1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
|
# 2008 September 1
#
# The author disclaims copyright to this source code. In place of
# a legal notice, here is a blessing:
#
# May you do good and not evil.
# May you find forgiveness for yourself and forgive others.
# May you share freely, never taking more than you give.
#
#***********************************************************************
#
# $Id: in4.test,v 1.4 2009/06/05 17:09:12 drh Exp $
set testdir [file dirname $argv0]
source $testdir/tester.tcl
set testprefix in4
do_test in4-1.1 {
execsql {
CREATE TABLE t1(a, b);
CREATE INDEX i1 ON t1(a);
}
} {}
do_test in4-1.2 {
execsql {
SELECT * FROM t1 WHERE a IN ('aaa', 'bbb', 'ccc');
}
} {}
do_test in4-1.3 {
execsql {
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('aaa', 1);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('ddd', 2);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('ccc', 3);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('eee', 4);
SELECT b FROM t1 WHERE a IN ('aaa', 'bbb', 'ccc');
}
} {1 3}
do_test in4-1.4 {
execsql {
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE rowid IN (1, 3);
}
} {aaa ccc}
do_test in4-1.5 {
execsql {
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE rowid IN ();
}
} {}
do_test in4-1.6 {
execsql {
SELECT a FROM t1 WHERE a IN ('ddd');
}
} {ddd}
do_test in4-2.1 {
execsql {
CREATE TABLE t2(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b TEXT);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(-1, '-one');
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(0, 'zero');
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(1, 'one');
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(2, 'two');
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(3, 'three');
}
} {}
do_test in4-2.2 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (0, 2) }
} {zero two}
do_test in4-2.3 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (2, 0) }
} {zero two}
do_test in4-2.4 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (2, -1) }
} {-one two}
do_test in4-2.5 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (NULL, 3) }
} {three}
do_test in4-2.6 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN (1.0, 2.1) }
} {one}
do_test in4-2.7 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN ('1', '2') }
} {one two}
do_test in4-2.8 {
execsql { SELECT b FROM t2 WHERE a IN ('', '0.0.0', '2') }
} {two}
# The following block of tests test expressions of the form:
#
# <expr> IN ()
#
# i.e. IN expressions with a literal empty set.
#
# This has led to crashes on more than one occasion. Test case in4-3.2
# was added in reponse to a bug reported on the mailing list on 11/7/2008.
# See also tickets #3602 and #185.
#
do_test in4-3.1 {
execsql {
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t1;
DROP TABLE IF EXISTS t2;
CREATE TABLE t1(x, id);
CREATE TABLE t2(x, id);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(NULL, NULL);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(0, NULL);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(1, 3);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(2, 4);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(3, 5);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(4, 6);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(0, NULL);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(4, 1);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(NULL, 1);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES(NULL, NULL);
}
} {}
do_test in4-3.2 {
execsql {
SELECT x FROM t1 WHERE id IN () AND x IN (SELECT x FROM t2 WHERE id=1)
}
} {}
do_test in4-3.3 {
execsql {
CREATE TABLE t3(x, y, z);
CREATE INDEX t3i1 ON t3(x, y);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(1, 1, 1);
INSERT INTO t3 VALUES(10, 10, 10);
}
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN () }
} {}
do_test in4-3.4 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x = 10 AND y IN () }
} {}
do_test in4-3.5 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN () AND y = 10 }
} {}
do_test in4-3.6 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN () OR x = 10 }
} {10 10 10}
do_test in4-3.7 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE y IN () }
} {}
do_test in4-3.8 {
execsql { SELECT x IN() AS a FROM t3 WHERE a }
} {}
do_test in4-3.9 {
execsql { SELECT x IN() AS a FROM t3 WHERE NOT a }
} {0 0}
do_test in4-3.10 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE oid IN () }
} {}
do_test in4-3.11 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (1, 2) OR y IN ()}
} {1 1 1}
do_test in4-3.12 {
execsql { SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (1, 2) AND y IN ()}
