diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-13 14:07:11 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-13 14:07:11 +0000 |
commit | 63847496f14c813a5d80efd5b7de0f1294ffe1e3 (patch) | |
tree | 01c7571c7c762ceee70638549a99834fdd7c411b /test/savepoint.test | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | sqlite3-63847496f14c813a5d80efd5b7de0f1294ffe1e3.tar.xz sqlite3-63847496f14c813a5d80efd5b7de0f1294ffe1e3.zip |
Adding upstream version 3.45.1.upstream/3.45.1
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'test/savepoint.test')
-rw-r--r-- | test/savepoint.test | 1058 |
1 files changed, 1058 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/test/savepoint.test b/test/savepoint.test new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3952981 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/savepoint.test @@ -0,0 +1,1058 @@ +# 2008 December 15 +# +# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of +# a legal notice, here is a blessing: +# +# May you do good and not evil. +# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others. +# May you share freely, never taking more than you give. +# +#*********************************************************************** +# +# $Id: savepoint.test,v 1.13 2009/07/18 08:30:45 danielk1977 Exp $ + +set testdir [file dirname $argv0] +source $testdir/tester.tcl +source $testdir/lock_common.tcl +source $testdir/malloc_common.tcl + +forcedelete test2.db + +#---------------------------------------------------------------------- +# The following tests - savepoint-1.* - test that the SAVEPOINT, RELEASE +# and ROLLBACK TO comands are correctly parsed, and that the auto-commit +# flag is correctly set and unset as a result. +# +do_test savepoint-1.1 { + wal_set_journal_mode + execsql { + SAVEPOINT sp1; + RELEASE sp1; + } +} {} +do_test savepoint-1.2 { + execsql { + SAVEPOINT sp1; + ROLLBACK TO sp1; + } +} {} +do_test savepoint-1.3 { + execsql { SAVEPOINT sp1 } + db close +} {} +sqlite3 db test.db +do_test savepoint-1.4.1 { + execsql { + SAVEPOINT sp1; + SAVEPOINT sp2; + RELEASE sp1; + } + sqlite3_get_autocommit db +} {1} +do_test savepoint-1.4.2 { + execsql { + SAVEPOINT sp1; + SAVEPOINT sp2; + RELEASE sp2; + } + sqlite3_get_autocommit db +} {0} +do_test savepoint-1.4.3 { + execsql { RELEASE sp1 } + sqlite3_get_autocommit db +} {1} +do_test savepoint-1.4.4 { + execsql { + SAVEPOINT sp1; + SAVEPOINT sp2; + ROLLBACK TO sp1; + } + sqlite3_get_autocommit db +} {0} +do_test savepoint-1.4.5 { + execsql { RELEASE SAVEPOINT sp1 } + sqlite3_get_autocommit db +} {1} +do_test savepoint-1.4.6 { + execsql { + SAVEPOINT sp1; + SAVEPOINT sp2; + SAVEPOINT sp3; + ROLLBACK TO SAVEPOINT sp3; + ROLLBACK TRANSACTION TO sp2; + ROLLBACK TRANSACTION TO SAVEPOINT sp1; + } + sqlite3_get_autocommit db +} {0} +do_test savepoint-1.4.7 { + execsql { RELEASE SAVEPOINT SP1 } + sqlite3_get_autocommit db +} {1} +do_test savepoint-1.5 { + execsql { + SAVEPOINT sp1; + ROLLBACK TO sp1; + } +} {} +do_test savepoint-1.6 { + execsql COMMIT +} {} +wal_check_journal_mode savepoint-1.7 + +#------------------------------------------------------------------------ +# These tests - savepoint-2.* - test rollbacks and releases of savepoints +# with a very simple data set. +# + +do_test savepoint-2.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c); + BEGIN; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 2, 3); + SAVEPOINT one; + UPDATE t1 SET a = 2, b = 3, c = 4; + } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } +} {2 3 4} +do_test savepoint-2.2 { + execsql { + ROLLBACK TO one; + } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } +} {1 2 3} +do_test savepoint-2.3 { + execsql { + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(4, 5, 6); + } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } +} {1 2 3 4 5 6} +do_test savepoint-2.4 { + execsql { + ROLLBACK TO one; + } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } +} {1 2 3} + + +do_test savepoint-2.5 { + execsql { + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(7, 