1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
|
@c $Id$
@node What is Kerberos?, What is PKIX?, Introduction, Top
@chapter What is Kerberos?
@quotation
@flushleft
Now this Cerberus had three heads of dogs,
the tail of a dragon, and on his back the
heads of all sorts of snakes.
--- Pseudo-Apollodorus Library 2.5.12
@end flushleft
@end quotation
Kerberos is a system for authenticating users and services on a network.
It is built upon the assumption that the network is ``unsafe''. For
example, data sent over the network can be eavesdropped and altered, and
addresses can also be faked. Therefore they cannot be used for
authentication purposes.
@cindex authentication
Kerberos is a trusted third-party service. That means that there is a
third party (the kerberos server) that is trusted by all the entities on
the network (users and services, usually called @dfn{principals}). All
principals share a secret password (or key) with the kerberos server and
this enables principals to verify that the messages from the kerberos
server are authentic. Thus trusting the kerberos server, users and
services can authenticate each other.
@section Basic mechanism
@ifinfo
@macro sub{arg}
<\arg\>
@end macro
@end ifinfo
@ifhtml
@macro sub{arg}
@html
<sub>\arg\</sub>
@end html
@end macro
@end ifhtml
@ifdocbook
@macro sub{arg}
@docbook
@<subscript>\arg\</subscript>
@end docbook
@end macro
@end ifdocbook
@c @iftex
@c @macro sub{arg}
@c @textsubscript{\arg\}
@c @end macro
@c @end iftex
@quotation
@strong{Note} This discussion is about Kerberos version 4, but version
5 works similarly.
@end quotation
In Kerberos, principals use @dfn{tickets} to prove that they are who
they claim to be. In the following example, @var{A} is the initiator of
the authentication exchange, usually a user, and @var{B} is the service
that @var{A} wishes to use.
To obtain a ticket for a specific service, @var{A} sends a ticket
request to the kerberos server. The request contains @var{A}'s and
@var{B}'s names (along with some other fields). The kerberos server
checks that both @var{A} and @var{B} are valid principals.
Having verified the validity of the principals, it creates a packet
containing @var{A}'s and @var{B}'s names, @var{A}'s network address
(@var{A@sub{addr}}), the current time (@var{t@sub{issue}}), the lifetime
of the ticket (@var{life}), and a secret @dfn{session key}
@cindex session key
(@var{K@sub{AB}}). This packet is encrypted with @var{B}'s secret key
(@var{K@sub{B}}). The actual ticket (@var{T@sub{AB}}) looks like this:
(@{@var{A}, @var{B}, @var{A@sub{addr}}, @var{t@sub{issue}}, @var{life},
@var{K@sub{AB}}@}@var{K@sub{B}}).
The reply to @var{A} consists of the ticket (@var{T@sub{AB}}), @var{B}'s
name, the current time, the lifetime of the ticket, and the session key, all
encrypted in @var{A}'s secret key (@{@var{B}, @var{t@sub{issue}},
@var{life}, @var{K@sub{AB}}, @var{T@sub{AB}}@}@var{K@sub{A}}). @var{A}
decrypts the reply and retains it for later use.
@sp 1
Before sending a message to @var{B}, @var{A} creates an authenticator
consisting of @var{A}'s name, @var{A}'s address, the current time, and a
``checksum'' chosen by @var{A}, all encrypted with the secret session
key (@{@var{A}, @var{A@sub{addr}}, @var{t@sub{current}},
@var{checksum}@}@var{K@sub{AB}}). This is sent together with the ticket
received from the kerberos server to @var{B}. Upon reception, @var{B}
decrypts the ticket using @var{B}'s secret key. Since the ticket
contains the session key that the authenticator was encrypted with,
@var{B} can now also decrypt the authenticator. To verify that @var{A}
really is @var{A}, @var{B} now has to compare the contents of the ticket
with that of the authenticator. If everything matches, @var{B} now
considers @var{A} as properly authenticated.
