diff options
author | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-13 14:07:11 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org> | 2024-04-13 14:07:11 +0000 |
commit | 63847496f14c813a5d80efd5b7de0f1294ffe1e3 (patch) | |
tree | 01c7571c7c762ceee70638549a99834fdd7c411b /www/cpu.html | |
parent | Initial commit. (diff) | |
download | sqlite3-63847496f14c813a5d80efd5b7de0f1294ffe1e3.tar.xz sqlite3-63847496f14c813a5d80efd5b7de0f1294ffe1e3.zip |
Adding upstream version 3.45.1.upstream/3.45.1
Signed-off-by: Daniel Baumann <daniel.baumann@progress-linux.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'www/cpu.html')
-rw-r--r-- | www/cpu.html | 377 |
1 files changed, 377 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/www/cpu.html b/www/cpu.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000..192cbaf --- /dev/null +++ b/www/cpu.html @@ -0,0 +1,377 @@ +<!DOCTYPE html> +<html><head> +<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0"> +<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> +<link href="sqlite.css" rel="stylesheet"> +<title>Measuring and Reducing CPU Usage in SQLite</title> +<!-- path= --> +</head> +<body> +<div class=nosearch> +<a href="index.html"> +<img class="logo" src="images/sqlite370_banner.gif" alt="SQLite" border="0"> +</a> +<div><!-- IE hack to prevent disappearing logo --></div> +<div class="tagline desktoponly"> +Small. Fast. Reliable.<br>Choose any three. +</div> +<div class="menu mainmenu"> +<ul> +<li><a href="index.html">Home</a> +<li class='mobileonly'><a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick='toggle_div("submenu")'>Menu</a> +<li class='wideonly'><a href='about.html'>About</a> +<li class='desktoponly'><a href="docs.html">Documentation</a> +<li class='desktoponly'><a href="download.html">Download</a> +<li class='wideonly'><a href='copyright.html'>License</a> +<li class='desktoponly'><a href="support.html">Support</a> +<li class='desktoponly'><a href="prosupport.html">Purchase</a> +<li class='search' id='search_menubutton'> +<a href="javascript:void(0)" onclick='toggle_search()'>Search</a> +</ul> +</div> +<div class="menu submenu" id="submenu"> +<ul> +<li><a href='about.html'>About</a> +<li><a href='docs.html'>Documentation</a> +<li><a href='download.html'>Download</a> +<li><a href='support.html'>Support</a> +<li><a href='prosupport.html'>Purchase</a> +</ul> +</div> +<div class="searchmenu" id="searchmenu"> +<form method="GET" action="search"> +<select name="s" id="searchtype"> +<option value="d">Search Documentation</option> +<option value="c">Search Changelog</option> +</select> +<input type="text" name="q" id="searchbox" value=""> +<input type="submit" value="Go"> +</form> +</div> +</div> +<script> +function toggle_div(nm) { +var w = document.getElementById(nm); +if( w.style.display=="block" ){ +w.style.display = "none"; +}else{ +w.style.display = "block"; +} +} +function toggle_search() { +var w = document.getElementById("searchmenu"); +if( w.style.display=="block" ){ +w.style.display = "none"; +} else { +w.style.display = "block"; +setTimeout(function(){ +document.getElementById("searchbox").focus() +}, 30); +} +} +function div_off(nm){document.getElementById(nm).style.display="none";} +window.onbeforeunload = function(e){div_off("submenu");} +/* Disable the Search feature if we are not operating from CGI, since */ +/* Search is accomplished using CGI and will not work without it. */ +if( !location.origin || !location.origin.match || !location.origin.match(/http/) ){ +document.getElementById("search_menubutton").style.display = "none"; +} +/* Used by the Hide/Show button beside syntax diagrams, to toggle the */ +function hideorshow(btn,obj){ +var x = document.getElementById(obj); +var b = document.getElementById(btn); +if( x.style.display!