summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/compiler/rustc_middle/src/traits/solve.rs
blob: 2c5b64a59cdb9f7fc2bccfca3365c2ce50574e4c (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
use std::ops::ControlFlow;

use rustc_data_structures::intern::Interned;
use rustc_query_system::cache::Cache;

use crate::infer::canonical::{CanonicalVarValues, QueryRegionConstraints};
use crate::traits::query::NoSolution;
use crate::traits::{Canonical, DefiningAnchor};
use crate::ty::{
    self, FallibleTypeFolder, ToPredicate, Ty, TyCtxt, TypeFoldable, TypeFolder, TypeVisitable,
    TypeVisitor,
};

pub type EvaluationCache<'tcx> = Cache<CanonicalInput<'tcx>, QueryResult<'tcx>>;

/// A goal is a statement, i.e. `predicate`, we want to prove
/// given some assumptions, i.e. `param_env`.
///
/// Most of the time the `param_env` contains the `where`-bounds of the function
/// we're currently typechecking while the `predicate` is some trait bound.
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Copy, Hash, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub struct Goal<'tcx, P> {
    pub predicate: P,
    pub param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
}

impl<'tcx, P> Goal<'tcx, P> {
    pub fn new(
        tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
        param_env: ty::ParamEnv<'tcx>,
        predicate: impl ToPredicate<'tcx, P>,
    ) -> Goal<'tcx, P> {
        Goal { param_env, predicate: predicate.to_predicate(tcx) }
    }

    /// Updates the goal to one with a different `predicate` but the same `param_env`.
    pub fn with<Q>(self, tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>, predicate: impl ToPredicate<'tcx, Q>) -> Goal<'tcx, Q> {
        Goal { param_env: self.param_env, predicate: predicate.to_predicate(tcx) }
    }
}

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Copy, Hash, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub struct Response<'tcx> {
    pub certainty: Certainty,
    pub var_values: CanonicalVarValues<'tcx>,
    /// Additional constraints returned by this query.
    pub external_constraints: ExternalConstraints<'tcx>,
}

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Copy, Hash, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub enum Certainty {
    Yes,
    Maybe(MaybeCause),
}

impl Certainty {
    pub const AMBIGUOUS: Certainty = Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Ambiguity);

    /// Use this function to merge the certainty of multiple nested subgoals.
    ///
    /// Given an impl like `impl<T: Foo + Bar> Baz for T {}`, we have 2 nested
    /// subgoals whenever we use the impl as a candidate: `T: Foo` and `T: Bar`.
    /// If evaluating `T: Foo` results in ambiguity and `T: Bar` results in
    /// success, we merge these two responses. This results in ambiguity.
    ///
    /// If we unify ambiguity with overflow, we return overflow. This doesn't matter
    /// inside of the solver as we distinguish ambiguity from overflow. It does
    /// however matter for diagnostics. If `T: Foo` resulted in overflow and `T: Bar`
    /// in ambiguity without changing the inference state, we still want to tell the
    /// user that `T: Baz` results in overflow.
    pub fn unify_with(self, other: Certainty) -> Certainty {
        match (self, other) {
            (Certainty::Yes, Certainty::Yes) => Certainty::Yes,
            (Certainty::Yes, Certainty::Maybe(_)) => other,
            (Certainty::Maybe(_), Certainty::Yes) => self,
            (Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Ambiguity), Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Ambiguity)) => {
                Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Ambiguity)
            }
            (Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Ambiguity), Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow))
            | (Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow), Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Ambiguity))
            | (Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow), Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow)) => {
                Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow)
            }
        }
    }
}

/// Why we failed to evaluate a goal.
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Copy, Hash, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub enum MaybeCause {
    /// We failed due to ambiguity. This ambiguity can either
    /// be a true ambiguity, i.e. there are multiple different answers,
    /// or we hit a case where we just don't bother, e.g. `?x: Trait` goals.
    Ambiguity,
    /// We gave up due to an overflow, most often by hitting the recursion limit.
    Overflow,
}

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Copy, Hash, TypeFoldable, TypeVisitable)]
pub struct QueryInput<'tcx, T> {
    pub goal: Goal<'tcx, T>,
    pub anchor: DefiningAnchor,
    pub predefined_opaques_in_body: PredefinedOpaques<'tcx>,
}

/// Additional constraints returned on success.
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Hash, Default)]
pub struct PredefinedOpaquesData<'tcx> {
    pub opaque_types: Vec<(ty::OpaqueTypeKey<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>)>,
}

