1 files changed, 47 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/src/test/incremental/string_constant.rs b/src/test/incremental/string_constant.rs
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cae7b4aab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/src/test/incremental/string_constant.rs
@@ -0,0 +1,47 @@
+// revisions: cfail1 cfail2 cfail3 cfail4
+// compile-flags: -Z query-dep-graph
+// [cfail3]compile-flags: -Zincremental-relative-spans
+// [cfail4]compile-flags: -Zincremental-relative-spans
+// build-pass (FIXME(62277): could be check-pass?)
+
+#![allow(warnings)]
+#![feature(rustc_attrs)]
+#![crate_type = "rlib"]
+
+// Here the only thing which changes is the string constant in `x`.
+// Therefore, the compiler deduces (correctly) that typeck is not
+// needed even for callers of `x`.
+
+pub mod x {
+    #[cfg(any(cfail1, cfail3))]
+    pub fn x() {
+        println!("{}", "1");
+    }
+
+    #[cfg(any(cfail2, cfail4))]
+    #[rustc_clean(except = "hir_owner,hir_owner_nodes,optimized_mir,promoted_mir", cfg = "cfail2")]
+    #[rustc_clean(except = "hir_owner_nodes,promoted_mir", cfg = "cfail4")]
+    pub fn x() {
+        println!("{}", "2");
+    }
+}
+
+pub mod y {
+    use x;
+
+    #[rustc_clean(cfg = "cfail2")]
+    #[rustc_clean(cfg = "cfail4")]
+    pub fn y() {
+        x::x();
+    }
+}
+
+pub mod z {
+    use y;
+
+    #[rustc_clean(cfg = "cfail2")]
+    #[rustc_clean(cfg = "cfail4")]
+    pub fn z() {
+        y::y();
+    }
+}