='none' ){ +x.style.display = 'none'; +b.innerHTML='show'; +}else{ +x.style.display = ''; +b.innerHTML='hide'; +} +return false; +} +var antiRobot = 0; +function antiRobotGo(){ +if( antiRobot!=3 ) return; +antiRobot = 7; +var j = document.getElementById("mtimelink"); +if(j && j.hasAttribute("data-href")) j.href=j.getAttribute("data-href"); +} +function antiRobotDefense(){ +document.body.onmousedown=function(){ +antiRobot |= 2; +antiRobotGo(); +document.body.onmousedown=null; +} +document.body.onmousemove=function(){ +antiRobot |= 2; +antiRobotGo(); +document.body.onmousemove=null; +} +setTimeout(function(){ +antiRobot |= 1; +antiRobotGo(); +}, 100) +antiRobotGo(); +} +antiRobotDefense(); +</script> +<div class=fancy> +<div class=nosearch> +<div class="fancy_title"> +Measuring and Reducing CPU Usage in SQLite +</div> +<div class="fancy_toc"> +<a onclick="toggle_toc()"> +<span class="fancy_toc_mark" id="toc_mk">►</span> +Table Of Contents +</a> +<div id="toc_sub"><div class="fancy-toc1"><a href="#overview">1. Overview</a></div> +<div class="fancy-toc1"><a href="#measuring_performance">2. Measuring Performance</a></div> +<div class="fancy-toc2"><a href="#compile_options">2.1. Compile Options</a></div> +<div class="fancy-toc2"><a href="#workload">2.2. Workload</a></div> +<div class="fancy-toc2"><a href="#performance_measurement">2.3. Performance Measurement</a></div> +<div class="fancy-toc2"><a href="#microoptimizations">2.4. Microoptimizations</a></div> +<div class="fancy-toc1"><a href="#performance_measurement_workflow">3. Performance Measurement Workflow</a></div> +<div class="fancy-toc1"><a href="#limitations">4. Limitations</a></div> +</div> +</div> +<script> +function toggle_toc(){ +var sub = document.getElementById("toc_sub") +var mk = document.getElementById("toc_mk") +if( sub.style.display!="block" ){ +sub.style.display = "block"; +mk.innerHTML = "▼"; +} else { +sub.style.display = "none"; +mk.innerHTML = "►"; +} +} +</script> +</div> + + + + + +<h1 id="overview"><span>1. </span>Overview</h1> + +<p>The graph below shows the number of CPU cycles used by SQLite on a +standard workload, for versions of SQLite going back about 10 years. +Recent versions of SQLite use about one third as many the CPU cycles +compared to older versions. + +</p><p> +This article describes how the SQLite developers measure CPU usage, +what those measurements actually mean, and the techniques used by +SQLite developers on their continuing quest to further reduce the +CPU usage of the SQLite library. +</p> + +<center> +<hr> +<div class="imgcontainer"> +<img src="./images/cpu-usage.jpg"></div><br> +Measured using cachegrind on Ubuntu 16.04 on x64 with gcc 5.4.0 and -Os.<br> +<hr> +</center> + +<h1 id="measuring_performance"><span>2. </span>Measuring Performance</h1> + +<p>In brief, the CPU performance of SQLite is measured as follows: + +</p><p></p><ol> +<li> Compile SQLite in an as-delivered configuration, without any special + telemetry or debugging options. +</li><li> Link SQLite against a test program that runs approximately 30,000 + SQL statements representing a typical workload. +</li><li> Count the number of CPU cycles consumed using + <a href="http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/cg-manual.html">cachegrind</a>. +</li></ol> + +<h2 id="compile_options"><span>2.1. </span>Compile Options</h2> + +<p>For performance measurement, SQLite is compiled in approximately the same +way as it would be for use in production systems. The compile-time configuration +is "approximate" in the sense that every production use of SQLite is +different. Compile-time options used by one system are not necessarily +the same as those used by others. The key point is that options that +significantly impact the generated machine