Adding upstream version 2:4.20.2+dfsg.upstream/2%4.20.2+dfsgupstream

Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/lib/ldb/common/ldb_msg.c b/lib/ldb/common/ldb_msg.c
index afddbe4..c334d70 100644
--- a/lib/ldb/common/ldb_msg.c
+++ b/lib/ldb/common/ldb_msg.c
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ struct ldb_val *ldb_msg_find_val(const struct ldb_message_element *el,
 static int ldb_val_cmp(const struct ldb_val *v1, const struct ldb_val *v2)
 {
 	if (v1->length != v2->length) {
-		return v1->length - v2->length;
+		return NUMERIC_CMP(v1->length, v2->length);
 	}
 	return memcmp(v1->data, v2->data, v1->length);
 }
@@ -749,9 +749,16 @@ int ldb_msg_element_compare(struct ldb_message_element *el1,
 	unsigned int i;
 
 	if (el1->num_values != el2->num_values) {
-		return el1->num_values - el2->num_values;
+		return NUMERIC_CMP(el1->num_values, el2->num_values);
 	}
-
+	/*
+	 * Note this is an inconsistent comparison, unsuitable for
+	 * sorting. If A has values {a, b} and B has values {b, c},
+	 * then
+	 *
+	 * ldb_msg_element_compare(A, B) returns -1, meaning A < B
+	 * ldb_msg_element_compare(B, A) returns -1, meaning B < A
+	 */
 	for (i=0;i<el1->num_values;i++) {
 		if (!ldb_msg_find_val(el2, &el1->values[i])) {
 			return -1;