8, 9); + SAVEPOINT two; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(10, 11, 12); + } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } +} {1 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12} +do_test savepoint-2.6 { + execsql { + ROLLBACK TO two; + } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } +} {1 2 3 7 8 9} +do_test savepoint-2.7 { + execsql { + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(10, 11, 12); + } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } +} {1 2 3 7 8 9 10 11 12} +do_test savepoint-2.8 { + execsql { + ROLLBACK TO one; + } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } +} {1 2 3} +do_test savepoint-2.9 { + execsql { + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('a', 'b', 'c'); + SAVEPOINT two; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('d', 'e', 'f'); + } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } +} {1 2 3 a b c d e f} +do_test savepoint-2.10 { + execsql { + RELEASE two; + } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } +} {1 2 3 a b c d e f} +do_test savepoint-2.11 { + execsql { + ROLLBACK; + } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t1 } +} {} +wal_check_journal_mode savepoint-2.12 + +#------------------------------------------------------------------------ +# This block of tests - savepoint-3.* - test that when a transaction +# savepoint is rolled back, locks are not released from database files. +# And that when a transaction savepoint is released, they are released. +# +# These tests do not work in WAL mode. WAL mode does not take RESERVED +# locks on the database file. +# +if {[wal_is_wal_mode]==0} { + do_test savepoint-3.1 { + execsql { SAVEPOINT "transaction" } + execsql { PRAGMA lock_status } + } {main unlocked temp closed} + + do_test savepoint-3.2 { + execsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 2, 3) } + execsql { PRAGMA lock_status } + } {main reserved temp closed} + + do_test savepoint-3.3 { + execsql { ROLLBACK TO "transaction" } + execsql { PRAGMA lock_status } + } {main reserved temp closed} + + do_test savepoint-3.4 { + execsql { INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 2, 3) } + execsql { PRAGMA lock_status } + } {main reserved temp closed} + + do_test savepoint-3.5 { + execsql { RELEASE "transaction" } + execsql { PRAGMA lock_status } + } {main unlocked temp closed} +} + +#------------------------------------------------------------------------ +# Test that savepoints that include schema modifications are handled +# correctly. Test cases savepoint-4.*. +# +do_test savepoint-4.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t2(d, e, f); + SELECT sql FROM sqlite_master; + } +} {{CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c)} {CREATE TABLE t2(d, e, f)}} +do_test savepoint-4.2 { + execsql { + BEGIN; + CREATE TABLE t3(g,h); + INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('I', 'II'); + SAVEPOINT one; + DROP TABLE t3; + } +} {} +do_test savepoint-4.3 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t3(g, h, i); + INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('III', 'IV', 'V'); + } + execsql {SELECT * FROM t3} +} {III IV V} +do_test savepoint-4.4 { + execsql { ROLLBACK TO one; } + execsql {SELECT * FROM t3} +} {I II} +do_test savepoint-4.5 { + execsql { + ROLLBACK; + SELECT sql FROM sqlite_master; + } +} {{CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c)} {CREATE TABLE t2(d, e, f)}} + +do_test savepoint-4.6 { + execsql { + BEGIN; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('o', 't', 't'); + SAVEPOINT sp1; + CREATE TABLE t3(a, b, c); + INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('z', 'y', 'x'); + } + execsql {SELECT * FROM t3} +} {z y x} +do_test savepoint-4.7 { + execsql { + ROLLBACK TO sp1; + CREATE TABLE t3(a); + INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('value'); + } + execsql {SELECT * FROM t3} +} {value} +do_test savepoint-4.8 { + execsql COMMIT +} {} +wal_check_journal_mode savepoint-4.9 + +#------------------------------------------------------------------------ +# Test some logic errors to do with the savepoint feature. +# + +ifcapable incrblob { + do_test savepoint-5.1.