code are avoided. For example, +the -DSQLITE_DEBUG option is omitted because that option inserts thousands +of assert() statements in the middle of performance critical sections of the +SQLite library. The -pg option (on GCC) is omitted because it causes the +compiler to emit extra probabilistic performance measuring code which interferes +with actual performance measurements. + +</p><p> +For performance measurements, +the -Os option is used (optimize for size) rather than -O2 because the +-O2 option creates so much code movement that it is difficult to associate +specific CPU instructions to C source code lines. + +</p><h2 id="workload"><span>2.2. </span>Workload</h2> + +<p> +The "typical" workload is generated by the +<a href="https://sqlite.org/src/file/test/speedtest1.c">speedtest1.c</a> +program in the canonical SQLite source tree. This program strives to +exercise the SQLite library in a way that is typical of real-world +applications. Of course, every application is different, and so +no test program can exactly mirror the behavior of all applications. + +</p><p> +The speedtest1.c program is updated from time to time as the SQLite +developers' understanding of what constitutes "typical" usage evolves. + +</p><p> +The +<a href="https://sqlite.org/src/file/tool/speed-check.sh">speed-check.sh</a> shell +script, also in the canonical source tree, is used to run the speedtest1.c +program. To replicate the performance measurements, collect the following +files into a single directory: +</p><ul> +<li> the "speed-check.sh" script, +</li><li> the "speedtest1.c" test program, and +</li><li> the <a href="amalgamation.html">SQLite amalgamation</a> source files "sqlite3.c" and + "sqlite3.h" +</li></ul> +<p> +Then run "sh speed-check.sh trunk". + + +</p><h2 id="performance_measurement"><span>2.3. </span>Performance Measurement</h2> + +<p> +<a href="http://valgrind.org/docs/manual/cg-manual.html">Cachegrind</a> is used to +measure performance because it gives answers that are repeatable to +7 or more significant digits. In comparison, actual (wall-clock) +run times are scarcely repeatable beyond one significant digit. + +<a name="microopt"></a> + +</p><h2 id="microoptimizations"><span>2.4. </span>Microoptimizations</h2> + +<p> +The high repeatability of cachegrind allows the SQLite developers to +implement and measure "microoptimizations". A microoptimization is +a change to the code that results in a very small performance increase. +Typical micro-optimizations reduce the number of CPU cycles by 0.1% or +0.05% or even less. Such improvements are impossible to measure with +real-world timings. But hundreds or thousands of microoptimizations +add up, resulting in measurable real-world performance gains. + +</p><h1 id="performance_measurement_workflow"><span>3. </span>Performance Measurement Workflow</h1> + +<p> +As SQLite developers edit the SQLite source code, they run the +<a href="https://sqlite.org/src/file/tool/speed-check.sh">speed-check.sh</a> +shell script to track the performance impact of changes. This +script compiles the speedtest1.c program, runs it under cachegrind, +processes the cachegrind output using the +<a href="https://sqlite.org/src/file/tool/cg_anno.tcl">cg_anno.tcl</a> TCL +script, then saves the results in a series of text files. +Typical output from the speed-check.sh script looks like this: + +</p><blockquote><pre> +==8683== +==8683== I refs: <font color="red">1,060,925,768</font> +==8683== I1 misses: 23,731,246 +==8683== LLi misses: 5,176 +==8683== I1 miss rate: 2.24% +==8683== LLi miss rate: 0.00% +==8683== +==8683== D refs: 557,686,925 (361,828,925 rd + 195,858,000 wr) +==8683== D1 misses: 5,067,063 ( 3,544,278 rd + 1,522,785 wr) +==8683== LLd misses: 57,958 ( 16,067 rd + 41,891 wr) +==8683== D1 