diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'dom/media/webvtt/test/reftest/vtt_reflow_display.html')
-rw-r--r-- | dom/media/webvtt/test/reftest/vtt_reflow_display.html | 37 |
1 files changed, 37 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/dom/media/webvtt/test/reftest/vtt_reflow_display.html b/dom/media/webvtt/test/reftest/vtt_reflow_display.html new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..e7ec496bc1 --- /dev/null +++ b/dom/media/webvtt/test/reftest/vtt_reflow_display.html @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +<!DOCTYPE HTML> +<html class="reftest-wait"> +<head> +</head> +<link rel="stylesheet" href="vtt_reflow_display.css"> +<body> +<div class="video-player"> + <div class="video-layer"> + <video id="v1" autoplay controls></video> + </div> +</div> +<script> +/** + * In bug 1733232, setting some CSS properties (from bug 1733232 comment17) + * would cause video frame's reflow called very frequently, which crashed the + * video control and caused no cue showing. We compare this test with another + * white video without any cues, and they should NOT be equal. + */ +function testDisplayCueDuringFrequentReflow() { + let video = document.getElementById("v1"); + video.src = "white.webm"; + let cue = new VTTCue(0, 4, "hello testing"); + cue.onenter = _ => { + cue.onenter = null; + video.pause(); + document.documentElement.removeAttribute('class'); + } + let track = video.addTextTrack("captions"); + track.mode = "showing"; + track.addCue(cue); +}; + +window.addEventListener("MozReftestInvalidate", + testDisplayCueDuringFrequentReflow); +</script> +</body> +</html> |