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE blobs(x); + INSERT INTO blobs VALUES('a twentyeight character blob'); + } + set fd [db incrblob blobs x 1] + puts -nonewline $fd "hello" + catchsql {SAVEPOINT abc} + } {1 {cannot open savepoint - SQL statements in progress}} + do_test savepoint-5.1.2 { + close $fd + catchsql {SAVEPOINT abc} + } {0 {}} + + do_test savepoint-5.2 { + execsql {RELEASE abc} + catchsql {RELEASE abc} + } {1 {no such savepoint: abc}} + + do_test savepoint-5.3.1 { + execsql {SAVEPOINT abc} + catchsql {ROLLBACK TO def} + } {1 {no such savepoint: def}} + do_test savepoint-5.3.2.1 { + execsql {SAVEPOINT def} + set fd [db incrblob -readonly blobs x 1] + set rc [catch {seek $fd 0;read $fd} res] + lappend rc $res + } {0 {hellontyeight character blob}} + do_test savepoint-5.3.2.2 { + catchsql {ROLLBACK TO def} + } {0 {}} + do_test savepoint-5.3.2.3 { + set rc [catch {seek $fd 0; read $fd} res] + set rc + } {0} + do_test savepoint-5.3.3 { + catchsql {RELEASE def} + } {0 {}} + do_test savepoint-5.3.4 { + close $fd + execsql {savepoint def} + set fd [db incrblob blobs x 1] + catchsql {release def} + } {1 {cannot release savepoint - SQL statements in progress}} + do_test savepoint-5.3.5 { + close $fd + execsql {release abc} + } {} + + # Rollback mode: + # + # Open a savepoint transaction and insert a row into the database. Then, + # using a second database handle, open a read-only transaction on the + # database file. Check that the savepoint transaction cannot be committed + # until after the read-only transaction has been closed. + # + # WAL mode: + # + # As above, except that the savepoint transaction can be successfully + # committed before the read-only transaction has been closed. + # + do_test savepoint-5.4.1 { + execsql { + SAVEPOINT main; + INSERT INTO blobs VALUES('another blob'); + } + } {} + do_test savepoint-5.4.2 { + sqlite3 db2 test.db + execsql { BEGIN ; SELECT count(*) FROM blobs } db2 + } {1} + if {[wal_is_wal_mode]} { + do_test savepoint-5.4.3 { catchsql "RELEASE main" } {0 {}} + do_test savepoint-5.4.4 { db2 close } {} + } else { + do_test savepoint-5.4.3 { + catchsql { RELEASE main } + } {1 {database is locked}} + do_test savepoint-5.4.4 { + db2 close + catchsql { RELEASE main } + } {0 {}} + } + do_test savepoint-5.4.5 { + execsql { SELECT x FROM blobs WHERE rowid = 2 } + } {{another blob}} + do_test savepoint-5.4.6 { + execsql { SELECT count(*) FROM blobs } + } {2} +} +wal_check_journal_mode savepoint-5.5 + +#------------------------------------------------------------------------- +# The following tests, savepoint-6.*, test an incr-vacuum inside of a +# couple of nested savepoints. +# +ifcapable {autovacuum && pragma} { + db close + forcedelete test.db + sqlite3 db test.db + + do_test savepoint-6.1 { + execsql { PRAGMA auto_vacuum = incremental } + wal_set_journal_mode + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c); + CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a, b); + BEGIN; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(randstr(10,400),randstr(10,400),randstr(10,400)); + } + set r "randstr(10,400)" + for {set ii 0} {$ii < 10} {incr ii} { + execsql "INSERT INTO t1 SELECT $r, $r, $r FROM t1" + } + execsql { COMMIT } + } {} + + integrity_check savepoint-6.2 + + do_test savepoint-6.3 { + execsql { + PRAGMA cache_size = 10; + BEGIN; + UPDATE t1 SET a = randstr(10,10) WHERE (rowid%4)==0; + SAVEPOINT one; + DELETE FROM t1 WHERE rowid%2; + PRAGMA incr_vacuum; + SAVEPOINT two; + INSERT INTO t1 SELECT randstr(10,400), randstr(10,400), c FROM t1; + DELETE FROM t1 WHERE rowid%2; + PRAGMA incr_vacuum; + ROLLBACK TO one; + COMMIT; + } + } {} + + integrity_check savepoint-6.4 + + wal_check_journal_mode savepoint-6.5 +} + +#------------------------------------------------------------------------- +# The following tests, savepoint-7.