = Iteration::new(); + + let input1 = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("input1"); + input1.extend(input1_slice); + + let input2 = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("input1"); + input2.extend(input2_slice); + + let output = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("output"); + + while iteration.changed() { + // output(K1, V1 * 100 + V2) :- input1(K1, V1), input2(K1, V2). + output.from_join(&input1, &input2, |&k1, &v1, &v2| (k1, v1 * 100 + v2)); + } + + output.complete() +} + +/// Computes a join where the values are summed -- uses iteration +/// variables (the original datafrog technique). +fn sum_join_via_relation( + input1_slice: &[(u32, u32)], + input2_slice: &[(u32, u32)], +) -> Relation<(u32, u32)> { + let input1: Relation<_> = input1_slice.iter().collect(); + let input2: Relation<_> = input2_slice.iter().collect(); + Relation::from_join(&input1, &input2, |&k1, &v1, &v2| (k1, v1 * 100 + v2)) +} + +proptest! { + #[test] + fn reachable_leapfrog_vs_var_join(edges in inputs()) { + let reachable1 = reachable_with_var_join(&edges); + let reachable2 = reachable_with_leapfrog(&edges); + assert_eq!(reachable1.elements, reachable2.elements); + } + + #[test] + fn reachable_rel_join_vs_var_join(edges in inputs()) { + let reachable1 = reachable_with_var_join(&edges); + let reachable2 = reachable_with_relation_join(&edges); + assert_eq!(reachable1.elements, reachable2.elements); + } + + #[test] + fn sum_join_from_var_vs_rel((set1, set2) in (inputs(), inputs())) { + let output1 = sum_join_via_var(&set1, &set2); + let output2 = sum_join_via_relation(&set1, &set2); + assert_eq!(output1.elements, output2.elements); + } + + /// Test the behavior of `filter_anti` used on its own in a + /// leapjoin -- effectively it becomes an "intersection" + /// operation. + #[test] + fn filter_with_on_its_own((set1, set2) in (inputs(), inputs())) { + let input1: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set1.iter().collect(); + let input2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set2.iter().collect(); + let intersection1 = Relation::from_leapjoin( + &input1, + input2.filter_with(|&tuple| tuple), + |&tuple, &()| tuple, + ); + + let intersection2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = input1.elements.iter() + .filter(|t| input2.elements.binary_search(&t).is_ok()) + .collect(); + + assert_eq!(intersection1.elements, intersection2.elements); + } + + /// Test the behavior of `filter_anti` used on its own in a + /// leapjoin -- effectively it becomes a "set minus" operation. + #[test] + fn filter_anti_on_its_own((set1, set2) in (inputs(), inputs())) { + let input1: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set1.iter().collect(); + let input2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = set2.iter().collect(); + + let difference1 = Relation::from_leapjoin( + &input1, + input2.filter_anti(|&tuple| tuple), + |&tuple, &()| tuple, + ); + + let difference2: Relation<(u32, u32)> = input1.elements.iter() + .filter(|t| input2.elements.binary_search(&t).is_err()) + .collect(); + + assert_eq!(difference1.elements, difference2.elements); + } +} + +/// Test that `from_leapjoin` matches against the tuples from an +/// `extend` that precedes first iteration. +/// +/// This was always true, but wasn't immediately obvious to me until I +/// re-read the code more carefully. -nikomatsakis +#[test] +fn leapjoin_from_extend() { + let doubles: Relation<(u32, u32)> = (0..10).map(|i| (i, i * 2)).collect(); + + let mut iteration = Iteration::new(); + + let variable = iteration.variable::<(u32, u32)>("variable"); + variable.extend(Some((2, 2))); + + while iteration.changed() { + variable.from_leapjoin( + &variable, + doubles.extend_with(|&(i, _)| i), + |&(i, _), &j| (i, j), + ); + } + + let variable = variable.complete(); + + assert_eq!(variable.elements, vec![(2, 2), (2, 4)]); +} |