} {}
# Tests for "... IN (?)" and "... NOT IN (?)". In other words, tests
# for when the RHS of IN is a single expression. This should work the
# same as the == and <> operators.
#
do_execsql_test in4-3.21 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x=10 AND y IN (10);
} {10 10 10}
do_execsql_test in4-3.22 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10) AND y=10;
} {10 10 10}
do_execsql_test in4-3.23 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10) AND y IN (10);
} {10 10 10}
do_execsql_test in4-3.24 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x=1 AND y NOT IN (10);
} {1 1 1}
do_execsql_test in4-3.25 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10) AND y=1;
} {1 1 1}
do_execsql_test in4-3.26 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10) AND y NOT IN (10);
} {1 1 1}
# The query planner recognizes that "x IN (?)" only generates a
# single match and can use this information to optimize-out ORDER BY
# clauses.
#
do_execsql_test in4-3.31 {
DROP INDEX t3i1;
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX t3xy ON t3(x,y);
SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
WHERE A.x=10 AND A.y IN (10)
AND B.x=1 AND B.y IN (1);
} {10 10 10 1 1 1 |}
do_execsql_test in4-3.32 {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
WHERE A.x=10 AND A.y IN (10)
AND B.x=1 AND B.y IN (1);
} {~/B-TREE/} ;# No separate sorting pass
do_execsql_test in4-3.33 {
SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
WHERE A.x IN (10) AND A.y=10
AND B.x IN (1) AND B.y=1;
} {10 10 10 1 1 1 |}
do_execsql_test in4-3.34 {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
SELECT *, '|' FROM t3 A, t3 B
WHERE A.x IN (10) AND A.y=10
AND B.x IN (1) AND B.y=1;
} {~/B-TREE/} ;# No separate sorting pass
# An expression of the form "x IN (?,?)" creates an ephemeral table to
# hold the list of values on the RHS. But "x IN (?)" does not create
# an ephemeral table.
#
do_execsql_test in4-3.41 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10,11);
} {10 10 10}
do_execsql_test in4-3.42 {
EXPLAIN
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10,11);
} {/OpenEphemeral/}
do_execsql_test in4-3.43 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10);
} {10 10 10}
# This test would verify that the "X IN (Y)" -> "X==Y" optimization
# was working. But we have now taken that optimization out.
#do_execsql_test in4-3.44 {
# EXPLAIN
# SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x IN (10);
#} {~/OpenEphemeral/}
do_execsql_test in4-3.45 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10,11,99999);
} {1 1 1}
do_execsql_test in4-3.46 {
EXPLAIN
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10,11,99999);
} {/OpenEphemeral/}
do_execsql_test in4-3.47 {
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10);
} {1 1 1}
do_execsql_test in4-3.48 {
EXPLAIN
SELECT * FROM t3 WHERE x NOT IN (10);
} {~/OpenEphemeral/}
# Make sure that when "x IN (?)" is converted into "x==?" that collating
# sequence and affinity computations do not get messed up.
#
do_execsql_test in4-4.1 {
CREATE TABLE t4a(a TEXT, b TEXT COLLATE nocase, c);
INSERT INTO t4a VALUES('ABC','abc',1);
INSERT INTO t4a VALUES('def','xyz',2);
INSERT INTO t4a VALUES('ghi','ghi',3);
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE a=b ORDER BY c;
} {3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.2 {
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE b=a ORDER BY c;
} {1 3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.3 {
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE (a||'')=b ORDER BY c;
} {1 3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.4 {
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE (a||'')=(b||'') ORDER BY c;
} {3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.5 {
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE a IN (b) ORDER BY c;
} {3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.6 {
SELECT c FROM t4a WHERE (a||'') IN (b) ORDER BY c;
} {3}
do_execsql_test in4-4.11 {
CREATE TABLE t4b(a TEXT, b NUMERIC, c);
INSERT INTO t4b VALUES('1.0',1,4);
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE a=b;
} {4}
do_execsql_test in4-4.12 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE b=a;
} {4}
do_execsql_test in4-4.13 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE +a=b;
} {4}
do_execsql_test in4-4.14 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE a=+b;
} {}
do_execsql_test in4-4.15 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE +b=a;
} {}
do_execsql_test in4-4.16 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE b=+a;
} {4}
do_execsql_test in4-4.17 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE a IN (b);
} {}
do_execsql_test in4-4.18 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE b IN (a);
} {4}
do_execsql_test in4-4.19 {
SELECT c FROM t4b WHERE +b IN (a);
} {}
do_execsql_test in4-5.1 {
CREATE TABLE t5(c INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, d TEXT COLLATE nocase);
INSERT INTO t5 VALUES(17, 'fuzz');
