1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
|
# Maybe-Async Procedure Macro
**Why bother writing similar code twice for blocking and async code?**
[![Build Status](https://github.com/fMeow/maybe-async-rs/workflows/CI%20%28Linux%29/badge.svg?branch=main)](https://github.com/fMeow/maybe-async-rs/actions)
[![MIT licensed](https://img.shields.io/badge/license-MIT-blue.svg)](./LICENSE)
[![Latest Version](https://img.shields.io/crates/v/maybe-async.svg)](https://crates.io/crates/maybe-async)
[![maybe-async](https://docs.rs/maybe-async/badge.svg)](https://docs.rs/maybe-async)
When implementing both sync and async versions of API in a crate, most API
of the two version are almost the same except for some async/await keyword.
`maybe-async` help unifying async and sync implementation by **procedural
macro**.
- Write async code with normal `async`, `await`, and let `maybe_async`
handles
those `async` and `await` when you need a blocking code.
- Switch between sync and async by toggling `is_sync` feature gate in
`Cargo.toml`.
- use `must_be_async` and `must_be_sync` to keep code in specified version
- use `impl_async` and `impl_sync` to only compile code block on specified
version
- A handy macro to unify unit test code is also provided.
These procedural macros can be applied to the following codes:
- trait item declaration
- trait implmentation
- function definition
- struct definition
**RECOMMENDATION**: Enable **resolver ver2** in your crate, which is
introduced in Rust 1.51. If not, two crates in dependency with conflict
version (one async and another blocking) can fail complilation.
## Motivation
The async/await language feature alters the async world of rust.
Comparing with the map/and_then style, now the async code really resembles
sync version code.
In many crates, the async and sync version of crates shares the same API,
but the minor difference that all async code must be awaited prevent the
unification of async and sync code. In other words, we are forced to write
an async and an sync implementation repectively.
## Macros in Detail
`maybe-async` offers 4 set of attribute macros: `maybe_async`,
`sync_impl`/`async_impl`, `must_be_sync`/`must_be_async`, and `test`.
To use `maybe-async`, we must know which block of codes is only used on
blocking implementation, and which on async. These two implementation should
share the same function signatures except for async/await keywords, and use
`sync_impl` and `async_impl` to mark these implementation.
Use `maybe_async` macro on codes that share the same API on both async and
blocking code except for async/await keywords. And use feature gate
`is_sync` in `Cargo.toml` to toggle between async and blocking code.
- `maybe_async`
Offers a unified feature gate to provide sync and async conversion on
demand by feature gate `is_sync`, with **async first** policy.
Want to keep async code? add `maybe_async` in dependencies with default
features, which means `maybe_async` is the same as `must_be_async`:
```toml
[dependencies]
maybe_async = "0.2"
```
Wanna convert async code to sync? Add `maybe_async` to dependencies with
an `is_sync` feature gate. In this way, `maybe_async` is the same as
`must_be_sync`:
```toml
[dependencies]
maybe_async = { version = "0.2", features = ["is_sync"] }
```
Not all async traits need futures that are `dyn Future + Send`.
To avoid having "Send" and "Sync" bounds placed on the async trait
methods, invoke the maybe_async macro as #[maybe_async(?Send)] on both
the trait and the impl blocks.
- `must_be_async`
**Keep async**. Add `async_trait` attribute macro for trait declaration
or implementation to bring async fn support in traits.
To avoid having "Send" and "Sync" bounds placed on the async trait
methods, invoke the maybe_async macro as #[must_be_async(?Send)].
- `must_be_sync`
**Convert to sync code**. Convert the async code into sync code by
removing all `async move`, `async` and `await` keyword
- `sync_impl`
An sync implementation should on compile on blocking implementation and
must simply disappear when we want async version.
Although most of the API are almost the same, there definitely come to a
point when the async and sync version should differ greatly. For
example, a MongoDB client may use the same API for async and sync
verison, but the code to actually send reqeust are quite different.
Here, we can use `sync_impl` to mark a synchronous implementation, and a
sync implementation shoule disappear when we want async version.
- `async_impl`
An async implementation should on compile on async implementation and
must simply disappear when we want sync version.
To avoid having "Send" and "Sync" bounds placed on the async trait
methods, invoke the maybe_async macro as #[async_impl(?Send)].
- `test`
Handy macro to unify async and sync **unit and e2e test** code.
You can specify the condition to compile to sync test code
and also the conditions to compile to async test code with given test
macro, e.x. `tokio::test`, `async_std::test` and etc. When only sync
condition is specified,the test code only compiles when sync condition
is met.
```rust
#[maybe_async::test(
feature="is_sync",
async(all(not(feature="is_sync"), feature="async_std"), async_std::test),
async(all(not(feature="is_sync"), feature="tokio"), tokio::test)
)]
async fn test_async_fn() {
let res = async_fn().await;
assert_eq!(res, true);
}
```
## What's Under the Hook
`maybe-async` compiles your code in different way with the `is_sync` feature
gate. It remove all `await` and `async` keywords in your code under
`maybe_async` macro and conditionally compiles codes under `async_impl` and
`sync_impl`.
Here is an detailed example on what's going on whe the `is_sync` feature
gate set or not.
```rust
#[maybe_async::maybe_async(?Send)]
trait A {
async fn async_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
fn sync_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
}
struct Foo;
#[maybe_async::maybe_async(?Send)]
impl A for Foo {
async fn async_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
fn sync_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
}
#[maybe_async::maybe_async]
async fn maybe_async_fn() -> Result<(), ()> {
let a = Foo::async_fn_name().await?;
let b = Foo::sync_fn_name()?;
Ok(())
}
```
When `maybe-async` feature gate `is_sync` is **NOT** set, the generated code
is async code:
```rust
// Compiled code when `is_sync` is toggled off.
#[async_trait::async_trait(?Send)]
trait A {
async fn maybe_async_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
fn sync_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
}
struct Foo;
#[async_trait::async_trait(?Send)]
impl A for Foo {
async fn maybe_async_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
fn sync_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
}
async fn maybe_async_fn() -> Result<(), ()> {
let a = Foo::maybe_async_fn_name().await?;
let b = Foo::sync_fn_name()?;
Ok(())
}
```
When `maybe-async` feature gate `is_sync` is set, all async keyword is
ignored and yields a sync version code:
```rust
// Compiled code when `is_sync` is toggled on.
trait A {
fn maybe_async_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
fn sync_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
}
struct Foo;
impl A for Foo {
fn maybe_async_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
fn sync_fn_name() -> Result<(), ()> {
Ok(())
}
}
fn maybe_async_fn() -> Result<(), ()> {
let a = Foo::maybe_async_fn_name()?;
let b = Foo::sync_fn_name()?;
Ok(())
}
```
## Examples
### rust client for services
When implementing rust client for any services, like awz3. The higher level
API of async and sync version is almost the same, such as creating or
deleting a bucket, retrieving an object and etc.
The example `service_client` is a proof of concept that `maybe_async` can
actually free us from writing almost the same code for sync and async. We
can toggle between a sync AWZ3 client and async one by `is_sync` feature
gate when we add `maybe-async` to dependency.
# License
MIT
|