@c (here we should have some more explanations)
@section Different attacks
@subheading Impersonating A
An impostor, @var{C} could steal the authenticator and the ticket as it
is transmitted across the network, and use them to impersonate
@var{A}. The address in the ticket and the authenticator was added to
make it more difficult to perform this attack. To succeed @var{C} will
have to either use the same machine as @var{A} or fake the source
addresses of the packets. By including the time stamp in the
authenticator, @var{C} does not have much time in which to mount the
attack.
@subheading Impersonating B
@var{C} can hijack @var{B}'s network address, and when @var{A} sends
her credentials, @var{C} just pretend to verify them. @var{C} can't
be sure that she is talking to @var{A}.
@section Defence strategies
It would be possible to add a @dfn{replay cache}
@cindex replay cache
to the server side. The idea is to save the authenticators sent during
the last few minutes, so that @var{B} can detect when someone is trying
to retransmit an already used message. This is somewhat impractical
(mostly regarding performance); MIT Kerberos 5 has a replay cache,
while Heimdal does not.
However, most GSS-API applicatons do not need a replay cache at all.
To authenticate @var{B}, @var{A} might request that @var{B} sends
something back that proves that @var{B} has access to the session
key. An example of this is the checksum that @var{A} sent as part of the
authenticator. One typical procedure is to add one to the checksum,
encrypt it with the session key and send it back to @var{A}. This is
called @dfn{mutual authentication}.
The session key can also be used to add cryptographic checksums to the
messages sent between @var{A} and @var{B} (known as @dfn{message
integrity}). Encryption can also be added (@dfn{message
confidentiality}). This is probably the best approach in all cases.
@cindex integrity
@cindex confidentiality
@section Further reading
The original paper on Kerberos from 1988 is @cite{Kerberos: An
Authentication Service for Open Network Systems}, by Jennifer Steiner,
Clifford Neuman and Jeffrey I. Schiller.
A less technical description can be found in @cite{Designing an
Authentication System: a Dialogue in Four Scenes} by Bill Bryant, also
from 1988.
These documents can be found on our web-page at
@url{http://www.pdc.kth.se/kth-krb/}.
@node What is PKIX?, What is a Certification Authority (CA)?, What is Kerberos?, Top
@chapter What is PKIX?
PKIX is the set of Internet standards for Public Key Infrastructure (PKI),
based on the ITU-T's x.509 standads. PKI is an authentication mechanism based
on public keys (the 'PK' in 'PKI').
In PKIX we have public keys "certified" by certification authorities (CAs). A
"relying party" is software that validates an entity's certificate and, if
valid, trusts the certified public key to "speak for" the entity identified by
the certificate.
In a PKI every entity has one (or more) certified public/private key pairs.
@node What is a Certification Authority (CA)?, What is kx509?, What is PKIX?, Top
@chapter What is a Certification Authority (CA)?
A Certification Authority (CA) is an entity in a PKI that issues certificates
to other entities -- a CA certifies that a public key speaks for a particular,
named entity.
There are two types of CAs: off-line and online. Typically PKI hierarchies are
organized such that the most security-critical private keys are only used by
off-line CAs to certify the less security-critical public keys of online CAs.
Heimdal has support for off-line CAs using its Hx509 library and hxtool
command.
Heimdal also has an online CA with a RESTful, HTTPS-based protocol.
@node What is kx509?, What is bx509?, What is a Certification Authority (CA)?, Top
@chapter What is kx509?
kx509 is a kerberized certification authority (CA). Heimdal implements this
protocol in its KDC. The protocol is specified by <a
href="http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6717.txt">RFC 6717</a>, though Heimdal has
implemented a number of extensions as well. A client is implemented by the
heimtools command's kx509 sub-command.
@node What is bx509?, Building and Installing, What is kx509?, Top
@chapter What is kx509?
bx509 is an online CA, like kx509, but the protocol is based on HTTPS.
Heimdal's bx509d implementation of bx509 implements two authentication bridges:
a "/bx509" end-point that allows clients to trade bearer tokens (including
Negotiate/Kerberos) and CSRs for certificates, and a "/bnegotiate" end-point
allowing clients to trade bearer tokens (including Negotiate/Kerberos) for
Negotiate tokens to HTTP servers.
|