SELECT 1 FROM t5 WHERE 'fuzz' IN (d); -- match
SELECT 2 FROM t5 WHERE 'FUZZ' IN (d); -- no match
SELECT 3 FROM t5 WHERE d IN ('fuzz'); -- match
SELECT 4 FROM t5 WHERE d IN ('FUZZ'); -- match
} {1 3 4}
# An expression of the form "x IN (y)" can be used as "x=y" by the
# query planner when computing transitive constraints or to run the
# query using an index on y.
#
do_execsql_test in4-6.1 {
CREATE TABLE t6a(a INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, b);
INSERT INTO t6a VALUES(1,2),(3,4),(5,6);
CREATE TABLE t6b(c INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, d);
INSERT INTO t6b VALUES(4,44),(5,55),(6,66);
SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND b IN (c);
} {3 4 4 44}
do_execsql_test in4-6.1-eqp {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND b IN (c);
} {~/SCAN t6a/}
do_execsql_test in4-6.2 {
SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND c IN (b);
} {3 4 4 44}
do_execsql_test in4-6.2-eqp {
EXPLAIN QUERY PLAN
SELECT * FROM t6a, t6b WHERE a=3 AND c IN (b);
} {~/SCAN/}
reset_db
do_execsql_test 7.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(a, b, c);
CREATE TABLE t2(d, e);
CREATE INDEX t1bc ON t1(c, b);
INSERT INTO t2(e) VALUES(1);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(NULL, NULL, NULL);
}
do_execsql_test 7.1 {
SELECT * FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t1 ON c = d AND b IN (10,10,10);
} {{} 1 {} {} {}}
ifcapable rtree {
reset_db
do_execsql_test 7.2 {
CREATE VIRTUAL TABLE t1 USING rtree(a, b, c);
CREATE TABLE t2(d INTEGER, e INT);
INSERT INTO t2(e) VALUES(1);
}
do_execsql_test 7.3 {
SELECT * FROM t2 LEFT JOIN t1 ON c IN (d) AND b IN (10,10,10);
} {{} 1 {} {} {}}
}
#-------------------------------------------------------------------------
reset_db
do_execsql_test 8.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(x INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, y);
CREATE UNIQUE INDEX t1y ON t1(y);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(111, 'AAA'),(222, 'BBB'),(333, 'CCC');
CREATE TABLE t2(z);
INSERT INTO t2 VALUES('BBB'),('AAA');
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1', 't1y','100 1');
}
db close
sqlite3 db test.db
do_execsql_test 8.1 {
SELECT t1.x FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 WHERE t2.z = t1.y;
} {222 111}
do_execsql_test 8.2 {
SELECT t1.x FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 WHERE t2.z = t1.y AND +t1.x IN (111, 222);
} {222 111}
do_execsql_test 8.3 {
SELECT t1.x FROM t2 CROSS JOIN t1 WHERE t2.z = t1.y AND t1.x IN (111, 222);
} {222 111}
# 2021-06-02 forum post https://sqlite.org/forum/forumpost/b4fcb8a598
# OP_SeekScan changes from check-in 4a43430fd23f8835 on 2020-09-30 causes
# performance regression.
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 9.0 {
CREATE TABLE node(node_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY);
CREATE TABLE edge(node_from INT, node_to INT);
CREATE TABLE sub_nodes(node_id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY);
CREATE INDEX edge_from_to ON edge(node_from,node_to);
CREATE INDEX edge_to_from ON edge(node_to,node_from);
ANALYZE;
DELETE FROM sqlite_stat1;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES
('sub_nodes',NULL,'1000000'),
('edge','edge_to_from','20000000 2 2'),
('edge','edge_from_to','20000000 2 2'),
('node',NULL,'10000000');
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
} {}
do_eqp_test 9.1 {
SELECT count(*) FROM edge
WHERE node_from IN sub_nodes AND node_to IN sub_nodes;
} {
QUERY PLAN
|--SEARCH edge USING COVERING INDEX edge_to_from (node_to=?)
