Merging debian version 2:4.20.1+dfsg-2.

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 22 deletions

diff --git a/debian/TODO b/debian/TODO
index 7671a1a..5d424a8 100644
--- a/debian/TODO
+++ b/debian/TODO
@@ -1,32 +1,25 @@
-
 This is an incomplete list of a number of issues that need to be fixed.
 
-
-TODOs before upload to unstable
-
 - make a list of basic tests that should be done to ensure that the package is
   acceptable for unstable (and run these tests)
 
 - investigate impact of changes to libraries to reverse dependencies and plan
-  transitions (if there are any)
-  - sssd
-    fixed in git (#725992)
-  - openchange
-  - evolution-mapi
-
-Other TODOs
-
-- handle ad-dc stuff
-  - have debconf question to configure ad dc
-    - the packaging from the old samba4/samba-ad-dc packages can help there
-  - convert the users to the new db, or document that this doesn't happen
-	automatically
-
-- what is the status of the docs?
-
-  - documentation2.patch is upstream
-  - The former documentation.patch needs to be rewritten against the xml input
+  transitions (if there are any).
+  - sssd: uses libndr which changes soname without transition (semi-private lib)
+    Especially painful for backports.
+    We're now emitting proper soname for libndrN at least (before it was just part
+    of samba-libs), so breakage will be at least visible before installing new
+    samba-libs
 
 - Add script to verify that headers are usable through current dependencies
   (to prevent bugs like #525888)
 
+- Investigate which binaries should go to which packages:
+
+  - Some libs and shared objects are specific to samba-ad-dc
+    (eg usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/samba/service/kdc, ntp_signd)
+  - dlz_*: should these go to samba-ad-dc too? multiarch dlz?
+  - samba_kcc: where should it go?
+  - samba-ad-client files: should samba-dnsupdate and samba-spnupdate
+    be there?
+