*, attempt to break the logic +# surrounding savepoints by growing and shrinking the database file. +# +db close +forcedelete test.db +sqlite3 db test.db + +do_test savepoint-7.1 { + execsql { PRAGMA auto_vacuum = incremental } + wal_set_journal_mode + execsql { + PRAGMA cache_size = 10; + BEGIN; + CREATE TABLE t1(a PRIMARY KEY, b); + INSERT INTO t1(a) VALUES('alligator'); + INSERT INTO t1(a) VALUES('angelfish'); + INSERT INTO t1(a) VALUES('ant'); + INSERT INTO t1(a) VALUES('antelope'); + INSERT INTO t1(a) VALUES('ape'); + INSERT INTO t1(a) VALUES('baboon'); + INSERT INTO t1(a) VALUES('badger'); + INSERT INTO t1(a) VALUES('bear'); + INSERT INTO t1(a) VALUES('beetle'); + INSERT INTO t1(a) VALUES('bird'); + INSERT INTO t1(a) VALUES('bison'); + UPDATE t1 SET b = randstr(1000,1000); + UPDATE t1 SET b = b||randstr(1000,1000); + UPDATE t1 SET b = b||randstr(1000,1000); + UPDATE t1 SET b = b||randstr(10,1000); + COMMIT; + } + expr ([execsql { PRAGMA page_count }] > 20) +} {1} +do_test savepoint-7.2.1 { + execsql { + BEGIN; + SAVEPOINT one; + CREATE TABLE t2(a, b); + INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a, b FROM t1; + ROLLBACK TO one; + } + execsql { + PRAGMA integrity_check; + } +} {ok} +do_test savepoint-7.2.2 { + execsql { + COMMIT; + PRAGMA integrity_check; + } +} {ok} + +do_test savepoint-7.3.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t2(a, b); + INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a, b FROM t1; + } +} {} +do_test savepoint-7.3.2 { + execsql { + BEGIN; + SAVEPOINT one; + DELETE FROM t2; + PRAGMA incremental_vacuum; + SAVEPOINT two; + INSERT INTO t2 SELECT a, b FROM t1; + ROLLBACK TO two; + COMMIT; + } + execsql { PRAGMA integrity_check } +} {ok} +wal_check_journal_mode savepoint-7.3.3 + +do_test savepoint-7.4.1 { + db close + forcedelete test.db + sqlite3 db test.db + execsql { PRAGMA auto_vacuum = incremental } + wal_set_journal_mode + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, PRIMARY KEY(a, b)); + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(randstr(1000,1000), randstr(1000,1000)); + BEGIN; + DELETE FROM t1; + SAVEPOINT one; + PRAGMA incremental_vacuum; + ROLLBACK TO one; + COMMIT; + } + + execsql { PRAGMA integrity_check } +} {ok} + +do_test savepoint-7.5.1 { + execsql { + PRAGMA incremental_vacuum; + CREATE TABLE t5(x, y); + INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(1, randstr(1000,1000)); + INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(2, randstr(1000,1000)); + INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(3, randstr(1000,1000)); + + BEGIN; + INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(4, randstr(1000,1000)); + INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(5, randstr(1000,1000)); + DELETE FROM t5 WHERE x=1 OR x=2; + SAVEPOINT one; + PRAGMA incremental_vacuum; + SAVEPOINT two; + INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(1, randstr(1000,1000)); + INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(2, randstr(1000,1000)); + ROLLBACK TO two; + ROLLBACK TO one; + COMMIT; + PRAGMA integrity_check; + } +} {ok} +do_test savepoint-7.5.2 { + execsql { + DROP TABLE t5; + } +} {} +wal_check_journal_mode savepoint-7.5.3 + +# Test oddly named and quoted savepoints. +# +do_test savepoint-8-1 { + execsql { SAVEPOINT "save1" } + execsql { RELEASE save1 } +} {} +do_test savepoint-8-2 { + execsql { SAVEPOINT "Including whitespace " } + execsql { RELEASE "including Whitespace " } +} {} + +# Test that the authorization callback works. +# +ifcapable auth { + proc auth {args} { + eval lappend ::authdata [lrange $args 0 4] + return SQLITE_OK + } + db auth auth + + do_test savepoint-9.1 { + set ::authdata [list] + execsql { SAVEPOINT sp1 } + set ::authdata + } {SQLITE_SAVEPOINT BEGIN sp1 {} {}} + do_test savepoint-9.2 { + set ::authdata [list] + execsql { ROLLBACK TO sp1 } + set ::authdata + } {SQLITE_SAVEPOINT ROLLBACK sp1 {} {}} + do_test savepoint-9.3 { + set ::authdata [list] + execsql { RELEASE sp1 } + set ::authdata + } {SQLITE_SAVEPOINT RELEASE sp1 {} {}} + + proc auth {args} { + eval