summaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/solve/search_graph/overflow.rs
blob: 1dd3894c91adc009c9c9e8fbaa1103fed4beeca2 (plain)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
use rustc_infer::infer::canonical::Canonical;
use rustc_infer::traits::query::NoSolution;
use rustc_middle::ty::TyCtxt;
use rustc_session::Limit;

use super::SearchGraph;
use crate::solve::{response_no_constraints, Certainty, EvalCtxt, MaybeCause, QueryResult};

/// When detecting a solver overflow, we return ambiguity. Overflow can be
/// *hidden* by either a fatal error in an **AND** or a trivial success in an **OR**.
///
/// This is in issue in case of exponential blowup, e.g. if each goal on the stack
/// has multiple nested (overflowing) candidates. To deal with this, we reduce the limit
/// used by the solver when hitting the default limit for the first time.
///
/// FIXME: Get tests where always using the `default_limit` results in a hang and refer
/// to them here. We can also improve the overflow strategy if necessary.
pub(super) struct OverflowData {
    default_limit: Limit,
    current_limit: Limit,
    /// When proving an **AND** we have to repeatedly iterate over the yet unproven goals.
    ///
    /// Because of this each iteration also increases the depth in addition to the stack
    /// depth.
    additional_depth: usize,
}

impl OverflowData {
    pub(super) fn new(tcx: TyCtxt<'_>) -> OverflowData {
        let default_limit = tcx.recursion_limit();
        OverflowData { default_limit, current_limit: default_limit, additional_depth: 0 }
    }

    #[inline]
    pub(super) fn did_overflow(&self) -> bool {
        self.default_limit.0 != self.current_limit.0
    }

    #[inline]
    pub(super) fn has_overflow(&self, depth: usize) -> bool {
        !self.current_limit.value_within_limit(depth + self.additional_depth)
    }

    /// Updating the current limit when hitting overflow.
    fn deal_with_overflow(&mut self) {
        // When first hitting overflow we reduce the overflow limit
        // for all future goals to prevent hangs if there's an exponental
        // blowup.
        self.current_limit.0 = self.default_limit.0 / 8;
    }
}

impl<'tcx> SearchGraph<'tcx> {
    pub fn deal_with_overflow(
        &mut self,
        tcx: TyCtxt<'tcx>,
        goal: Canonical<'tcx, impl Sized>,
    ) -> QueryResult<'tcx> {
        self.overflow_data.deal_with_overflow();
        response_no_constraints(tcx, goal, Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow))
    }
}

impl<'tcx> EvalCtxt<'_, 'tcx> {
    /// A `while`-loop which tracks overflow.
    pub fn repeat_while_none(
        &mut self,
        mut loop_body: impl FnMut(&mut Self) -> Option<Result<Certainty, NoSolution>>,
    ) -> Result<Certainty, NoSolution> {
        let start_depth = self.search_graph.overflow_data.additional_depth;
        let depth = self.search_graph.stack.len();
        while !self.search_graph.overflow_data.has_overflow(depth) {
            if let Some(result) = loop_body(self) {
                self.search_graph.overflow_data.additional_depth = start_depth;
                return result;
            }

            self.search_graph.overflow_data.additional_depth += 1;
        }
        self.search_graph.overflow_data.additional_depth = start_depth;
        self.search_graph.overflow_data.deal_with_overflow();
        Ok(Certainty::Maybe(MaybeCause::Overflow))
    }
}