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Copy, Clone, Hash)]
pub struct PredefinedOpaques<'tcx>(pub(crate) Interned<'tcx, PredefinedOpaquesData<'tcx>>);

impl<'tcx> std::ops::Deref for PredefinedOpaques<'tcx> {
    type Target = PredefinedOpaquesData<'tcx>;

    fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
        &self.0
    }
}

pub type CanonicalInput<'tcx, T = ty::Predicate<'tcx>> = Canonical<'tcx, QueryInput<'tcx, T>>;

pub type CanonicalResponse<'tcx> = Canonical<'tcx, Response<'tcx>>;

/// The result of evaluating a canonical query.
///
/// FIXME: We use a different type than the existing canonical queries. This is because
/// we need to add a `Certainty` for `overflow` and may want to restructure this code without
/// having to worry about changes to currently used code. Once we've made progress on this
/// solver, merge the two responses again.
pub type QueryResult<'tcx> = Result<CanonicalResponse<'tcx>, NoSolution>;

#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Copy, Clone, Hash)]
pub struct ExternalConstraints<'tcx>(pub(crate) Interned<'tcx, ExternalConstraintsData<'tcx>>);

impl<'tcx> std::ops::Deref for ExternalConstraints<'tcx> {
    type Target = ExternalConstraintsData<'tcx>;

    fn deref(&self) -> &Self::Target {
        &self.0
    }
}

/// Additional constraints returned on success.
#[derive(Debug, PartialEq, Eq, Clone, Hash, Default)]
pub struct ExternalConstraintsData<'tcx> {
    // FIXME: implement this.
    pub region_constraints: QueryRegionConstraints<'tcx>,
    pub opaque_types: Vec<(ty::OpaqueTypeKey<'tcx>, Ty<'tcx>)>,
}

// FIXME: Having to clone `region_constraints` for folding feels bad and
// probably isn't great wrt performance.
//
// Not sure how to fix this, maybe we should also intern `opaque_types` and
// `region_constraints` here or something.
impl<'tcx> TypeFoldable<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for ExternalConstraints<'tcx> {
    fn try_fold_with<F: FallibleTypeFolder<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>(
        self,
        folder: &mut F,
    ) -> Result<Self, F::Error> {
        Ok(FallibleTypeFolder::interner(folder).mk_external_constraints(ExternalConstraintsData {
            region_constraints: self.region_constraints.clone().try_fold_with(folder)?,
            opaque_types: self
                .opaque_types
                .iter()
                .map(|opaque| opaque.try_fold_with(folder))
                .collect::<Result<_, F::Error>>()?,
        }))
    }

    fn fold_with<F: TypeFolder<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>(self, folder: &mut F) -> Self {
        TypeFolder::interner(folder).mk_external_constraints(ExternalConstraintsData {
            region_constraints: self.region_constraints.clone().fold_with(folder),
            opaque_types: self.opaque_types.iter().map(|opaque| opaque.fold_with(folder)).collect(),
        })
    }
}

impl<'tcx> TypeVisitable<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for ExternalConstraints<'tcx> {
    fn visit_with<V: TypeVisitor<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>(
        &self,
        visitor: &mut V,
    ) -> std::ops::ControlFlow<V::BreakTy> {
        self.region_constraints.visit_with(visitor)?;
        self.opaque_types.visit_with(visitor)?;
        ControlFlow::Continue(())
    }
}

// FIXME: Having to clone `region_constraints` for folding feels bad and
// probably isn't great wrt performance.
//
// Not sure how to fix this, maybe we should also intern `opaque_types` and
// `region_constraints` here or something.
impl<'tcx> TypeFoldable<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for PredefinedOpaques<'tcx> {
    fn try_fold_with<F: FallibleTypeFolder<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>(
        self,
        folder: &mut F,
    ) -> Result<Self, F::Error> {
        Ok(FallibleTypeFolder::interner(folder).mk_predefined_opaques_in_body(
            PredefinedOpaquesData {
                opaque_types: self
                    .opaque_types
                    .iter()
                    .map(|opaque| opaque.try_fold_with(folder))
                    .collect::<Result<_, F::Error>>()?,
            },
        ))
    }

    fn fold_with<F: TypeFolder<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>(self, folder: &mut F) -> Self {
        TypeFolder::interner(folder).mk_predefined_opaques_in_body(PredefinedOpaquesData {
            opaque_types: self.opaque_types.iter().map(|opaque| opaque.fold_with(folder)).collect(),
        })
    }
}

impl<'tcx> TypeVisitable<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for PredefinedOpaques<'tcx> {
    fn visit_with<V: TypeVisitor<TyCtxt<'tcx>>>(
        &self,
        visitor: &mut V,
    ) -> std::ops::ControlFlow<V::BreakTy> {
        self.opaque_types.visit_with(visitor)
    }
}