lappend ::authdata [lrange $args 0 4] + return SQLITE_DENY + } + db auth auth + + do_test savepoint-9.4 { + set ::authdata [list] + set res [catchsql { SAVEPOINT sp1 }] + concat $::authdata $res + } {SQLITE_SAVEPOINT BEGIN sp1 {} {} 1 {not authorized}} + do_test savepoint-9.5 { + set ::authdata [list] + set res [catchsql { ROLLBACK TO sp1 }] + concat $::authdata $res + } {SQLITE_SAVEPOINT ROLLBACK sp1 {} {} 1 {not authorized}} + do_test savepoint-9.6 { + set ::authdata [list] + set res [catchsql { RELEASE sp1 }] + concat $::authdata $res + } {SQLITE_SAVEPOINT RELEASE sp1 {} {} 1 {not authorized}} + + catch { db eval ROLLBACK } + db auth "" +} + +#------------------------------------------------------------------------- +# The following tests - savepoint-10.* - test the interaction of +# savepoints and ATTACH statements. +# + +# First make sure it is not possible to attach or detach a database while +# a savepoint is open (it is not possible if any transaction is open). +# +# UPDATE 2017-07-26: It is not possible to ATTACH and DETACH within a +# a transaction. +# +do_test savepoint-10.1.1 { + catchsql { + SAVEPOINT one; + ATTACH 'test2.db' AS aux; + DETACH aux; + } +} {0 {}} +do_test savepoint-10.1.2 { + execsql { + RELEASE one; + ATTACH 'test2.db' AS aux; + } + catchsql { + SAVEPOINT one; + DETACH aux; + ATTACH 'test2.db' AS aux; + } +} {0 {}} +do_test savepoint-10.1.3 { + execsql { + RELEASE one; + DETACH aux; + } +} {} + +# The lock state of the TEMP database can vary if SQLITE_TEMP_STORE=3 +# And the following set of tests is only really interested in the status +# of the aux1 and aux2 locks. So record the current lock status of +# TEMP for use in the answers. +set templockstate [lindex [db eval {PRAGMA lock_status}] 3] + + +if {[wal_is_wal_mode]==0} { + do_test savepoint-10.2.1 { + forcedelete test3.db + forcedelete test2.db + execsql { + ATTACH 'test2.db' AS aux1; + ATTACH 'test3.db' AS aux2; + DROP TABLE t1; + CREATE TABLE main.t1(x, y); + CREATE TABLE aux1.t2(x, y); + CREATE TABLE aux2.t3(x, y); + SELECT name FROM sqlite_master; + SELECT name FROM aux1.sqlite_master; + SELECT name FROM aux2.sqlite_master; + } + } {t1 t2 t3} + do_test savepoint-10.2.2 { + execsql { PRAGMA lock_status } + } [list main unlocked temp $templockstate aux1 unlocked aux2 unlocked] + + do_test savepoint-10.2.3 { + execsql { + SAVEPOINT one; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 2); + PRAGMA lock_status; + } + } [list main reserved temp $templockstate aux1 unlocked aux2 unlocked] + do_test savepoint-10.2.4 { + execsql { + INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(3, 4); + PRAGMA lock_status; + } + } [list main reserved temp $templockstate aux1 unlocked aux2 reserved] + do_test savepoint-10.2.5 { + execsql { + SAVEPOINT two; + INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(5, 6); + PRAGMA lock_status; + } + } [list main reserved temp $templockstate aux1 reserved aux2 reserved] + do_test savepoint-10.2.6 { + execsql { SELECT * FROM t2 } + } {5 6} + do_test savepoint-10.2.7 { + execsql { ROLLBACK TO two } + execsql { SELECT * FROM t2 } + } {} + do_test savepoint-10.2.8 { + execsql { PRAGMA lock_status } + } [list main reserved temp $templockstate aux1 reserved aux2 reserved] + do_test savepoint-10.2.9 { + execsql { SELECT 'a', * FROM t1 ; SELECT 'b', * FROM t3 } + } {a 1 2 b 3 4} + do_test savepoint-10.2.9 { + execsql { + INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(5, 6); + RELEASE one; + } + execsql { + SELECT * FROM t1; + SELECT * FROM t2; + SELECT * FROM t3; + } + } {1 2 5 6 3 4} + do_test savepoint-10.2.9 { + execsql { PRAGMA lock_status } + } [list main unlocked temp $templockstate aux1 unlocked aux2 unlocked] + + do_test savepoint-10.2.10 { + execsql { + SAVEPOINT one; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('a', 'b'); + SAVEPOINT two; + INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('c', 'd'); + SAVEPOINT three; + INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('e', 'f'); + } + execsql { + SELECT * FROM