|--USING ROWID SEARCH ON TABLE sub_nodes FOR IN-OPERATOR
`--USING ROWID SEARCH ON TABLE sub_nodes FOR IN-OPERATOR
}
# ^^^^^ the key to the above is that the index should only use a single
# term (node_to=?), not two terms (node_to=? AND node_from=).
# dbsqlfuzz case
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 10.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c,d,PRIMARY KEY(a,b,c)) WITHOUT ROWID;
INSERT INTO t1(a,b,c,d) VALUES
(0,-2,2,3),
(0,2,3,4),
(0,5,8,10),
(1,7,11,13);
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1','10 3 2 1');
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
PRAGMA reverse_unordered_selects(1);
SELECT d FROM t1 WHERE 0=a AND b IN (-17,-4,-3,1,5,25,7798);
} {10}
# 2021-06-13 dbsqlfuzz e41762333a4d6e90a49e628f488d0873b2dba4c5
# The opcode that preceeds OP_SeekScan is usually OP_IdxGT, but can
# sometimes be OP_IdxGE
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 11.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(a TEXT, b INT, c INT, d INT);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('abc',123,4,5);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES('xyz',1,'abcdefxyz',99);
CREATE INDEX t1abc ON t1(b,b,c);
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1abc','10000 5 00 2003 10');
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
} {}
do_execsql_test 11.1 {
SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE b IN (345, (SELECT 1 FROM t1
WHERE b IN (coalesce(1,random()))
AND c GLOB 'abc*xyz'))
AND c BETWEEN 'abc' AND 'xyz';
} {xyz 1 abcdefxyz 99}
do_execsql_test 11.2 {
EXPLAIN SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE b IN (345, (SELECT 1 FROM t1
WHERE b IN (coalesce(1,random()))
AND c GLOB 'abc*xyz'))
AND c BETWEEN 'abc' AND 'xyz';
} {/ SeekScan /}
# 2021-06-25 ticket 6dcbfd11cf666e21
# Another problem with OP_SeekScan
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 12.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(a,b,c);
CREATE INDEX t1abc ON t1(a,b,c);
CREATE INDEX t1bca on t1(b,c,a);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(56,1119,1115);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(57,1147,1137);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(100,1050,1023);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(101,1050,1023);
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1abc','358677 2 2 1');
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1bca','358677 4 2 1');
ANALYZE sqlite_schema;
SELECT * FROM t1 NOT INDEXED
WHERE (b = 1137 AND c IN (97, 98))
OR (b = 1119 AND c IN (1115, 1023));
} {56 1119 1115}
do_execsql_test 12.1 {
SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE (b = 1137 AND c IN (97, 98))
OR (b = 1119 AND c IN (1115, 1023));
} {56 1119 1115}
# 2021-11-02 ticket 5981a8c041a3c2f3
# Another OP_SeekScan problem.
#
reset_db
do_execsql_test 13.0 {
CREATE TABLE t1(id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, a INT, b INT, c INT);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(10,1,2,5);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(20,1,3,5);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(30,1,2,4);
INSERT INTO t1 VALUES(40,1,3,4);
ANALYZE sqlite_master;
INSERT INTO sqlite_stat1 VALUES('t1','t1x','84000 3 2 1');
CREATE INDEX t1x ON t1(a,b,c);
PRAGMA writable_schema=RESET;
SELECT * FROM t1
WHERE a=1
AND b IN (2,3)
AND c BETWEEN 4 AND 5
ORDER BY +id;
} {10 1 2 5 20 1 3 5 30 1 2 4 40 1 3 4}
finish_test
|