miss rate: 0.9% ( 1.0% + 0.8% ) +==8683== LLd miss rate: 0.0% ( 0.0% + 0.0% ) +==8683== +==8683== LL refs: 28,798,309 ( 27,275,524 rd + 1,522,785 wr) +==8683== LL misses: 63,134 ( 21,243 rd + 41,891 wr) +==8683== LL miss rate: 0.0% ( 0.0% + 0.0% ) + text data bss dec hex filename + 523044 8240 1976 <font color="red">533260</font> 8230c sqlite3.o + 220507 1007870 7769352 sqlite3.c +</pre></blockquote> + +<p>The important parts of the output (the parts that the developers pay +the most attention to) are shown in red. +Basically, the developers want to know the size of the compiled SQLite +library and how many CPU cycles were needed to run the performance test. + +</p><p>The output from the +<a href="https://sqlite.org/src/file/tool/cg_anno.tcl">cg_anno.tcl</a> script +shows the number of CPU cycles spent on each line of code. +The report is approximately 80,000 lines long. The following is a brief +snippet taken from the middle of the report to show what it looks like: + +</p><blockquote><pre> + . SQLITE_PRIVATE int sqlite3BtreeNext(BtCursor *pCur, int *pRes){ + . MemPage *pPage; + . assert( cursorOwnsBtShared(pCur) ); + . assert( pRes!=0 ); + . assert( *pRes==0 || *pRes==1 ); + . assert( pCur->skipNext==0 || pCur->eState!=CURSOR_VALID ); + 369,648 pCur->info.nSize = 0; + 369,648 pCur->curFlags &= ~(BTCF_ValidNKey|BTCF_ValidOvfl); + 369,648 *pRes = 0; + 739,296 if( pCur->eState!=CURSOR_VALID ) return btreeNext(pCur, pRes); + 1,473,580 pPage = pCur->apPage[pCur->iPage]; + 1,841,975 if( (++pCur->aiIdx[pCur->iPage])>=pPage->nCell ){ + 4,340 pCur->aiIdx[pCur->iPage]--; + 5,593 return btreeNext(pCur, pRes); + . } + 728,110 if( pPage->leaf ){ + . return SQLITE_OK; + . }else{ + 3,117 return moveToLeftmost(pCur); + . } + 721,876 } +</pre></blockquote> + +<p> +The numbers on the left are the CPU cycle counts for that line of code, +of course. + +</p><p> +The cg_anno.tcl script removes extraneous details from the default +cachegrind annotation +output so that before-and-after reports can be compared using a +side-by-side diff to view specific details of how a +micro-optimization attempt affected performance. + + +</p><h1 id="limitations"><span>4. </span>Limitations</h1> + +<p>The use of the standardized speedtest1.c workload and cachegrind has +enabled significant performance improvement. +However, it is important to recognize the limitations of this approach: + +</p><ul> +<li><p> +Performance measurements are done with a single compiler (gcc 5.4.0), +optimization setting (-Os), and +on a single platform (Ubuntu 16.04 LTS on x64). The performance of +other compilers and processors may vary. + +</p></li><li><p> +The speedtest1.c workload that is being measured tries to be representative +of a wide range of typical uses of SQLite. But every application is +different. The speedtest1.c workload might not be a good proxy for the +kinds of activities performed by some applications. The SQLite developers +are constantly working to improve the speedtest1.c program, to make it +a better proxy for actual SQLite usage. Community feedback is welcomed. + +</p></li><li><p> +The cycle counts provided by cachegrind are a good proxy for actual +performance, but they are not 100% accurate. + +</p></li><li><p> +Only CPU cycle counts are being measured here. +CPU cycle counts are a good proxy for energy consumption, +but do not necessary correlate well with real-world timings. +Time spent doing I/O is not reflected in the CPU cycle counts, +and I/O time predominates in many SQLite usage scenarios. +</p></li></ul> +<p align="center"><small><i>This page last modified on <a href="https://sqlite.org/docsrc/honeypot" id="mtimelink" data-href="https://sqlite.org/docsrc/finfo/pages/cpu.in?m=30de04a5bf">2022-01-08 05:02:57</a> UTC </small></i></p> + |