t1; + SELECT * FROM t2; + SELECT * FROM t3; + } + } {1 2 a b 5 6 c d 3 4 e f} + do_test savepoint-10.2.11 { + execsql { ROLLBACK TO two } + execsql { + SELECT * FROM t1; + SELECT * FROM t2; + SELECT * FROM t3; + } + } {1 2 a b 5 6 3 4} + do_test savepoint-10.2.12 { + execsql { + INSERT INTO t3 VALUES('g', 'h'); + ROLLBACK TO two; + } + execsql { + SELECT * FROM t1; + SELECT * FROM t2; + SELECT * FROM t3; + } + } {1 2 a b 5 6 3 4} + do_test savepoint-10.2.13 { + execsql { ROLLBACK } + execsql { + SELECT * FROM t1; + SELECT * FROM t2; + SELECT * FROM t3; + } + } {1 2 5 6 3 4} + do_test savepoint-10.2.14 { + execsql { PRAGMA lock_status } + } [list main unlocked temp $templockstate aux1 unlocked aux2 unlocked] +} + +#------------------------------------------------------------------------- +# The following tests - savepoint-11.* - test the interaction of +# savepoints and creating or dropping tables and indexes in +# auto-vacuum mode. +# +do_test savepoint-11.1 { + db close + forcedelete test.db + sqlite3 db test.db + execsql { PRAGMA auto_vacuum = full; } + wal_set_journal_mode + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, UNIQUE(a, b)); + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, randstr(1000,1000)); + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, randstr(1000,1000)); + } +} {} +do_test savepoint-11.2 { + execsql { + SAVEPOINT one; + CREATE TABLE t2(a, b, UNIQUE(a, b)); + SAVEPOINT two; + CREATE TABLE t3(a, b, UNIQUE(a, b)); + } +} {} +integrity_check savepoint-11.3 +do_test savepoint-11.4 { + execsql { ROLLBACK TO two } +} {} +integrity_check savepoint-11.5 +do_test savepoint-11.6 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t3(a, b, UNIQUE(a, b)); + ROLLBACK TO one; + } +} {} +integrity_check savepoint-11.7 +do_test savepoint-11.8 { + execsql { ROLLBACK } + execsql { PRAGMA wal_checkpoint } + file size test.db +} {8192} + +do_test savepoint-11.9 { + execsql { + DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1; + DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t2; + DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t3; + } +} {} +do_test savepoint-11.10 { + execsql { + BEGIN; + CREATE TABLE t1(a, b); + CREATE TABLE t2(x, y); + INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1, 2); + SAVEPOINT one; + INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3, 4); + SAVEPOINT two; + DROP TABLE t1; + ROLLBACK TO two; + } + execsql {SELECT * FROM t2} +} {1 2 3 4} +do_test savepoint-11.11 { + execsql COMMIT +} {} +do_test savepoint-11.12 { + execsql {SELECT * FROM t2} +} {1 2 3 4} +wal_check_journal_mode savepoint-11.13 + +#------------------------------------------------------------------------- +# The following tests - savepoint-12.* - test the interaction of +# savepoints and "ON CONFLICT ROLLBACK" clauses. +# +do_test savepoint-12.1 { + execsql { + CREATE TABLE t4(a PRIMARY KEY, b); + INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(1, 'one'); + } +} {} +do_test savepoint-12.2 { + # The final statement of the following SQL hits a constraint when the + # conflict handling mode is "OR ROLLBACK" and there are a couple of + # open savepoints. At one point this would fail to clear the internal + # record of the open savepoints, resulting in an assert() failure + # later on. + # + catchsql { + BEGIN; + INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(2, 'two'); + SAVEPOINT sp1; + INSERT INTO t4 VALUES(3, 'three'); + SAVEPOINT sp2; + INSERT OR ROLLBACK INTO t4 VALUES(1, 'one'); + } +} {1 {UNIQUE constraint failed: t4.a}} +do_test savepoint-12.3 { + sqlite3_get_autocommit db +} {1} +do_test savepoint-12.4 { + execsql { SAVEPOINT one } +} {} +wal_check_journal_mode savepoint-12.5 + +#------------------------------------------------------------------------- +# The following tests - savepoint-13.* - test the interaction of +# savepoints and "journal_mode = off". +# +if {[wal_is_wal_mode]==0} { + do_test savepoint-13.1 { + db close + catch {forcedelete test.db} + sqlite3 db test.db + execsql { + BEGIN; + CREATE TABLE t1(a PRIMARY KEY, b); + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 2); + COMMIT; + PRAGMA journal_mode = off; + } + } {off} + do_test savepoint-13.2 { + execsql { + BEGIN; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 4); + INSERT INTO t1 SELECT a+4,b+4 FROM t1; + COMMIT; + } + } {} + do_test savepoint-13.3 { + execsql { + BEGIN; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(9, 10); + SAVEPOINT s1; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(11, 12); + COMMIT; + } + } {} + do_test savepoint-13.4 { + execsql { + BEGIN; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(13, 14); + SAVEPOINT s1; + INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(15, 16); + ROLLBACK TO s1; + ROLLBACK; + SELECT * FROM t1; + } + } {1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12} +} + +db close +delete_file test.db +do_multiclient_test tn { + do_test savepoint-14.$tn.1 { + sql1 { + CREATE TABLE foo(x); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(1); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(2); + } + sql2 { + BEGIN; + SELECT * FROM foo; + } + } {1 2} + do_test savepoint-14.$tn.2 { + sql1 { + SAVEPOINT one; + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(1); + } + csql1 { RELEASE one } + } {1 {database is locked}} + do_test savepoint-14.$tn.3 { + sql1 { ROLLBACK TO one } + sql2 { COMMIT } + sql1 { RELEASE one } + } {} + + do_test savepoint-14.$tn.4 { + sql2 { + BEGIN; + SELECT * FROM foo; + } + } {1 2} + do_test savepoint-14.$tn.5 { + sql1 { + SAVEPOINT one; + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(1); + } + csql1 { RELEASE one } + } {1 {database is locked}} + do_test savepoint-14.$tn.6 { + sql2 { COMMIT } + sql1 { + ROLLBACK TO one; + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(3); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(4); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(5); + RELEASE one; + } + } {} + do_test savepoint-14.$tn.7 { + sql2 { CREATE INDEX fooidx ON foo(x); } + sql3 { PRAGMA integrity_check } + } {ok} +} + +do_multiclient_test tn { + do_test savepoint-15.$tn.1 { + sql1 { + CREATE TABLE foo(x); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(1); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(2); + } + sql2 { BEGIN; SELECT * FROM foo; } + } {1 2} + do_test savepoint-15.$tn.2 { + sql1 { + PRAGMA locking_mode = EXCLUSIVE; + BEGIN; + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(3); + } + csql1 { COMMIT } + } {1 {database is locked}} + do_test savepoint-15.$tn.3 { + sql1 { ROLLBACK } + sql2 { COMMIT } + sql1 { + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(3); + PRAGMA locking_mode = NORMAL; + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(4); + } + sql2 { CREATE INDEX fooidx ON foo(x); } + sql3 { PRAGMA integrity_check } + } {ok} +} + +do_multiclient_test tn { + do_test savepoint-16.$tn.1 { + sql1 { + CREATE TABLE foo(x); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(1); + INSERT INTO foo VALUES(2); + } + } {} + do_test savepoint-16.$tn.2 { + + db eval {SELECT * FROM foo} { + sql1 { INSERT INTO foo VALUES(3) } + sql2 { SELECT * FROM foo } + sql1 { INSERT INTO foo VALUES(4) } + break + } + + sql2 { CREATE INDEX fooidx ON foo(x); } + sql3 { PRAGMA integrity_check } + } {ok} + do_test savepoint-16.$tn.3 { + sql1 { SELECT * FROM foo } + } {1 2 3 4} +} + +#------------------------------------------------------------------------- +# This next block of tests verifies that a problem reported on the mailing +# list has been resolved. At one point the second "CREATE TABLE t6" would +# fail as table t6 still existed in the internal cache of the db schema +# (even though it had been removed from the database by the ROLLBACK +# command). +# +sqlite3 db test.db +do_execsql_test savepoint-17.1 { + BEGIN; + CREATE TABLE t6(a, b); + INSERT INTO t6 VALUES(1, 2); + SAVEPOINT one; + INSERT INTO t6 VALUES(3, 4); + ROLLBACK TO one; + SELECT * FROM t6; + ROLLBACK; +} {1 2} + +do_execsql_test savepoint-17.2 { + CREATE TABLE t6(a, b); +} {} + +finish_test |